加载中...
共找到 21,504 条相关资讯
Operator: Greetings, and welcome to the MSC Income Fund Fourth Quarter Earnings Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this conference is being recorded. It is now my pleasure to introduce Zach Vaughan. Please go ahead. Zach Vaughan: Thank you, operator, and good morning, everyone. Thank you for joining us for MSC Income Fund's Fourth Quarter 2025 Earnings Conference Call. Joining me with prepared comments are Dwayne Hyzak, Chief Executive Officer; David Magdol, President and Chief Investment Officer; Nick Meserve, Managing Director and Head of the Private Credit Investment Group; and Cory Gilbert, Chief Financial Officer. MSC Income Fund issued a press release yesterday afternoon that details the fund's fourth quarter and full year financial and operating results. Document is available on the Investor Relations section of the fund's website at mscincomefund.com. A replay of today's call will be available beginning an hour after the completion of the call and will remain available until March 6. The Information on how to access the replay was included in yesterday's earnings release. We also advise you that this conference call is being broadcast live to the Internet and can be accessed on the fund's home page. Please note that information reported on this call speaks only as of today, February 27, 2026, and therefore, you are advised that time-sensitive information may no longer be accurate at the time of any replay listening or transcript reading. Today's call may contain forward-looking statements. Any of these forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of words such as anticipates, believes, expects, intends, will, should, may or similar expressions. Statements are based on management's estimates, assumptions and projections as of the date of this call, and there are no guarantees of future performance. Actual results may differ materially from the results expressed or implied in these statements as a result of risks, uncertainties and other factors, including, but not limited to, the factors set forth in the fund's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, which can be found on the fund's website or at sec.gov. MSC Income Fund assumes no obligation to update any of these statements unless required by law. During today's call, management will discuss non-GAAP financial measures, including adjusted net investment income, or ANII. ANII is net investment income, or NII, as determined in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP, excluding the impact of the capital gains incentive fee. MSC Income Fund believes presenting ANII and the related per share amount is useful and appropriate supplemental disclosure for analyzing the fund's financial performance since the calculation of the capital gains incentive fee is based on realized gains and losses and unrealized fair value appreciation and depreciation, none of which are included in NII. Please refer to yesterday's press release for a reconciliation of these non-GAAP measures to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures. Two additional key performance indicators that management will be discussing on this call are net asset value or NAV and return on equity, or ROE. NAV is defined as total assets minus total liabilities and is also reported on a per share basis. MSC Income Fund defines ROE as the net increase in net assets resulting from operations divided by average quarterly NAV. As a reminder, the fund effectuated a 2-for-1 reverse stock split on December 16, 2024. All per share amounts, share data related information discussed on this call today reflect the effect of the reverse stock split. Please note that certain information discussed on this call, including information related to portfolio companies, was derived from third-party sources and has not been independently verified. Now I'll turn the call over to MSC Income Fund's CEO, Dwayne Hyzak. Dwayne Hyzak: Thanks, Zach. Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining us. We appreciate your participation on this morning's call. We hope that everyone is doing well. On today's call, we provide you with the fund's key quarterly updates while also providing a few updates on the fund's performance for the full year. Following our comments, we'll be happy to take your questions. We're very pleased with the fund's performance in the fourth quarter which resulted in a return on equity of 16.3%, favorable adjusted net investment income per share and a significant increase in the fair value of the fund's investments including the benefits of net realized gains in both the fund's private loan and lower middle market portfolios, which resulted in a significant increase in NAV per share. The fund also produced favorable investment activity in the fourth quarter which generated meaningful growth of its investment portfolio. After the fund's positive performance in the first 3 quarters of 2025, the fund's strong performance in the fourth quarter resulted in an ROE of 12.5% for the full year and pretax adjusted NII per share in excess of the fund's total dividends paid. Based upon the quality of the fund's existing investment portfolio, combined with the fund's expanded regulatory leverage capacity, which became effective at the end of January 2026 and which provides the fund significant capacity to add additional debt to fund the future growth of its investment portfolio and the current attractive pipeline of new private loan investment opportunities, we remain excited about the future expectations for the fund. We're also confident that the fund's sole focus on its private loan strategy with respect to new portfolio company investments and the growth of recurring interest income from such debt investments, together with the fund's contractual future base management fee reductions as the fund's lower middle market investments decreased as a percentage of its total investment portfolio which strengthened the fund's ability to deliver attractive recurring dividends and favorable total returns to the fund shareholders in the future. Fund generated adjusted net investment income, or ANII, which is NII, excluding the impact of the capital gains incentive fee of $0.34 per share in the quarter or $0.37 per share on a pretax ANII basis. These results, combined with our positive outlook for the future, resulted in our most recent dividend announcements, which I will discuss in more detail later. The fund finished the quarter with NAV per share of $15.85, a $0.31 increase from the prior quarter, we continue to be pleased with the performance of the fund's investment portfolio, including both the private loan and lower middle market portfolios. Before I will discuss our financial results in more detail. Consistent with our guidance last quarter, the fund's private loan investment activity in the fourth quarter returned to our expected normal level of quarterly activity and resulted in a net increase in private loan investments of $57 million. The fund remains highly focused on executing new investment opportunities that are consistent with its historical private loan investments as we work to grow the fund's investment portfolio. Consistent with my comments last quarter, we're pleased that the fund successfully exited 2 private loan portfolio equity investments in the fourth quarter with these activities resulting in total realized gains of $16 million (sic) [ $15.9 million ] or $0.34 per share both at meaningful premiums to the fund's third quarter fair values. Fund is also focused on maximizing the benefits from its legacy lower middle market investment portfolio and recycling this existing capital into private loan investments as investments are exited or repaid. Part of these activities, the fund fully exited its investments in one high-performing lower middle market portfolio company, Mystic Logistics in the fourth quarter, resulting in a $6 million realized gain. We also continue to see significant interest from potential buyers in several of the fund's lower middle market portfolio companies, which we expect will lead to additional favorable realizations over the next few quarters. Fund also continues to benefit from attractive follow-on investments in existing lower middle market portfolio companies, which we believe are beneficial to both current investment income and future value creation. Nick and David will cover the fund's investment activity in more detail. Based upon the fund's results for the quarter and its future outlook, earlier this week, the fund's Board of Directors declared a regular quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share and a supplemental dividend of $0.01 per share, both of which are payable on May 1, 2026, to shareholders of record as of March 31, 2026. Going forward, the fund expects to continue to maintain a dividend policy that provides for its total quarterly dividends, which are expected to include a regular quarterly dividend and a supplemental dividend to be set at a level generally consistent with the fund's pretax ANII per share. Based upon the total dividends payable on May 1 and the current stock price, the fund is currently providing its shareholders a dividend yield at 11.5%. As we look forward to the fund's near-term investment activities, as of today, I would characterize the private loan investment pipeline as above average. We're excited about the current pipeline of new investment opportunities and follow-on investment opportunities in existing portfolio companies, and we remain confident in our ability to generate attractive new private loan investment opportunities and grow the fund's investment portfolio over the next several quarters. My last few comments are reminders of the continued support the fund has received from Main Street Capital Corporation. Main Street's wholly owned subsidiary was appointed the sole advisor to the fund in October 2020. Main Street has purchased over $27 million of the fund's common stock. In conjunction with the fund's equity offering in January 2025, Main Street entered into an open market share purchase plan to purchase up to $20 million of the fund's shares for a 12-month period beginning in March 2025 at times when the fund shares are trading at predetermined levels below the fund's NAV per share with the terms of such plan being identical to the fund's open market share repurchase plan to purchase up to $65 million of the fund shares and with any open market share purchases being split by the fund and Main Street on a pro rata basis. Through today, Main Street has purchased over $5 million and the fund has repurchased over $18 million under these plans. We believe Main Street's significant equity ownership in the fund and its participation in the post-listing share purchase plan demonstrates Main Street's commitment to the future success of the fund and reinforces Main Street's confidence in the strength and quality of the fund's investment portfolio and investment strategy. With that, I'll turn the call over to Nick. Nicholas Meserve: Thanks, Dwayne, and good morning, everyone. As Dwayne highlighted in his remarks, we are pleased with the performance of the fund's private loan investment portfolio in the fourth quarter, which represents the largest portion of the fund's investment portfolio in which, as a reminder, is now the fund's sole focus with respect to new portfolio company investments. The overall operating performance for most of the fund's private loan portfolio companies continue to be positive, contributed the fund's favorable fourth quarter financial results. As we previously noted, over the past few years, the fund has seen softness in certain private loan portfolio companies within the consumer space. We have been and are working on maximizing recoveries on those specific investments over the next few years. One of the favorable realized exits in the fourth quarter that Dwayne mentioned was a previously restructured portfolio company with consumer exposure. Due to the significant efforts and successes of that portfolio company's management team, the hard work of our team and the patience to work through a difficult situation, we ended up with a positive outcome. We expect and hope to have similar outcomes on several previously restructured investments in the future. Fund also benefited from a realized gain of $13.5 million from the exit of one of its equity investments in a private loan portfolio company in the fourth quarter, which illustrates the opportunity that can be available in the future from these equity co-investments. Given the current economic uncertainty that exists across certain parts of the economy, we are diligently working to stay in front of the fund's portfolio companies to understand their exposures to changing environments. To date, based upon these ever-evolving discussions, we are comfortable with the future outlook for the portfolio. At quarter end, 92% of the private loan portfolio was comprised of secured debt investments over 99% of which were first lien and 96% of which were floating rate loans. Portfolio had an attractive weighted average yield of 10.7%, which was down 130 basis points from the end of 2024 primarily as a result of decreases in the SOFR rates for these floating rate debt investments. But we're also starting to see the tighter spreads on new investments start to bring down the portfolio average. During the fourth quarter, the fund invested $101 million in the private loan portfolio, which after aggregate investment activity, resulted a net increase of $57 million. Fund ended the fourth quarter investments in 81 private loan portfolio companies totaling $809 million of fair value and representing 61% of the fund's total investment portfolio at fair value. As Dwayne mentioned, our private loan pipeline is above average, continue to see increasing private equity activity, and that is delivering both good new origination levels and replenishing the pipeline. With that, I'll turn the call over to David. David Magdol: Thanks, Nick, and good morning, everyone. In addition to the private loan portfolio that Nick just covered, the fund also maintains a portfolio of legacy lower middle market investments. As a reminder, these are combined debt and equity investments in smaller privately held companies, whereby the fund partner directly with the company's existing business owners and management team through co-investments with Main Street Capital Corporation utilizing the customized one-stop debt and equity financing solutions provided in Main Street's lower middle market investment strategy. After the listing of the fund shares on New York Stock Exchange in January of 2025, the fund no longer makes investments in new lower middle market portfolio companies but continues to participate in follow-on investments in its existing lower middle market portfolio companies. We are pleased to report that the overall operating performance for most of the fund's lower middle market portfolio companies continues to be positive, which contributed to the attractive fourth quarter financial results. These contributions included both strong dividend income and continued fair value appreciation. During the fourth quarter, the fund completed $23 million in total lower middle market follow-on investments which after aggregate investment activity resulted in a net increase in the lower middle market portfolio of $15 million. At quarter end, the Lower Middle Market portfolio had investments in 55 portfolio companies totaling $488 million of fair value and representing 36% of the fund's total investment portfolio. The lower middle market portfolio at fair value was comprised of 53% debt investments and 47% equity investments. 99% of these debt investments were first-lien loans and they had an attractive weighted average yield of over 12%. The fund had equity ownership positions in all of its lower middle market portfolio companies, representing an 8% average ownership position. We expect these investments will continue to provide significant benefits in the future, including the opportunity for continued dividend income, fair value appreciation and eventually meaningful realized gains upon the future exit of these lower middle market investments. As Dwayne mentioned, we continue to see significant interest from potential buyers in several of the funds lower middle market portfolio companies, which we expect will lead to favorable realizations and additional fair value appreciation over the next few quarters. A great recent example of the benefits of these portfolio companies can provide is the recent exit of the fund's investment in Mystic Logistics in the fourth quarter. This exit resulted in a realized gain of $6 million. Also notable is the fact that Mystic Logistics paid total dividends to the fund of $5.5 million over the life of the investment. Turning to the fund's total investment portfolio as of December 31, the fund continued to maintain a highly diversified portfolio with investments in 144 portfolio companies spanning across numerous industries and end markets. The fund's largest portfolio companies represented less than 4% of the total investment portfolio at fair value at quarter end and less than 4% of total investment income for the year ended December 31, with most of the portfolio investments representing less than 1% of the fund's income and assets. With that, I'll turn the call over to Cory. Cory Gilbert: Thank you, David, and thank you to everyone who has joined us today. Fund's total investment income for the fourth quarter was $34.9 million, an increase of $1.5 million or 4.4% from the fourth quarter of 2024 and a decrease of $0.5 million or 1.3% from the third quarter. Fourth quarter included income considered less consistent or nonrecurring in nature of $1.9 million as we've previously discussed these nonrecurring items vary quarter-to-quarter and can include dividend income from equity investments and interest and fee income from accelerated prepayment repricing and other activity related to debt investments. For the fourth quarter, these items were $0.9 million higher than the average of the prior 4 quarters, $1.1 million higher than the fourth quarter of 2024 and $0.6 million higher than the third quarter. Dividend income for the fourth quarter increased by $2.6 million from a year ago and by $1.7 million from the third quarter. The increase in dividend income from both the prior year and third quarter was primarily due to an increase in dividends from lower middle market equity investments and included $1.2 million of nonrecurring items. As we previously discussed, dividend income will fluctuate quarter-to-quarter based on the underlying performance, cash flows and capital allocation activities of the fund's portfolio companies and certain nonrecurring items. Interest income for the fourth quarter decreased by $0.8 million from a year ago and by $1.3 million from the third quarter. The decrease in interest income from both the prior year and the third quarter was principally attributable to a decrease in interest rates primarily resulting from decreases in benchmark index rates on floating rate debt investments and an increased negative impact from investments on nonaccrual status, partially offset by the growth of the investment portfolio. Fee income for the fourth quarter decreased by $0.3 million from a year ago and by $0.9 million from the third quarter. The decrease in fee income from both the prior year and the third quarter was primarily due to the refinancing and prepayment of debt investments. Fund's expenses, net of waivers for the fourth quarter increased by $1.3 million from the prior year and by $2.2 million from the third quarter. These increases were primarily driven by a $2.8 million capital gains incentive fee accrued in the fourth quarter of 2025. This accrual was partially offset by a $1.2 million decrease in interest expense and a $0.4 million decrease in base management fee from the prior year and a $0.5 million decrease in general and administrative expenses and a $0.3 million decrease in interest expense from the third quarter. The capital gains incentive fee accrual is primarily the result of the significant net fair value appreciation of the fund's investments since the listing and was recognized during the fourth quarter of 2025. However, this amount is not currently payable and is not expected to be payable in the near future, if ever. The decrease in interest expense from a year ago was largely driven by a decreased weighted average interest rate on the credit facilities due to a decrease in the applicable spreads resulting from amendments of the credit facilities since the fourth quarter of 2024 and decreases in floating benchmark index rates. The decrease in interest expense from the third quarter is primarily driven by a decreased weighted average interest rate in the credit facilities due to decreases in floating benchmark index rates. The fund's expense ratio calculated as the ratio of total noninterest operating expenses, excluding incentive fees, as a percentage of the fund's average total assets was 1.8% on an annualized basis for the fourth quarter, a decrease from 2.1% in the prior year and a decrease from 2% in the third quarter. The fund's NII, excluding the impact of the capital gains incentive fee and NII related taxes in the fourth quarter was $17.2 million or $0.37 per share increasing from $14.2 million or $0.35 per share from the prior year. During the quarter, the fund recorded a net increase in the fair value of its investments of $17.2 million representing the impact of $16.6 million of net realized gains and a $0.5 million of net unrealized appreciation. The net fair value increase was attributable to increases of $12 million in the lower middle market portfolio and $8.1 million in the private loan portfolio partially offset by a decrease of $3.1 million in the residual middle market portfolio. Overall, the fund's operating results for the fourth quarter resulted in a net increase in net assets of $30 million and NAV per share of $15.85, a $0.31 increase from the third quarter and $0.32 above the fund's public offering price per share in its public offering and listing on the New York Stock Exchange in January 2025. As of year-end, the fund had investments on nonaccrual status, comprising 1% of the total investment portfolio at fair value and 3.9% at cost. As of year-end, the fund's regulatory asset coverage ratio was 2.22 and its net debt to NAV ratio was 0.79. As Dwayne mentioned, the fund's focus remains on achieving a fully invested portfolio through its expanded regulatory leverage capacity, which became effective on January 29, 2026. With that, I will now turn the call back to the operator so we can take any questions. Operator: [Operator Instructions] Our first question is from Brian McKenna with Citizens. Brian Mckenna: Great. So it was good to see a strong quarter of originations and then just kind of the growth in the overall investment portfolio. Sorry if I missed this, but I'm just trying to figure out how should the decline in interest income quarter-on-quarter was from lower base rates and then why we didn't see really any meaningful offsets there from growth in this portfolio? I'm assuming it's timing related, but any thoughts there would be helpful. Dwayne Hyzak: Sure, Brian. Thanks for the question. I'd say to the second part, it is timing. I think a lot of the investment activity was back ended. It was in the second half of the quarter. So that's why you don't see as much of a benefit there. You did see some decline from rates. And I'd say that, that was about just over $0.5 million was the decline from a SOFR movement standpoint inside the quarter. Brian Mckenna: Okay. Got it. That's helpful. And then just given the commentary on the main call around the outlook for the lower middle market portfolio, and what will likely need some additional markup in realization events across that portfolio. It would seem like some of this is going to flow through to MSIS as well, similar to 3Q or 4Q. So given this dynamic and then the upside that's created and net assets from that along with a low level of leverage today, is there an opportunity to lean in further on the buyback just so you start accreting even more NAV? Dwayne Hyzak: Yes. I'd say, Brian, when you look at the benefit or the impact to MSC Income Fund will be the same as Main, obviously, just a different allocation. Historically, Main Street had about 80% of lower middle market investments and MSC Income Fund had 20%. That's assuming they had liquidity at the time. But in general, somewhere in that area code would be the sharing between Main Street and MSC Income Fund on historical lower middle market investments. I think when you look at those proceeds, I think we'll just have to continue to look at what's the best use of that capital. Is it to provide a buyback or some other similar activity for the shareholders? Is it to pay out more dividends? Or is it to retain that capital if we can do so on a tax cost-efficient basis, retain that capital and grow the portfolio. So we haven't had those significant realizations come through yet. But if we see that type of activity, those will be the 3 things we have to weigh and determine what's the best path for the fund and for the shareholders. Operator: Our next question is from Robert Dodd with Raymond James. Robert Dodd: Several have answered on the prior call, but I do have one here. On the mix, right, I mean, you're a 36% lower middle market at the end of December. Obviously, Mystic exited. Sounds like you're expecting several more realizations from the lower middle market portfolio so there will be some fair value appreciation probably there. And on the other hand, growth in the private loan portfolio as well. I'm going to pull out a crystal ball fast. What do you think the odds are that you get down close to, say, 20% lower middle market by the end of this year or even the end of next year because that's where the fee trigger changes for the base management fee. So do you -- with the expectations of realizations in the moment, do you think it is actually going to shift the mix significantly over the next, say, 12 to 24 months? Dwayne Hyzak: Sure, Robert. Thanks for the question. I'd say, similar to some of our comments in the past, I think the movement from where we are today with 36% lower middle market to being at or below 20%, that's going to take an extended period of time, and that's going to be the case for a couple of reasons. One, we think this is a huge positive for the investment portfolio. It's a very, very diversified portfolio. So there's no individual name on the lower middle market side that I would say is significant. I think the largest thing we have from memory is about 3.5%. So even if you exit that, you'd have to have several of those exit, obviously, trying to drop 16%, 17%. You'd have to have 5 or 6 of them exit if they were all the same size, but that's the largest. So you've got a very diversified portfolio. So as you exit these investments, it's just going to take time. I think when you look at the other factor and Mystic is a good example, if you go back and look at the press release, that was issued for the Mystic transaction. We did realize the exit in Mystic. But in that situation, it was a merger with a larger kind of complementary business. So as a result, the funds stayed in that investment for a part of its investment, both debt and equity, basically moved up the capital structure from a larger equity investment relative to total investment to something that was more first lien senior secured debt and a smaller equity investment. But that -- the -- some of those proceeds stayed invested in that business, which is now called UBM or United business Mail, I think, is the UBM stands for. So you'll have some of that. So sometimes, when we exit our lower middle market companies, it's not a 100% full exit. You could have some rollover continuation in the new business. So again, like we said in the past, it's going to be a while. I'd say the biggest catalyst for bringing that percentage down is going to be less about the excess of the lower middle market investments. It's going to be more about the growth of the portfolio first through the additional debt capacity that the fund has. And then after that, any other ability that we have to grow the portfolio. So the example would be XYZ company, say it's 3%, that gets proceeds, but then you take those proceeds. And to Brian's point from earlier, if you retain them as opposed to paying them out and use that retained capital to grow the business, that should get you closer to 20% percentage over time as opposed to paying that out and not growing the portfolio. So those would be the ways that we would look at that transition. Operator: Our next question is from Kenneth Lee with RBC Capital Markets. Kenneth Lee: Just one in terms of the portfolio leverage there. Wondering if you could just share any updated outlook you might have just given the originations pipeline, given the current environment and the opportunities you're seeing now that you've gone past the regulatory limits there? Dwayne Hyzak: Sure, Ken. Thanks for the question, and thanks for joining us. Yes, I'd say we have the expanded regulatory leverage. We received that just with the passage of time, that happened at the end of January. So in conjunction with that, we obviously have to go get the -- just one thing to have the capacity, but you also have to have access to it. So I'd say we've been actively working to get additional liquidity. Obviously, we haven't announced anything yet, but I think we feel good about where we sit in terms of the fund's ability to gain additional debt capacity, both secured and unsecured. We just have to go execute to it. But I think we feel good about leverage. We feel good about liquidity. We just got to have the -- have those activities get finalized and get executed. Kenneth Lee: Got you. Very helpful there. And just in terms of the private loan side in terms of some of the more recent deals you've been seeing some of the more recent investments there. Wondering if you could talk a little bit more about some of the spreads you're seeing and then what are your expectations around that go forward. Dwayne Hyzak: Sure. I'll give super high level, and then I'll let Nick add on additional color. I'd say here more recently in the last quarter or 2. I think that our view and my view is that spreads have started to stabilized. They are less than they were 12 or 18 months ago. But overall, I think the spreads has stabilized, I think that's likely because of some of the uncertainty in the marketplace. I think bigger factor is just the overall increase in private equity activity as a whole would be my view. But Nick, you give your views or additional color? Nicholas Meserve: Yes. Since beginning of the third quarter, we've seen spreads kind of stabilize in that 5% to 5.50% range. I think what we have also seen is I'd say the outliers of maybe a deal at S+ 600 or 650, we're seeing less and less of those. And so we really see a tighter band of pricing kind of in that 5% to 5.75% range on the wide end. On the smaller end of deals that we focus on, we have not seen a lot of crossover to 4.75%. I think from a cost of capital perspective in the industry. Once you dip below that, it gets tougher. And so I think we'll hopefully see that continue into 2026 and like we would expect kind of a flattish year on spreads in that 5%, 5.50% range. Operator: Our next question is from Arren Cyganovich with Truist Financial. Arren Cyganovich: I was wondering if you could just provide a little detail on how the underlying portfolio companies are doing in general, what you're seeing in terms of revenue EBITDA growth trends you're seeing for the portfolio overall? Dwayne Hyzak: Yes, Arren, thanks for the question. I'd say we -- in both the lower middle market and the private credit, I would say we're seeing consistent good performance, nothing significant one direction or other in terms of significant outperformance or underperformance, Obviously, having a big diverse portfolio. You're always going to have some companies that are outperforming and others that are not performing in the way that we would want them to or where we expected them to. But overall, I wouldn't say there's been anything that is a significant change over the last couple of quarters in either direction. David, Nick, if you guys have a different view or anything you want to add? Unknown Executive: Nothing there. Arren Cyganovich: And then on the LMM portfolio kind of coming down over time, is -- can you remind me if what's the plan long term? Is there always going to be some element of LMM? I mean I see that as personally view the LMM portfolio is a net positive given the history you've had in terms of equity realizations with a lot of those investments? Dwayne Hyzak: Yes. Arren, I'd say the plan there is that eventually -- I just don't know when eventually is, could be 10, 15, 20 years, eventually lower middle market as it sits today, will eventually get to a very, very small amount and eventually 0. And the reason I say that is because the Fund's strategy after the listing at the end of January of 2025 is that it will not make any new lower middle market investments. It will continue to support and participate in any add-on or follow-on investments in existing companies just like we talked about related to Mystic and UBM. We have also had a number of companies in the fourth quarter and first quarter that have had follow-on investment opportunities, and the fund is going to participate in those on a pro rata basis with Main Street. So because of that, it's going to take a long time. But eventually, even though we have a permanent holding period ability on our side at MSC Income Fund at Main Street. Our partners typically don't. They're individuals, they're going to age out. They're going to want to retire. In certain situations, their management team might be able to buy them out and give them full liquidity. But most situations, that likely results in a transaction where the company is sold to a third party in most situations. So that's going to be the driver. It's just going to take a long time. I think longer term, we view that as a positive for the Fund. The Fund's goal is to produce a very consistent well-covered dividend covered by recurring interest income. So as you have investments in the lower middle market that have a mix of debt and equity as they get repaid, exited and we take those proceeds and deploy them into first lien senior secured private loan investment opportunities. One, you're moving up the capital structure from a risk standpoint, you're also generating more consistent contractual, predictable income. So we think that's consistent with the fund's plan, and that is our expectation or our intent. Longer term, and this is -- do not have anything planned here. But longer term, Main Street is always looking for different avenues or opportunities to create value from an investment standpoint. There's nothing that Main Street is doing today. But if Main Street is a platform decides to enter into a new strategy that we think is attractive for Main Street, then we would offer that to MSC Income Fund. We have to have an agreement with the MSC Income Fund Board. But if it was attractive to Main Street, I would bet that it's -- there's a good chance it's attractive to MSC Income Fund as long as it's supportive with the fund's goal, as I said earlier, with producing a very consistent, well-covered kind of highly predictable dividend. So I think you could see something else change. But longer term, as we sit here today, it's more status quo and it's just going to take a while for the lower middle market portfolio to roll off. Operator: Our next question is from Doug Harter with UBS. Douglas Harter: Mindful of your prior answer about needing to get the leverage facilities. Can you just remind us what the target leverage is? Nicholas Meserve: Sure. Cory Gilbert: Thanks for your question. Yes, our target leverage under the new expanded regulatory leverage range is going to be 1.15 to 1.25 debt to equity. Douglas Harter: Got it. And do you expect that to change as kind of as the mix shifts away from lower middle market? Just how should we think about the inherent leverage of the 2 strategies. Dwayne Hyzak: Yes. I would say, as we see it today, I would not expect it to change. I think we always want to have some reasonable amount of flexibility and liquidity. So I think if you start going above that, just from our perspective, from my perspective, I think it starts getting tight. So I think that 1.15 to 1.25 is probably a pretty good range. I think as you have the portfolio migrate from lower middle market to private loan, that's when you probably move up inside of that range. But as we sit here today, I would not expect us to go above that range. Operator: Our next question is from Mickey Schleien with Ladenburg Thalman. Mickey Schleien: Dwayne, your software allocation at about 7%, it's not particularly high, but it is meaningful. So I'd love to hear what your thesis is on the impact of AI on these companies? And how have you been underwriting investments in those companies over the last couple of years? Dwayne Hyzak: Sure, Mickey. Thanks for the question, and thanks for joining us. As you said, the fund's exposure to software is very limited kind of that mid-single digit type percentage. Inside of that, and you probably heard us say this before, just given your longer-term history with Main Street over the years. We, as a platform, are very much value-based or value-focused investors. So software, particularly high-growth software. You think about some of the stuff you hear about in the industry, ARR type loans or loans where you expect a bunch of growth before the loan can be serviced from a debt service standpoint. Those are things that just don't fit our profile. They never have, and they don't today. So that's why when we look at our exposure here, even though we've got kind of a mid-single-digit type percentage exposed to software, we think those software names are pretty well protected. Obviously, they and we are talking about their exposures to AI. But as we sit here today, we're not there's nothing there that we're overly concerned about. And Nick, if you want to add any additional color there, any different takes on it. Nicholas Meserve: As Dwayne said, we just didn't really focused. We haven't historically focused on, I'd say, high growth in the software space, and we won't do that going forward, so I think our exposure, we do have there is a little less exposed or we're a little insulated from some of the AI boom is there's just less growth there. I think we focus a little more on infrastructure software versus pure growth SaaS software. Mickey Schleien: So when you refer to infrastructure software, are you referring to sort of enterprise-level software that's really ingrained into the portfolio companies' operations? Nicholas Meserve: To that degree, I think a lot of times, it will be a different moat they might have or it's more of a niche software for a very specific industry. Those I think would be less impacted by AI as you go forward. But eventually, will have an impact, but I think that's what we focus historically. Operator: This concludes our question-and-answer session. I would now like to hand the floor back to management for any closing remarks. Dwayne Hyzak: We just want to thank everyone again for joining us this morning. We appreciate the continued support of the fund shareholders and we look forward to our next update call in May after the release of our results for the first quarter. Thank you. Operator: Thank you. This concludes today's conference. You may disconnect your lines at this time. Thank you again for your participation.
Chek Tan: Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to CIMB Group's financial results briefing for the fourth quarter of 2025. Our host is CIMB Group CEO, Novan Amirudin; and Group CFO, Khairul Rifaie. My name is Steven from the CIMB IR team. You should have received the analyst presentation and financial statements by now from the Investor Relations e-mail. Otherwise, you may find the documents in the IR section of our website at www.cimb.com. Before we begin, please be informed that this briefing is being recorded. [Operator Instructions] At this juncture, I would like to hand over the briefing to Novan and Khairul. Novan, over to you. Muhammad Amirudin: Thank you very much, Steven. Thank you very much all for joining our presentation this afternoon. So it's been a very resilient year despite all the challenges that we saw on the FX side, given the ringgit appreciated vis-a-vis other ASEAN currencies, the persistent rate cuts that we saw in all markets that we operate as well as the various macroeconomic headwinds. We completed 2025, which is the first year of our Forward 30 execution by delivering record net profit of MYR 7.9 billion and which translated to an 11.3% ROE. I will now go into the drivers behind this record performance. First and foremost, our noninterest income, NII, if you focus on the table on the left-hand side, the NII has 2 components. One is our NIMs and secondly is our asset growth. The first point, NII was flat despite all the persistent rate cuts, and we attribute this to our successful cash strategy, which focused on reducing our cost of funds, which then cushioned our NIM compression to 8 basis points year-on-year. Now alongside that, assets then grew for us on a constant currency basis by 6.1%. So these 2 factors basically assisted in our flat NIM despite the persistent rate cuts. NOII saw a year of growth. Year-on-year, it grew 3.1%. But the main call out here is our client franchise business derived from NOII, which grew 4.8% faster than the growth in NOII. This is a testament to our successful cross-sell strategy, which focus on client franchise business as opposed to just trading income. Moving on to our operating expenses. Thanks to our capability strategy, this led to disciplined cost control and our cost-to-income ratio at 47.3%. As you can see, OpEx grew 2% year-on-year with a flat personnel costs, but we continued investments in technology. We invested MYR 1.7 billion in 2025, which is about 7.8% of our income, which is within the guidance of 8% to 9% that I provided earlier in the year. With regards to asset quality, this is the best ever GIL that CIMB Group has achieved. So our GIL improved from 2.1% last year to 1.7%. Our credit cost remained stable at about 30 basis points, and our coverage ratio remained above 100%, closing at 103.2%. All these contributed to our net profit growth on a constant currency basis of about 5.3%. So we grew from MYR 7.7 billion to MYR 7.9 billion. With regards to capital, we've optimized CET1 to 14.3%. And as a result of the record financial performance, we then decided to share our record performance with our shareholders also via a record dividend payout. We paid out MYR 0.471. And if you recall the last quarter, we were the first Malaysian company to announce a MYR 2 billion capital return program. This MYR 0.471 include the first tranche of that. So with all those drivers coming together, that gave us a ROE of 11.3%, which is 10 basis points higher than the 11.2% we achieved last year. So if we look at 2025 in review, based on all the guidance that we provided to you at the start of the year, we have largely met all our guidance. Cost-to-income ratio was very close. We guided less than 47%. We achieved 47.3% from the 2% increase in OpEx. A recap of our Forward30 strategy, which is our 6-year plan until 2030. This anchors on our purpose of advancing customers and society. And how are we executing Forward30 is what I'd like to call the 4 Cs. The first C is capital, and this is important for us to always look at how to reallocate capital to grow. The second C is cash, about building a very strong deposit franchise business to optimize our cost of funds. Our third C is cross-sell, and this is to increase returns and increase ROE. And our fourth C is capabilities and capabilities is all about becoming simpler, better, faster to the group. Now how do we perform on each of the 4 Cs throughout the year, which led to our strong financial performance. The first C on capital, if you look at the table on the top left-hand side, given the challenges that we saw in Indonesia and Thailand last year, we then reallocated more capital towards Malaysia, which was a lot more stable and saw a lot more tailwinds relative to the other ASEAN markets. So RWA allocation to Malaysia increased to 56% and therefore, profit before tax also increased to 61% with a stronger ROE of 12.1% for Malaysia. Correspondingly, you would see that the RWA allocation in Indonesia and Thailand reduced, which then also led to a reduction in the PBT contribution to the overall group. Singapore remained a very strong market for us, 18% ROE in 2025, and we maintained our RWA allocation there with a slightly higher contribution in profit before tax. I've always mentioned Thailand is a market that we are restructuring. That work is ongoing. It's seeing a lot of progress, and we will be updating you about our Thailand progress in the not-too-distant future. Now sharing our strong performance with our key stakeholders. As I mentioned earlier, this is the year where we've paid the highest dividend amount of MYR 0.471. And you can see on the table on the bottom left-hand side how that has grown over time. We announced our MYR 2 billion capital return program until the end of 2027. All permanent workforce in Malaysia are earning above the Malaysian living wage. And we committed earlier this year a MYR 200 million investment in the communities that we serve until 2030. This is 13% higher than our commitment in the previous cycle. The second C on cash. As a result of the focus on deposits and the focus on building a strong deposit franchise, we saw a reduction in our cost of funds by 21 basis points year-on-year, coming from a 5.4% increase in deposits on a constant currency basis, which improved our loan-to-deposit ratio. This helped cushion the persistent rate cuts that we saw in all markets. So NIM compressed by about 8 basis points year-on-year. But what is encouraging is what we saw in the fourth quarter last year, which we are continuing to see in January this year, where the NIM compression is starting to bottom out, as you can see on the chart on the right-hand side. We always believe that to build a strong cash franchise, it is a byproduct of having very good cash management services and offerings to our customers. In the third quarter of 2025, we launched the OCTO Biz app for non-retail businesses. This is the OCTO equivalent, but for businesses. With the launch of OCTO Biz, all our front-end customer-facing applications, whether it is Touch n' Go, OCTO or Octo Biz are now all next-generation ready. We also work with the government and we've invested in the BUDI 95 program towards the third quarter of last year. We were involved from the front-end side via Touch n' Go all the way to the back-end side, where we invested in a system that tracks the fuel subsidies that's given to each Malaysian, and we also manage the cash management side from the government to the petrol companies. In December last year, we also announced our blockchain [indiscernible]. We have committed that our next CIMB bond offering will be in tokenized format. We've been admitted into the Bank Negara Digital Asset Innovation Hub with regards to blockchain -- just a few days ago, we announced our partnership with one of our key partners [indiscernible] Financial with regards to participating in their digital platform for cash management and treasury solutions. Our third C, cross-sell. This is something that you saw the growth in the client franchise outgrowing our growth in NOII last year. We remain as the #1 investment banking house, whether on the bond side as well as investment banking as a whole across Malaysia, Indonesia, Singapore and Thailand with respect to deal volume advice to our clients. Our fees and commission grew 3.2% year-on-year. Our treasury client sales, which is the business that we generate from our customers on the treasury side grew 7.2% year-on-year. Wealth grew 9.2% on the back of a 3% increase in our wealth customers. Our fourth C, which is capabilities, there is a relentless focus in CIMB Group to become simpler, better and faster. This is contributing to what you are seeing in the table at the bottom, where operating expenses have remained relatively flat with a 2% growth coming from a flat personnel costs over income, but still continued investments in technology, which was within our guidance. There is -- and then we are focusing on our -- getting simpler, better, faster by setting up the SBF Lab within CIMB Group. This is where we encourage all businesses and enablers to come up with processes to improve your processes further. If something used to take 12 steps, why not 6 is something that used to have 6 [indiscernible], why not 2. Last year, we saw 30 over projects coming up from a bottom-up basis from the relevant businesses to our SBF Lab to make things simpler, better and faster. We also invested MYR 100 million in upskilling our people when it comes to AI last year, and there's an increasing usage of AI throughout our organization, whether is it coming from transaction monitoring, whether it's coming from client onboarding and more recently into our front-end customers, providing them with the tools and data to serve our customers better. So with that, I'll now hand it over to Khairul to go through his observations. Khairul, over to you. Khairulanwar Bin Rifaie: Thank you, Novan, and good afternoon, everyone. So I'll go straight into the numbers with first Slide. Now you have gone through this, but I'll provide a bit more color on these numbers on Slide 10. Firstly, if you look at our underlying performance, that has been robust. We had a seasonally weaker 4Q 2025, typically in the fourth quarter. As you can see on a constant currency basis, if you compare this quarter to last year fourth quarter, on a constant currency basis, our total income grew by 3.8% with our net profit growing at 8.3%. Similarly, the underlying robust performance was recorded on a year-on-year basis. If you look at total income, that grew by 4.2% with net profit growing at 5.2%. As Novan mentioned, our NIMs are bottoming out and is providing a lot of stability. The year-on-year contraction of 8 basis points is well within our guidance of contraction. But you look at the Q-on-Q performance that's underpinned by Malaysia NIMs expanding by 4 basis points Q-on-Q after the contraction that we had during the third quarter of 5 basis points given during that period of third quarter of the policy rate cut. On our expenses, you can see what -- not mentioned in terms of it being well contained, growing only at 2% year-on-year. But if you look at it from a historical perspective as well, that has only grown by 3.1% on a 4-year CAGR basis. So that cost control has been ongoing and will continue going forward. On the next slide, if I break it down further to some of the business segments on PBT. So just very briefly before we go into the business segment P&L later on, on consumer banking, the year-on-year performance was slightly down flattish, but underlying that, if you look at NOI, that grew well at 14%, but this was offset by the prior year where we had a slightly higher overlay write-back in 2024. On a Q-on-Q basis, that's down because in the third quarter, we had some lumpy NPL sale in Malaysia. On wholesale banking, we had a very strong year, especially on T&M, driving that year-on-year growth. In addition to that, we had some higher write-back coming through in Malaysia. Q-on-Q, there was a very exceptional third quarter performance on trading. So normalization of that impacted the PBT on a Q-on-Q basis. In addition to that, if you recall, we had quite a sizable recovery coming through in Malaysia on the oil and gas sector in the third quarter. We did have a similar write-back in the fourth quarter in Indonesia, but that was smaller compared to the Malaysia write-back in the third quarter. On Commercial Banking, we did some preemptive macro overlays. So that impacted the year-on-year performance in addition to some NIM compression coming through. Q-on-Q, that was relatively flat with strong NOI being offset by higher costs. CDA and group funding are slightly lower on a year-on-year basis. This is coming from higher OpEx and also slightly higher provisioning from Philippines. But within that, Touch n' Go Digital has recorded a strong profitable trajectory coming from a small base. Q-on-Q OpEx accruals that we recorded in the third quarter and the absence of that or the normalization of that in the fourth quarter has driven the PBT growth. Moving on to the country performance. If you look at on Slide 12, a very good strong year-on-year profit growth in Malaysia. That's driven by NII growth with stable NIMs year-on-year with asset growth coming through. Q-on-Q, it is slightly down, a normalization of the trading and FX. And also we had the lumpy NPL sales coming through in Malaysia in the third quarter, which was not repeated in the fourth quarter. Singapore, top line was driving that good growth on PBT with the top line growing at 6.9%, both on NOI and also NII. In the fourth quarter, however, we did have a low -- so in the fourth quarter, we had lower provisions driving the strong growth in terms of PBT. Indonesia, overall, it was challenging from a macro perspective. So that impacted our NIMs in the first half, which then, of course, impacted our year-on-year growth on PBT. On the fourth quarter, we had lower NOI coming from the normalization of the trading and FX from a very exceptional third quarter in addition to the absence of an NPL sale, which we recorded during the third quarter. Thailand, somewhat similar to Indonesia, where the backdrop was challenging. So growth was weak and also we had some NIM pressure from the persistent rate cut in Thailand. So that impacted our PBT performance on a year-on-year basis. Q-on-Q, we also recorded a lower NOI compared to the third quarter. On Slide 13, a breakdown of our P&L firstly, NII. So overall, we had a very good quarterly NII momentum sequentially. You can see on a constant currency basis, we grew well, close to 4% Q-on-Q, and that's driven by that NIM expansion, in particular, coming through from Malaysia. So 2 drivers coming through from Malaysia on that NIM expansion. Number one, despite us -- the first point, despite us having that typical seasonal pressure on which both on retail and also wholesale. This is more than offset by our deposit rates coming off -- coming from the policy rate cut from the third quarter. So the full impact of that positive impact in the fourth quarter helped us drive that NIM expansion Q-on-Q. Similarly, in Thailand and Singapore as well, that NIM expansion is really about how we managed to optimize our lower cost of funds. Indonesia, on the other hand, recorded a NIM contraction. We had some lumpy income coming through during the third quarter. But in addition to that, we had a 75 basis points policy rate cut in the third quarter. So the full impact of that -- the full negative impact of that coming through in the fourth quarter. On a year-on-year basis, on constant currency, NII grew by 3.2%. If you look at the NIM contraction, it's really driven mainly by 2 countries, which is Indonesia and also Thailand. Indonesia contracted NIMs by 12 basis points. And this is given the very tight liquidity and competitive environment in the first half of the year. That slowly improved during the second half. The liquidity environment in the fourth quarter was good. So we did see that liquidity improvement coming through. But however, because of the tough first half, that drove the NIM contraction and also all the policy rate cuts that we had in Indonesia. And that is similar as well to Thailand. Also in Singapore, where we had a NIM contraction of 18 basis points, where SORA moved by about 160, 170 basis points down throughout the year. Malaysia is positive. flat NIM is positive given where the rate cut came through in July. This is through the active balance sheet and liability management on both rate and also balances. We managed to reduce our expensive wholesale funding by about MYR 5 billion compared to the start of the year. Moving on to NII on Slide 14. 4Q is really a normalization of what was a really exceptional third quarter. You can see the top left graph where there is a normalization on -- firstly, on fee income and others. We had a couple of NPL sales coming through in Malaysia and also in the third quarter, which wasn't repeated. That amounted to about MYR 170 million in the third quarter, which was not repeated in the fourth quarter. Trading was also very strong in the third quarter. But you can see compared to -- on the right-hand side, the client franchise drop is not as significant as the drop in trading, which dropped by 48% Q-on-Q. On a year-on-year basis, both trading and FX and also fee and other income grew more or less at the same level at the fees side, Singapore bank assurance really driving the fees [indiscernible] on a year-on-year basis was relatively flat at about MYR 170 million, so that was relatively flattish. Trading and FX that what -- not mentioned is really driven by the client franchise business growing client franchise sales are growing at 7.2% year-on-year. On Slide 15, operating expenses, I think I said earlier, this remains well under control. The quarterly movement is mainly due to the seasonal impact, firstly, on personnel costs. If you recall, we accrued a larger bonus during the third quarter because of the strong top line performance during the third quarter. So the movement is really a normalization of that. Marketing and admin in general, this is a typical fourth quarter seasonal catch-up that we do as the activities ramp up during the fourth quarter. Similarly, in terms of technology, we did some accelerated depreciation of charges given the investments that we are making in technology. On the overall year-on-year numbers, like what Novan highlighted on P-cost and technology costs on establishment, we did some tactical cost savings during the start of the year given the view that we were having some headwinds on the macro backdrop, we did some tactical cost savings. Marketing did increase year-on-year given our focus on improving our group spending and also some of the partnership costs in Philippines are picking up. Admin in general, if you exclude some of the one-off that happened in 2024 is really on an underlying basis, that was a relatively low growth compared to the reported number that you see at 15.2%. Asset quality on Slide 16, this remains strong. So on the total provisions on a Q-on-Q basis, that is slightly lower. Recoveries is lower given the bigger recovery that we had in the third quarter on the Malaysia [indiscernible]. In the fourth quarter, there was quite a significant one coming through in Indonesia, but it was lower than third quarter. On the non-retail side, that came down slightly. And that is really driven by the underlying improving on the non-retail side, but we also had some Singapore overlay write-back on a portfolio basis on the non-retail segment. On the retail segment, there is some underlying improvement in Indonesia and Malaysia on the ECL number itself. We also had some MEF refresh coming through in Malaysia, which then resulted in the number coming down lower. On a year-on-year basis, the higher recoveries year-on-year is mainly driven by Malaysia and Indonesia. On the nonretail side, it's really driven -- the slight increase is really driven. If you recall, we did some overlays related to macro uncertainties in the second quarter and also in the third quarter. So that drove the number a bit higher on a year-on-year basis. If you exclude that additional overlay that we did on the non-retail side, on an underlying basis, that is actually relatively stable. On the retail side, that has gone up slightly. Overlays again impacting some of the variances. Last year, we had a bigger -- last year meaning 2024, we had a bigger write-back in terms of overlay on the retail side that has come off lower and that drove the number higher. So if you exclude those noises on overlay, on an underlying basis, Malaysia and Indonesia year-on-year is slightly lower, also partly driving that slightly lower number is the model deployment. If you recall, I mentioned in Indonesia and Malaysia, we deployed some models and that resulted in some of the ECL coming in a bit lower on a year-on-year basis. So overall, you can see the numbers in terms of the ratios are all trajecting well throughout the year. We are maintaining our loan loss coverage well above that 100% level. Slide 17 is a new slide. This is to show our breakdown on our total asset growth as a total -- our business franchise. And this is where we want to also break down the drivers of growth on the debt and securities level. So there has been -- this is a better reflection of our overall business and not just showing our loan segment. So here, you can see on a constant currency basis that what Novan mentioned, our asset is growing at 6.1% and our debt securities growing at 9.2%, driven by Singapore and also Malaysia. On loans, if you look at it on a constant currency basis, growing at 3.1%. What we mentioned during the third quarter where we see momentum picking up, you can really see that coming through in the fourth quarter in wholesale banking. The momentum picked up as well and strongly. Within that number of 2.9%, Malaysia wholesale on a Q-on-Q basis grew by 5.8% Q-on-Q. Consumer Banking on a Q-on-Q basis continued its growth trajectory overall recording at 2.2% year-on-year growth, Malaysia being slightly higher than that 2.2%. Commercial Banking on a year-on-year basis, relatively flattish. But within that, Singapore is growing at 14% year-on-year on a local currency basis. So if you look at it from a perspective of country, Malaysia growing at 3.6% with consumer growing higher at 3.7%. Indonesia, the main driver of that growth is corporate banking and also the auto segment. In Singapore, consumer and commercial are both growing at 14% year-on-year. Thailand is actually negative across all segments. On deposit, on Slide 19, the CASA ratio is relatively stable. If you look at it from a year-on-year perspective, we did do some optimization on the campaign rates in Thailand and Singapore during the quarter, and that drove the CASA number down lower on a Q-on-Q basis. But on the other hand, you saw earlier the NIMs in Thailand and also Singapore expanded. But the second point here, you can see in terms of the CASA ratio, despite that coming off for Singapore and Thailand, the CASA ratio has remained relatively stable on a Q-on-Q basis. Another driver of the CASA coming down is on the wholesale banking due to some year-end seasonality and some of the [indiscernible] CASA on the wholesale side. Dividend payouts on Slide 20, Novan has gone through this. Just to highlight one more point in terms of the dividend yield, that's at 5.7%. Slide 21, our capital ratios on CET1 has remained fairly stable at above the 40% mid level, 40% of CET ratio level. Our liquidity ratios on the right-hand side remains very refresh. On the segment PBT on Slide 22, Consumer Banking. So you can see here on a line-by-line basis that contraction is really coming through on the operating income because of that lumpy sale on NPLs that we recorded during the third quarter. We did, however, have some offset to that with lower provisions given the MEF refresh that we did for Malaysia. On a year-on-year basis, on the operating income on the NOII side, this is actually driving a good growth of 14%, where there's the offset is actually on the NII side, which was weaker on a year-on-year basis. Provisions was higher that I mentioned because we had a bigger overlay write-back in 2024. If you exclude that, on an underlying basis, provisions actually fell in Indonesia and also Malaysia. Slide 23. Q-on-Q, Commercial banking is relatively flattish. We did record a good NOII growth during the quarter of about 9% for the business on a year-on-year basis, it is impacted by our conservative proactive provisioning in terms of the macro overlays. So it is higher on a year-on-year basis, but the business also recorded some NIM contraction. If you look at the loan side, Malaysia driving that growth higher, but Malaysia is growing by 3.4%. So the reported number is impacted by the currency translation. If you look at CASA, it's also growing very well for Malaysia and Singapore, driving that total deposit growth of 2% with Malaysia CASA growing close to 7% and Singapore CASA growing close to 15%. On Slide 24, wholesale banking normalization of an exceptional third quarter in terms of our trading and FX treasury end markets. You can see that being reflected with the lower operating income. In addition to that, there was a higher write-back coming through from Malaysia in the third quarter. So a smaller write-back coming through in Indonesia in the fourth quarter impacted the provisions being higher as well. Year-on-year, very good strong performance on PBT, and this is driven by some of the provisions being lower in Indonesia and also Malaysia. Slide 25, digital assets and group funding. On a Q-on-Q basis, the growth is really coming through from a normalization of OpEx where we accrued some of those bonuses -- higher bonuses in the third quarter. On a year-on-year basis, slightly lower because of the higher OpEx and also higher provision from Philippines. If you look at Touch n' Go, that is growing very well and on a very good profitable trajectory. If you look at some of the indicators, the growth of number of registered users is very strong at 11% now ending the year at 32.3 million. If you compare that to the third quarter, the growth is also strong, and that has remained the trajectory for many years. So in the third quarter, that number of users was 31.4 million. In Philippines, in terms of customers that grew strongly, close to 20%. However, on the loan side, we are bringing it down slightly with a slight negative growth of 1.3% year-on-year as we recalibrate the strategy [indiscernible] Forward30. Lastly, on Islamic on Slide 26, it is impacted during the quarter performance on the normalization of the NOI. So that is slightly lower. On a year-on-year basis, a very good growth driven by the asset growth and stable NIMs. Provisions as well was lower. So you can see in terms of the financing growth, it continues to outpace the conventional growth and growing at 6.4% and the Islamic deposits also tracking similarly on the financing side. So that's the end of the financials. Thank you, and I pass the presentation back to Novan for the closing. Muhammad Amirudin: Okay. Thank you, Khairul. So how do we see 2026? I think FX will continue to be a headwind. Malaysia ringgit vis-a-vis all the other asset currencies, we feel that will be a headwind for us. However, we are not allowing that noise to distract us, so the team continues to be extremely focused on doing what we do best and to execute the 4 Cs. And therefore, our target ROE for 2026 will be in the 11% to 11.5% range, and we are on track to achieve our 12% to 13% ROE in 2027 which we guided earlier to be our midterm checkpoint for Forward30. So what is driving the 11% to 11.5% ROE guidance? We are looking at an asset growth on a constant currency basis of 5% to 7%, our cost-to-income ratio to be below 47%, credit costs to be 25 to 35 basis points and our CET1 ratio to be at least equal to or above 14%. So with that, I will now end our presentation and take any questions that you have. Chek Tan: Thank you, Novan and Khairul. We will now begin the Q&A session. [Operator Instructions]. We have the first question, it's Yong Hong. Yong Hong Tan: Just 3 questions from me. Thanks for the 2026 guidance. But if you are targeting ROE to be broadly the same level as 2025, what are the levers to get to 12% for 2027? And if earnings-wise, if that is lower than your expectations, any other levers that we can pull to get to that 12% level in 2027? That is my first question. Muhammad Amirudin: Okay. Thank you, Yong Hong. So the journey to 2027, we have a number of levers. First, with regards to our capital allocation itself, which you will see a lot more focus on the Malaysia business. You saw earlier on Page 6, the Malaysia ROE has increased from 11% to 12.1%. We're going to be focusing to grow a lot more in Malaysia vis-a-vis the other markets, which is namely Indonesia and Thailand. So you're going to see a lot more capital reallocation from Thailand, to some extent, Indonesia, a lot more into Malaysia, which is generating above 12% ROE. Our focus in Singapore will remain the same, if not slightly higher, where ROE is now at 18%. So think of capital reallocation from Thailand, Indonesia, into Malaysia and Singapore. So that's the first lever. And then within each of these countries, there's going to be a lot more relentless focus on noninterest income. The focus on the wealth business, focus on our wholesale business with Singapore as a wealth and treasury hub, focus on transaction banking, which will facilitate our cash business, all that will grow NOII, treasury client sales that you saw a very strong growth this year versus previous years. So a lot more client franchise NOII, which will also boost our ROE. We're going to continue that discipline on cost that you have seen. You have seen over the last many years, OpEx growth is roughly about 3% CAGR. Last year was 2%. We're going to continue with that discipline on cost. We're going to continue with the discipline on asset quality. You saw GIL at the lowest ever for CIMB, credit costs to remain contained. And then on the capital side, we announced the capital return program up to end of '27. We're going to execute that. So I think when we put all these levers together, we are confident of achieving the 2027 ROE guidance. Yong Hong Tan: Just following up on your capital to get to that ROE, can we maybe have the thinking that the capital return will be earlier, if not so [indiscernible] that will give us a better base to get to the ROE target in 2027. Is that the right way to think about that? Muhammad Amirudin: Yes. I mean we always proactively think of capital. Capital, we see -- we value the capital from our shareholders a lot. And therefore, we're always proactively thinking about how to return it faster. I mean this is excess capital that we have committed anyway. You saw what we did in the last quarter where market was not expecting us to do a special dividend, but we chose to do a special dividend earlier ahead of time. You saw how we executed this over the last 2 years where we had excess capital and we've done that as special dividend. So we are going to continue executing this like how we've executed in the past. But at the end of the day, it's a balance of many factors that we need to take into account, and we will continue to be vigilant about it. Yong Hong Tan: Maybe on margins, I mean I missed that earlier. Is there any guidance on margins for this year? Khairulanwar Bin Rifaie: Yes. So, Yong Hong, yes, so in terms of the margin guidance, right, for the group, we are looking at plus/minus 5 basis points. So relatively stable, plus/minus. Within that, I think more importantly, if you look at Malaysia, we are looking at Malaysia to be stable to slightly spending, right? Niaga has given their guidance is a plus/minus 10 basis points to 3.9% to 4.1%. Where we see potentially some further weakening is Singapore, right? Singapore, but I think it will be less than what we recorded in 2025 as what you saw in SORA even though weakening has stabilized compared to what we recorded in '25. So there should be some weakening of that. But I think where the offset to this is really Malaysia, where we are looking at stable to slightly spending because in terms of our rate outlook in Malaysia, right, we are expecting rates to be stable versus the negative impact that we had in 2025. So that's number one. But number two, to the point on our cash strategy, that will continue to gain traction going into 2026, and that will help our margin trajectory. And lastly, we continuously optimize the higher cost of funding, wholesale funding that we did. So we managed to do that already for the last couple of years. We'll continue doing that again in 2026. So just as a number, last year in 2025, we reduced our wholesale funding by about MYR 5 billion on an endpoint to endpoint. So we'll continue to try and optimize the expensive funding in 2026 as well. So that will help that margins in Malaysia to be stable to slightly expanding. So overall, just to recap, at the group level, we are looking at plus/minus 5% -- 5 basis points. Yong Hong Tan: Yes. Sorry, just one small follow-up. What are the scenario where you see margin expanding by 5 basis points, and what are the scenario that you see margins coming down by 5 basis points? Khairulanwar Bin Rifaie: Yes. So I think the main lever is because I think 2 parts, which is our biggest -- 2 biggest markets. So one is Malaysia. The other is Indonesia. So if you look at Indonesia, the range is plus/minus 10 basis points. We have seen liquidity environment improving in Indonesia over the second half, and that has been sustained in the fourth quarter. Similarly, in the first -- so far, that liquidity environment has been stable. But I think we still have a long way to go to the end of the year. So that liquidity has to be there. Competition has to be fairly rational for us to get to the upper end of that range where Niaga has guided. So that's number one. Number two, our biggest market will be the biggest driver, which is Malaysia. And so far, liquidity has improved slightly if you look at it from this year, starting of the year. So the continuation of that maybe could give us some slight upside to margins in Malaysia. So that will drive that upper end of our guidance. Muhammad Amirudin: The next question comes from Harsh. Harsh Modi: Can you hear me? Muhammad Amirudin: Yes. Harsh Modi: Just one question. I understand your payout was in line with guidance. But how do we think about your guidance on regular moving over the next couple of years? Special, I understand as you have guided for a number, you've already started paying and you'll do it as you can release. So that's on -- as it comes through, you'll do. But special is 55% the number we should plan for over the next 2, 3 years or even that number can increase meaningfully over next few years? Khairulanwar Bin Rifaie: Yes. So I think, yes, so in terms of our dividend payout of 55%, we've been sustaining that for the last 3 to 4 years. And looking at the growth trajectory and giving that stability to the market, I think we need that number to be a sustainable number -- a really sustainable number. And that sustainable number is really driven by all the entities within our group and how we extract that capital to the holding level. And we believe based on our trajectory, right, this is the sustainable number of 55%. We will -- we do continue reviewing this number. And if you look at our guidance, it is stable at the 55% level, given how we have optimized all the capital levels in all the entities. Harsh Modi: Right. So basically, unless and until there is any release of capital, be it Thailand, be it Basel norms or what have you or maybe higher payout from Niaga, it is not likely that we will end up getting -- so above and beyond your MYR 2 billion commitment and 55%, we should not pencil in anything else. Khairulanwar Bin Rifaie: Yes. I mean, yes, so. So based on today's view and outlook on growth and what excess capital we can expect from all the various levers that we have, both Malaysia and outside Malaysia, this is the level that we are comfortable with in terms of 55% and also the capital return that we have committed up until the end of 2027. Harsh Modi: Khairul, if I just want to double-click on that. If -- let's say, assuming that the about MYR 1.3 billion, MYR 1.4 billion remaining on special out of MYR 2 billion, that comes out from, let's say, optimizing capital elsewhere and narrowing the gap between group and bank to an extent. Is 55% enough to optimize your ROAs -- to optimize your returns, ROEs in particular? Or you can push up to 60%, 65% over a couple of years? Khairulanwar Bin Rifaie: So the basis of this 55% is more or less with the current sort of projection of CET1 and outlook, right? So we are maintaining a stable capital ratio broadly across all our entities, including GH with this 55% payout. And on top of that, that capital return that we have committed. If we want to optimize further, right, it depends on many, many other levers. And if we can optimize our CET1 further, that's where there could be a potential higher dividend payout firstly for all our entities that hopefully, that can translate to a higher payout at GH as well -- group holdings as well. Chek Tan: We do not have any further questions at this time. [Operator Instructions] We have one coming from Tushar from Nomura. Tushar Mohata: The first question is on Indonesia and Niaga. Given the developments in Indonesia and the increased scrutiny on free float and the discussion that Indonesian stocks might need to increase free float to 15%. What would be your considerations in deciding whether to sell in the market or do a dividend in [indiscernible] like how it had happened in 2016, I believe, when the previous round of free float increase was required? Muhammad Amirudin: Thank you, Tushar, for your question. So at this point in time, yes, there's a top of the 15%. There is no policy in terms of how we will get there at the moment. I think the indication is over a period of time. From our perspective, all options are on the table. If there's a requirement to then increase our stake, then we will consider all options, whether is it a re-IPO in the market or whether is it a DIS, I mean, it all goes back to which one gives us the best value. I mean the reason I mentioned the word pre-IPO is because today, Niaga 7% free float, the liquidity is thin. The trading doesn't reflect the true value of the business, which is achieving a 13-odd percent ROE. So therefore, if we were to ever want to consider increasing stake by selling some stock, then it needs to be via a full marketing process. But at the end of the day, all options are on the table for us, and we will execute the one that extracts the best value. Tushar Mohata: Okay. And just want to understand the minimum CET1 required by end of 2026, which you are targeting at greater than 14%. I understand that the structure of CIMB is a bit different where dividends are paid out of group holdings level. So group holdings CET1 is more important. But is it fair to say that group holdings, this kind of structure versus all of your peers where bank level CET1 is more important, you need to maintain a higher group holdings level CET1 versus others where bank level CET1 can be lower? Khairulanwar Bin Rifaie: The answer is no. So it's similar. It's the same, right? So whatever capital levels because we are covered by Malaysia Central Bank. So whatever capital level that's required at CIMB Bank, CIMB Islamic, CIMB Investment Bank, similar to CIMB Group Holdings. So it's not more that is required at the holding level. Chek Tan: [Operator Instructions] Next question comes from Benjamin from UBS. Benjamin Tan: I just have one quick question. Just you mentioned that the stronger ringgit has been a headwind to the performance at CIMB. Just wanted to get some rough sensitivity, like, let's say, if the ringgit were to strengthen another 5% or whatever number you have in mind, what is the downside to the ROE guidance that you have, that would be very helpful or like if Malaysian ringgit were to depreciate versus a basket of currencies regionally, what would be the impact on your earnings and your ROE. Khairulanwar Bin Rifaie: Yes. I think the sensitivity is relatively mechanical, right, given the contribution of Niaga and our overseas operations. Niaga is actually is the one that is impacting us the most with the PBT contribution of that 22%, right? To a lesser extent, a very small component in terms of U.S. dollar, but it's not material driver, but that's not material. But the main one is actually Indonesia and to a certain extent, Singapore as well, right? But if you look at how we have managed that, which was very challenging in 2025 still within that 11% to 11.5% ROE, right? And that is a reflection of our diversified business with Malaysia performing very well in terms of the ROE, as mentioned on a year-on-year basis. Of course, we are susceptible to that sensitivity that you mentioned, but we are going to be very agile to still focus on meeting our guidance of 11% to 11.5%. Muhammad Amirudin: Yes. So I think my answer is actually there's no impact. We're not speculating on FX. We'll focus on executing and doing what we do best. So yes, as FX move, it then impacts our numbers, and we will see how that impacts our numbers. And therefore, we will be agile and we will pivot our strategies accordingly. So whatever it is to make sure that we achieve what we have guided the market. Chek Tan: I think there are no further questions at this point in time. Andrew San from Macquarie, are you there? Andrew San: Happy Friday. Just a question on your guidance. I noticed that in terms of when you put down asset growth guidance instead of loan guidance or is there something more to be read into that? Muhammad Amirudin: Sorry, can you repeat that? I think you broke up. Andrew San: So in terms of the guidance that you mentioned, the asset -- sorry, asset growth guidance that you put down, yes, in terms of what you put down, it's 5% to 7%. Is there any difference with loan growth guidance? Can I just translate that loan growth guidance? Yes. Okay. Muhammad Amirudin: Sure. So the reason why we put asset growth is that's how we operate our business. From our capital and deposits that we have, we then mobilize it into either loans or either through securities. And we are a large universal bank and also a strong investment bank. When we advise our customers to raise financing, it's the financing that makes most sense for them. If a loan makes more sense, we extend a loan. If a bond makes more sense, then we advise them on a bond, but we can also use our balance sheet to underwrite part of the bond. If an equity makes more sense, then we advise them to raise equity. So that's why we are focused on an asset growth guidance rather than just too narrowly focusing on loan growth per se. But with regards to our own internal numbers, as part of this 5% to 7% asset growth, loan growth is a subset of that. If I were to look at Malaysia, which is our largest market, we are looking at growing loans at about 4% to 5%, which is in line with the GDP, and it would differ across all markets. But at the end of the day, our business plan is around an asset growth strategy. Andrew San: Sorry, can you remind me what the loan growth guidance is for Indonesia and Thailand as well? Khairulanwar Bin Rifaie: Yes. Indonesia is 3% to 5%, right? Singapore will be in the higher single digit, and that's driven mostly by SME and also consumer. In Thailand, we're expecting the market environment to still remain fairly challenging. So in Thailand, it will likely be a negative growth. This is on loans specifically. But again, I just want to reiterate, we are looking at it more from an asset growth in totality for all the countries as well. Muhammad Amirudin: [indiscernible] so therefore, when we make NII, the cash that get deployed either through loans or through securities, we still make NII from that, just that the bonds that allow us to trade in as well. So that's why we're going on an asset growth basis. I just want to understand that. Andrew San: Okay. I understand. And just a follow-up on the Malaysian loan growth of 4% to 5%. Can you help me understand? I mean, the GDP growth has been strong, and we should be seeing GDP growth in the high 4%, if not 5% in terms of forecast for this year. And at the same time, you're focusing growth more on Malaysia going forward. Why is loan growth only at 4% to 5% for Malaysia? Muhammad Amirudin: So yes, we're a big universal bank, which includes a large investment bank. Our clients in Malaysia, they raise financing either through loans or through the capital markets, which is the bond market. I mean the Malaysian bond market grew a lot more compared to the loan market last year, and we are the #1 player in the bond market. So from our perspective, it's all about what makes sense most for our customers. If it's a lot more efficient for them to raise bonds, and we did a lot of bonds for our top clients last year, then we will advise them to raise bonds, but we will then underwrite part of the bonds and that goes on our balance sheet. So that's why we focus on asset growth. So I would like to take your focus away from just loan growth alone because that's not how we operate our business, unlike maybe some of our peers. But look, at the end of the day, if it makes more sense for our customers to do loans, then you will see the loan growth number grow a lot more. But I don't want to be too fixated on the loan growth number. Andrew San: Okay. And just a follow-up on that again. Then how should we think about NOI as a percentage of total income or NOI growth for this year then? Khairulanwar Bin Rifaie: Yes. So I think for this year, right, if you look at from a numbers perspective, where we ended the year in terms of proportion at 31.7%, right, given our focus on 2 things. One is our cross-sell, so on the client franchise component. But secondly, also on the bond side, that also create a lot of opportunity on NOI, we do expect NOI to grow stronger than NII. And that is somewhere slightly higher than the mid-single digits of level for NOI. So that proportion, we do -- we are targeting that to expand further in 2026. Andrew San: Okay. So expecting NOI to grow stronger than NII. And that's also including the fact that you might have a higher base in terms of bond sales from 2025. Muhammad Amirudin: Yes. But that's not the main reason, yes. I mean our NOI growth, as I presented earlier, the client franchise grew faster than NII itself. In fact, if you look at the earlier Page 14, last year, our client franchise of trading and FX is actually higher than our trading income. So yes, there won't be trading gains. We will take trading gains as they come, but the focus is on client franchise business, where we make treasury client sales, where we make fees and commissions from either our banking products or investment banking advisory -- so the contribution of NOI will come from both, but I would say a lot more on the client franchise side. Chek Tan: Just one more, I think, from Jin Han. Jin Han Chin: I have just a couple of questions on Singapore. I may have missed it, but could we get the in-house view on where SORA rates are going and what's underpinning expectations for 2026 as well as a little bit more color on credit costs for Singapore. If you could share any numbers would be great. Khairulanwar Bin Rifaie: Yes. So I'll take the credit cost numbers first for Singapore. I will share a specific number, but in terms of directionally, right? So in 2025, we recorded quite a significant net write-back in Singapore. Going into 2026, we still expect the credit cost for Singapore to be relatively flattish, meaning not write-back position, but a very, very small credit cost as there are some pipelines of further recoveries coming through in 2026. So a very small credit cost number. Yes. On the point on SORA, right, we have some views on where it will go. We're looking at around 50 basis points further lower or so. Chek Tan: I think we are -- there are no further questions at this point in time. Okay. Since there are no further questions, I'd like to pass the line back to Novan for his closing remarks. Muhammad Amirudin: Thank you very much for your time on the Friday afternoon to join our presentation. For those that are fasting, I just want to wish you [Foreign Language] and see you all again soon. Thank you very much. Chek Tan: Ladies and gentlemen, that concludes our briefing for today. Thank you for joining us, and wish you a good evening ahead.
Gabrielle McCaig: Good morning, and welcome, everyone, to Via's Fourth Quarter 2025 Earnings Call. I'm Gabby McCaig, Via's Chief Corporate Communications Officer and Head of Investor Relations. With me today are Daniel Ramot, Via's Co-Founder and CEO; and Clara Fain, Via's Chief Financial Officer. During today's call, Daniel will review our fourth quarter 2025 business update before handing it off to Clara to discuss financial results and our guidance for the full year 2026. Daniel will end with some additional comments before opening it up to Q&A. In addition to prepared remarks on this call, additional information can be found in our investor presentation, press release and SEC filings on our Investor Relations website at investors.ridewithvia.com. Before we get started today, we wanted to draw your attention to the safe harbor statement included in our press release and investor presentation. Items we discuss today will include forward-looking statements about topics, including, but not limited to, our future financial performance, projections and management's plans and objectives for future operations. Actual results may differ materially from those presented in the forward-looking statements and are subject to risks and uncertainties described more fully in our SEC filings, including our annual report on Form 10-K. Any forward-looking statements that we make on this call are based on our assumptions as of today, February 27, 2026. Unless required by law, we undertake no obligation to update or revise these statements as a result of new information or future events. We would also like to point out that our discussion today will include certain non-GAAP financial measures in addition to, not as a substitute for, financial measures calculated in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Definitions of these non-GAAP financial measures, along with reconciliations of non-GAAP to GAAP financial measures are provided in our press release and our investor presentation. And without further ado, I'll now hand it over to Daniel. Daniel Ramot: Thanks, Gabby, and thank you, everyone, for joining us today. We're delighted to report that Via delivered another exceptional quarter, exceeding expectations on both top and bottom line performance. In Q4, our revenue grew 30% year-over-year to $119 million. This was the eighth consecutive quarter with year-over-year platform revenue growth at or above 30%, highlighting Via's ability to consistently deliver rapid, durable growth. Q4 was the strongest quarter in company history for net new platform revenue. This outstanding result was driven by our relentless focus on product innovation and our ability to deliver to our customers not only the most cutting-edge technology in the market, but also the solution that best matches their needs. The number of customers on our platform grew sharply in Q4 to 821. We saw strong organic customer growth of 9% year-over-year, and we added 94 new customers through our acquisition of Downtowner, an important expansion of our platform and exciting opportunity for future growth. We also remain highly focused on maintaining our progress towards profitability. In Q4, we had the narrowest loss in Via's history at negative 6% of adjusted EBITDA margin. 2025 was an outstanding year for Via. Not only did we take the company public and acquire Downtowner, we also achieved rapid and consistent growth throughout the year and continue to invest in our product and team to support durable growth in the years to come. In 2025, we grew platform revenue 31% year-over-year to $434 million. Adjusted EBITDA improved year-over-year by 8 points to negative 8%. In Q4, we continue to win new customers at a rapid rate. We are seeing strong growth in the number of large customers who adopt our platform across the U.S. and globally, in part driven by an acceleration in the number of cities and transit agencies selecting Via to manage their entire transit network. As has been consistently the case throughout Via's history, we saw exceptional retention and growth from our existing customers. For the past year, Via's net revenue retention was 119%. We also recorded the highest gross revenue retention in Via's history, 98%, beating the previous record set just a quarter earlier in Q3 2025. Our incredibly low churn is the result of the meaningful impact in ROI we deliver to our customers and the consistency with which we do so. Sarasota County, Florida has been a Via customer since 2021 when we partnered with the county to launch a new microtransit system. At the time, the county trimmed 15 underutilized bus routes and used those savings to fund the microtransit service. For the same annual budget, Sarasota was able to significantly expand the reach of their public transit network, shorten passenger wait times by 4x and reduce cost per ride by 50%. Further savings of $700,000 annually were achieved by leveraging the microtransit system to serve transportation disadvantaged riders, a service that was previously provided by a separate fleet. Breaking down operational silos is a key advantage that Via platform provides to our customers. This success led to Via being awarded a paratransit software and services contract, representing a 6.3x expansion of our contract. We can now leverage our unified platform to integrate the microtransit and paratransit services and drive even greater savings for the county. I wanted to share another case study that demonstrates the outstanding ROI that our customers can achieve when they adopt our platform. An agency in Missouri was able to reduce cost per ride by more than 50% from $75 to $30 when integrating paratransit and microtransit through our platform. This translates into $2 million of savings per year for the agency. One of our key goals for the IPO was to gain the ability to leverage our public company stature and balance sheet to strategically acquire assets that broaden our platform and global reach. We're very pleased that in Q4, just 3 months after the IPO, we made our first such acquisition. We have been following Downtowner and its founders for many years and have been impressed with their execution and product. We also recognize a strong cultural fit between our teams, which is a critical consideration for every acquisition we evaluate. Over more than a decade, Downtowner built a specialized business focused on efficient public transit solutions for Destination Cities. The Downtowner team developed innovative tools, deep expertise and proprietary data to manage the complex geography and weather conditions, seasonal demand patterns and local commuting needs of these unique environments. In acquiring Downtowner, we gained direct access to these tools, expertise and data, which we can now leverage to expand our platform. We also gained 94 new customers. We believe that many of Downtowner's customers have additional transit technology needs that are well served by Via's platform. The average ARR per Downtowner customer is significantly lower than Via's current ARR per customer, providing an exciting opportunity for growth within the Downtowner customer base. We believe that in the current market conditions, targeted and selective acquisitions such as Downtowner represent an attractive opportunity and sound capital allocation strategy for Via. Product innovation is a key driver of our growth. In 2025, our product development accelerated meaningfully. Our team of 400 engineers, product managers and data scientists released more than 50 new products and major features during the course of the year. A key driver of product acceleration was our use of AI to increase the efficiency of our engineering and product teams. The faster rate of product innovation has allowed us to increase the pace at which we expand our product portfolio and broaden our platform, an increase that is already having a measurable impact on our business. Our pipeline grew more than 50% year-over-year in 2025. While we have always used machine learning to power algorithms, we are now embedding AI across our platform, automating key workflows, improving the learning and decision-making of our algorithms and leveraging Via's proprietary data to generate deep insights and proactive recommendations for our customers. We are setting the industry standard when it comes to developing AI for government, providing solutions that meet the exceptionally high bar for accuracy, reliability and security that is necessary when powering critical public services. We know there's a lot of talk about AI. We wanted to go beyond talk and show you some of the AI products we're rolling out to our customers. As you'll see, the proprietary data we've amassed over more than a decade is a critical foundation underlying many of these products. First, let's take a look at our tool for automating the design of transit networks. Using AI, we leverage publicly available demographic data alongside Via's travel demand, rider mode choice and other proprietary data to generate an optimal bus network. Once we've established the optimal bus network, the AI can turn its attention to the microtransit component of the system. You can see the AI in action as it evaluates a large number of potential zone designs before converging to the optimal microtransit zones. This is a powerful new planning tool that has the potential to revolutionize how transit networks are planned. We have also embedded AI into our operations software, where it monitors the system's operations to proactively generate insights and recommendations. Here, we see insights generated by the built-in agent based on ridership demand data. Each insight leads to an AI-powered recommendation. Planners can rapidly visualize the data in forming the recommendation and take immediate action. In this case, expanding the microtransit zone to cover a whole foods that is driving a lot of ridership. Once the zone change is made, it goes live immediately, allowing riders to travel directly to the whole foods. The same tool also continuously evaluates system safety. Here, we see another AI-generated insight, identifying an unsafe virtual bus stop. With a click, the planner can access satellite footage to review the location. In this case, the planner determines the stop is indeed unsafe and easily removes it from the system. Dispatchers often need to deal with unexpected disruptions. Our AI agent can assist them, transforming potentially challenging and stressful real-time decisions into a human-AI collaborative process that is well informed and seamless. In this example, the dispatcher needs to secure a new ride for a passenger whose vehicle is broken down. The AI agent helps the dispatcher quickly understand how assigning the passenger to a new vehicle will impact other passengers already on that vehicle. The AI agent then facilitates the assignment selected by the dispatcher. Our target market is unique and very few companies that sell into this market and have been able to achieve meaningful scale. As the category leader and thanks to the proven impact that our platform has delivered to cities, we've been able to develop strong relationships with mayors, city managers and other key municipal decision makers. This is evident in the outstanding bipartisan group of mayors who are the inaugural members of our newly launched Mayors Council. The goal of the council is to support transit innovation in the U.S. and facilitate adoption of modern transit technology and innovative transit approaches by mayors across the country. We are confident that the support of mayors on the council will prove instrumental to accelerating adoption of smart transit solutions in cities throughout the U.S. Our market is massive, and we have only begun to penetrate it. Based on a report we commissioned from a major consulting firm, our serviceable addressable market is estimated to be $82 billion. Today, we capture a little over 1% of this market. Across this massive global market, there is an enormous gap between the antiquated technology that government organizations have historically relied on and the cutting-edge software we have developed. This gap is rapidly expanding, in large part, thanks to AI. We believe that transforming this market represents a generational opportunity. It is also a market with a unique set of challenges. While our customers are mission-driven and motivated to provide high-quality service to their constituents, they are burdened by cumbersome procurement and regulatory constraints. They also have many complex and bespoke technical requirements that are essential to their operations. We've spent over a decade developing a deep understanding of these customers. One of our most important early insights was that our customers need so much more than better software. They need better solutions. We learned that the standard seat-based SaaS model will not drive durable growth or achieve meaningful scale when the customers are local governments. That is why we have, from the very beginning, been steadfast in our approach. We must provide our customers not only cutting-edge software, but a complete solution. To do this, we adopted a novel innovative approach to our market. We built an end-to-end platform of software and services. Our platform comprises the world's most advanced AI-powered software for public transit systems. It also incorporates a broad range of technology-enabled services, many of which are provided through a curated ecosystem of third-party providers that we assembled over the years, and it is priced based on usage, not seats. As Via grew, we often faced skepticism about our model. Wouldn't it have been so much simpler to just sell software. But we made what I believe has proven to be a prescient decision to look beyond the traditional software model. Our platform approach enabled us to grow rapidly and become the undisputed leader in our category. Our scale affords us a tremendous data advantage over existing players and potential newcomers to the space. And the services we provide ensure that our platform is tightly linked to the physical world, which we believe will ensure that Via emerges as a long-term beneficiary of AI. One powerful case study for how our platform can leverage AI is our use of autonomous vehicles. By incorporating AVs as a service into our platform, as we've done with Waymo and Chandler, Arizona, we will be able to drive increased margins in our operations and deliver savings for our customers as the cost of AVs declines. Perhaps most interestingly, as we work closely with local government organizations around the world, we've seen how badly they need smart AI-powered solutions in virtually every aspect of their internal operations. We've spent the past decade establishing Via as a company that can deliver complex solutions that really work for the public sector. In the process, we've built strong relationships with mayors and senior city officials the world over. Today, with AI dramatically speeding up product and software development, we're exceptionally well positioned to build on these relationships and partner with mayors and city managers to build AI-powered solutions that extend well beyond public transit. This new initiative is Via AI Labs. Just launched out of stealth, it's already clear that we have a huge opportunity to help cities use AI to solve some of their most pressing challenges efficiently and scalably. As we look forward to 2026, we couldn't be more bullish about the opportunity to leverage our engineering team and category leadership in public transit to meaningfully expand the range of solutions we provide to local governments and help drive efficiency across multiple areas of municipal government. And with that, I'll pass it over to Clara to review the financial highlights for the quarter and the year. Clara Fain: Thank you, Daniel. We are very pleased to wrap up our first year as a public company with another remarkable quarter. Q4 net new revenue was the strongest in the company's history, and we exceeded our revenue and adjusted EBITDA guidance, showcasing our commitment to consistent execution and durable growth as we continue to capture the massive opportunity ahead of us. Now let's dive into the results. In Q4 2025, our annual run rate revenue, which is defined as our quarterly revenue multiplied by 4, was $476 million, representing a year-over-year increase of 30%. This marks our eighth consecutive quarter of 30% plus year-over-year revenue growth for our platform. Our growth continues to be fueled by exceptional strength in the United States with platform revenue up 39% year-over-year in the U.S. In Q4 2025, the number of customers leveraging our platform was 821, representing a year-over-year increase of 23%. Our year-over-year organic growth was 9%, in line with our historical range of 8% to 12%. In addition, we acquired Downtowner, our first acquisition as a public company in late December. This added 94 customers to the platform. In Q4 2025, excluding Downtowner, revenue per customer was the highest in Via's history as more customers than ever expanded their usage and adopted multiple products on our platform. We ended the quarter with 94 customers with annual run rate revenue over $1 million, a 31% year-over-year growth. In 2025, we generated 97% of revenue through recurring fees for access to the platform. Our contracts are typically multiyear, 2 to 3 years on average with additional option years. Our contracting unit is typically the vehicle, whether the contract is software or software and services, we offer bundled price per vehicle per month or per vehicle per hour. This allows our customers to easily scale their usage of the platform. Upfront or onetime revenue is very limited, representing less than 3% of total revenue in 2025 and often consists of software implementation, consulting, hardware or advertising fees. As an example, a customer in Texas contracted for $3.4 million over 3 years. The customer selected our microtransit software and tech-enabled services, including fleet, drivers and call center. The contract includes approximately 22,000 vehicle hours per year at a rate of $50 per hour. This brings the annual contract value of the contract to $1.1 million of annual recurring fees. An annual inflation escalator of 3% is automatically applied in the second and third years of the contract. The contract also included $15,000 of upfront software implementation fees recognized over the life of the contract. We are continuing to benefit from flywheel effects in multiple states such as Ohio and Illinois, where the success of existing customers drives referenceability and allows us to rapidly grow revenue without a corresponding increase in sales and marketing investment. In Ohio, we have seen an 1,800% increase in revenue per sales head with S&M decreasing over time. We ended 2025 with 19 states in flywheel, representing a 73% growth year-over-year. Now let's dig into our margins and expenses, which we're presenting on an adjusted basis. As of Q4 2025, we spent 13% of our revenue on sales and marketing compared to 15% in Q4 2024. Over time, we expect to continue to invest efficiently in S&M to capture our market opportunity. We also spent 15% of revenue on G&A, which was consistent year-over-year. Our G&A expenses went up quarter-over-quarter, driven by a onetime step-up of expenses related to our transition from private to public company, professional services, legal and infrastructure costs as well as increased auto and D&O insurance costs, which both renewed at higher rates. Our research and development efforts are our #1 area of investment. As of Q4 2025, R&D expenses represented 18% of revenue compared to 21% in Q4 2024. Our engineering team continues to gain efficiency by extensively leveraging the most advanced AI coding tools. And it is worth noting that our R&D spend as a percentage of revenue declined meaningfully in 2025 despite the weakness of the U.S. dollar versus the Israeli shekel, the currency of our largest R&D center. We wrapped up Q4 2025 with negative 6% adjusted EBITDA margin, our lowest loss on record compared to negative 10% in Q4 2024 and negative $0.5 million of operating cash flows, driven by improved financial performance and favorable timing of customer collections. Over the past few years, we have been able to drive significant operating leverage while generating rapid revenue growth. We strongly believe that we can continue to execute at the same level in 2026. Now let's turn to 2026 guidance and our long-term plans. For the first quarter of 2026, we expect revenue to be between $123.3 million and $123.8 million, representing 25% to 25.5% year-over-year growth. We expect adjusted EBITDA margin to be between negative 5.9% and negative 5.5% with adjusted EBITDA between negative $7.25 million and negative $6.75 million. For the full year 2026, we expect revenue to be between $542.9 million and $545.1 million, representing 25% to 25.5% year-over-year growth. We expect adjusted EBITDA margin to be between negative 2.3% and negative 1.4% compared to negative 8% in 2025, with adjusted EBITDA between negative $12.5 million and negative $7.5 million. Additionally, we expect to deliver our first quarter of profitability in Q4 2026 with positive adjusted EBITDA, which will be a major milestone for Via and an important step on our path to delivering great returns to our shareholders. Finally, we wanted to reiterate our commitment to our long-term financial goals to achieve 20% to 25% in adjusted EBITDA margin. Now I'll pass it back to Daniel for some concluding remarks. Daniel Ramot: Thank you, Clara. I just wanted to reiterate again how pleased we are with this quarter and the full 2025 year performance. 2025 was a banner year for Via, capped by milestones like our IPO, continued 30% plus growth and an incredible velocity of impactful product development. However, we are still in the early days of transforming the massive and hugely important public transit market, not to mention the opportunity to enable local government efficiency more broadly. And I'm confident in our ability to continue to deliver strong performance in the coming years. With that, I wanted to thank you all again and turn it back to the operator so we can take some questions. Operator: [Operator Instructions] Your first question comes from John DiFucci with Guggenheim Securities. John DiFucci: Since it's one question, I was -- I'll let someone else ask the AI question. So I'm going to go on to something here, something else. Listen, we've done a ton of work on Via. And by the way, this looks really good. So nice job on this quarter and the guide. And we've done a ton of work here on the space lately and realize there's a lot out there that you can do because your customers are public, and so they -- all that stuff is public, you just have to find it. It just takes a lot of work. We also realize in doing this, there's a lot of FUD out there that when taken out of context can be somewhat misleading. So we -- like we see Via as a software-led solutions company. Although there's some stuff out there, I think, with some investors wondering how much services comes into that. We think it's really important as Daniel did a good job explaining that today in your prepared remarks. But I think there's one large customer out there with contracts that are services. That customer, I think, also buys software from you. But I'm just curious, is this somewhat of an anomaly that is services-only contracts that aren't coupled with software? Or is it more common to see in your business? Daniel Ramot: John, thanks for the feedback and the question. You're absolutely right. That specific contract that I believe you're referring to is an anomaly, and it's an outcome of a very specific set of circumstances. Generally, we don't see anything like that in the market across the U.S. or Europe or any of our other markets. We're very focused on selling, as you said, software-enabled solutions. And as I tried to explain in my prepared remarks, as you commented, we think it's absolutely critical to the business model and other companies that have attempted to do it a different way, come in with your standard SaaS model or just insist on selling software. I don't think have been able to scale in any meaningful way. And so this is just -- in our view, this is the way to conquer this market. It's a huge market. And I think with AI coming in, some of this is looking even better than it was before as far as resilience and the opportunity, frankly, to leverage AI to deliver even better results to our customers. John DiFucci: And I think that the unique circumstances around that contract, I think we're fully aware of, and anyone that wants -- we have all that information that's out there. Nice job. Daniel Ramot: And thank you also for all the work that you did on that. That report was excellent and really enjoyed reading it. Operator: Your next question comes from Adam Hotchkiss with Goldman Sachs. Adam Hotchkiss: I guess, Daniel, to start, as you enter '26 and think about the '26 guide, how should we think about what the RFP pipeline looks like in public transit? What are the mix of deals available out there this year versus what you did in '25? And then maybe, Clara, what are the puts and takes around margins from a mix perspective, particularly on the gross margin front? Daniel Ramot: Adam, thanks. What we're seeing as far as RFPs coming out of the public transit systems, agency, cities and so forth, if I take a step back and look more broadly, it's pretty consistent year-over-year. For us, what's interesting is that the number of these opportunities today that we're able to go after versus a year ago, feels much larger because of the expansion of the solutions that we're able to provide, the scale that we're at, frankly, the IPO, I think, has really helped as well. And so we're just seeing -- of the RFPs that are coming out of the opportunities that become available, if I try to estimate what percentage of those can we go after at this stage in early '26 versus, say, early '25, it feels like a significantly larger percentage, and you're seeing that in that pipeline number that we disclosed. So you're seeing both more opportunities and then they tend to be larger opportunities just as far as you're asking about the mix. We're increasingly seeing opportunities to take over entire transit networks that we're today feel very well positioned to go after and are winning. So that's the good sign. So I think we feel very bullish about that pipeline of opportunities coming into 2026. Clara Fain: On the gross margin question, as you saw, the gross margin was consistent quarter-over-quarter, slightly up. The breakdown of the mix of customers buying services was also consistent with about 20% of our customers buying services as well as software. In the long term, we're reiterating our commitment to our 50% target. As Daniel mentioned, the services we provide are core to the business, and they're actually particularly important in the context of AI. We've discussed before that we have multiple levers to get to 50%. But we've also discovered that we have some new levers which are coming faster than expected, Adam, and one of them is AVs. Drivers represent a large chunk of our COGS, about 50%. And that alone could drive a paradigm shift that we're not really factoring into our assumptions. So all the levers are very much in place, and they will contribute over time to gross margin improvement. And in the short term, we believe that gross margin will be consistent with what we've been saying. Operator: Your next question comes from Josh Baer with Morgan Stanley. Josh Baer: Congrats on a strong quarter. I wanted to ask one on the AI moats that you have, but actually not on the data sets and the technology, which I think should be really clear to everyone, and you did a great job demoing that and explaining some of your proprietary data sets. So I want to approach that from a different angle that's sort of unique, I think, to Via and your end market around go-to-market. What do you have -- like how would you characterize your go-to-market moat selling into this government customer base? Maybe a couple of ways to answer like what would it take for a new entrant to effectively sell to government transportation agencies and cities? And you talk about the years of work and investment building up your current go-to-market. Daniel Ramot: Josh, thanks for the question. I totally agree. There are multiple moats from an AI perspective that we believe we have. You mentioned some of them. I think the go-to-market is probably one of the less appreciated ones. This is a very -- there are very few companies that sell certainly at any scale into this market. It's not just the government market. I think I would just kind of go one level deeper and classify it as the local government, specifically in this case, focused on transit and public transportation. And access to that market is very challenging for a number of reasons. The regulatory requirements, the process itself is tough to get through and requires a huge amount of investment. And then in the end, there's a huge element of trust and relationship and understanding the decision-makers, knowing them. We've invested over a decade in doing that. If you were to come out to the U.S. conference, mayors with us and see the relationships that we've built with mayors across the country, that's not a -- it didn't happen to us. We created this through many, many years of investment and delivering solutions to them. And I actually think our business model factors into that as well. I think if we were just selling software, we would be another software vendor that they have across a list of -- a very, very long list of software vendors by being focused on solutions, by providing them sort of wrapping that go-to-market with consulting, with engineers that support them, with people on the ground to help with the deployment, just creates a huge level of understanding between our company and these customers that then allows us to accelerate our delivery and our go-to-market. Operator: Your next question comes from Patrick Walravens with Citizens. Patrick Walravens: Daniel, I'm particularly interested on how you're using intelligence internally and where you see that going. And I'm sure everyone would love to hear your thoughts on Block announced last night that they're laying off 40% of their employees as they're leveraging intelligence across their country -- company. I mean I just wonder what your reaction is to that. Daniel Ramot: Thanks, Pat. That's a really interesting question. We're using -- so there's the obvious stuff. We're seeing incredible gains in efficiency and engineering. I think that's very clear. And I do think that's a paradigm shift in how our teams are working, the rate at which we're able to deliver new product. It's opening up enormous opportunities for us. And we're trying to use these tools, and I think they have been quite successful across the company. So whether it's sort of back-office operations, we've talked about before the way we respond to RFPs. These are extremely complex, I'd say, somewhat convoluted processes that often require hundreds of pages of responses very, very formal and structured. And so the ability to deploy AI to support us in that process, for example, has led to some really nice gains. So across the company, we're trying to deploy these. On the question of how does that affect headcount, I guess it depends what kind of market you are. Our feeling is that in our market, we are just scratching the surface as far as the number of customers that we're able to get to. We're just above 1%. But also within those customers, what we could offer them that at least for me, any gain in productivity that we can achieve, I would like to turn into selling more stuff to more customers faster rather than trying to use that to cut the team in any dramatic way. I guess if you're in a different market and you don't have that opportunity, then maybe that's the right calculus for you. For us, any centimeter -- percent of gain that we can get, we're just going to deliver more value to our customers and I think accelerate our penetration of this market that -- it's not easy to get into this market as I described before. So that's the opportunity that we're trying to pursue rather than necessarily using that to cut our team. Operator: Your next question comes from Brian Peterson with Raymond James. Brian Peterson: Congrats on the results. So Clara, I wanted to understand on Downtowner, how we should be thinking about the financial contributions for 2026. And as we think about M&A opportunities, how does that pipeline look for the next couple of years? Clara Fain: Brian, thanks for the kind words and for the question. The Downtowner acquisition was not about the revenue contribution. We acquired them to penetrate the Destination Cities market and add 94 customers. And those customers are quite small today, but they have the potential to adopt the entire Via platform. So we're pretty bullish on that and the opportunity there and that we're very excited about. On your general question about M&A, we're particularly excited about the M&A opportunities ahead of us. There's a dislocation in the market, and our industry is not immune to that. And so we're going to continue to be very disciplined, but we're seeing lots of opportunities in the market at attractive prices. Operator: Your next question comes from Brad Zelnick with Deutsche Bank. Brad Zelnick: I guess just with a number of new wins in the quarter, can you tell us how regional network effects played a part in winning new business in what sounded like a strong U.S.-led quarter? And also, how are things progressing internationally? Clara Fain: Brad, thanks for the question. We were really pleased with the flywheel effect that we're seeing. I think we're sharing two new examples in the earnings today with Ohio and Illinois. And you can see we're seeing an acceleration of revenue at a much faster pace in those flywheel markets. So we have about 19 states that we consider flywheel today in the U.S. So we're getting started. And as we continue to concur more states, we should see accelerations in those markets as well. So we're pretty excited about it. And I would say this is playing out the referenceability and the flywheel effect are playing out as expected. And you can also derive that in our S&M as a percentage of revenue, which has been continuing to come down despite having a record quarter from a net new revenue perspective. You pointed out that the growth has been fueled by the U.S. The U.S. was up 39% this quarter year-over-year. So we're continuing to see really strong results in the U.S. And our pipeline is definitely reinforced up more than 50% year-over-year, reinforced by that strength in the U.S. market. Daniel Ramot: Brad, I can comment on Europe. Europe is a complex picture, a very interesting and complex one. We have some markets that are strong like the U.K. and then other markets where we're facing some headwinds like in Germany. To try to understand what's happening in Germany, maybe I'll describe the following. We first entered the market, which is typical the same as we did in the U.S. and other places with microtransit. As microtransit is adopted, what we're trying to then transition into is a state where the more and more of our platform is being adopted by those customers. So planning and then eventually that they're acquiring our entire platform. And that is for us to get to that next stage of growth, if you will, that's the transition that's required. In Germany, we were very successful in introducing microtransit. That next phase where adoption of our entire platform is becoming ubiquitous from a change perspective, a regulatory perspective, with the European structure is just proving to take longer than we would have liked, certainly and longer than it took in the U.S. So in Germany, we're just at this interim phase. We're still selling microtransit. We're trying to get to that next level of being able to sell the entire platform. And that really requires -- for that to happen, it requires our customers to change their network to reduce certain fixed routes, replace them with microtransit, combine services that have previously been siloed. That is just -- with the regulatory environment in Europe, it is just proving to be a longer process. I think it's inevitable. We're confident that it is going to happen. It just may take a little bit longer for us to break through and then hopefully see that acceleration come up again. Operator: Your next question comes from Alex Zukin with Wolfe Research. Aleksandr Zukin: Congrats on a solid report. Maybe for Daniel and Clara for both of you, I think you both mentioned opportunities, specifically both on the new product side with some of the AI-powered software that you're introducing. And Clara, you mentioned some opportunities with the autonomous vehicle adoption that should be pretty gross margin accretive, I think maybe a little bit even sooner than what we had in our models. And I'm curious kind of how we should think about that playing out for the coming year. Obviously, we have the guidance. If you could comment on kind of where the investments are for the coming year over and above what we kind of had in our model. And how we should think about gross margin progression, particularly through the year as we look at the guidance based on those products coming to market. Clara Fain: Alex, thanks for the question. And I think you're right to point out that there are some potential step function changes to gross margin from organic efforts around AI and autonomous vehicles. The timing of those is quite interesting to think through. I would say in the very short term, we believe that gross margin will be consistent with what we're seeing, but has the potential to have step function improvement from these levers. And these levers definitely include AI products at scale where we're seeing really nice opportunities as well as the acceleration of the AV rollout with some of our AV partners. And again, we're feeling increasingly confident that, that will happen. In the future that may not be in the next quarter or 2, but it's not too distant either. Operator: Your next question comes from Michael Turrin with Wells Fargo. Michael Turrin: You mentioned starting the year with record pipeline. You're also guiding for very stable growth throughout this year. So I was just hoping you could give us a bit more context around what drives the consistent growth profile you're expecting throughout the year, the visibility you have into what you're guiding for? And then also, how should we think about timing in this market around converting pipeline to bookings and revenue? I'm just aiming to tease a bit more around the durability of the growth profile you're expecting for investors here. Clara Fain: Thanks, Michael. That's actually an insightful question. I'm glad you asked the question. It's worth remembering the model that we're in. We are selling long-term contracts that are multiyear with committed budgets and volume kickers to our customers, meaning that as we sit today, we have over 95% visibility in our revenue guidance for the next 12 months. Meaning that most of the revenue is coming from deals that are already live, contracted or won and about to be contracted. So we have really high visibility into the guidance that we've shared. Now looking forward, we are -- the pipeline is an interesting leading indicator where we're seeing an increasing pipeline of over 50% starting this year. It takes on average 9 to 10 months from a deal to get from opportunity creation to close. So that pipeline on average should convert throughout the year, but really towards the second half of the year, and it's really a good indicator for the demand that we're seeing for 2027. That's how we think about it internally. Obviously, it's on us to execute on the pipeline with the existent win rates to be able to deliver the durability of the growth, but the leading indicator is there. Operator: Your next question comes from Jonathan Ho with William Blair. Jonathan Ho: Congratulations on the strong quarter. I just wanted to understand a little bit more about AI Labs and the opportunity that you see sort of with that launch. And what sort of drove the decision? Like what are customers specifically focused on achieving with AI? Daniel Ramot: Thanks, Jonathan. Really appreciate the question. It's been -- for a very long time, we've been thinking that the access that we have to our customers at the highest levels of municipal decision-making is pretty unique and something that we should be able to leverage to diversify and grow into other areas. The challenge has always been that there's so much to do in our own space in transit, so many new products to build, solutions to develop that we've never quite had the bandwidth to do that and go into these other areas, and we want to remain very focused. What we're seeing with AI and this acceleration in our ability to build product very, very quickly is that all of a sudden, we have a way in a scalable way, not just one-off things that we then can't scale to build solutions that extend beyond transit. And we are hearing from our customers in many conversations that in addition to transit, they're saying to us, if you could do what you did for us in transit in the way we -- I mean, I'll just throw out a couple of examples, the way that we process small business applications, how we deal with sanitation, that would be transformational. And no one else is really doing that for us and no one understands these needs. These are conversations anywhere from mayors to city managers, city council members, but all the way down to staff. And so we've seen these opportunities. I think what's unique about this period is that we have the ability to go after them in a way that I think can be very successful and scalable. And so that's what we're trying to do. Operator: Your next question comes from Scott Berg with Needham & Company. Scott Berg: Congrats on a really nice quarter. I wanted to focus on the gross retention metric at 98% that you said was your best ever, certainly would be one of the best in my coverage universe today. But did you do anything different in 2025 to help power those results? And how do we think about your assumptions around gross retention into your '26 guidance? Clara Fain: Thanks, Scott. Thanks for the question. We've been executing at very high levels of gross revenue retention forever. So part of it is the mission criticality of the platform. But I think this quarter, we reached a record high gross revenue retention, particularly because our customers are benefiting from the entire platform. So as we sell more products to our customers, we are seeing an increasing gross revenue retention with these customers, and it just increases the strength of the platform. So as we think about why we're getting to these levels of retention, I think it definitely comes back to the ubiquity of the platform and our ability to sell more products to these customers and having them benefit from them as we continue to scale. Operator: This concludes the question-and-answer session and we will conclude today's conference call. Thank you for joining. You may now disconnect.
Operator: Hello, everyone, and welcome to YPF Fourth Quarter 2025 and Full Year 2025 Earnings Webcast Presentation. Please note that this call is being recorded. [Operator Instructions] I'd now like to hand the call over to Margarita Chun, YPF's IR Manager. Please go ahead. Margarita Chun: Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. This is Margarita Chun, YPF's IR Manager. Thank you for joining us today in our full year and fourth quarter 2025 earnings call. Before we begin, please consider our cautionary statement on Slide 2. Our remarks today and answers to your questions may include forward-looking statements. which are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to be materially different from the expectations contemplated by these remarks. Our financial figures are stated in accordance with IFRS, but during the presentation, we might discuss some non-IFRS measures such as adjusted EBITDA. Today's presentation will be conducted by our Chairman and CEO, Mr. Horacio Marin; our Finance VP, Mr. Pedro Kearney; and our Strategy, New Businesses and Controlling VP, Mr. Maximiliano Westen. During the presentation, we will go through the main aspects and events that shape the annual and Q4 results as well as our updated guidance for 2026. And finally, we will open the floor for Q&A session together with our management team. I will now turn the call over to Horacio. Please go ahead. Horacio Marin: Thank you, Margarita, and good morning. I would like to begin by highlighting that 2025 was a transformational and landmark year for the company. First, we delivered exceptional operating performance, consistently beating our own records across all business segments. Second, we almost completed our exit program from mature fields and secure Tier 1 shale blocks in Vaca Muerta. Third, we have taken significant steps forward in the development of the LNG project. Now, let me translate all these milestones into numbers. During 2025, despite the volatile price environment, we achieved a record-high EBITDA of $5 billion. This is the highest EBITDA in the last 10 years and stands as the third largest in the company history, underscoring our resilience and operational discipline despite the 15% contraction in Brent prices. This outstanding outcome was driven by record shale oil production, growing by 42% in December 2025 on an interannual basis. We produced 204,000 barrels per day, exceeding by far the target of 190,000 barrels per day set at the beginning of the year. Progress on the VMOS project was also remarkable, with completion stage above 50% and the first oil delivery anticipated by early 2027. Moreover, the strategic combination of shale oil ramp-up and exit from mature fields allowed us to reduce by 44% our lifting costs in Q4 2025 compared to last year. Including the recent conventional divestment, such as Manantiales Behr and Tierra del Fuego blocks, our lifting cost would have been below $8 per BOE. This consolidate a structural cost reduction, bringing us closer to becoming a pure share player. In 2025, our Vaca Muerta shale reserves significantly expanded by 32%. It now accounts for 88% of our total peak oil reserves, and we increased the reserve replacement ratio to 3.2x and the reserve life to 9 years. Moreover, when looking the full potential of our shale acreage in the long term, including the recent M&A transaction, YPF holds a total well inventory in Vaca Muerta of 16,500 at a 100 stake and 10,300 at ownership. In parallel, we achieved a strong operational efficiency in our midstream and downstream segments. We reached a record-high refinery utilization rate of almost 100% in Q4, growing by 10% internally. This excellence, together with higher efficiency through disciplined cost management and proactive pricing policy, resulted in outstanding adjusted EBITDA margin of $22.6 per barrel. Furthermore, 2025 was a highly active year for YPF with respect to M&A. We executed a significant acquisition, securing 3 world-class blocks in Vaca Muerta, Sierra Chata, La Escalonada, and Rinco de la Ceniza. More recently, in early 2026, we further reinforced our portfolio by swapping assets with Pluspetrol to fully own 3 wet gas block, key for the Argentina LNG project. We also acquired part of Equinor asset in Vaca Muerta in partnership with Vista Energy. For YPF, Vista Energy represent far more than a strategic partner. It's a trusted ally with a shared determination to accelerate Vaca Muerta development. At the same time, we enhanced our portfolio efficiency through targeted investments, including our 50% stake in Profertil and the conventional Manantiales Behr field. These transactions are expected to generate nearly $1 billion in proceeds, for which around $750 million will be collected during December 2025 and 2026. This, in that sense, it fortifies our balance sheet and provides financial flexibility to focus on our core growth business. Turning to Argentina LNG project, I'm proud to highlight the strong commitment of our international founding partners, ENI and XRG. Together with YPF, we formalized this month the foundational structure of the project. Our fully integrated project is supported by one of the most competitive LNG breakeven prices worldwide, positioning YPF as a future leadership in the global LNG market. Finally, in terms of financing during 2025, we successfully raised $3.7 billion of new funding. This proves the company ability to secure multiple financing sources to comply our ambition plan. The company closed the year with a net leverage ratio of 1.9x. All of these outstanding metrics demonstrate the successful execution of our 4x4 Plan. We are committed to becoming a leading shale integrating company and a significant shale exporter in the coming years. Let me walk through the main aspects of a full year and Q4 2025 financial results. Annual revenues totalized $18.4 billion, reflecting a modest decline of 4% compared to the previous year. This was primarily driven by a significant 15% contraction in Brent. This impact was largely mitigated by higher shale production and record-high processing levels. Similarly, Q4 revenues followed the same trend, decreasing 4% year-on-year, while Brent dropped by 15% in the same period. adjusted EBITDA increased by 8% in 2025, with EBITDA margin growing from 24% in 2024 to 27% in 2025. A clear evidence of our ability to drive value in a lower pricing environment. Q4 was outstanding as adjusted EBITDA was nearly $1.3 billion, reaching an impressive 53% internal growth. This remarkable achievement was due to the outstanding performance of our shale operation, which contribute over 70% of our total production mix, coupled with successful execution of our exit program from conventional mature field. As a result, we achieved a substantial reduction in our total upstream lifting costs. Moreover, our midstream and downstream segment also delivered record-breaking operational results, further reinforcing the strength of integration of our business model. A key factor behind this achievement has been the technological transformation that the company started in 2025. To achieve exceptional results, we must change traditional way of working. In that sense, since December 2024, we now rated 7 real-time intelligence centers to provide 24/7 support of both the upstream and downstream operations. Integrating AI with expertise of our technical team, this center optimize decision-making in upstream, refining, and commercial processes. These impressive operational and financial results were achieved through the disciplined execution of our $4.5 billion investment plan, of which approximately 75% was strategically allocated to unconventional operations. In that regard, let me point out that CapEx for 2025 ended around 10% below our original estimate, mostly driven by further operational improvements and lower costs in dollar terms. Finally, we achieved a strong financial performance in Q4, with free cash flow returning to positive territory at $261 million. This improvement was primarily driven by the partial proceeds from the sale of our 50% stake in Profiltein, collecting $200 million, complemented by our solid operational performance. As a result, our net leverage ratio improved to 1.9x, down from 2.1x record in Q3. Finally, I would like to reconfirm that the safety of our workers is our top priority in the development of the activities of the company. During 2025, we delivered substantial progress in our safety indicator, we achieved a frequency rate of 0.09 accidents per million hours worked. This was driven by our integrated safety culture model, along with preventive action, training, and risk control activities. Let me mention that YPF upholds world-class safety standard across all the operations. In the upstream segment, by the end of 2025, YPF record a lost time injury rate of 0.15 per million hours worked, significantly lower than the international benchmark of 0.24 in 2024, as reported by the International Association of Oil and Gas Producers. In the downstream segment, YPF record an exceptional lost time injury rate of 0.06 per million hours worked in 2025, positioning us among the top performers in Solomon's refinery benchmark. I would like to extend my sincere appreciation to all our employees for their strong commitment and steady dedication. We reaffirm our strong commitment to continue improving our safety standards. Now turn the call to Pedro to analyze in detail our 2025 financial results. Pedro Kearney: Thank you, Horacio, and good morning to you all. Now, let me walk through the primary drivers behind the changes in our EBITDA, liquidity position, and free cash flow in 2025 compared to last year. In 2025, adjusted EBITDA increased by $356 million. This achievement was driven by the strategic shift in our production and cost matrix in the upstream business, enhanced by further operational efficiencies, collectively contributing around $900 million. Additionally, records in our refinery protection levels, strict cost discipline, and higher refining crack spreads in our midstream and downstream business contributed to an additional $220 million to our EBITDA growth. At 2024 international price levels, our pro forma adjusted EBITDA would have reached approximately $5.8 billion. The market pricing environment in 2025 shift downwards. The 15% decline reflected in Brent prices resulted in a negative impact of around $800 million, pushing our 2025 adjusted EBITDA to $5 billion. Switching to cash flow, we reported, as expected, a negative free cash flow of $1.8 billion in 2025, primarily due to exceptional and non-recurring effects. This included approximately $550 million related to the acquisition of premier Tier 1 acreage in Vaca Muerta, net of partial proceeds from the divestment of non-core assets, roughly $530 million in one-off exit costs from mature fields, and approximately $160 million in contributions to the infrastructure projects Vaca Muerta Sur, Southern Energy LNG and Oldelval Duplicar, as well as prepayments of dollarized costs for 2026 as part of our proactive hedging strategy. Adjusting for these extraordinary items, free cash flow for the year would have been negative $500 million, largely explained by the negative EBITDA of about $350 million from conventional mature fields, most of which, although formerly part of YPF's asset portfolio, were strategically exited during the year. From a financing perspective, 2025 was a strong year for the company, as we fully met our financial plan by raising $3.7 billion, one of the largest debt financing secured in recent years. This goal was possible through a combination of cross-border trade-related loans and highly competitive issuances in both local and international capital markets at very attractive financing costs. In the international capital markets, we demonstrated our strong market access and credibility by raising $1.6 billion. Early in the year, we issued $1.1 billion through the 2034 bond. In October, we re-tapped our 2031 bond, adding $500 million. More recently, just last month, we re-tapped our 2034 bond, adding $550 million at a yield of 8.1%, the lowest rate secured by the company in international capital markets in the last 9 years. These proceeds were strategically allocated to prepaid at $325 million for the AB loan with CAF, originally executed in 2023, and to fund the partial acquisition of Equinor assets from Vista Energy. On the local capital market front, during 2025, we issued a total of 10 series of local bonds amounting to $1.4 billion, with an average tenure of 2 and a half years and a highly attractive average interest rate of 6.5%. The depth and quality of these issuances underscore the strong demand for YPF securities in the domestic market. Regarding financial and trade-related loans from relationship banks, I would like to highlight the $700 million export-backed loan closed in the fourth quarter. This transaction marked the successful reopening of the syndicated corporate cross-border loan market in Argentina. As of today, we have disbursed only $50 million from this facility, leaving a substantial undrawn commitment of $650 million available before April 2026. Looking ahead to 2026, the company faces maturities totaling approximately $2.1 billion, primarily comprised of $1 billion in local bonds, around $300 million in international bond amortizations, and the remaining in trade-related and financial loans amortizations. Thanks to our robust financial position, supported by diversified funding sources and nearly fully available bank credit lines, YPF is exceptionally well-prepared to meet its debt obligations over the next 12 months. From a liquidity standpoint, by year-end, our cash and short-term investment totaled roughly $1.2 billion. The positive free cash flow of the fourth quarter, combined with increased EBITDA, allow us to close in 2025 with a net leverage ratio of 1.9x. I am now turning to Max to go through some details of our operational performance. Maximiliano Westen: Thank you, Pedro, and good morning to everyone. Let me start by taking a closer look at our upstream performance. During 2025, we achieved sound production growth of 35% in our shale oil output, delivering 165,000 barrels per day. This impressive expansion accelerated in the fourth quarter, with shale oil output averaging 196,000 barrels per day. By December, we surpassed a major milestone, producing over 200,000 barrels per day and exceeding our year-end target by roughly 7%. The outstanding performance of our shale operations more than offset the anticipated decline in conventional oil production, which averaged 90,000 barrels per day in 2025, dropping 32% compared to 2024. The reduction was even more pronounced in the fourth quarter, averaging 68,000 barrels per day, excluding the recently divested assets, primarily the Tierra del Fuego and Manantiales Behr blocks, our pro forma conventional production would have averaged around 35,000 barrels per day by December. Consequently, the combined strategy of divesting conventional fields and scaling up our sale operations, generating significant savings in our average lifting costs, declining 26% to $11.6 per BOE in 2025. During the fourth quarter, lifting costs dropped 44% inter annually to $9.6 per BOE. On a pro forma basis, excluding the recently divested conventional assets, our lifting cost would have been below $8 per BOE. Swimming into our shale oil hub blocks, we maintained best-in-class costs at $4.4 per BOE, virtually unchanged from last year, driven, among other factors, by the implementation of the real-time intelligence center in Neuquen. Turning to natural gas, production averaged 36.2 million cubic meters per day in 2025, reflecting a modest 3% decline versus 2024. This was mainly due to our strategic exit from mature fields, partially offset by a strong 14% increase in shale gas production in 2025. As expected, the fourth quarter was lower sequentially, influenced by seasonality and the continued progress of our divestment strategy. I would like to expand my comments on YPF's leading position in Vaca Muerta by presenting a benchmark analysis conducted by Rystad Energy, a renowned consulting firm specialized in the energy sector. In 2025, YPF's 4 oil blocks in Vaca Muerta delivered the most efficient lifting costs among the leading operators within this shale formation, reaching $4.4 per BOE. Vaca Muerta's total average lifting cost was $5.9 per BOE, and excluding YPF, would have amounted to $6 per BOE. YPF's lifting cost is lower than the Permian Basin, which averaged $4.9 per BOE. This remarkable efficiency underscores 3 key points. First, although still in early stage of development, Vaca Muerta demonstrates exceptional productivity, closing the gap with operational metrics observed in Permian. Second, the YPF asset premium, world-class quality. And third, the efficiency program implemented by YPF in recent years that allowed the company to further reduce its operating costs. Moreover, it is worth highlighting the outstanding quality of Vaca Muerta's source rock, a geological advantage that positions the play among the most competitive and conventional resources globally. The shale oil EUR levels in Vaca Muerta, at its current stage of development, more than double the average of the shale play in the U.S., accumulating roughly 1 million barrels. YPF's shale oil core hub, including La Angostura Sur block, averages a EUR between 1.2 million and 1.5 million barrels. This indicates, first, that Vaca Muerta is a world-class asset with a unique potential that could translate into further competitiveness towards full-scale development. Second, that YPF holds the best acreage within Vaca Muerta with the highest productivity. Regarding well cost, YPF also stands as the most efficient player on the basin, roughly 10% below Vaca Muerta's average. Moreover, YPF achieved the fastest drilling speed in Vaca Muerta. Since 2021, YPF's growth in this area has significantly outperformed its peers. Let me add that last October, YPF reached a record of 540 meters per day in Barril Grande block, adjacent to La Angostura Sur. The well was drilled in 11 days with a lateral length exceeding 3,000 meters. Finally, it is worth noting that even at its current stage, Vaca Muerta's breakeven price remains highly competitive, slightly above Permian's. YPF holds Tier 1 assets that are as competitive as Permian fields, featuring similar breakeven price of approximately $40 per barrel, when assuming 10% cost of capital. This is because YPF's higher well costs are effectively offset by superior productivity and lower lifting costs. Zooming into our hydrocarbon reserves, total P1 reserves under the SEC criteria grew by 17% in 2025. This expansion was mainly driven by a substantial 32% expansion in our Vaca Muerta shale reserves, which now represent 88% of our total proved reserves, partially offset by our divestment program from conventional reserves. In 2025, proved reserve additions totaled 467 million BOE, largely supported by the continuous expansions, discoveries, and improved recovery of our unconventional operations, particularly in La Angostura Sur, La Amarga Chica, Bandurria Sur, and La Calera blocks. These additions were partially offset by higher total hydrocarbon production of 192 million BOEs, downward revision of 58 million BOEs. mainly due to the changes in project strategy and drilling schedules, as well as 29 million BOE reduction explained by M&A transactions. It is worth highlighting that P1 developed reserves increased by 4% in 2025, driven mainly by development activities, new extensions, and discoveries mentioned exceeding annual production levels. Meanwhile, proved undeveloped reserves grew by 34% as new additions offset the volumes developed in the drilling of new wells. Giving the strong ramp-up in shale hydrocarbon production in 2025 and the continued development of our shale reserves, the reserve replacement ratio increased to 3.2x with a reserve life of 9 years. For total P1 reserves, the ratio stood at 2x with a reserve life of 6.7 years. Notably, when excluding conventional assets under our divestment program, the pro forma ratio for our total P1 reserves improved to 2.7x with our reserves life of 8 years. Now, let me share the progress achieved in the exit program from conventional mature fields. To date, 45 blocks out of 48 involved in the Phase 1 of Andes Program have been completed. This considers the reversion of 18 blocks to the provinces in total, including the agreement for 7 blocks with the province of Tierra del Fuego, completed in January this year. Regarding the 16 blocks under phase two of Andes Program, this year, we signed the sale of Manantiales Behr, which we will discuss in more detail later, in 2 blocks in the Malargue cluster. We expect to complete the divestment of the remaining blocks throughout the year. Now, I would like to present an overview on the main M&A transactions executed during 2025 and expected activity for 2026. In 2025, the company completed a series of significant acquisitions, securing 3 world-class blocks for a combined investment of roughly $850 million. Additionally, we acquired the remaining 50% stake in Refinor, among other minor transactions, optimizing fuel supply logistics in the north end of the country. In terms of asset sales in 2025, we also made progress, selling 49% stake in Aguada del Chanar Block and divesting conventional mature fields in YPF Brazil, among other minor transactions. Moving to 2026, let me start highlighting two key acquisitions that we have recently executed to reinforce our leading position in Vaca Muerta. First, in January 2026, we signed a non-cash asset swap agreement with Pluspetrol in Vaca Muerta. YPF transferred to Pluspetrol a 20% stake out of its 45% working interest in two recently acquired blocks from TotalEnergies, La Escalonada and Rincón de la Ceniza. In exchange, Pluspetrol transferred to YPF a 50% stake in three strategic wet gas blocks, key for the development of Argentina LNG project: Meseta Buena Esperanza, Aguada Villanueva, and Las Tacanas. Second, early this month, we acquired a portion of Equinor's assets in Vaca Muerta, increasing our existing ownership in three blocks for nearly $170 million. We added 4.9% stake in Bandurria Sur, one of our core hub blocks, resulting in a total participation of nearly 45%. We added 15% stake in both Bajo del Toro and Bajo del Toro Norte blocks, elevating our working interest in each to 65%. In terms of sales of assets, it is worth mentioning two other relevant transactions executed in the last months. First, last December, we successfully completed the sale of our 50% stake in Profertil for $635 million with attractive valuation. Second, last week, we executed the sale of Manantiales Behr conventional field, the first performing block under the Andes 2 Program, for approximately $410 million and an earn-out of $40 million. Looking ahead, YPF has publicly announced its plan to divest its 70% interest in Metrogas. This transaction is expected to generate significant proceeds during 2026, strengthening YPF's balance sheet and providing the flexibility to advance with our core growth strategy. Now, let me share the progress achieved in terms of operational excellence and technological innovation across our upstream and downstream segments. In the upstream business, particularly within our shale operations during 2025, drilling speed averaged 324 meters per day, while fracking speed averaged 262 stages per set per month, reflecting consecutive record-setting performances. Last January, we further improved those metrics by reaching 378 meters per day and 282 stages per set per month in drilling and fracking speeds, respectively. And if we compare against January 2023, we recorded an incredible growth of 66% and 61%. In addition, on the back of the continuous operational performance, during 2025, we managed to expand our activity efficiently by increasing 26% the oil wells tied in, reaching 250 oil wells on a growth basis, most of them operated by YPF. In the downstream business in 2025, the efficiency program was at the forefront of our decisions and allowed us to reach outstanding results. We inaugurated five real-time intelligence centers to provide operational support 24/7, highlighting the last real-time operations room inaugurated in December in La Plata Refinery, which serves as an integrated central hub for detecting operational deviations, replacing the previous model that monitors each industrial unit independently. In the fourth quarter of 2025, La Plata Refinery was awarded as the Refinery of the Year in Latin America. This is the first time that our refinery won an international award in its 100-year anniversary. The industrial complex also achieved the first quartile performance in multiple Solomon benchmarking KPIs. As a result, in the fourth quarter 2025, we reached record-high processing levels that resulted in a surplus of gasoline and mid-distillates production, enabling YPF to export refined products to neighboring countries and substitute imports. Turning to our midstream and downstream performance in 2025, our processing levels averaged 320,000 barrels per day, marking a 6% internal growth with a strong refinery utilization rate of 95%. In the fourth quarter, as just mentioned, we set a new 15-year record by processing 335,000 barrels per day, achieving a utilization rate of 99%. Last month, we beat our own record again, reaching 352,000 barrels per day, representing a utilization rate of 104%. Turning to domestic sales of gasoline and diesel, dispatch volumes remained robust throughout the year and the fourth quarter, growing internally 3% and 5% respectively, driven by increased demand across all commercial segments. We remained a solid 56% market share, consistent with our historic leadership in the sector, which increases up to 60% when including gasoline and diesel produced by YPF and dispatched through third-party gas stations. In terms of prices, during 2025, local fuel prices remained broadly aligned with international prices, with an average annual discount of only 3%. Moreover, last month, our local fuel prices stood 1% above import parities. Lastly, our midstream and downstream adjusted EBITDA margin remained strong at $17.2 per barrel in 2025. Notably, during the fourth quarter, our margin jumped to $22.6 per barrel on the back of our record processing levels, coupled with higher diesel crack spreads and lower costs. I am now turning back to Horacio for Argentina LNG 2026 guidance and final remarks. Horacio Marin: Thank you, Max. Before we move on to our 2026 guidance, I would like to share updates on the Argentina LNG project. The first phase, known as the Southern Energy or SESA Tolling phase, where YPF holds an equity stake of 25%, aims a total LNG capacity of around 6 million tons per year. In 2025, the project secured FID for the 20-year available charter agreement, covering two floating LNG and will require the construction of a 100% dedicated gas pipeline. Total CapEx will be around $2 billion. It will be partially financed through a project finance structure similar to VMOS financing. Regarding procurement status, main packages for the onshore and offshore infrastructure have already been awarded. The project is expected to start operating between 2027 and 2028. The Argentina LNG phase consider development, design, construction, and operation on a fully integrated LNG condensate and NGL project. It focuses on [ Wenca ] gas block of Vaca Muerta. The infrastructure involved includes a liquefaction capacity of 12 million tons per year through two floating LNG and dedicated gas pipeline. It also consider a dedicated oil pipeline for condensate, wide-grade pipeline for NGLs, and onshore facilities, including fractionation, storage, and port facility. Once operational, the project cash flow will be anchored by long-term offtake agreement with investment-grade counterparties, including the sponsors of the project. The foundational sponsor of the project are YPF, ENI and XRG, an energy investment platform wholly owned by ADNOC. The partnership structure was formalized this month through the signing of a joint development agreement by the three parties. The CapEx of the project, excluding the upstream investment, is estimated to be around $20 billion, including the financial costs. Project leverage is expected to be around 70% of the total cost, consistent with precedent LNG transaction. The project is intended to be financed through non-recourse financing with multiple sources of funding, including ECAs, development banks, and commercial banks as potential anchors. The FID is targeted for 2026. Commercial operation for the first floating LNG unit is expected by 2030, and the second unit by 2031. During 2026, we evaluate the possibility to expand the project for an additional capacity of 7 million tons per year through a third floating LNG vessel, which FID will take place in 2027 or 2028 and COD by 2032. Finally, let me highlight that Argentina LNG holds one of the lowest breakeven price among the leading pre-FID projects globally, as reported by Rystad Energy. This advantage is reinforced by the efficient monetization of natural gas, condensate, and NGLs. In summary, Argentina LNG emerges as a reliable, robust, and flexible alternative worldwide, with all the ingredients to succeed: strong business rationale, coupled with outstanding economics, and a strong support for multiple stakeholders, including the sponsors and the off takers. Finally, I would like to share our updated 2026 outlook. Let's start by addressing our shale oil production plan. For this year, we are targeting production of roughly 215,000 barrels per day, consistent with what we announced in our last Investor Day. This represent more than double 2023 output. Moreover, our year exit rate is expected to be around 250,000 barrels of shale oil per day. In terms of adjusted EBITDA, we estimate a range of $5.8 billion and $6.2 billion based on an average Brent of $63 per barrel. This substantial increase, achieved despite declining international prices, is driven by our strategic shift in the production mix of our upstream operation and continuing efficiency program across the company. We continue to focus on our most profitable shale oil assets while successfully disposing large scale of conventional fields. Compared to 2023, this reflect an increase between 40% and 50%, reaching record high adjusted EBITDA since the beginning of YPF. Switching to our CapEx 2026, we plan to invest between $5.5 billion and $5.8 billion, consistent with our strategy plan disclosed during the Investor Day. Nearly 70% of these funds will be allocated in our shale operation. Regarding the free cash flow, we estimate a neutral to slightly negative position for 2026, as our increased estimated EBITDA and significant proceeds from the M&A transaction previously described will be offset by our CapEx plan, tax payment, and equity contribution to infrastructure projects. As a result, our net levered ratio will push down to the range of 1.6 and 1.7x, below the net levered ratio of 1.9x record as of December of 2025. Before turning to the Q&A section, I would like to once again tell you that I am especially proud to be working in YPF, and all of YPF employee of their commitment and their effort, without whom the remarkable results achieved in 2025 would have been not possible. We are very focused in transforming YPF as one of the best energy companies worldwide, and we continue driving our 4x4 Plan during 2026 with even more passion and conviction. With this, we'll conclude our presentation and open for floor questions. Operator: [Operator Instructions] Your first question comes from the line of Daniel Guardiola of BTG. Daniel Guardiola: I have a couple of questions from my end. One is on production. I saw you just shared a very impressive exit rate for 2026 of 250,000 for shale oil. I wanted to know if you could please provide us with the expected quarterly pace behind these targets, and perhaps more importantly, what are the key operational or infrastructure bottlenecks that could prevent you from achieving these exit rates? That would be my first question on production. My second question is on well productivity. I wanted to know if you can share with us how many years of Tier 1 drilling inventory you guys have at the current development pace that you have? Once you eventually transition or migrate into Q2 acreage, what would be the expected impact on EURs, IP30s, and eventually on IRR? Those would be my two questions. Horacio Marin: This is Horacio. Thank you very much for the questions. The first one about the production. You have to expect during the half of the year that we'll be delivering between 200,000 and 210,000 barrels a day. Not a big increase at all. Why that? Because of the evacuation. That's why YPF was one of the pusher of VMOS, because we need more evacuation for deliver more production. Also, we have a very good numbers in the new ones, in the last, what is La Angostura Sur, and the plant will be finished by the middle of the year. After that, you will see an incremental, a big incremental that we see this year, and we are going to have, at the end, the 250,000 barrels per day. And next year, you will see more incremental, we are talking next year about that, okay? The second one about the merchant acquisition, I have no know if I'm going to answer your question word by word. Well productivity. Okay, the well productivity, if you see in the presentation, we take data from Rystad that compare the benchmark between all the Argentine companies, we see the well productivity for Argentina, the number one in almost all the benchmark is YPF. If you want to see there, you can see their numbers. In the drilling part, you will see that our cost from them is $4,000 per meter. We are very close, our number. What you don't have there, and you will see now, is that we make a very, I would say, very good bidding process, very pushing with the big, big numbers for the international oil service company. We wait after the bidding, or we finish in December, we have reducing unit cost by more than 20% for those tools. During this year, you will see in the first quarter, we have to see reduction in our CapEx per well. Operator: Your next question comes from the line of Bruno Montanari from Morgan Stanley. Bruno Montanari: I have a few questions on my end. First, on the free cash flow generation, can you help us understand, the profile of cash flows throughout the quarters? I'm trying to get a sense of, if there is any concentration, on CapEx or the contributions with Argentina LNG, that could, perhaps make a more concentration of cash burn in any particular quarter, or if there is any particular quarter where there could be positive free cash generation because of the collections from the divestments? That's the first question. The second question, quick one. On your free cash flow outlook for the year, do you consider the sale of Metrogas or only the transactions that are already closed? If I could add a third one, can you comment on what your current drilling completion cost is for the shale hub? Horacio Marin: Thank you, Bruno, for your question. Number 3, I think I just answered before, okay? I pass there, okay. With number -- with the -- you talk about the LNG. The LNG, we've no big investment this year. We are focused this year for the FID of the 12 million ton per year. I mean, it's not the material for any of the companies this year. It's, you don't have to expect a big investment in LNG for 2026. Regarding CapEx, and you say any contribution, I think it will be, we are going to increase. At the end of the year, we have to increase to between 4 to 5 rigs. In the second part of the year, you will see more CapEx. That's why we see that our guidance for this year is more CapEx than previous this year, even though we are increasing a lot our efficiency in all aspects of the company. Regarding what you want to see -- the other you say about Metrogas, yes, we are now in the strip. We are in the finishing with the government that we will get the extension. After the extension, that is very near. I don't know, it's in a month or so. You will see that we are going to sell this year Metrogas. You ask also about how we get the cash flow positive, so I pass to Pedro, that he has all the figures in his mind, okay? Pedro, your turn. Pedro Kearney: Bruno. Just to put this annual free cash flow position for 2026, let me highlight, assuming that we are going to get an annual EBITDA of $6 billion. Assuming -- can you hear me correctly? Bruno Montanari: Yes. Yes, that's good. Pedro Kearney: Okay, great. How are the math behind this neutral to slightly negative free cash flow position that we are forecasting for 2026? Assuming an EBITDA of approximately $6 billion, a CapEx of $5.7 billion, then interest payment of approximately $800 million, taxes of approximately $200 million, and the contributions to the infrastructure project, as you mentioned, should range on a $300 million, including VMOS, SESA, and a potential also expansion on the other system. That puts you -- and adding some extra costs from material fields and working capital, that puts you in a negative free cash flow position of between $1.2 billion to $1 billion. That will be offset by the collections from the M&A. I'm talking about the whole year, the M&A activity that we started at the beginning of the year, and we expect to continue along the year with the Metrogas sale, as Horacio mentioned. That puts you in a neutral free cash flow position, assuming that the remaining M&A activity, in particular the Metrogas sale, will take place during the year. Operator: Question comes from the line of Guilherme Martins of Goldman Sachs. Guilherme Costa Martins: I have a couple of ones from my side. The first one is on the ongoing investment of conventional assets under this project, right? I understand the company plans to be 100% exposed to shale oil. Could you please provide an update on when should we see this milestone being achieved? How should we think in terms of evolution of conventional production for the next two quarters? My second question is regarding lifting costs. I understand there was some non-recurring events in 4Q, some maintenance in shale that impacted the number for the quarter. How should we think in terms of evolution of lifting costs for the next two quarters as well? Horacio Marin: First question, I didn't understand the question. That's why let me ask in Spanish. [Foreign Language] Okay, okay. I would say personal goal. My personal goal is at the end of the year, not to have any production of conventionals, okay? But, so far, we have very few. We have only in Mendoza, but also we are looking to try to get out very quickly. We have only gas in the north of Argentina, that is not operating part of that, and it's always positive cash out there. That is not marginal, but we want to be pure shale company. Now you will see that it will be during this year, the lifting cost is going down, not only because we are out of conventional, but also because we are improving the production of shale, and also because we are focused a lot in productivity. We think that we will have, at the end of the year, in order of total cost of YPF in order of $7 per barrel. I don't know if it's okay what I answer for your question? Are you seeing that I need to go further? Guilherme Costa Martins: No, thanks so much. Operator: Your next question comes from the line of Andres Cardona of Citigroup. Andres Cardona: I have a couple of questions. The first one is in the reserves report. If you could help us to understand how many drilling locations are certified there, if you could put in the context of the total drilling inventory that the company has. The second one is, the review now includes upstream on the benefits. How does this change your, like, desire to develop projects that maybe were on hold because of the economy? This is a matter of the CapEx capacity that you may need to keep those projects on hold for the need to long-term development. Horacio Marin: Okay. First question. In the presentation, you saw [ 16,300 ] location. That is gross, and it's 10, it's gross, and it's 10,000, the net. The one that you have in the reserve, would be the official in for the SEC, is 5% of the location that you already mentioned. We have plenty of reserves. Now are no reserves for the SEC, for the rule, because it's a rule, not the physical way of calculating the reserve. You will see year by year, that as we are developing, that the P1 is, might be increasing a lot comparing with any company because we have a portfolio that is very huge for Vaca Muerta. In the part of RIGI, from my point of view, I think it's a very, very good decision as a government for all the industry, that it will help for sure to develop the full Vaca Muerta for all the industry. We think that it's a positive decision, and we are analyzing, and we are now because of the RIGI, we are looking at how to develop all Vaca Muerta for YPF in the best way for making value for shareholders. That is the reason why next year in April, we are going to go to New York to explain the full development of YPF from 2026 forward. Okay? Operator: Our next question comes from the line of Nicolas Barros of Bank of America. Nicolas Barros: So just one question here from our side, on your LNG project, right? Given the recent news flow, what are your expectations on bringing a new partner to join the project? Horacio Marin: Now, you know that we have a binding signature between our founder partners, that what they are is ENI, XRG from -- and from the subsidy from ADNOC and YPF. We are analyzing the interest of a 4 partner in this moment, but it's not like it's necessary, the 4 partner, to develop the project. With the 3, we can develop all the projects for the 12 million tons per year size. Okay? That is the answer. Operator: Your next question comes from the line of George Gasztowtt of Latin Securities. George Gasztowtt: I was wondering on the refining side, how you're seeing the refining margin coming so far this year after an impressive quarter. I know that local prices at the pump and global fuel prices have remained attractive, but obviously, Brent has firmed up towards the sort of latter half of the quarter. Are you seeing your cracks hold or starting to compress? Horacio Marin: We have an excellent price policy that we are following, I don't know, it's all around the world also, that we can see all the price of any pump of any gas station in real time. If the spread change, okay, if they reduce, I have to reduce the price. If they increase, I have to increase. If the price of oil go up, I have to go up. If they go down, I have to go down. That is how we manage the price in YPF. The second one is with RIGI attention? George Gasztowtt: No. That's it. Operator: The next question comes from the line of Matias Cattaruzzi of Adcap Securities. Matias Cattaruzzi: First, can you break down the upcoming LNG and infrastructure commitments for 2027 and '28? And then I have another question about sensitivities. But if you want to reply first..... Horacio Marin: Another question or not? On the second question. Matias Cattaruzzi: Okay, the second question is, with Brent at $70 per barrel and fair break-evens at $45, for YPF, what would be the elasticity going forward? Do we take into account the investor day that YPF did? If the production plan can change if these prices maintain over time? Horacio Marin: Okay. The LNG this year, I say, is not material, okay? Really, I prefer to say not material because I have a commitment with all the partners now. I have not to say what is not public, okay? It's not material for any of the 3 companies. For '28, if we get the FID, what is our goal? Our goal during this year, it will be more important, it will be more material, that we will explain in really next year, I don't know, it's April or March in New York. I will explain in detail, very good detail, so there you can get all the numbers, okay? Our goal for all the 3 partners today is to get the FID this year. We have to start after to building all the infrastructure for the LNG to be in 4 years, everything done, okay? The second one, you say the, our break even $45. What is our specific brand? I don't understand what you mean. Matias Cattaruzzi: [indiscernible]. Horacio Marin: Okay, if this break even to $45, we, I think we are going to have another war. There will be no LNG in the life. It would be -- I think it's another war. I don't expect that, but if that happen, this year, why we accelerate going out from the conventional, the more, I would say, more conventional, no, the marginal field, is we prepare for. If the analyst was right that the price was going to be down this year, we prepare not to have problem for the CapEx for this year, are going up, because after this couple of years, YPF will be so strong that you will see in the future. But if Go to $45, for sure, even our pre-break-even price is $45 this year, we have no problem. For next year, we have to change because, even though we are profitable, we don't have the capital unless you give the capital for us. For sure, we will change. Okay? Matias Cattaruzzi: Okay. And if it goes to $70, $75, do you plan on accelerating CapEx or? Horacio Marin: This -- today, this year, no, because we have to finish VMOS, we have to increase the evacuation, okay? As soon as we have the evacuation, if we can accelerate, it's my goal to be as quickly as possible. Remember that I want to be out of YPF in '31. So I have to deliver everything to YPF till '31. That is my goal. Operator: We don't have any further questions. I'd now like to hand the call back to Horacio Marin for final remarks. Horacio Marin: Okay. Thank you very much for all your questions. Thank you very much for all this year to be cooperative and ask questions that are good and challenging for us. I can tell you that I see the figures of the company in more detail than you can see, almost in all the figures, and I see this company is doing very well. Our thing is now the strength of the current YPF is amazing. I will see to make big value for all the shareholders, is our goal for all our team. We are very proud every day working in YPF, delivering our 4x4, and we are very exciting and very proud, all of us, that we are delivering what we say at the beginning of 2024. For you, that they are analysts and for all the investors, that we are going to work very hard to make Argentina exporting more than $30 billion in 2031, and deliver a lot of value for all shareholders of YPF. Thank you very much. Operator: Thank you for attending today's call. You may now disconnect. Goodbye.
Operator: Greetings, and welcome to TeraWulf Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2025 Earnings Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this conference is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to your host, Mr. John Larkin, Senior Vice President, Director of Investor Relations. Thank you. You may begin. John Larkin: Thank you, operator. Good afternoon, and welcome to TeraWulf's Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2025 Earnings Call. Joining me today are Chairman and CEO, Paul Prager; CTO, Nazar Khan; and CFO, Patrick Fleury. Before we begin, please note that our remarks today may include forward-looking statements. These statements are subject to risks and uncertainties, and actual results may differ materially. Words such as anticipate, expect, believe, intend, estimate, project, could, should, will and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. For a discussion of these risks, please refer to our filings with the SEC available at sec.gov and in the Investor Relations section of our website. We will also reference certain non-GAAP financial measures. Reconciliations to the most comparable GAAP measures are available in our earnings release and filings. With that, I'll turn the call over to our Chairman and CEO, Paul Prager. Paul Prager: Thank you, John, and good afternoon, everyone. 2025 was a defining year for TeraWulf. We said we would transition this company into a scaled power-backed AI infrastructure platform, and we did. Our strategy is simple and disciplined, control energy advantaged sites, engineer infrastructure around power and contract long-term credit-backed AI capacity. Everything we did in 2025 supports that strategy. First, we acquired 100% of Beowulf Electricity & Data, eliminating related party complexity and fully integrating power generation expertise into our platform. In today's market, power is the gating factor. If you don't control power, you don't control your destiny. We do. Second, we secured long-duration site control at Cayuga, up to 400 megawatts at a retired coal facility with real grid infrastructure already in place, brownfield, power backed, scalable. That's our model. Third, we signed a 450-megawatt lease with Fluidstack supported by Google's credit. That was a platform-defining deal. It validated our model, our execution capability and ability to contract at scale. With Google's warrants, it will be our largest shareholder. That alignment speaks for itself. Fourth, we replicated the model in Texas through the Abernathy joint venture, proving portability across power markets. And fifth, we executed the WULF Compute and Flash Compute financings. These transactions demonstrated that contracted credit-enhanced AI infrastructure supports scalable and repeatable capital structure. Operationally, we delivered WULF Den and CB1, began recording HPC revenue and have now delivered CB2A for Core42. We are building, delivering and contracting simultaneously. And since year-end, we added approximately 1.5 gigawatts of additional power back capacity in Kentucky and Maryland. Now let's talk about what actually differentiates us, power and execution. The AI build-out is not constrained by GPUs. It is constrained by power, interconnection, transmission and increasingly new generation. That's why Morgantown matters. Morgantown is not just another data center site. It is a former coal generation facility in the Washington, D.C., Northern Virginia corridor, one of the most power-constrained data center markets in the world. Our Phase 1 vision includes approximately 500 megawatts of new dispatchable generation, 250 megawatts of battery storage and 500 megawatts of data center load, followed by a similar Phase 2. Critically, the site is being engineered to operate as a net generator to the state. We are not just consuming capacity. We are adding it in constrained markets that is the only sustainable model at scale. This industry is moving towards integrated bring your own generation campuses. We are well ahead of that curve because we are fundamentally a power company that builds and operates digital infrastructure, not the other way around. We know how to permit generation. We know how to build generation. We know how to operate generation. We understand grid behavior, and we know how to integrate generation, storage and compute in a way that works for customers and regulators. There are very few teams that can do that credibly and at speed. We are premier among them. Turning to Kentucky. Demand is extremely strong. We are engaged with every major hyperscaler and several large AI compute platforms. A data room is open, diligence is active. Conversations are robust and substantive. This week, we met directly with Governor, Beshear and state leadership. The alignment at the state and local level is clear and constructive. Kentucky understands the economic and strategic import of power backed AI infrastructure. This is 480 megawatts, a campus with immediate power availability, expansion potential and strong state support. We are excited and highly confident in the long-term value of this asset. While we execute on the platform, we are consistently evaluating a constant pipeline of additional opportunities. We review hundreds of sites and most do not meet our standards. We are disciplined around 4 key elements; power control and durability, scalability in 250 to 500-megawatt phases, signed credit-backed contracts, we do not speculate. And fourth, capital efficiency. We turn sites away all the time. But when we do find one that meets these criteria, we move decisively. Importantly, we already control the sites necessary to deliver our targeted 250 to 500 megawatts of contracted capacity annually through the end of the decade. The runway is in place. Growth from here is execution. Finally, we are building the team to match the ambition of the platform. We recently added a senior data center construction lead for Meta and have strengthened origination, project management, commissioning and cybersecurity capabilities. This business is one in the trenches of engineering detail, construction discipline and operational rigor. We are staffed accordingly. So in summary, the strategy is clear. The sites are secured. The capital is in place. Customer demand is strong. The team is built. Now it is about disciplined delivery, turning contracted megawatts into energized capacity and durable recurring cash flow. With that, I'll turn it over to Nazar. Nazar Khan: Thank you, Paul. Let me start with delivery and risk compression. WULF Den and CB1 were delivered in the third quarter and generated revenue throughout the fourth quarter. CB2A is operational and CB2B is expected to be fully online in March. By the end of the first quarter, all Core42 capacity will be energized and revenue producing. Following contract execution, Core42 requested incremental fit-out enhancements. We adjusted sequencing accordingly. The monthly recurring charge was revised, no penalties were triggered and revenue commencement remains aligned with the customer's deployment schedule. Turning to the Fluidstack buildings. CB3 is expected to deliver in mid-May. After signing, the tenant finalized certain design optimizations, which we incorporated without changing building footprint or lease economics. The associated revenue timing impact has been incorporated into the financial model. Importantly, CB4 and CB5 were designed collaboratively with the tenant from inception. These buildings reflect a fully standardized, repeatable design and represent the majority of contracted WULF compute capacity. Several structural improvements materially reduce execution risk. First, electrical redundancy has been optimized and standardized. Second, trade stacking and sequencing have been refined to minimize rework. Third, long lead equipment was procured after final design alignment. And fourth, mechanical and electrical systems now follow a repeatable installation model. Execution risk declines as design standardizes and CB4 and CV5 reflect a mature optimized build. Both buildings remain on schedule with targeted lease commencement dates of third quarter and fourth quarter of 2026, respectively. Through design optimization, we increased critical IT capacity from 162 megawatts to 168 megawatts per building without impacting the base construction budget. That incremental 12 megawatts across the campus is expected to generate approximately $200 million of additional lease revenue over the initial term. Finally, Abernathy, our joint venture remains aligned with its fourth quarter 2026 lease commencement and continues progressing under fixed EPC structure, which further limits construction cost variability. Execution requires managing scope, timing and cost in real time. We have incorporated adjustments transparently and remain focused on disciplined delivery. Large-scale AI infrastructure requires active management of scope, schedule and cost. We have incorporated refinements transparently, preserved economics, increased capacity and maintain budget integrity. Execution remains disciplined and on track. With that, I'll turn it over to Patrick. Patrick Fleury: Thank you, Nazar. The second half of 2025 was transformational for the company. We secured over $12.8 billion of HPC lease agreements, executed $6.5 billion of debt and equity-linked financing and materially strengthened our balance sheet liquidity while carefully managing and minimizing dilution. Let's begin at a high level before diving into the financial details. We are a business in transition and executing on rapid growth. The 2025 results still reflect a meaningful contribution from Bitcoin mining and its inherent volatility, including commodity pricing and complex network difficulty dynamics. Over time, that volatility will decline as long-term credit-enhanced HPC revenues become the dominant driver of results. Importantly, while mining introduces revenue volatility, its flexible load profile has been strategically valuable at Lake Mariner, supporting demand response participation and power cost management. Mining is not a long-term growth focus, but it has enabled the transition. The 2025 results of operations reflect that transition in motion and the balance sheet reflects that we have the capital structure to execute. In the fourth quarter of 2025, revenue was $35.8 million, down from $50.6 million in 3Q '25, primarily driven by lower Bitcoin production. Importantly, HPC lease revenue increased to $9.7 million in Q4, up 35% from $7.2 million in Q3. For the full year, revenue increased 20% to $168.5 million from $140.1 million in 2024, with digital asset revenue of $151.6 million and HPC lease revenue of $16.9 million. We commenced HPC leasing in July 2025 and have energized 18 megawatts of critical IT capacity as of year-end. As additional buildings come online, revenue mix will continue shifting towards stable contracted HPC revenue. Cost of revenue, exclusive of depreciation increased 10% from $17.1 million in Q3 to $18.9 million in Q4. Demand response proceeds recorded as a reduction in cost of revenue decreased [Technical Difficulty] million in Q3. For the full year, [Technical Difficulty] million in 2024, primarily due to higher realized power prices. Demand response proceeds also increased year-over-year from $8.6 million in 2024 to $17.7 million in 2025. Operating expenses increased as we scaled the platform to support HPC deployment. Quarter-over-quarter operating expenses rose to $8.8 million from $4.5 million. Full year operating expenses increased to $19.7 million in 2025 from $7.6 million in 2024, reflecting staffing and operational readiness. For context, TeraWulf finished 2024 with under 100 full-time employees and will exit 2026 with close to 300 full-time employees. Let me address the HPC leasing segment profitability as presented in Note 19 of our 10-K. The as-reported annual segment profit margin is approximately 42% versus our long-term guidance of approximately 85%. That difference is driven by 3 factors; first, $1.2 million of tenant fit-out revenue and associated costs during 2025. PFO carries a modest margin as provided for under the HPC leasing. Second, $4.1 million of development and pre-revenue operating costs; and third, partial period revenue contribution as buildings [ ramps ]. Adjusting for those factors yields approximately 77% segment profit margin in 2025, which is consistent with ramp expectations and converging towards our 85% steady-state margin guidance as utilization stabilizes. SG&A expense also increased as we scaled the platform to support HPC deployment. Quarter-over-quarter, SG&A expense rose to $66.6 million from $16.7 million. Full year SG&A expense for 2025 totaled $147.8 million from $70.6 million in 2024. After adjusting for stock-based compensation, SG&A increased from $39.7 million in 2024 to $94.5 million in 2025. This increase is primarily attributable to an incremental $47.5 million of new hires, strategic growth performance and milestone-based employee compensation in 2025, reflecting the notable scale of execution achieved during calendar 2025. Adjusting for this item results in total SG&A of approximately $47 million in 2025, in line with our prior guidance of $50 million to $55 million. Depreciation increased to $88.6 million in 2025 from $59.8 million in 2024, reflecting infrastructure placed into service and accelerated depreciation of $19.6 million associated with certain mining assets transitioning to HPC use. Interest expense in Q4 was $62.4 million compared to $9.8 million in Q3, and we recognized interest income of $31.5 million in Q4 compared to $4.1 million in Q3. Annual interest expense for 2025 and 2024 was $80.2 million and $19.8 million, and we recognized interest income of $39 million and $3.9 million, respectively. The increases in net interest expense were expected following our capital raises at TeraWulf and WULF Compute in the second half of 2025. Actual cash interest paid during Q4 and calendar year 2025 was $6.9 million and $13.9 million, respectively. Change in fair value of warrant and derivative liabilities in 2025 was a loss of $429.8 million, primarily related to the Google warrant. This is a noncash loss and therefore, does not affect our liquidity. Equity and net loss of investee net of tax for 2025 was $4.1 million, which represents TeraWulf's 50.1% share of the net loss of the Abernathy Joint Venture, which was formed in October 2025 and has not yet commenced operations. Our GAAP net loss in 2025 was $661.4 million compared to a net loss of $72.4 million in 2024, with the increase primarily driven by noncash fair value adjustments related to the Google warrant and noncash depreciation. Our non-GAAP adjusted EBITDA in 2025 was negative $23.1 million, down from positive $60.4 million in 2024. As a reminder, these results are inclusive of significant increases in SG&A and operating expenses over the past 12 months as we invest heavily in our HPC business. Turning to the balance sheet and liquidity. As of December 31, 2025, cash and restricted cash totaled $3.7 billion. Total assets amounted to $6.6 billion, with total liabilities of $6.4 billion. Regarding liquidity, as detailed in our fiscal year-end 2025 investor presentation on the slide titled Capital Structure. As of January 31, 2026, the HoldCo parent entity had approximately $500 million of available cash or approximately $300 million pro forma for the Kentucky acquisition announced on February 2. Regarding project level capital positions and construction progress, both WULF compute and Abernathy are fully funded through substantial completion with long-term fixed rate financing, eliminating construction funding uncertainty and reducing reliance on near-term capital markets access. Importantly, we do not anticipate the need for additional equity to fund our currently contracted development. As of January 31, 2026, WULF Compute had approximately $3 billion of gross cash or $2.6 billion net of debt service reserve and interest-earning construction accounts, with $850 million of CapEx spend complete and $2.38 billion remaining. That leaves approximately $200 million of cash cushion, which is incremental to the substantial contingency embedded in the financing structure. As Nazar noted, schedule adjustments resulted in approximately $16 million less projected revenue in years 2025 through 2026. However, design optimization has increased capacity from 162 to 168 critical megawatts across CV4 and CV5, generating approximately $200 million of incremental revenue over the initial lease term. The net effect improves projected cash flows and reduces expected debt and maturity by approximately $45 million versus prior projections. Finally, with regard to the Abernathy JV, as of January 31, 2026, the JV had approximately $1.5 billion of gross cash or $1.2 billion net of debt service reserve, interest during construction, letter of credit and HoldCo LockBox accounts, with $268 million of CapEx spend complete and $1.1 billion remaining. That leaves approximately $70 million of cash cushion at Flash Compute with a further $100 million liquidity reserve at the parent JV, supported by a $1.35 billion lump sum EPC contract with [indiscernible]. With respect to Kentucky, we have proposals in hand for secured loan facilities to fund pre-lease development to preserve HoldCo parent liquidity. Demand for near-term power remains strong, and we are targeting 480 megawatts online in the second half of 2027. We do not build on speculation. In summary, 2025 reflects a business transitioning from volatile Bitcoin mining revenue to stable contracted HPC revenue. Mining has strategically supported that transition. Contracted HPC revenue is ramping, liquidity and contingency are strong. With that, operator, we are ready to take questions. Operator: [Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from Mike Grondahl with Northland Securities. Mike Grondahl: First, I just wanted to start with Kentucky. That site sounds like the reception has been strong. Could you give us a few more details on the site and what an ideal customer or lease would look like there? Paul Prager: Mike, this is Paul Prager. It's a fantastic site. This was the site of a former smelter. It's at a transmission super highway. Multiple utilities can service the property. What was most compelling about it, was its central location and the immediate availability of power in scale. Demand for the site is extremely strong. Our data room is open. Every major hyperscaler and several large AI compute platforms are doing diligence. The conversations to date have been substantive with some written term sheets already coming over the desk. Earlier this week, I was down in Kentucky. I met with Governor, Beshear and state leadership. The alignment at the state and local level is clear, very constructive, very, very, very pro-business. The importance of this project for the local community, particularly the public schools, which Kentuckians are super proud of is massive. We held a community info session 2 nights ago. We had a job fair yesterday. We filled the auditorium and then some. We're extremely excited and confident in the long-term value of the asset. As Patrick has said from day 1, we're all focused on the best financial credits to be our long-term customers. I think we've operated that way in the past, and that's the message going forward. I think you'll see a world-class credit as our next customer for what we're hoping to be a 10- to 15-year deal. I think we'll see that deal happen pretty soon. I don't want to give you a drop dead date, but we're in very, very active and substantive discussions. Mike Grondahl: Great. And then secondly, the Maryland site, seems like a lot of potential up to 1-plus gigawatts, but a little bit more complex. And kind of playing into what you guys have talked about, bring your own power, how does that play into some of TeraWulf's strengths? Paul Prager: Sure. Just to be clear, Chesapeake Data, it's about the power and load differentiation. It's a gig site with certainly a gig data center load capability, 500 megawatts of battery storage capability. It's a former coal generation campus. It's in the Northern Virginia corridor, which means prices are exceedingly competitive. It's designed to be a net contributor to the Maryland grid. It's very well supported by Governor Moore and MDE. Again, both Maryland and Kentucky, by the way, have very sophisticated brownfield programs, which make it really easy for a guy like us who's been around the block and owned and operated coal-fired power plants shutting down, mitigated them, did everything the right way. These 2 states have very, very progressive programs on how we do that at commercial feasibility. Listen, the market is moving to bring your own generation. We said that a year ago. In December, Alphabet bought Intersect for almost $5 billion. In January, Microsoft raised dedicated generation as part of their 5-point infrastructure strategy. President Trump in January floated the notion that PJM emergency auctions needed to incentivize new generation. New generation projects would go to the top of the queue for interconnect. And then just the other night, in the State of the Union, the President stated data centers need to build and fund their own generation. So that's where the world is going. We have a real and growing power shortfall. Morgan Stanley says potentially 47 gigawatts, 2025 to '28. The hyperscalers are openly stating that power is the binding constraint. Look at anything recent public commentary by Colette Kress, NVIDIA's CFO, Sundar, Alphabet's CEO; certainly Jens Huang, NVIDIA's CEO. I mean it's all about we need power. So delivering generation alongside that load solves the problem. We could bring incremental megawatts to the grid or the system, dispatchable generation using CCGTs, not just bridging power. And we have a history of partnering with grid operators to solve reliability and adequacy challenges. What's our core competency? We've been talking about this. This is the only team out there. For 25 years, we have been developing, building, renovating, rescuing generation, 6 gigs of power generation experience on this team together on this team, it's been over 25 years. We have deep expertise in siting, interconnection, generation development. And that's why we could go and take on a project like Morgantown and have the support that we can from both the local and state communities as we pursue this. We're really excited about Morgantown. It's a big job, but it fits into our schedule. And again, we've told the world we're 250 to 500 incremental megawatts of data center load every year, and this fits right in. Operator: Our next question comes from Tim Horan with Oppenheimer. Timothy Horan: Do you think the pricing and terms and conditions in Kentucky can be materially better than what you've done in the past? And the construction schedule seems pretty ambitious. Do you have the labor and all the equipment you think you'll need and, I guess, the permits to get it done? Paul Prager: So I think I'll go first and maybe Nazar, you can go second. In terms of the labor, yes, Kentucky is a fantastic -- it's just a fantastic place. You have not only the construction expertise and the trades expertise, but you got people that really want to work. We brought on for that job Fluor, which I consider to be a world-class contract party. We've dealt with them in the power space for a long time. They have relationships along in our C-suite for many, many years at every level. We are already ahead of the curve in sort of procurement. We have a proven design that our hyperscaler customers really like. And we think because it's immediate available power, we don't think -- we know because we've got this very robust conversation going on right now with folks that want to come in and be our customers there for competitive pricing. Naz? Nazar Khan: Yes. And just to add to what Paul said. As Paul said, we brought in a Fluor on the EPC side. So we're already hitting the ground running with respect to the overall development of the project. And so the time lines that you see for the second half of '27 are reflective of ongoing and meaningful discussions already with the EPC. So that's -- so we feel pretty good about the overall time line. The other big component is gathering the labor that's going to support the project as well. And so there have been efforts already underway for both the mechanical, electrical and civil scopes to get the requisite labor to support the project as well. So that date is informed by quite a bit of discussion that we've had with Fluor, who's our EPC as well as the work that we've done on site since the acquisition. In terms of just the overall economics, I think we've said these on prior calls, we really think about these projects on an unlevered yield basis. And so if you look at where we've been historically, we think we'll be in that ZIP code or maybe better over time. But again, as we think about the overall economics of the project, we're always kind of zeroing in on what's the unlevered yield that we're developing at and pushing to kind of maintain and continue to increase that as well. Operator: Our next question comes from Chris Brendler with Rosenblatt Securities. Christopher Brendler: Congratulations on the progress here. I wanted to ask on couple of -- on the power side. First, I noticed that the PUE across all these sites is right in line with the initial deals at 1.25. And you mentioned in the slides that that's best-in-class. And my understanding was there were certain aspects of like Mariner and Cayuga that drove that 1.25, but maybe I'm mistaken, it seems like it's standard for TeraWulf to operate at that incredible efficiency. Can you just give us a little color there on why you're able to sort of runcurles around your competitors when it comes from a PUE standpoint? Nazar Khan: Sure. Chris, it's Nazar here. So there's a couple of factors in that. As you noted, one is just the geographic location. And again, as we are more in the northern half of the country versus southern half of the country, there are benefits that we have from an ambient conditions perspective with respect to the design and being able to meet that peak PUE. You'll see the Abernathy site is at 1.4 PUE, again, which is reflective of just the geographic location. In addition to that, we have invested heavily kind of on the cooling side as well. And so we're giving ourselves extra room on the design that we have on cooling as well to maintain that lower PUE. So in general, as we think about where we are for generally kind of in the northern half of the country where we have these off seasons during kind of the winter and the spring and where the summer isn't sustained heat, we think we can kind of maintain that 1.25 PUE. Christopher Brendler: Okay. Was there also a redundancy aspect to it? Are you still not using big diesel generators in these sites? Nazar Khan: That's correct. And again, that gets back to these brownfield sites. So typically, you're seeing us play at brownfield industrial sites. And the way to think about it is when the smelter was there, there was a significant investment to design and build a smelter at that site. The last thing that Century wanted was a single point of failure on power coming into the site, no different than a data center, right? So there's 5 different lines coming into that site, which provides a considerable amount of kind of redundancy. So when we look at sites like that, we see that there are multiple independent pathways for the delivery of power, which obviate the need for on-site kind of backup generation. So again, Morgantown, similar. It used to be a former coal-fired power plant, that 1.5 gigawatt coal-fired power plant did not want to have a single point of failure and getting power out. We're utilizing that same system now to kind of bring power back in. So the big benefit with these industrial -- former industrial brownfield sites is that usually, they have that built-in redundancy that data centers want as well. Paul Prager: I just wanted to thank for that question regarding PUE because we put a page in the deck called critical IT capacity, the metric that matters. And what we're going to be trying to do and really sort of ensure the Street and our retail shareholders understand gross megawatts measure scale, but it's critical IT megawatts that measure monetized execution. And we think of TeraWulf as an execution story. So we're really going to be reporting more in the context of critical IT as opposed to just gross megawatt capacity. We think it's far... Christopher Brendler: Great. One more quick question is the 0.5 gig of battery power sort of caught my eye. Can you just give us a little color on why and what that means? Nazar Khan: So as we're adding these large loads and if you see in the statements that we've made, we want the site to be overall a net supplier of energy back to the grid and to the state. So having that battery storage allows the load at the site to operate in a way [Audio Gap] really impacting peak demand. And so it's kind of a critical peak demand shaver, which we think, again, provides -- makes the loads that are there assets back to the grid rather than burn it. So we think the right composition is about 0.5 megawatt of storage per megawatt of load. And so that's why you see in each of the phases at Morgantown for every megawatt of load, there's about 0.5 megawatt of battery storage. Christopher Brendler: That's great. Congrats on 2025 transformational year, looking forward to 2026. Operator: Our next question comes from Nick Giles with B. Riley. Nick Giles: Guys, I want to congratulate you for the progress across all fronts. Maybe just following up on that last one, you mentioned the battery storage, and there just appears to be some different moving parts at Chesapeake. So can you just give us a sense for how CapEx could differ from Mariner and what you're doing to really derisk that development? Nazar Khan: Sure. So when we think about -- as we think about the composition of Morgantown, as you noted, there's a few different legs here versus what we're doing at Lake Mariner or other sites. On the data center side, we're in that $8 million to $10 million per megawatt range for CapEx. And so that's what we've done at Lake Mariner, at Abernathy. And as we look to contract Kentucky, we're in that same range. In Morgantown, now, we're adding 2 incremental legs. One is the power generation side and the second is the battery storage. On the power gen side, we're in that -- we're going to be somewhere in the $2 million to $3 million per megawatt range for the fully delivered power plant. Part of that will be time. Part of that will be the type of turbines that we are deploying, and we're working on a number of different alternatives for that site as we speak. But that will be around $2 million to $3 million per megawatt for that capacity. And there's about another million or so kind of dollars per megawatt on the critical IT load. So kind of the battery storage is usually kind of priced in a megawatt hour basis. But when we translate it back to just kind of the overall load, that's around another $1 million. And so when we think about what we're offering back to our customer, it's the data center that they're already paying for in other deals that we have, that $8 million to $10 million per megawatt range. In addition to that, now it's the components on the generation side, the $2 million to $3 million per megawatt on the dispatchable gas-fired generation and then another $1 million or so on the battery storage. So all in around $13 million to $14 million per megawatt on a fully loaded basis. What that does kind of embedded within that, we will be seeking to kind of charge that full cost back in the capacity payment back to the underlying customer. So they'll effectively now be long the value of the generation as well as long the capacity in the data center. With the grid connectivity, we will have now kind of the ability to both bring the power in from the grid as well as generate more than enough power to offset that load kind of going out. And so on a net basis, we think over time, the net cost of power that the tenant will realize will be meaningfully lower than just a grid solution only. So kind of on the ins and outs, again, there'll be kind of paying a capacity payment for all of the CapEx, both on the gen side as well as the data center. But they'll be belong kind of the value of that gen -- the value of that energy, and that will be offset by whatever they pay for the power coming in. So net-net-net, we think it's a very strong position. It gives the tenant, a, a quicker path to scale up in scale, that gigawatt is a large amount. And b, we think over time, their net cost of power will be meaningfully lower than a solution that's relying on the grid only. Nick Giles: Nazar, I really appreciate all that detail. I'm sure others will have follow-ups. I just wanted to squeeze one in on the regulatory side, I think you still need approvals from FERC at Morgantown. Can you just walk us through what the timing looks like there and how we should think about what you ultimately need to get across the finish line from a third-party perspective? Nazar Khan: Yes. It's pretty pro forma approval process that we've done countless times. It happens anytime you transfer an existing power facility to another party. We're certainly -- they tend to look for things like are you monopoly in the area, stuff like that. We are not. We consider this to be just pretty routine. We would expect FERC approval within 3 to 6 months. Operator: Our next question is from Stephen Glagola with KBW. Stephen Glagola: Could you update us on any remaining zoning requirements or state and local approvals needed to move forward with the Hawesville data center campus? That's one. And then two, separately, while Cayuga has already received zoning approval, are there any additional permitting or regulatory steps still outstanding for that site? Paul Prager: We'll go backwards. I'll start with Cayuga. And in Cayuga, we had our first informal session with the planning Board a couple of nights ago. It went very well. They were engaged. They asked good questions. And so that process is one where we go ahead and finalize our application. That will take another month or so. They then meet on it, they review it. We come to an agreement together on what that permit should look like. They'll be solving for certain conditions like are you drawing water from the lake? What will noise levels be in the midst of operation? What are you doing for the site in terms of beautification, things like that. These are all reasonable things. It's what we do. It's what any company in redeveloping a former power plant or industrial complex does. The Cayuga process, as you know, first was -- had to go through zoning board of approval to ensure that it was consistent with the definition required to achieve a permit. It did win the day on that. And so we're just ordinary course routine working together with the planning board of the town to move forward. With respect to Kentucky, Naz? Nazar Khan: Yes. So on Kentucky, Stephen, from a permit perspective, we have to obtain the requisite building permits. That being said, we had a town hall this week in Hawesville. We had a workforce session for potential employees. And so the entire Judge Executive, Economic Development Director in Hawesville are all kind of fully on board and very eager to kind of get us going. As Paul mentioned earlier, it's an extremely supportive environment. And so while we don't have the permits in hand, everyone is fully aware of what we're doing. We briefed them on both the scope, size and scale of the buildings that we're bringing. Importantly, as a part of what we're doing at Hawesville, we're also decommissioning and taking down the old aluminum smelter. So there's a big cleanup that's happening at the site as well, which the town is very eager to have happened. So we got to do all that, but that's, I think, going to come in time. We're expecting -- as soon as we can get this lease signed up, we'll be in a position to kind of submit all those things. We have previewed a number of those things, and we're hopeful that it should be a pretty smooth process to kind of get approvals around that. Paul Prager: Just 2 more things. One is with respect to both of these projects, there's not just one permit you get. There's a principal notion of a permit for a facility. But all along the way, you have -- whether it's a specific demolition permit or a building permit for a particular structure, you need to get local permit. The second thing I just wanted to mention about Cayuga, which is kind of interesting, as the state has become really a popular place for people, and they look forward to doing more data centers there, they are starting to come with this notion of what about power. The beautiful thing about the Cayuga site is it was a former power site. It can be again. We have the ability both in terms of the landlord's huge site, which is 400 acres. We have the ability to sort of bring in our own power generation if that was ever something important to state or local constituents. So Cayuga is, I think, really a much better site than just any other one in terms of that part of the world because of its ability to house a power plant on it, if it's needed. Operator: Our next question is from Darren Aftahi with ROTH. Darren Aftahi: First one, if I may. Could you kind of characterize the -- maybe competitive process at Hawesville, maybe comparing that to like Mariner? And are we talking about one entity taking the 384, is it going to be multiple entities? And then I've got a follow-up. Paul Prager: I'll start maybe just by giving you -- in the environment that we were contracting for Lake Mariner, I think we were very confident we had a really special site. But I think the hyperscalers were on the growth curve in terms of education. They were on the growth curve in terms of figuring out design. When we started Lake Mariner, I think people were not as rock solid in their design notions or in terms of how they would fill out their customers' ledger. So I think we're in a very different environment now. We're in an environment where the hyperscalers are -- I mean, this is [Audio Gap] I've been in over the course of the last 45 years. I mean you've got Meta is very aggressive. Google's got a great program. Amazon's got a great program. Microsoft come back into the market. They're extremely competitive. You've got some of the neos that are really seeking larger and larger facilities. So we're in a much more competitive environment where the customers actually have much more definition to what it is they want. The second thing is when we started out with Lake Mariner, we had already built some buildings a little bit. And so we had to sort of work with our customers, for instance, in WULF Den and CB1 and 2 on sort of figuring out the design elements that they wanted even in CB3. Whereas 4 and 5, we built those buildings from the ground up with the customer, which made the whole procurement and build process that much more efficient. So I would tell you, we have a much more committed and sophisticated customer right now who knows the design needs that he or she wants, and we're in a much more competitive environment. So we're pretty excited about -- that was -- what the beautiful thing about Kentucky is its immediate availability has just enabled a very robust dialogue for us in terms of filling out our customers. But Naz, do you want to add something? Nazar Khan: Yes. The only thing to add, Darren, is we're targeting 1, maybe 2 customers for the entire site. Darren Aftahi: That's helpful. And then just as a follow-up. I mean, so you've given -- you've kind of raised your bogey and given this 250 to 500 range. I guess what are the 1 or 2 deterministic factors that kind of drive that range? And given your background in power as a team, I mean, is there any reason we could think maybe there's upside to that range? I'm just trying to get an understanding of what that context really means. Nazar Khan: I can start here, and then Paul, you can jump in. The 250 to 500 is a very kind of calibrated range that we're giving you. It factors in the operational and just deployment capabilities. Again, this is getting hundreds of people on site across multiple trades. It's a procurement process around equipment and ensuring that we're not the last buyer, but we have quite a bit of room between what we need and where the market has availability. And then from a financing perspective, it's what the company can bear from an accretive perspective. So when we talk about 250 to 500 megawatts per year, that's $2.5 billion to $5 billion of incremental capital per year that we are guiding the market that we're going to spend every year for the next few years. And so when we talk about the 250 to 500 really is a calibrated guidance around all of the various facets that are required to properly execute and deliver upon capacity. So that's where we are. That's what we see is available. 1.5 years or so ago, we were guiding at 100 to 150. As we've been able to now deploy capacity and understand the needs of customers, we've upped that guidance to 250 to 500. We remain very confident that every year for the next few years, we will continue to sign up another 250 to 500 megawatts of critical IT load with customers, deliver that 12 to 18 months hence and do that year-over-year and continue to kind of grow shareholder value as we're doing that. Paul Prager: Yes. I would want to add a few things. Number one is we selected Fluor to be our contractor in Kentucky. Why? Because we think they're the most skilled contractors in the country. They're particularly good on the front-end projects so that the execution side goes flawlessly. I think as we move forward, the notion of the selection of Fluor was scalable growth so that we could work with them on additional projects on a national level. The second thing is we're all about execution. Again, whether it's on the development side or the execution side, we could talk as much about our pipeline as you want. We could talk as much about all the projects that we're reviewing before we decide to make a move. But at the end of the day, if we don't deliver for our customers, we are out of business and we have failed our investors. So we need to be conservative here because we're still on the -- we're still a nascent business. I mean we've seen changes in the design of our facilities just between CB2A, B, 3, then 4 and 5. And so I think as we're learning and growing in partnership with our customers and now our leading contractor in Kentucky, we will continue to enhance our execution capabilities -- and if there is an opportunity to grow beyond what we've said is 250 to 500 incremental critical IT load, then we will. But for right now, we have to keep our eye on the ball. The table is full of lots of cookies and cakes and candies, but we have to stay focused on the meat and potatoes and deliver for our customers. Operator: Our next question comes from Brett Knoblauch with Cantor Fitzgerald. Brett Knoblauch: Paul, I guess you have multiple attractive sites that you could theoretically kind of go and lease out now. I guess in talking to prospective customers, is there a reason why they would want maybe the Kentucky site over Lake Cayuga or maybe the mega campus that you're building in Maryland? And has in your mind, what maybe site is next up for grabs changed? Has kind of Kentucky jumped to the top of the list? Paul Prager: Listen, I -- so first off, the answer is the demand is so significant. I think that a party would be happy to take everything off the table at any one time. But it's about time to power. And that's why Kentucky has become so important to the customers that we're in discussion with. The ability to have that kind of scale within this short period of time or [ albeit ] promptly, if you will, just makes it one of the most exciting sites in the country. The one thing that we've been pushing, Brett, is we like regional diversity. We think hyperscaler customers are getting focused on that, too. We think they've seen now, they've experienced what happens now first in Ohio and then now down in ERCOT. When you get everybody all in one place, it's a question of security, but it's also a question of what can the grid really handle. And so I think having regional diversity is something that our customers find compelling. And that's a good reason for them to really focus on Kentucky, that and the immediacy of its power. Brett Knoblauch: Awesome. And then I think in the prepared remarks, you said that Kentucky could potentially expand beyond the 480. I guess to what extent have you guys looked into that? And how much do you think it could expand beyond 480? Paul Prager: I think, listen, we've talked to our power suppliers there. We understand the grid there. I think that -- and again, I was just with the governor a couple of days ago, and he's really terrific. He runs DGA. He is very commercial. He's very pro-business for the state. I think that we will have opportunities to expand our footprint both in the generation side and on the customer side in Kentucky. But again, I have to stay focused, right? My job is execution. I've got to deliver these facilities to our customers, and we're doing that at Lake Mariner. And Kentucky is going to be a very prompt bid. We've already issued a limited notice to proceed to floor just because our customers really want to get onto that property. So we're doing everything we can to facilitate that. Just going to really focus on execute. Operator: Our next question comes from Michael Donovan with Compass Point. Michael Donovan: To follow up on what you're talking about, Paul, on sizing and design plans. For Maryland and Kentucky phase build-outs, what is the target critical IT megawatt per building or hall you're thinking about today? Should we think about repeatable modules similar to Fluidstack? And what drives that sizing decision? Nazar Khan: Yes. This is Nazar here. So in the Fluidstack context, that 168 megawatts of critical IT load is the base design that we worked closely with them on developing. You've seen that number pop up subsequently with other of our peers as well. But in that context, that's kind of the base design. That puts you a little over kind of 200 megawatts of gross capacity. And so in general, as we're having discussions with various customers, we typically look at that 200-megawatt gross, 160-megawatt net as kind of a building block that we're building off of. And so the design that we're working on with Fluor really kind of incorporate that, again, roughly 200 megawatts plus or minus gross, 160 megawatts plus or minus net critical IT megawatts as the base building block from which we're kind of deploying that. And so when we talked about Kentucky, for example, in that 380 of net, that's a couple of those buildings would kind of consume that capacity. Operator: Our next question is from John Todaro with Needham & Company. John Todaro: First one is more high-level political regulatory. It sounds like really good conversations with the governors in Kentucky and Maryland. Just wondering though more at a broader level, how you are viewing some of the pushback at the state level to data center builds. Just any commentary there, whether sort of the media articles might be overblown or if there is some risk there. Nazar Khan: So it all requires, I would say, thoughtful and careful engagement. How you bring your load on is critical to how you're perceived and what impacts you have. And so if you have been listening to us for the last few years when we talk about Bitcoin mining, we've said from the beginning, there's a way to do Bitcoin mining that's accretive and an asset back to the grid, and there's a way to do it where you're not. And so we have been very engaging with. I mean, for example, in Kentucky, we spent a tremendous amount of time with the energy supplier there, Big Rivers and have developed a very close and strong working relationship with them, where we are kind of aware of the challenges they have on committing to supporting a large load. And if it's there, it's great. And when it's gone, it's not so great. That's a, and so kind of ensuring that our interests are aligned with them and they have clear visibility on where we are. And then b, just in terms of the overall load profile and when you're consuming power and what happens at those kind of peak demand hours. And so we've been very, again, thoughtful in thinking through how does our load and where we're locating these loads tie back to what's happening in the grid around it and how do we ensure that, again, that our loads can be overall assets and kind of beneficial back to the grid and to the local communities versus just kind of coming in and being burdens. And so I think the articles, the news is news and kind of it comes out, how it comes out. But we pride ourselves in trying to be very thoughtful around the issues that we think are pertinent and properly addressing them. And so hopefully, over time, you'll see even in Kentucky, based upon how we're structuring things with the local utility down there, that it hopefully becomes a model for how things should be done an example of how data centers should be integrated back to grids. John Todaro: Great. And then second one is just on kind of where we are in the headcount growth for Kentucky and Maryland and just, I guess, how you frame up some of the G&A guardrails around there. Nazar Khan: So we are in the early stages on both. We have kind of ramped up the Kentucky team to half a dozen or so folks over time, including the on-site personnel, that's going to be over 100 people for Kentucky by itself. Each of our sites, we are targeting somewhere in that 100 to 120 people range for fully loaded staffing once the site is fully operational. And we're probably a couple of people in Maryland right now. As was noted earlier, we're pending kind of FERC approval to take over the site. There's existing generation at the site, and so we're ramping that team up to kind of support the operations as well. So I'd say we're in a couple of dozen people between the 2 sites now, but that's quickly increasing. And again, we should be hitting towards the end of the year, early next year, we should be hitting pretty sizable numbers in Kentucky, and we'll kind of be in that 100 people range at Kentucky by this time next year, I would guess. Paul Prager: We've also, of course, added at the corporate level so that we can manage the much larger portfolio and stay on top of everything from procurement. And so it's legal, it's accounting, it's IT. It's everything that you need at the corporate level to manage projects of this scale. Operator: Our final question is from Martin Toner with ATB Cormark. Martin Toner: When do you think Phase 1 of Morgantown might be able to be turned on? Nazar Khan: We're working through that as we speak. So at Morgantown, in addition to the 3 legs we mentioned earlier, just kind of run the load, the data center, the gas gen and the battery storage. There's also a remediation that goes along with that. We were with the MDE just this afternoon and kind of scoping that out. And so once we get definition around the timing and scope of that remediation plan, that will then kind of feed into just the timing. If you look at what we said kind of in the deck, we've kind of positioned this as kind of end of '28, kind of in '29 and beyond. So generally, that's where we are. But over the next, I'd say, couple of quarters here, we'll have greater definition to provide around the specific timing of Morgantown. Paul Prager: Coming at it from 10,000 feet, State of Maryland had some challenges because they've shut down a lot of their great generation. They weren't really as pro generation as -- or as prescient to what would happen as a lot of other states, which have been very, very supportive like Pennsylvania next door. So the governor has really changed policy. We've received written commitments for expedited permitting for our site. So I don't think this is going to be business as usual. I think they're really keen to have us come there, create jobs, both at the county level and the state level. The reception has been amazing, but they have literally given us sort of an office to work with to expedite all sorts of permitting from the repowering to the remediation. Operator: We have reached the end of the question-and-answer session, and this concludes today's conference. You may disconnect your lines at this time, and we thank you for your participation.
Operator: Hello, everyone. Thank you for joining us, and welcome to the Pembina Pipeline Corporation Q4 2025 Results Digital Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] I will now hand the call over to Dan Tucunel, Vice President of Capital Markets. Please go ahead. Dan Tucunel: Thank you, Jade. Good morning, everyone. Welcome to Pembina's conference call and webcast to review highlights from the fourth quarter of 2025. On the call today, we have Scott Burrows, President and CEO; and Cameron Goldade, Chief Financial Officer, along with other members of Pembina's leadership team. I would like to remind you that some of the comments made today may be forward-looking in nature and are based on Pembina's current expectations, estimates, judgments and projections. Forward-looking statements we may express or imply today are subject to risks and uncertainties, which could cause actual results to differ materially from expectations. Further, some of the information provided refers to non-GAAP measures. To learn more about these forward-looking statements and non-GAAP measures, please see the company's management discussion and analysis dated February 26, 2026, for the period ended December 31, 2025, as well as the press release Pembina issued yesterday, which are all available online at pembina.com and on both SEDAR+ and EDGAR. I will now turn things over to Scott. J. Burrows: Thanks, Dan. Yesterday, we reported our fourth quarter results, which included earnings of $489 million, adjusted EBITDA of approximately $1.075 billion and adjusted cash flow from operating activities of $731 million or $1.26 per share. For the full year, we delivered earnings of $1.694 billion and adjusted EBITDA of $4.289 billion. We achieved record annual volumes across our Pipelines and Facilities divisions, which represented a 3% increase over 2024. Full year results also included adjusted cash flow from operating activities of $2.854 billion or $4.91 per share. Each year, I'm always proud to look back and reflect on our team's many accomplishments. 2025 was no exception. In addition to solid financial and operating results, we also advanced strategic projects and strengthened our long-term competitive positioning. I'm particularly proud that Pembina continues to deliver on its promises, including providing safe and reliable operations, meeting its financial targets, constructing major projects on time and on budget and continuing to execute its strategy with an improved risk profile. Several notable achievements in 2025 and early 2026 stand out. Safety is a core value and the foundation of Pembina's operations and culture. While the journey never ends, I am pleased with our strong safety and environmental performance that exceeded our internal 2025 targets, highlighted by improved performance across key indicators relative to our 3-year averages. We advanced construction of several growth projects, including the RFS IV propane-plus fractionator at the Redwater Complex, the Wapiti natural gas processing expansion and the K3 cogeneration facility. All 3 projects are trending on time and on or under budget. The Wapiti expansion and K3 cogen are currently in the commissioning phase and are expected to be in service in the next few weeks, and we look forward to the RFS IV expansion coming online during the second quarter. Additionally, under previously announced funding agreements, PGI in collaboration with certain producer customers expects to place approximately $725 million of new infrastructure into service throughout 2026, all supported by long-term take-or-pay agreements. approximately $725 million of new infrastructure into service throughout 2026, all supported by long-term take-or-pay agreements. We supported our long-term resilience through extensive recontracting across the business. These contracting successes support continued utilization of our assets, help ensure our stable cash flow stream and create the foundation for future opportunities. In 2025, we renewed existing contracts and executed incremental new contracts totaling over 200,000 barrels per day of conventional pipeline transportation capacity. This includes successfully recontracting substantially all available for renewal on the Peace Pipeline system under contracts expiring in 2025 and 2026. We look forward to providing further contracting updates throughout 2026. As part of the toll review at Alliance Pipeline, we significantly extended Alliance's long-term contractual profile as shippers elected a new 10-year toll option on approximately 96% of available capacity. And we contracted the remaining capacity available on the 100,000 barrels per day Nipisi pipeline, which was reactivated in 2023 to serve the growing Clearwater heavy oil play. Having fully contracted Nipisi, we are now focused on opportunities to increase egress capacity to respond to strong customer demand for incremental services. In response to growing demand for condensate and NGL transportation, we progressed development of conventional pipeline expansions to reliably and cost effectively meet rising transportation demands from growing production in the Western Canadian Sedimentary Basin. In late 2025, Pembina announced that it is proceeding with its Fox Creek-to-Namao Expansion of the Peace Pipeline system, which will add approximately 70,000 barrels per day of market delivery capacity to the Peace Pipeline system. And yesterday, we announced 2 additional expansions of our Northeast BC pipelines, the Birch-to-Taylor Expansion and the Taylor-to-Gordondale Expansion. In total, these 3 expansions represent $625 million of investment to ensure Pembina's continued ability to service growing volumes in Northeast British Columbia and Alberta. We took steps to significantly enhance our propane export capabilities through a new 30,000 barrel per day LPG export agreement with AltaGas at its West Coast terminals and the sanctioning of the Prince Rupert terminal optimization project. Through these 2 initiatives, Pembina ensured access to 50,000 barrels per day of highly competitive propane export capacity to premium priced markets, including Asia for Pembina and our customers' propane. On the Cedar LNG project, we advanced construction of a floating LNG vessel to over 35% complete and significantly progressed the onshore construction activities. Further, Pembina met its commitment to investors by completing the remarketing of our 1.5 million tons of annual Cedar LNG capacity by signing long-term agreements with PETRONAS, a global LNG industry leader and Ovintiv, one of the largest liquids-rich natural gas producers in Canada. In addition to increasing Pembina's expected financial contribution from the project, these agreements further validate the Cedar LNG project and highlight the strong demand for global export capacity given the clear advantages of Canadian West Coast LNG, including competitively priced feedstock and advantaged shipping distance to Asian markets. Finally, Pembina and its partner, Kineticor made significant progress on the development of the Greenlight Electricity Center, securing the required power grid allocation for the proposed third-party innovation center, which was subsequently assigned to a potential customer of Greenlight and completed a land sale agreement with the customer. We also ensured the availability and delivery timing of 2 turbines to support the approximately 700 -- 900-megawatt first phase of Greenlight. Greenlight represents an extension of Pembina's existing value chain and an opportunity to enhance growth by investing in long-term contracted infrastructure with an investment-grade counterparty while diversifying its customer base and would create incremental demand for natural gas and associated liquids production within Western Canada. Pembina and Kineticor continue to progress various work streams, including finalizing a commercial agreement with the customer, engineering, procurement and regulatory activities and expect to make a final investment decision in the first half of 2026. It was a busy and productive year for the Pembina team, and I look forward to building upon our momentum from 2025 as we strive for even greater success in 2026. We are planning to hold a webcast and conference call on April 7, where Pembina's officer team will provide a general business update and long-term outlook. Additional details will be communicated in the coming weeks. I will now turn things over to Cam to discuss in more detail the financial highlights for the fourth quarter and full year. Cameron Goldade: Thanks, Scott. As Scott noted, Pembina reported fourth quarter adjusted EBITDA of $1.075 billion. This was a $179 million or 14% decrease over the same period in the prior year, which primarily reflects a $118 million lower contribution from marketing and new ventures, the impact of a new toll structure and revenue sharing mechanism on the Alliance Pipeline and a $37 million period-specific capital recovery that impacted 2024 with no similar impact in 2025. These factors were partially offset by volume growth and solid performance across the Pipelines and Facilities divisions. Looking at quarter-over-quarter results by division, the major factors impacting the quarter in Pipelines included higher volumes on the Peace Pipeline system, lower operating expense on the Cochin pipeline, lower revenue on the Canadian portion of the Alliance Pipeline as a result of reduced long-term firm tolls and impacts from the new revenue sharing mechanism under previously announced settlement, offset by higher demand on seasonal contracts, lower revenue on certain pipeline assets due to period-specific impacts of capital recoveries recognized in the fourth quarter of 2024 and lower interruptible volumes on the Cochin pipeline due to narrower condensate price differentials. In Facilities, factors impacting the fourth quarter included lower revenue related to period-specific impacts of capital recoveries recognized in the fourth quarter of 2024 on certain PGI assets and higher operating expenses as well as higher contribution for PGI assets, primarily due to higher volumes and the impact of the acquisition of a 50% working interest in Whitecap's Kaybob Complex during the fourth quarter of 2024. In Marketing and New Ventures, fourth quarter results reflected the net impact of narrower NGL frac spreads, partially offset by realized gains on NGL-based derivatives and lower realized gains on crude oil-based derivatives due to lower volumes and narrower price spreads. Finally, in the Corporate segment, fourth quarter results were lower than prior period due to higher long-term incentive costs, partially offset by lower noncompensation-related expenses. Earnings in the fourth quarter were $489 million. This represents a 15% decrease over the same period in the prior year. In addition to the factors impacting adjusted EBITDA, the decrease in earnings in the fourth quarter was primarily due to the net impact of higher depreciation and amortization expense in pipelines, lower other expenses recognized in the share of profit from PGI as 2024 included costs related to asset disposals, higher share of profit from Greenlight due to a gain on sale of land to a third-party potential customer and various unrealized gains and losses on derivatives, a gain recognized by Pembina on a sale of land to a third-party potential customer of Greenlight, combined with lower net finance costs and lower acquisition and integration costs, offset by higher restructuring costs, and finally, lower income tax expense. Total volumes in the Pipelines and Facilities divisions were 3.7 million barrels of oil equivalent per day in the fourth quarter. This represents an increase of 1% over the same period in the prior year. Higher fourth quarter Pipelines volumes were driven primarily by higher interruptible and contracted volumes on the Peace Pipeline system, an increase in volumes on AEGS as the fourth quarter in 2024 was impacted by third-party outages, an increase in contracted volumes on the Nipisi pipeline, lower interruptible volumes on the Cochin pipeline due to narrower condensate price differentials and the sale of the North segment of the Western Pipeline in the third quarter of 2025. Higher fourth quarter Facilities volumes were driven primarily by the acquisition of Whitecap's Kaybob complex in the fourth quarter of 2024, higher volumes at the Dawson assets due to higher natural gas prices, higher volumes at the Duvernay Complex and a decrease in Aux Sable volumes due to lower ethane extraction. The fourth quarter contributed to solid full year results that included earnings of $1.694 billion, adjusted EBITDA of $4.289 billion, cash flow from operating activities of $3.301 billion or $5.68 per share and adjusted cash flow from operating activities of $2.854 billion or $4.91 per share. During the fourth quarter, Pembina announced a 2026 adjusted EBITDA guidance range of $4.125 billion to $4.425 billion. The midpoint of the 2026 guidance range represents 2023 to 2026 fee-based adjusted EBITDA per share compound annual growth of approximately 5%, positioning Pembina to deliver on the target we originally provided at our 2024 Investor Day. Based on Pembina's existing strong financial position, the 2026 year-end proportionately consolidated debt to adjusted EBITDA ratio is expected to be approximately 3.7 to 4.0x. Excluding debt related to the construction of the Cedar LNG facility, which is expected to enter service in late 2028, this ratio would be approximately 3.4 to 3.7x. With 2026 serving as the peak investment year for Cedar LNG, 2026 is also expected to represent the peak year for Pembina's proportionally consolidated debt to adjusted EBITDA ratio. With incremental cash flow from projects entering service and a significant ramp down in Cedar LNG spending post 2026, Pembina's leverage is expected to return to the lower end of its target range of 3.5 to 4.25x. I'll now turn things back to Scott. J. Burrows: Thanks, Cam. Doing what we said we would do is core to Pembina's leadership team, and I believe our 2025 accomplishments and our longer track record as a company speak to that. We continue to focus on providing safe, reliable, responsible and cost-effective energy infrastructure solutions. I believe we are uniquely positioned to capture incremental new volumes in the growing Western Canadian Sedimentary Basin and connect our customers to high-value global markets while unlocking new opportunities beyond our strong legacy business. Our entire organization is focused on ensuring the long-term resilience of our business and providing investors with visibility to attractive growth throughout the end of the decade and beyond. Thank you for joining us this morning. Please go ahead and open up the line for questions. Operator: [Operator Instructions] Your first question comes from Aaron MacNeil of TD Cowen. Aaron MacNeil: I'm hoping you can sort of give a bit more detail on the decision not to pursue the full Taylor-to-Gordondale Expansion. And I realize this could very well be my own misinterpretation, but my impression was that this would likely go ahead once the permits were in place. So either way, I guess I'm just wondering, has anything in terms of your outlook changed? Are you opting for maybe a lower risk approach? Has ARC's decision to remove the second phase of Attachie sort of caused you to pause this a bit? Or is it the commodity outlook? Or maybe I'm just overthinking it, and this was always the strategy. So just any insights there would be helpful. Jaret Sprott: Aaron, it's Jaret. Thanks for the question, and I think it's a really good one. So like we said in our press release, we've got 3 projects on the go on the pipeline -- conventional pipeline side, our Fox Creek-to-Namao, which we talked about there a few quarters ago, our Birch-to-Taylor and then our Taylor-to-Gordondale kind of like, we'll call it Phase 1. All of this capital, 100% is being driven by really Canada unlocking our egress constraints. We have our oil constraints being alleviated, which is driving more demand for condensate. Our condensate import pipelines are fairly tapped, ours and third party. So that's going to drive a lot of condensate domestic growth. And then obviously, with that condensate comes natural gas and that egress constraint is also being lifted with LNG Canada being ramped up, Cedar coming online, other projects, et cetera. So that's really driving the need for condensate and NGLs. And I know you know that, but I think it's important to ground ourselves that a lot of that growth is coming from, obviously, the Montney, but specifically up in that neighborhood of, I'll call it, north of Taylor BC up into that north of Fort St. John, Fort Nelson geographic area, a lot of it is coming from there. That really drives to the Birch-to-Taylor project, if you think about it that way. So first off, I want to say that, that project, the collaboration and the consolidation of the industry, the indigenous communities and our partners, the BC government and the BC regulator, that was a tremendous outcome for us getting all of our hurdles in place and behind us collectively. That project really is allowing us, number one, it's going to grow our condensate and natural gas liquids, specifically C3+ capacity. It's really to meet their needs, the growth demand that I talked about for all those other reasons. I think also, Aaron, sanctioning that project now and bringing that online kind of the end of '27 into '28, it really -- it shows the -- we've been really good at project execution. We pride ourselves on our safety record. We pride ourselves on working with local communities and subcontractors, et cetera. And I think really getting focused on making this project a cost focus and a safety-focused project versus a schedule-driven project because we all know our customers can drill significantly faster than we can build long linear assets. So that's kind of Birch-to-Taylor. Now I'll get into actually your question. So like you said, February 10, we did receive our federal permit for Taylor-to-Gordondale. And I really think about Taylor-to-Gordondale as growth in the Montney in 2 other specific regions geographically. I'm going to call it the Dawson Creek area. So southeast of Taylor, we're seeing a lot of growth in the Montney in that neighborhood. And you're seeing -- it's the condensate and the C3+ once again. And then on the Alberta side of the border, you're seeing a lot of growth in the Montney in what some refer to as the Peace River Arch in and around that Gordondale and up to the western side of the Alberta border. Ultimately, that -- getting that permit was also a tremendous amount of work. We did have some, I would say, objectives, commercial objectives, but I think our team persevered and got that. We will need that project full stop one day. The condensate, and it's in the near future due to all the exact same demand. The condensate is growing in that area, the C3+ is growing in that area. But what I will say is one of the things about Pembina is not only our ability to build projects on time and on budget. We also our flexibility of our infrastructure and our people. Our people really took a step back and work collaboratively with operations, our engineering hydraulics teams, and they came up with a little bit more of a capital-light solution. All of this capital we required for the full build-out, but a capital-light solution, which really is a prudent deployment of capital, which Cam gives me a high five for all the time. And it still allows us to meet our customer needs and meet their egress demand, almost like as they grow, it's almost on demand, we can go out and build this. So hopefully, that provides you a little bit of color. We don't see this due to overall certain customers talking about production profiles and condensate is growing, natural gas is going to come with it. Pembina's ability to grow with our customers is, I think, better than anyone else in the basin. Aaron MacNeil: That's a lot more detail than I was expecting. I can -- maybe second question. I can appreciate that marketing fundamentals have been challenging year-to-date, but we've seen Canadian gas prices decrease in the last few weeks. Liquids pricing is on balance up since you released the guidance, which should sort of improve the frac spread and other marketing strategies. So I guess I'm just wondering if you'd characterize your previously disclosed marketing outlook is maybe a bit better on the margin now than you previously thought as we get sort of closer to that annual recontracting window? Chris Scherman: Yes. Aaron, thanks. It's Chris Scherman. I think we've all seen significant volatility to start the year. Obviously, we're only 60 days in. And you just referenced it, we're happy to see the price outlook for the remainder of the year improve, especially sort of over the last week. And I think all in all, things are actually looking positive for us for the remainder of the year. I'd highlight the first 45 days of the year. We definitely saw some headwinds on U.S. frac spread, primarily as a result of U.S. weather, which drove up Chicago gas prices. But given those U.S. frac spread headwinds to start the year, combined with the improved outlook for the remainder of the year, right now, we're still looking to be slightly ahead of the midpoint on our marketing guidance for the full year. I'd highlight there's still a lot of year left to go. I'd also highlight that given those headwinds earlier in the year, we can probably expect a little bit of a reshaping of the profile through the full year, but we're optimistic and sort of remain on plan for the full year. Jaret Sprott: Aaron, I'll just -- maybe -- it's Jaret here. Just on the flip side of that, obviously, with really high Chicago gas prices, that puts pressure on our frac spread business. But it also -- the AECO to Chicago spread drives fee-based business to offset some of that noise. And then obviously, I think Cam might talk to it, but we're seeing some fairly strong fluctuations in FX just over the last 60 days, et cetera. Operator: Your next question comes from Jeremy Tonet from JPMorgan Securities. Jeremy Tonet: Just wanted to go to the Tourmaline contract extension, if I could. And just wondering how that looks -- how that shakes out economics versus prior. Just wondering with the market right now, how it's developing, does it look similar on a same-store basis there? Or how are things evolving? Jaret Sprott: Jeremy, it's Jaret. So first off, really pleased to extend our partnership with Tourmaline. They're obviously one of our largest customers and one of the largest producers in Western Canada. And it always kind of -- it warms my heart to see that the Cutbank Complex, which is Pembina's original acquisition in the gas processing back in '09 that we're continuing to see flat production, growing production in and around that area. So with respect to tolls, we won't get into the details on that. But obviously, I'll break it down into a couple. Pipe and frac tolls, you'll see those consistent with the rest of our business. It wouldn't be specific to this customer in this area. And then on the PGI side of our business, the gas economics and the overall netbacks in and around this area, they are strong because of the liquids production that comes out of it that supports the overall netback for our customers. So in this area, you don't have to see a lot of toll erosion in order to meet the customers' needs on the processing side. With that said, although we're extremely excited to extend this partnership, you recall in Q3, we recorded a small write-down with respect to one of our processing contracts that didn't get extended in a different geographical area of the Deep Basin. So -- but with that said, since that date of that press release and talking about that expiry, our teams who are focused on filling our assets every day have essentially recovered 60% of that value, and we'll continue to backfill that portion of the business. Also, Jeremy, that has been fully baked into our -- the recontracting and the Q3 announcement that has fully been baked into our 2026 guidance and our overall long-range plan. Jeremy Tonet: Okay. Great. Great to hear on that recovery there. I was just wondering if we could step back a little bit, take a higher view of the basin, kind of picking up with the current commodity price outlook and how that, I guess, impacts the driller activity expectations for your customers. We've seen volatility out there. Just wondering what's the latest conversations you're having with customers, ARC and others and how you expect, I guess, activity to change over time? J. Burrows: Yes, Jeremy, it's Scott here. I would just caution that, like Chris said, it's the increase in commodity price has happened pretty rapidly here. And let's break that down. I mean it's really been on the crude oil price. I mean, we still have seen a ton of volatility in AECO and AECO and Station 2 today are kind of where we started the year, if not slightly below. Propane has kind of remained flattish. So it's very commodity specific, and the crude oil run-up here has just happened very shortly. So I would say this short-term run-up, I don't know that it's been sustained enough to say that producers have changed their activity from the start of the year. There's also been a fair bit of M&A to end last year. And I think as people work through closing those transactions, hopefully, over the next couple of weeks or months here, we'll see kind of revised drilling plans. This comment is not specific to the recent M&A because, obviously, you can't talk about that. But historically, what I would say over the last 2 years, as we've seen some of the consolidation happen, we've actually seen an acceleration of volumes most people don't buy another company to keep production flat or decline it. Typically, we've seen growth. So we're excited to see what could come out of some of the consolidation, but I can't speak specifically to that just yet. Jaret Sprott: Maybe just further to that, when I break it down into the different geological formations, I'll start with like in the old school Drayton Valley area, we're also seeing these prices even at $60, we're seeing a tremendous amount of drilling. And even as you talk about the South Duvernay, et cetera, our system out in that area, obviously, is seeing strong volumes. If you move up into kind of that Peace River Arch area again that I talked about, you are seeing a lot of companies talk about Charlie Lake oil. That's continuing to grow and Pembina has oil assets in the area to capture those volumes into the Edmonton market. If you go kind of north, back up our Clearwater area, the Nipisi pipeline, based on all of the connections we have today and the pumps we have in place, you're seeing the upstream customers really talk about the recovery factors increasing the drilling results, how economic they are. You can continue to see Nipisi capture more and more of those volumes, and we're working on -- I talked about the optimization we did at Taylor-to-Gordondale. Our teams are driving some really cool cheap expansions on the Clearwater -- for the Clearwater customers on the Nipisi pipeline. And then when you think about the Montney, I think I touched on it, but our customers, they have so much land across so many geographical areas and Pembina's system obviously expands a significant geographical area. Our customers, if they're having some challenges or they're maxed out on capacity in one area or constrained by natural gas egress in an area, they can always redeploy capital. Like I said, the oil sands needs condensate. The import pipelines are fairly full. It has to come from somewhere and our customers, the Alberta innovation or the Western Canadian Energy innovation, it will unlock this condensate. And I think our system is pretty primed to capture it. So things are in good shape. Operator: Your next call comes from Theresa Chen from Barclays. Theresa Chen: Now that Dow has provided a revised time line for Path2Zero with Phase 1 expected by year-end '29 and Phase 2 by year-end '30. Could you provide an update on the different options you're evaluating at this point and infrastructure investment necessary to supply the 50,000 barrels per day of ethane for your commitment? Chris Scherman: Thanks for the question. It's Chris. So obviously, we're very pleased to see the project moving ahead in line with really our expectations. As we've touched on Dow before and you're referencing, the minor delay in the project has allowed us to reevaluate how best to serve the customer here, what the most efficient capital-efficient infrastructure options are to serve the customers' needs. We will be out this year clarifying that. That work continues. We keep pointing down that path. So we look forward to making FID on these additional infrastructure this year, but we can't provide any more detail today on the call. Obviously, Dow, a valued partner to us, congratulate them on the progress they made on the project, and we look forward to getting more details out to the market and progressing. Theresa Chen: Understood. And turning to Greenlight, given the progress there, the grid allocation, land sale and turbine availability, what are the key next steps and decision points from here? What is the expected time line for contracting FID and in-service thereafter? Chris Scherman: You bet. So Chris again. Obviously, we've made significant progress since forming that JV. You referenced it, right, in 2025. We secured the 907 megawatts of AESO allocation, which we subsequently assigned to our potential customer, entered into agreements on turbines, locked those up, got where we needed to be in the queue for those, closed our land sale to set our customer up for success. both on the base project as well as a bunch of growth. So as we're looking forward now, we're targeting an FID in Q2. We're positive on that time line and really focused on 3 work streams between now and then. Number one, commercial. So we continue to work through negotiations with our potential customer. We're in the middle of those negotiations. So obviously, limited details on that at this point. But I'd say they're going as expected. Time lines are going as expected, and we have confidence we're going to reach a midstream-like long-term contract to underpin this commercially. Secondly, regulatory, we're making great progress. We don't view this as a high-risk work stream for the project, and we're not part of the discussions between the customer and the government, but we understand those are going really well. There's more information that's come out on the levy and the rest of it, which is, I think, positive and in line with expectations. And then finally, third work stream engineering. So we're working through our FEED. We've got top-tier global engineering partners in that. That's progressing well, all pointed towards Q2 FID targets. So Scott spoke about it in his opening remarks, but I think things are going as we hoped on this. We think the project remains a tremendous on-strategy extension of our business, and we're excited to get it across the line here in Q2. Operator: Your next question comes from Sam Burwell from Jefferies. George Burwell: I wanted to see if you could give an update on the Alliance short-haul expansion project. I think back in 3Q, you talked about running an open season during the first quarter of this year. So curious if there's any update on the progress you're making there? Jaret Sprott: Jaret here. So we continue to see strong demand in the Alberta Industrial Heartland area for natural gas to progress other industries. There's still a few days left in the quarter, and you should expect to see an announcement fairly shortly. George Burwell: Okay. Great. And I guess just like one quick clarification on the Tourmaline deal. Was all of that renewals of existing business effectively? Or is there anything incremental on the transport side or the frac side? Jaret Sprott: No, it was all -- essentially all of it was renewal, same volumes. Operator: Your next question comes from Robert Hope from Scotiabank. Robert Hope: Just want to maybe dive a little bit deeper into the timing of the April 7 presentation. Is there anything specific driving that? Do you think you'll have some incremental clarity on some of the projects that you're progressing? Or is it April 7 just to kind of make it a stand-alone event rather than giving we'll call it, longer-term guidance today? Cameron Goldade: Robert, it's Cam here. Yes, really, I mean, honestly, a couple of factors. One, we recognize there's a window here for market participants that works better or worse. And so as we get into March, we start to interfere with potentially other commitments. But I think probably more presently, things are moving fast, obviously, with certain of our key growth opportunities. And so our objective when we release the long-term guidance is to give you and our investors as much granularity and as much concreteness to that buildup as possible. And so I think our objective this time around, whereas in 2024, we generally gave a growth outlook and some pieces, which would support that. we're really trying to provide the market with a really robust buildup to that. And so we'd love to be in a position to have obviously the most certainty possible around that buildup. And that's the biggest factor that aligns with the sort of post Q1 timing. Robert Hope: I appreciate that. And then you've touched on most of the kind of, we'll call it, the $4 billion bucket of potential projects, but PGI infrastructure was one that was highlighted as an opportunity set that you're advancing. Can you maybe expand a little bit further what opportunities you could see as the next phase of growth for PGI? Jaret Sprott: Rob, Jaret here. Yes, you know what, PGI is going to continue to grow their business. We obviously step one with respect to that business is filling white space. So some of the announcements we made with the infrastructure build-out we're doing with Whitecap in and around the Lator area, that's really all designed to, one is fill existing white space at some plants in and around that area, but also then to grow the liquids volumes on to Pembina's Peace Pipeline system and the NGLs into Fort Saskatchewan and Pembina's Redwater facilities. After that, we're looking at continuing to build out organically. There are opportunities out there that we're evaluating. So probably more to come on that. And then lastly, there's always the inorganic stuff. I think PGI out of any one of the gas processing businesses in Western Canada has been ahead of its time with respect to creativity. And being on the board with KKR, we continue to encourage and press the team on to come back to us with more and more of those creative ideas. So that's kind of how we see the business there. Operator: Your next question comes from Spiro Dounis from Citi. Spiro Dounis: First, let me congratulate you all on your silver medal in hockey, hard fought. Sorry if that's too soon. Going to the questions, I'll keep them above the belt here. Maybe just going to contract renewals. Scott, you mentioned over 200,000 barrels a day contracted last year and more to come in 2026. So maybe could you provide a broader commercial update on what you're expecting this year? Is it similar to 2025? And any reason we can expect different outcomes, either positive or negative? J. Burrows: Yes. Thanks for the question, and I'll ignore the comment. Maybe next quarter, we can talk about it. But yes, I think we did try to highlight it, obviously, a very, very successful 2025. We feel like we started off the year strong, as Jaret mentioned, both with the Tourmaline recontracting, but as well as the success on Alliance and Nipisi. And so in terms of specifically to 2026, again, we're not going to get into specific contract profiles. It's obviously a competitive dynamic. But what I will say is that we would expect to have a little more granularity on this on our April 7 update and talk a little bit about more where we're at year-to-date and what our expectations are. So good question, but I don't want to front run our April 7 update. Spiro Dounis: Yes. I totally respect that. Second question, maybe just going back to Taylor-to-Gordondale. Just curious how you're thinking about the cadence and the timing for the remaining expansion phases, how you think you're going to break it up? And I ask because it looks like the CapEx guidance is unchanged here. And so do the remaining phases FID in '26? It sounds like it could be after that. Jaret Sprott: Yes, great question. I also put your comments behind me while I answer your question. Yes, so the short haul or the Phase 1, pardon me, the short-hauls Alliance Phase 1, that's fully baked into our 2026 capital guidance right now. And with respect to FID timing, obviously, it will be shortly in the future. You'll probably hear a little bit more on April 7 with respect to that. But it's really -- we have some flexibility now to go and be very focused on project execution on this Phase 1 and Phase 2 will be coming really as we start to fill up these next phases. And like I said earlier to my question to Aaron -- or answer to Aaron was really, it's almost like an on-demand ability for us to grow with our customers. And then also, we'll be we have ordered our pipe, and we have ordered obviously, some of the aboveground equipment like pumps and all that stuff. So that's all part of the process and for the full build-out. So we will just deploy that capital as required. Operator: Your next question comes from Praneeth Satish from Wells Fargo. Praneeth Satish: Maybe just turning to Greenlight. So I understand the commercial details, they're still being finalized. But can you provide any high-level guardrails on maybe the minimum IRR that you'd look to achieve here? And also whether this would be a take-or-pay or cost of service like contract? And then as a follow-up, I guess, if you were to FID greenlight, considering it's got an in-service date pushing into the next decade, would this influence your long-term EBITDA CAGR guidance that you plan to give in April? And I guess, how far out do you think you could reasonably guide if you get this project? Chris Scherman: It's Chris. I'll take the first part on greenlight and then maybe turn it over to Cam to talk about guidance. As I mentioned, we're in the middle of negotiations. So unfortunately, Cam provide limited guidance. But what I can say is it's a long-term contract. It's a long-term contract with midstream-like attributes. It looks a lot like our core business, and we're really pleased with the fact that we've been able to do that. I think when it comes down to it, if you think about it on a build multiple basis, it's going to look a lot like other Pembina greenfield projects that we've been doing under long-term contracts with ancillary benefits down the road as we think about integrating gas supply and the other components into it, looking to drive that down over time, consistent with how we've pursued other projects in our core business. J. Burrows: Yes. I'd just add a little bit of color. Obviously, we have a partner on the file and therefore, a private equity partner and therefore, would need to project finance the project, which when you stack those 2 things up, you can assume that there would be a low-risk EBITDA profile in order to support a project finance. Cameron Goldade: And Praneeth, it's Cam. I'll just pick up on one thing that Chris said around the structure. And that is want to reiterate and make sure everyone understands that while the project in its own right is a really interesting project. One of the things that really sells it for us or really gets us excited about it is the integration with the rest of our business. And so you've heard us talk about it, and I think we'll be in a position to talk more about it or more succinctly about it as we get to our April 7 presentation. But in summary, I mean, there's a ton of integration potential around the Alberta Industrial Heartland. And I think the so what of that is it really starts to take a greenfield-like return profile and really turn it into a brownfield-like return profile ultimately for Pembina. And so that's what gets us really excited about that, and you couple that with a low-risk contract structure. Growth outlook, obviously, as we've said before, once these types of opportunities get built and certainly has been the precedent on the southern side of the border, they tend to cluster. And I think as we walked our Board through yesterday, we have a ton of advantage in terms of our Alberta industrial Heartland position, everything that comes along with that. And so getting the first one in the ground gives us a huge advantage in terms of building a business out of this. Praneeth Satish: Got you. That's very helpful. And then you kind of touched on this, but I guess with the Nipisi pipeline, running full. Can you walk us through, I guess, some of the next phases of potential expansion, what that might look like? Is that -- it sounds like you're adding incremental capacity through additional pump stations, if I heard correctly, so at a low CapEx cost. But I guess how much more of that can you do? And yes, and how should we think about the likely commercial structure here? Is this kind of fee-based or cost of service, some of the expansions that you're looking at? J. Burrows: Thanks. So as Jaret touched on, and he can provide a little bit more color, we are going through some debottlenecks, which can add, as you pointed out, some very reasonable both from a return and from a time-to-market debottlenecks. I think the bigger picture here longer term is we have an opportunity to expand portions of that pipe to add significant capacity. And so we're right now doing the engineering and continuing to advance the engineering on what that might look like and are having commercial discussions. So we kind of have a 2-phased approach. We have the early debottlenecks and then we have a larger potential winning of the pipe. Jaret or Chris, anything there you guys want to add? Jaret Sprott: I would just add that when we say right now that -- so commercially, we're contractually full for the base asset, but we do have a third party that's going to be making connection in the next few months that will get us to physically being full on a physical basis. And then the debottleneck projects I talked about will give us about 20% to 30% incremental torque on that asset. And that truly is through drag-reducing agent that we use every day on our Cochin pipeline. We're very familiar with how that works, and we'll try to work in installing that and then just some minor horsepower upgrades to get that capacity. J. Burrows: Cameron? Cameron Goldade: It's Cam. I just want to -- yes. I just want to chime in one more piece here. And I think it's worth noting that the history on this asset is something that we're quite proud of and I think speaks to our business and our commercial attitude overall, which is, obviously, this asset was in a different form of service with a different customer pre-2021, and it was underpinned by a long-term contract at this point. We obviously took out a service because we thought that was the right thing to do in light of the options. And as we sit here today, the EBITDA that this pipe will generate in 2026 is materially above what it did in the former service under the foundational contracts like to the tune of 50%. So -- and we see significant growth opportunity on top of that. So we're really pleased with our approach to that. And I think it speaks to both the diversity and the optionality in our business. Operator: Your next question comes from Maurice Choy from RBC Capital Markets. Maurice Choy: Just wanted to start with your capacity to do these projects. You sanctioned a few more projects today. It sounds like you've got at least to Dow and Greenlight projects to come later this year. How would you characterize your remaining investment capacity for the remainder of, say, this decade that you can actually self-fund before your debt-to-EBITDA perhaps moves meaningfully closer to your [ $4.25 billion ] limit? Cameron Goldade: Yes. Great question, Maurice. It's Cam here. So I'd say I'd go back to some things we said in the past, which is our track record and our intention has been that we obviously seek to fund capital with cash flow after dividends. And at our level that we're at today, we can think about that as roughly plus or minus about $1.5 billion a year in any given year for round numbers. And I would say, obviously, this year, we've talked about how it's the peak year for Cedar. We are running a slight free cash flow deficit in 2026. But as we look forward to 2027 and beyond, we begin to generate meaningful free cash flow, again based on our currently sanctioned project opportunity profile. As we think about larger opportunities and if you want to think about what might come on top of it, like let's dream for a moment around Greenlight and that becoming a reality and multiple opportunities on top of that. I think that's where we start to like the structure that we have today, which is obviously a partner, and we have that in other parts of our business. We like the opportunities within our business and honestly, look at various financing opportunities, which will enable us. But when you do the really simple math around deploying $1.5 billion at historical return multiples that Pembina has done, you can pretty clearly get to a mid-single-digit growth number for Pembina into a very long term. And so we like that. We have that investment capacity. And not only just the financial capacity, I think we have the execution capacity. Clearly, we have a really solid track record of executing projects on time and on budget, and we're applying that to projects in our core business as well as some of these ones which are on the face of it new for us maybe, but realistically very similar to what we've done in the past in many other ways and taking a similar strategy. So we're managing the risk from that perspective. Maurice Choy: Understood. And if I could just finish up by following up on the 3 streams you discussed on the Greenlight project. I accept that these things are complex, does involve a lot of work. But is there anything material here that is out of your control or your counterparty's control that you see may derail this FID or even the timing of it? J. Burrows: Okay. I'll chime in, and Chris, feel free to add anything. But I think to answer that question, I mean, we are obviously in control of our project and the negotiations with our customer, but we don't control our customers' ultimate decision to FID their innovation center. So there's 2 pieces to this to the puzzle. And I think that's potentially what you're getting at. So there's obviously our piece and then there's the innovation center piece, and that's not obviously within our control. Operator: Your next call comes from Robert Catellier from CIBC Capital Markets. Robert Catellier: Just a quick one here on the new pipeline. I'm just curious on the commercial impetus to use a cost of service agreement on the Birch-to-Taylor Expansion. J. Burrows: That's just the legacy of that pipeline. That's how that pipeline has been underpinned for 10 years as soon as since we put it into service. So that's just been the initial contracting, and that's how that pipeline is structured. Robert Catellier: Okay. And then I just wanted to turn to LNG and some maybe longer-dated questions here. As you're aware, there's been some media reports about the owners of LNG Canada potentially monetizing their stakes in Phase 1 to -- or partially monetizing in order to fund a Phase 2. And given Pembina had a history of developing export options, I'm just curious on your view or interest in participating in an existing operating LNG facility other than the one you're building. The second part of that is, if you look ahead and the possibility of a Cedar LNG Phase 2, I'm wondering if there's enough pipeline capacity for Coastal GasLink as is or if it expands to be able to support a Cedar LNG Phase 2 down the road? J. Burrows: Yes. I think on your first question, our understanding from media reports is that it's simply a financing to help fund Phase 2. So that's not something that we're currently participating in. We don't want to be a passive investor in something. So nothing to see from a Pembina perspective on the rumors of a sell-down. And then on the second part of the question, I mean, we have positioned Cedar to potentially take incremental gas, whether it's the Cedar Link pipeline or a few of the other onshore facilities. And so we would love to do a Cedar 2. But as you pointed out, it's solely dependent on gas supply. And what I would say is right now, our partners at LNG Canada, I think, are pretty focused on getting Phase 1 up and running and engineering Phase 2. So I think until they're through some of those decisions, we won't have a line of sight to that. But we stand ready, willing and able if that's a possibility. Operator: Your next question comes from Benjamin Pham from BMO. Benjamin Pham: Just on the topic of the value chain extensions and opportunities. I mean Pembina has been pretty good at that part of it. You added gas and LNG and then now power. My question specifically on the power side, is that from your advantage now, is that more getting your feet wet through the DC Greenlight opportunity to do a couple of cogens? Or is there a much more broader potentially per scaled growth allocation that Pembina is looking at? Chris Scherman: It's Chris. Well, here's what I'd say. I'd say we definitely see the potential for significant growth in the gas-to-power space, in particular, to power data centers. We think that the Alberta market and the Alberta is ripe for growth in that space, and we think we're really well positioned with our current project with our partners. And so for us, it is one of the growth pathways that we're pursuing, frankly, and see an opportunity to grow into. We're not looking to grow into the merchant power space. That's not a space we're going to go to. You mentioned cogens, I mean, cogens, integrated cogens associated with existing infrastructure and deals are certainly in play. But as far as the meaningful growth pathway, it's really that behind the meter gas to power to support innovation center growth, which we see a lot of potential. Jaret Sprott: And I'll just add to that, Ben. If you think about -- I mentioned earlier in the call that gas egress is obviously one of the biggest constraints for Canadians to produce condensate and get it up to the oil sands. A full build-out of Cedar is roughly -- pardon me, a full build-out of Greenlight is roughly 75% of the same gas consumption that Cedar would be. So obviously, driving that for our customers, allowing them to fill our value chain in other areas is pretty key for Pembina. Benjamin Pham: Okay. Got it. And then the value chain side of things, what's Pembina's current view on the oil side of things, whether it's organic or inorganic? J. Burrows: Well, I think from our perspective, we remain bullish on oil growth. As Jaret mentioned a few times in his comments, we're excited about all the potential debottlenecks on the Enbridge system and on TMX for a couple of reasons. That's obviously going to drive growth in the oil sands, which should have a pull on condensate, which should be good for our overall system. In terms of Pembina's specific investments as it relates to oil, right now, our -- I'd say our 2 main focuses would be on the Nipisi pipeline, which we've talked to at length today. And then as Jaret also mentioned earlier, the Charlie Lake oil play on our conventional system. So that's really where we're focused from a direct oil exposure, but we are excited and bullish on oil growth in the oil sands and therefore, condensate. Operator: Your next question comes from the line of Sumantra Banerjee from UBS. Sumantra Banerjee: Just a quick general one on capital allocation. I know you discussed your comments on leverage and the previous question on investment capacity before. But I just wanted to ask if you had any more color you could add on 2026 capital allocation priorities. Cameron Goldade: Yes, it's Cam here. I guess I'll just reiterate that for 2026, we're really focused on project execution. And so obviously, we are sustaining a free cash flow deficit in 2026. So barring a material change in our business performance, free cash flow is going to be directed towards capital execution in 2026. Outside of that, we expect to continue. We've had a long track record of a growing dividend, and so anticipate to continue to deliver that in line with our historical trend in 2026 and beyond that. And outside of that, it continues to be just execution all around. Obviously, we continue to reassess things should market fundamentals change drastically. But as we see the world right now, it's sort of steady as she goes in the way we've laid it out in our guidance. Operator: Your next question comes from Patrick Kenny from NBCM. Patrick Kenny: I was just wondering if we can get an update on the Yellowhead extraction opportunity, assuming that the pipeline starts construction here in a few months. Curious what the timing could look like for your extraction opportunity. And then you talked about how tight the condensate market is, but I guess with Redwater 4 coming online so I just wanted to get an update on how you're thinking about a Redwater 5 based on C3+ fundamentals. Chris Scherman: Pat, it's Chris. I'll take the Yellowhead question and then turn over to Jaret. So continue to progress Yellowhead, remain excited about that project. expect something this year, frankly, as far as an announcement if we can keep everything on track and get to where we want to get it. Jaret Sprott: And Pat, with respect to RFS V, I'll just point out, RFS IV is not on yet, but I'm just kidding. It really will come down to incremental frac capacity, either be it regional or in the Fort Saskatchewan area. Pembina, obviously, we believe we have a great product for our customers today. We have unit train capacity. We have ample storage. We have high reliability and availability. And we do -- RFS IV is being executed at a -- on a dollar per barrel basis, significantly better than any other frac expansions in Western Canada right now. With all that said, NGL frac capacity is really going to grow with new gas egress. So as we get more and more light and see that LNG Canada Phase 2 or other projects becoming real and in service, that's really -- because that gas demand has to find a home, then the NGLs will get extracted. So I kind of always think of it as frac capacity will continue to grow with gas stress constraints getting unlocked. But we are in a tremendous position to be building V. Patrick Kenny: Okay. Great. And then maybe for Scott, just high level here as it relates to the grand bargain MOU. Obviously, we're waiting for clarity on carbon policy this spring. I was just curious your thoughts on what industry would need to see in order to support projects like Pathways or even your Alberta carbon grid. Just overall, what needs to happen to support that next major wave of oil sands growth? J. Burrows: Well, I think when we just highlighted a couple of times today, we have what I'll say is some very economic and fast-to-market expansions up to 700,000 barrels. I mean those numbers have been floating around slightly higher, slightly lower on TMX and Enbridge. And to me, that feels like the first wave that's going to be unlocked, and we're pretty excited about that. It's great to see the governments coming together and working in a more constructive manner. I think we're pretty optimistic about what could come out of that. Specifically as it relates to carbon price, I think just as we've highlighted over the last several years, certainty and regulatory certainty will be a huge impact on whether some of these carbon activities go ahead or not. One of the things that we've talked a lot about -- we haven't talked about our ACG project for a while, but that's not because we haven't been working on it in the background and we continue to progress it. But it's hard to contract it when you don't know what the carbon price is. And I think as we get more clarity on long-term carbon price, that will allow companies to make the decisions that they are going to make around capturing carbon or not. So I'm pleased to see that we're making some progress and optimistic as we move towards April that the governments are going to come together and come up with a plan that works for everybody. Operator: At this time, there are no further questions. I will now turn the call back to Scott Burrows, CEO, for closing remarks. J. Burrows: Thank you for all the questions today and the interest in Pembina. I'd be remiss after talking about all the accomplishments in 2025, if I didn't thank all of our hard-working staff and contractors and communities that we work with. So thank you, everyone. And I think you heard on the call today, we're pretty excited and optimistic about 2026 and beyond. Have a good rest of your day. Operator: This concludes today's call. Thank you for attending. You may now disconnect.
Operator: Good morning, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to Boralex Fourth Quarter 2025 Financial Results Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] Please note that the conference is being recorded. [Operator Instructions] Finally, media representatives are invited to contact Camille Laventure, Senior Advisor, Public Affairs and External Communications at Boralex. Her contact information is provided at the end of the quarterly press release. And now I would like to turn the call over to Coline Desurmont, Director, Investor Relations for Boralex. Please go ahead. Coline Desurmont: Thank you, operator. Good morning, everyone. Welcome to Boralex's Fourth Quarter and Year-end Results Conference Call. On today's call, Patrick Decostre, our President and Chief Executive Officer, will provide an update of our business. Afterwards, Stephane Milot, our Executive Vice President and Interim Chief Financial Officer, will present the financial highlights of the quarter. Then we will be available to answer your questions. During this call, we will discuss historical as well as forward-looking information. When talking about the future, there are a variety of risk factors that have been listed in our different filings, which can materially change our estimated results. These documents are all available for consultation on SEDAR. Mr. Decostre will now start with his comments. Please go ahead, Patrick. Patrick Decostre: Thank you, Coline, and good morning, everyone. Thank you for joining us today. It's a pleasure for me to present our results and key achievements for the fourth quarter and fiscal year 2025. 2025 was a year of strong execution for Boralex despite greater quarterly volatility in resource generation and unfavorable year-over-year pricing comparison in France. We remain disciplined in our approach focused on our long-term strategy and continue to deliver sustainable growth while reinforcing our leadership in renewable energy. We have been very active in the fall by submitting projects in 4 different RFPs, 2 in Ontario, 1 in New York State and 1 in the U.K. The demand for renewable remains very solid in our different markets, and we're counting on a very strong pipeline of projects to benefit from for years to come. These results not only reflects the strength and commitment of our talented teams across the organization, but also the resilience of our business model and our strong focus on creating long-term value for our shareholders and partners. In terms of financial performance. For fiscal year 2025, total combined production was 8% higher than in 2024, but 10% below anticipated production. Wind conditions in 2025 improved compared to last year throughout North America and the commissioning of new projects provided a significant advantage. However, overall wind levels in France and in the United States fell short of our projections. As a result, our financial performance in 2025 is below our expectations for a combined operating income of CAD 248 million and a combined EBITDA of CAD 655 million, down 2% from 2024. The increase in production was not sufficient to offset the negative impact of lower selling prices in France, as expected, due to lower prices on our short-term contract. Stephane will cover later in more details our fourth quarter results. On the development side, 2025 was a very good year for Boralex with our portfolio of development projects and growth trajectory now exceeding 8.2 gigawatts. Our installed capacity stands at 3.8 gigawatts, representing an increase of 615 megawatts, driven entirely by organic growth. During the year, our company entered a new phase with the launch of our 2030 strategic plan, building on the strong foundation we have established over many years and setting a clear path for continued long-term success. Since its introduction, we have made significant progress in our 4 key markets. In the United Kingdom, the commissioning of Limekiln wind farm reflects our expansion in that high potential market. Our position was also solidified with receiving ministerial approval for the 189-megawatt Clashindarroch extension, which includes both wind and battery storage. And with the recent award of a CfD for the Sallachy 44-megawatt Sallachy wind farm through the AR7 process. Meanwhile, in France, we have consolidated our leadership position with the commissioning of 2 wind farms, Fontaine-Les-Boulans and Febvin-Palfart, totaling 29 megawatts. In addition, Boralex ranked first by cumulative capacity in the most recent French Wind Auction, securing 2 projects with a total capacity of 125 megawatts. In the U.S., we signed 2 contracts with NYSERDA for the Fort Covington and Two Rivers Solar Project, totaling 450 megawatts. Both projects have advanced to the secured stage within the year. Looking to our progress in Canada. The commissioning of our Apuiat wind farm marks an important step in Quebec renewable energy journey. We are also moving forward with the construction of 2 major wind projects, Des Neiges Sud, for which we secured financing earlier this year, and most recently, Des Neiges Charlevoix. Finally, we reached an important milestone with the successful deployment of battery energy storage technology. This quarter, we have -- we commissioned the Sanjgon battery energy storage system, Boralex's first operational storage project in North America developed in partnership with the Walpole Island First Nation. The Hagersville battery energy storage project also began operations in Q4 2025, and we are very pleased to announce the commercial commissioning of the site as we received yesterday the retroactive confirmation from IESO effective February 18. This project is the largest battery storage project in Canada and has been developed in partnership with The Six Nations of the Grand River Partners First Nations. Together, these projects add 380 megawatts to our installed capacity, making us the largest battery storage operator in Canada. We also highlight the rapid expansion of our storage activities in Ontario and the continued diversification of our portfolio in terms of technologies and also in terms of type of revenues. Both projects demonstrate our team's strong execution and ability to successfully scale new technologies in new regions. Turning to market updates. Quebec continues to show strong momentum in renewable energy development. Hydro-Quebec has confirmed that it will launch a new call for wind power tenders in spring 2026 for Southern Quebec while launching earlier this week a call for partners for its major development zone. With our sustained presence and ongoing development activities in this market, we are well positioned to capture these upcoming opportunities. At the federal level, Ottawa has introduced 25 global tariffs on certain steel derived products, including wind turbine towers, while also tightening import quotas. Partial exemptions have been granted and additional carve-outs may follow, particularly for projects already contracted or currently under procurement. In the United States, NYSERDA 2025 call for tenders closed in December with results expected shortly. Also, NYSERDA has been granted expanded authority to procure up to 5.6 terawatt hour per year by 2029, signaling continued policy support and long-term demand for renewable energy in New York State. In France, after a period of uncertainty, the publication of the third Pluriannual Energy Plan in February 2026 finally sets the country's energy trajectory through 2035. It aims to increase the share of decarbonized energy in final consumption to around 60% by 2030, supported by a mix of renewable energy and nuclear generation. The framework also confirms the relaunch of renewable energy tenders starting in 2026. I will now briefly review the main variances in our development project portfolio and growth path. Our portfolio of early, mid and advanced stages project now represents 7.2 gigawatt. The change was mainly due to the addition of projects in the early and mid-stage totaling 1,383 megawatt, partly offset by the transition of project to the secured stage and by the discontinuation or sale of other projects. The growth path now consists of 1.1 gigawatt of wind, solar and battery storage projects. The evolution of the growth path included the addition of new projects in the secured stage, including Fort Covington and Two Rivers Solar Project totaling 450 megawatts, and the 125-megawatt Oxford BESS project. This increase was partially offset by the start of operation of 6 projects during the year, representing 615 megawatts that moved into operation. At the beginning of its new strategic plan, Boralex is very well positioned to deliver strong organic growth going forward in each of its targeted market. Before handing it over to Stephane, I would like to say a few words on the appointment of Philippe Bonin as the new CFO announced this morning. I'm very pleased to welcome Philippe in the Boralex team. Philippe will bring extensive leadership experience from major companies in a variety of sectors and a strong strategic mindset that will be essential in supporting our 2030 growth ambitions. We look forward to his contribution as we continue to make Boralex evolve to deliver on our key objectives. I also want to sincerely thank Stephane Milot for his outstanding work during the interim period. His dedication and deep understanding of our business has been invaluable during this transition. On a more personal note, Stephane, I want to express how grateful I am to be working with you. Your truly compassionate and people-centered leadership has made a meaningful impact here at Boralex. You are highly appreciated throughout the company, and we are very lucky to have your ongoing support and great spirit well beyond the scope of your responsibilities. Thank you, Stephane. [Foreign Language] Stéphane Milot: Hi, everyone. Thank you, Patrick, for your kind words. It has been a great opportunity with a lot of work, but also a lot of fun, I can tell you. So I truly appreciate it and look forward to continuing our journey together. Special thanks to our finance team at Corporate, North America, Europe. You rock, everyone. We did -- what a past 6 months we had together. So you really made the difference. Thank you. So now back to the quarter. Total combined production was up 17% compared to the same quarter last year, driven by more favorable wind conditions and the impact of newly commissioned sites in Europe and North America. Production was nevertheless 7% lower than anticipated due to unfavorable weather conditions in North America and to a lesser extent, in Europe. Our combined EBITDA amounted to $203 million, up $12 million, and consolidated discretionary cash flows amounted to $56 million, up $9 million compared to the fourth quarter of 2024. The financial results were positively impacted by better wind conditions and the contribution of newly commissioned sites in Europe and Canada, partially offset by the impact of lower prices of short-term contracts in France. I will now provide a more detailed overview of our quarterly production. So in North America, total combined production for the quarter was 5% higher than the same quarter last year, but 9% lower than anticipated production. Production from wind assets in North America was 9% higher compared to the same quarter last year. However, production came in 6% below expectations, mainly due to lower contribution from U.S. wind farms. Production from wind -- not, sorry, from hydro assets was 23% lower than last year and 30% lower than anticipated, mainly due to unfavorable weather conditions across North America. Production from solar assets in the United States was 9% lower than the same quarter last year and 5% lower than anticipated. In Europe, total production was 40% higher compared to the same quarter last year, but 4% lower than anticipated. Regarding our balance sheet, available liquidity and authorized financing amounted to $681 million as of December 31, 2025, an increase of $158 million compared to December 31 of last year. Total debt stood at $4.4 billion, with project debt accounting for 85% of the total. I would like to congratulate again our finance team for delivering [ especially ] results this year, securing $1 billion in project financing and closing $250 million corporate financing jointly led by La Caisse and Fondaction in Quebec. So these achievements highlight our ability to structure sophisticated financings on optimal terms, strengthening our financial flexibility and positioning us well to achieve our 2030 objectives. So lastly, this year was an important one on the CSR front. Boralex was ranked first in the annual Best 50 Corporate Citizens ranking by Corporate Knights, demonstrating our leadership in sustainability among Canadian companies. Other recognitions received this year include an award presented to Boralex France for its diversity initiatives as well as the price awarded to the Hagersville battery energy storage project by the Canadian Renewable Energy Association for the Innovative Canadian Clean Energy Project of the Year. These achievements illustrate Boralex's ability to combine performance, innovation, and lasting positive impact in the communities where we operate. For more information, I invite you to read our 2025 CSR report, which was published earlier this morning along with all the other annual documents that were published. So in conclusion, 2025 was a successful year for Boralex with the launch of our new strategic plan, supported by the commissioning of large-scale projects in our key markets. And looking ahead, we are very excited for the years to come, and we will continue our efforts to execute on our projects. We have been active in recent tender processes in Ontario, New York State while carefully preparing for the upcoming 2026 wind power call for tender announced by Hydro-Quebec. So driven by sustained demand for renewable energy, Boralex continues to grow in a disciplined yet ambitious manner, backed by a renewable team that is fully engaged and committed to implement our strategic plan and achieve our growth objectives. Thank you for your attention. We are now ready to take your questions. Yes. Operator: [Operator Instructions] We are now going to proceed with our first question, and the question comes from the line of Baltej Sidhu from National Bank of Canada. Baltej Sidhu: Looking forward to continue working with you, Stephane. So just a few questions for me here. On the French wind roll-offs, I think the government in France noted that it's going to be focusing on repowering existing wind farms to increase capacity and protect the environment, which we believe is going to be beneficial to your portfolio. So could you just provide a little bit of insight as to how we should be thinking about the French portfolio in that regard and what you've identified to be repowered? I don't know, you have Ally-Mercoeur and also Le Grand Camp. But any other additional details you can provide? Patrick Decostre: Yes, sure. Indeed, the government is looking to this to favor the social acceptability of project and make them easier to be authorized. Our team, as you know, we have had a recurring strategy before the 2022 crisis, and we have postponed it a little bit because the prices were so high that it was interesting to catch this value during -- up to 2025. So no, the team -- in between, the team has worked on roughly 450 megawatts of new project reborrowing that will increase. In this 450 megawatts, there is 200 megawatts of new capacity. So it means that we have taken 250 megawatts of projects in operation and we have worked to obtain an authorization on this project. Half of these projects have already been authorized. So we will be ready to bid them in the next RFP when they will come. And typically, the Ally-Mercoeur project is both a repowering and an extension of a project that we put in service 21 year ago, I was 21 years younger at that time and you too, in France of 39 megawatts and now it's 104-megawatt project that will be put in service in 2028. So this is typically an advantage, as you mentioned, for Boralex going forward. Stéphane Milot: Yes. Just maybe a point on the megawatt that Patrick mentioned. This is like for the next, I would say, 5 years or so, like it will be bid in upcoming RFPs. It's like -- just want to mention that. Patrick Decostre: Yes. And it's a favorable situation also in terms of return. Obviously, We are developing where we are. Thanks, I would say, to the situation in the U.S., there is a little bit more pressure on the price of the turbine worldwide. So we are able to secure good price in France, as you have seen, around EUR 86 per megawatt hour, the last tender. And the price of the turbine are kept down. So it's a good return that we will have to execute with this project. Baltej Sidhu: Excellent. That's great color. So just sticking on with France and the other side of the equation towards pricing. We're looking at merchants and recontracting prices that you've noted. Do you see them coming in line with your expectations? And how do we think about the cadence of recontracting those assets that are now coming off those short-term contracts? Patrick Decostre: Essentially, in France, we have a policy of what we call the reference hedging path. So we are fixing the price every year in advance, up to 3 years in advance. And the percentage of that is hedged is increasing the soon -- the closer you are to the gate closure of the year before. So that is exactly what we're doing. So we are -- you have to understand that our team is always in the market on this with -- this is always pay as produced contract also. We are not taking volume commitment on that, and they are comparing to the possibility also to go with the brownfield PPA. But you understand that 250 megawatts of project that will be repowered in the next years is part of this portfolio of projects that are emerging today because it was the project -- the contract we early terminate in 2022. So that is another avenue for this project is to be increased and securing a 20-year contract with EDF again. Stéphane Milot: But in the current context, it's for sure that the priority is to go with the EDF contract so to build these projects. But we did, as Patrick mentioned, we had for specifically those projects, but not project, but assets where we exited the contracts, we made a lot of money in the past few years. So that was a good decision to push the repowering forward. Baltej Sidhu: Great. And then just one more for me here. Could you give us an update on your 2 U.S. solar farms that I think has secured a contract, Fort Covington and Two Rivers that Patrick had touched on in the prepared remarks. So what conditions do we need to see for those 2 projects products to cross the line towards FID and if there's any expectations on kind of timing, if you can give any details on that? Patrick Decostre: Yes. Essentially, on these projects, we are working on finalizing the investment decision in terms of finalizing negotiation with model suppliers, finalizing negotiation with a BoP supplier and engineering at the same time to optimize them. So the team is working hard on this. And yes, we will provide information when we would be ready to take this investment decision. Operator: We are now going to proceed with our next question, and the questions come from the line of Sean Steuart from TD Cowen. Sean Steuart: A couple of questions. Patrick, hoping you can give some perspective on the upcoming wind tender from Hydro-Quebec, whether it's partnering with them on larger scale projects or advancing your own projects. Can you give us a sense of the magnitude you anticipate participating or at least submitting into that tender and expected timing on -- the clarity on timing with respect towards -- with respect to that tender. Patrick Decostre: Yes. There is 2 things. There is one for large-scale project in Hydro-Quebec as open one area, which is called Wocawson for a partnership selection process. This is -- we are -- Boralex meets all the minimum eligibility criteria for the selection. As you know, we are a partner with Hydro-Quebec since years. And so we know we have good communication with them. We know how to work with them. And our team is presently looking to all the RFP requirements, the governance structure and how we can play this with them. This is a partnership between Hydro-Quebec, Alliance de l'Est, and IPP, and it confirms what Hydro-Quebec has said 2 years ago that for the large project, they will go with IPP. So that is, I think, the good news because I know that in the market, there was a question about this. So this is confirming what we are seeing and what Hydro-Quebec has been saying for the last 2 years that there will be a position for IPPs there. So that's one thing. The other point is they mentioned that there will be consolidation for a call for tender for a minimum of 150-megawatt size of project in Southern Quebec, and this is typically aligned with the Boralex development footprint and experience and the relationship that we have with indigenous community. And the consultation is now. The bid are due in February '27, and the award is scheduled for August '27 next year. So this is also something that is -- it will be, again, long-term contract. So very classical project in Quebec for Boralex, and we will be there to bid. Sean Steuart: Okay. And then maybe a question for Stephane. As you work to move more projects into the secure development pipeline. Can you comment on the funding platform? Any thoughts towards incremental asset recycling or refinancing initiatives that you might have in your thought process towards bolstering liquidity? Stéphane Milot: Yes. So it's really aligned with the plan we presented in last June. So asset recycling, not necessarily in the near future, but they're in the plan. And also, like you've seen with the debt with La Caisse and Fondaction. So corporate debt, asset recycling and potential refinancing, we're working on a large one in France and always looking at other opportunities to get better conditions or flexibility in terms of financing. So pretty much in line with plan. Operator: [Operator Instructions] We are now going to proceed with our next question, and the questions come from the line of Nelson Ng from RBC Capital Markets. Nelson Ng: My first question just relates to Hagersville. So congrats on commissioning the project. I just want to clarify, I guess, given that it was operating since December, but only commissioned last week, will that project make a full quarter financial contribution in Q1? Stéphane Milot: Yes. We got some very limited revenue in the fourth quarter but it will kick in starting more at, say from mid-February with more regular revenue stream. So you can, in your modeling, take this data, the kind of a date to start applying the contribution that we've discussed with you in the past. Nelson Ng: Okay. Perfect. And then just looking at that growth path chart and just looking at some of the bigger projects on the secured list. So I think you were talking about the New York solar projects earlier. The plan is to complete those projects by -- or in 2028, right? Stéphane Milot: Yes. So we're still working on with that schedule in mind. Yes. So we're going as fast as we can. Nelson Ng: Okay. And then for the Oxford battery project, is that also a 2028 completion date project? Stéphane Milot: No. That's a 2027, if I recall. Patrick Decostre: Mid '27, yes. Yes, we obtained all the authorization. There was some final authorization that should be obtained and we were planning to obtain them in March. And finally, in February, we get everything this year. So we are -- the kickoff meeting of the project was this week. Stéphane Milot: It's going really well, financing also, everything is in line. It's going to be -- it's all green, if I could say, on this one. Nelson Ng: Great. And then one other thing. So you were talking about recontracting in France, but I know in Texas and New Mexico, I think there are a few projects that might be selling power on a merchant basis. And I know, I guess it's a joint decision given that you own 50% of the assets. But given the demand for power in that region, like what are your thoughts on whether it's recontracting those assets, repowering them? Stéphane Milot: I will -- just one thing before -- go ahead, Nelson. Nelson Ng: Yes. No, I'm just thinking in terms of from a repowering perspective. Like time is -- I think, time is running out in terms of prequalifying them for tax credit. So can you just talk about recontracting, repowering and some of the considerations you're looking at? Stéphane Milot: Yes. I will let Patrick answer this one. But just before, you talked about recontracting in France. It's really more like our typical repowering project that we're looking at in France, which is really like, you know, it's like almost -- it's a rebuild. It's not a repower like it could be seen in the U.S. So it's a new project where we're looking at it, and we are taking into consideration the fact that when we repower or rebuild, we remove the -- what we had in place and when we looked at returns, it's a net return on the overall project. So I just want to make sure everyone on the line get this part. As far as U.S. is concerned, we're not in a position right now to indicate exactly what's going to be our strategy there, but we're working on different scenarios. Nelson Ng: Okay. Got it. And then just one last question. You mentioned the short-term contracts in France in terms of the pricing headwind. I think I was doing the rough math, and I think the realized European wind price year-over-year was down about 22%, and I presume those short-term contracts are the key driver. But when you look forward into 2026, is there a rough expectation in terms of what the realized wind price would be in terms of -- like is it a smaller step down in '26? Stéphane Milot: Yes. I think as you know, all the pricing effect, Nelson, has different parts to it. For merchant, I think if you look at the forward curves, it will give you an idea. But as far as contract is concerned, we still expect in 2026 a negative but much less important negative effect than what we got in 2025, but still a negative variation because of the way we have set up the contracts when we exited contracts in end of 2022. And also the fact that we had a window, as you know, to like the 18 months measure that we could benefit from. So it's all that, that we got the benefit in a few years back and then now it's like unwinding. So 2026 will be the last year where we'll get this effect. After that, it's going to be more back to normal. Operator: There are currently no further questions at this time. So I'll hand back to you for closing remarks. Stéphane Milot: All right. Let's go, Coline. Coline Desurmont: Yes. Thanks, everyone, for your attention. Our next conference call to announce first quarter results will be on Thursday, May 14, 2026 at 9 a.m. Have a nice day, everyone, and a nice weekend. Patrick Decostre: Thank you, everyone. Stéphane Milot: Thanks. Operator: This concludes today's conference call. Thank you all for participating. You may now disconnect your lines. Thank you.
Operator: Good morning, and welcome to the disclosures. Before starting, I would like to remind you that once the presentation is over, and as usual, we will move on to the Q&A session. [Operator Instructions] So we're going to start with the presentation. We have Mikel Barandiaran, the CEO of Dominion; and Roberto Tobillas, the Director General; and Patricia Berjon, who's the Director for Corporate Development. Unknown Executive: Well, good morning, everybody, and many thanks for attending this call for 2025, and many thanks for being so patient, too, because we are starting somewhat later because of a technical issue. So many, many thanks, many thanks for waiting. But before talking about the figures of the year and to understand how this evolution has been in the different business areas, I think that what we should do is mention how the year 2025 has evolved and also refer to the many events that have happened at the global level that have had a direct impact on the company's evolution. And I think that compared to previous years, geopolitics has now become an ingredient that we have to take into account because we are facing a context where what is improbable has become something possible. And this global paradigmatic shift also includes other things like elections in those countries in which we have a significant presence like in Chile and the paradox that still exists in France where it's difficult to carry out structural reforms. But as regards to macroeconomic events, the most relevant ones have focused on the tariff war that was kicked off in April by the North American government and the effect that this has had for global trade. But although this has not affected the company directly, it has done so indirectly because it has affected the decision-making of some of our customers or different economic agents. And another consequence, another relevant consequence is the strong depreciation of the North American dollar, which has produced significant exchange rate differences and conversion differences in the figures of this year. And what this proves what we already observed since we presented our current strategic plan or our most recent plan, and it shows that there's more uncertainty, which is not disappearing. It's only increasing. But as regards to the strategic plan, this fiscal year of 2025 has been a year in which we have consolidated the transformation that we initiated in the previous fiscal years, and we materialized many of the objectives that we had set ourselves within the pillars of recurrence, simplification and sustainability, which are the 3 fundamental pillars of the plan. So in the year 2025, we initiated the new reporting where the businesses and environmental activities for the industry have their own strategic area structure on the Global Dominion environment. And the creation of these 2 major areas, Global Dominion Environment and the rest of the businesses under Global Dominion Tech Energy want to simplify and regroup the activities in such a way that it's easier to understand the company and also be able to value its elements. And this also means that we can work on different options to develop the strategic area of GDE, where the company has put its focus on organic and inorganic growth, which is the end result of the potential that we can see nowadays where the buildup opportunities are numerous and where the optimization of markets by geographies and activities is a fact. This process has already been addressed in the second part of 2025 with several acquisitions of companies and infrastructures, and we hope that we will add more in the short and medium term. And at the same time that we are developing greenfields in different strategic locations like the case of Tarragona and the United Arab Emirates. And finally, and as regards to the simplification process, we already made the most relevant divestitures of activities in previous fiscal years. And in the month of July, we carried out the divestment of the PV facilities we had in the Dominican Republic that has improved the balance sheet. And we also divested our activities in France where the possibilities of growth were below our objectives. And this divestment doesn't have any impact on the year's figures because this was as of December 31, but in any case, it's going to change things in 2026. But apart from the qualitative improvements, if we were to have to underscore the figures of the year, well, we are growing organically by 4% and we are doing so because both GDE as well as GDP services, in other words, the recurrent areas of the company are growing above the guidance. They're growing at levels of 6%. And this means that this year, the projects have not contributed as much as in other previous years. And we also have to underscore that the simplification of nonstrategic activities is improving our profitability. It's growing and our EBITDA over sales margin is 13.7%, which is a maximum figure for the company, a historic maximum figure. Thirdly, the depreciation of the dollar affects the balance sheet as well as our net profits and this has a one-off effect because of the correction of the divested assets in the Dominican Republic. And this one-off is EUR 18.5 million. And without that correction, our net profits would have been 10% higher compared to the figure reported in 2024. But an important thing is a strong reduction in the net financial debt, which at the end of the fiscal year is EUR 137 million, and this is 25% lower than the figure reported in '24 and 35% -- sorry, and 34% lower than the figure we saw in the first half of the year. So that means that the leverage ratio is 0.9x EBITDA. But before talking about the figures in detail, I would like to remind you that the figures for 2024 have been pro forma to be able to compare identical parameters because the divestitures are significant. And we have applied a pro forma formula. So in other words, these divestments, it's EUR 134 million and EUR 7.5 million in and EUR 5.2 million in net profits. So we are going to compare this with this figure with this pro forma figure that gives us a real snapshot of what this looks like. We've closed the year with a business figure of EUR 1,045 million, which means that an organic growth of sales of 4% with lots of inorganic growth and also growth of ForEx because ForEx has taken off 2% and inorganic growth, 11%. And although there's been a slowdown of projects whose causes that I will be describing later on in the information divided by segments. And as I said, we are growing at a very good speed over in -- especially in activities, the recurrence of GDE and GDT services and the margins are growing and EBITDA has reached a maximum figure of 13.7% of the sales, which shows that this simplification has been very handy with the divestitures of those activities that had lower margins, and we focused much more on activities and businesses that have much more profitability than are related to the environmental world. And the results of 2025, some of them stand below EBITDA, and it's important to detail this and the most important things would be a progressive reduction of financial expenses that finishes with a reduction of 8%, another EUR 2.5 million less in absolute terms. And this reduction came from the reduction of interest rates, which we expect will continue in the next quarters, motivated by 2 factors because there's been a reduction of the financial debt in our balance sheet and the normalization of the interest rates, especially in the United States, where the company also has debt denominated in dollars, interrupted operations. And well, we have the relative figures for the Cerritos wind farm and losses have been reduced by EUR 3 million compared to 2024. And this reduction is mainly due to a reduction of financial expenses associated with the funding of the wind farm and with the commissioning of it, which would generate income. And this commissioning of the wind farm was one of the necessary conditions to carry out the divestment in the infrastructure, which started in the second half of 2025. And right now, we are working on the negotiation of a PPA with different companies so that we can maximize the value of this infrastructure. And finally, this correction that has been brought about by the depreciation of the North American dollar in the assets of the Dominican Republic represent an extraordinary effect of EUR 18.5 million. So the attributable net profit is EUR 10.2 million without taking into account that one-off of EUR 18.5 million. So the figure would be EUR 28.7 million, which compared to 2024, it's a recurrent profit that is 10% higher. But let's now review -- let's review each one of the segments, each one of the business segments, starting off with Global Dominion Environment. And this segment has a turnover of EUR 472 million in the fiscal year, which is equivalent to an organic growth of 5.9%, which is nearly 6% that we mentioned before, a percentage that stands above the guidance of the strategic plan. And so this, we have to add positive in organic growth totaling 1.1% as a consequence of these acquisitions that we announced in Q3. In other words, we're talking about Ecogestion de Residuos and UREC, which is a recovery unit for water in Cartagena, which is in the area of circular economy and the German company, ZCR that operates in the area of decarbonization. But sales have had a negative impact on ForEx of about minus 3% and this area has reached a contribution margin of 10.3% of sales, which is somewhat higher compared to the figure reported in the previous fiscal year. And as mentioned on other occasions, within this area, there are different activities with very different margins. And we have those margins of circular economy that are higher than the rest. And right now, the circular economy represents 25% in the area of GDE. So as the weight of circular economy grows, the objective would be that this should reach something like 50-50, and then the margins will carry on growing. Regarding the total figures of the company, this segment, GDE accounts for 45% of our turnover and 28% of the total margin of the company. So -- and in relation to what we've already said about the strategy of the company in this area, we are working on a relevant pipeline with lots of acquisition possibilities, and we're looking for new capacities, new capabilities and a new position so that GDE can become a European reference in terms of environmental services and infrastructures. And not only that, we also have the organic development of this area, which is very significant. And I have to underscore that as regards to the circular economy, we're signing new contracts for the recovery of hydrocarbons and both in Spain and Latin America, but especially in Chile and Peru, where this activity -- where this automatic cleaning activity is a new development, and it's something that only we do and where we are consolidating our presence, and this is becoming a recurrent activity. As regards to decarbonization, we're still signing new contracts with existing and new customers. And we've signed the first thermal optimization contract in the United States. So we're opening up this market to this activity, and this has an enormous potential. Let's move on now to Global Dominion Tech Energy. And here, we explain the 2 segments, GDT Services and GDT projects. On the one hand, GDT Services closes the fiscal year with a business figure of EUR 460 million, which is organic growth of 5.8%. And this segment is what actually has the divestitures -- the divestments are focused on this segment, and they subtract 23% of the turnover, and we have to add that ForEx is subtracting 2%. So this year, anything that is related to this area is affecting us in other areas, too. And the GDT Services segment accounts for 44% of the total sales. But if we were to add this segment to GDE, we'd be talking about 90% of the company's turnover. And these segments are recurrent, as I said before. So therefore, we have achieved this objective, this recurrency objective in the plan that is exceeding 60% of our total and also 60% of the contribution margin related to recurrent activities. And these recurrent activities are the ones that have grown organically above the guidance. So this gives us lots of visibility in terms of turnover and in terms of future cash flow generation. So we have the margin -- the contribution margin in the segment that reached 19.7% over sales. And as regards to the total figure of the company, GDT Services accounts for 53% of the company's contribution margin. Finally, GDT Projects closes the fiscal year with a figure of EUR 113 million, which is 14% lower than what we reported a year ago. And as mentioned, not only in this period of time, but this behavior has to do with the temporary slowdown in the execution of projects. And this is a consequence of the situation of geopolitical uncertainty that we're facing and also because there's been a change. There's been a change of strategies in renewable projects where we do not execute anything until we incorporate a financial partner. So we want to have a greater financial discipline. So this slower rhythm of execution does not represent the loss of any projects or the collapse of any projects. So our pipeline is still strong and will eventually become income for us. And on the closing date of the fiscal year, the pipeline is EUR 413 million, which I think is well more than 2 years of project execution. The contribution margin now reaches 28.5% of sales in the year. And in Q4, the percentage has been higher, much higher than the average, and this can be explained by the reversal of some provisions because of costs that we have not incurred in a project that has already finished. So we made an adjustment and the adjustment was positive, and it's the transmission line or transport lines in Angola. As regards to the total figures of the company, GDT projects accounts for 11% over sales and 30% of the contribution margin. So once -- now that we've taken a look at the P&L, both globally and by segments, let's move on now to the main movements of the balance sheet. With regard to fixed assets, we have -- they have remained in line because this has coincided with the amortization of the CapEx of the year and also with the changes of perimeter. And there have been changes in the infrastructural assets where this reduction of nearly EUR 62 million comes from divesting in the photovoltaic assets in the Dominican Republic. The variation of the operational net circulating capital -- working capital is -- represents a net investment of EUR 250 million and there's also variation in the rate of exchange and elimination of the debt positions associated to renewable assets in the Dominican Republic. With regards to financial debt, well, it now stands at EUR 136.6 million, which means that it's a reduction of 25% compared to December of 2024 and 34% compared to the last debt figure reported in June 2025. And this reduction has been brought about by the generation of operating cash flow in the year and also because we've collected EUR 70.3 million because this operation was signed in dollars and in euros, it means that we'll be collecting EUR 70.3 million for the divestment of the wind farms in the Dominican Republic. So that means that the leverage of the company is equivalent to 0.9x EBITDA. So in other words, it's 0.9x for this fiscal year. So this generation of operating cash flow was EUR 71.7 million. So that means 5.4% higher compared to the operating cash flow that we generated in 2024. And of course, in 2024, we generated EUR 76 million in cash flow, but we have to discount a number of activities. So the figure for comparative purposes is EUR 78 million. Cash generation has been used to pay an earn-out totaling EUR 1.2 million that corresponds to the acquisition of the Gesthidro company in 2023 and also for the payment of dividends to the shareholders were EUR 50 million in July as well as the minority shareholders, EUR 1.9 million and the investment of C&O related to the divestment in the Dominican Republic and EUR 6.3 million that correspond to interrupted operations. In terms of CapEx, it has to be underscored that in addition to the EUR 20.1 million of maintenance CapEx, which is a figure that remains stable year-on-year, and we've even managed to optimize our levels, we have destined EUR 37 million to the expansion of different activities, among which we have the renting business for mobile devices, the development of renewable infrastructures and greenfields in the area of circular economy in Fujairah and in Tarragona. So as a conclusion of these results in this year, we have achieved the targets established for the fiscal year. So this is thanks to the transformation we've carried out with a very positive evolution, and we have materialized many actions that were geared towards the simplification exercise established in the plan. And we've done so within the context that is pretty turbulent too, with lots of complications. So therefore, we have reached this final year of the strategic plan with most of the changes made and decisions taken in order to carry on progressing in our focus on the environmental world through Global Dominion environment. And we also confirm that in 2026, we will be presenting a new strategic plan where we will lay down the foundations of Dominion of the future and where each strategic area will play a very important role. And before finishing, I would like to remind you that the dividend policy establishes a payment of 1/3 of the attributable net profit. But even so, the Board is going to suggest or propose to the AGM that we pay a much higher figure, much more than the EUR 3 million that would result from applying that policy. And this is so that we can preserve the remuneration to the shareholders. So we will suggest a dividend of EUR 8 million in 2026, which is equivalent to about 50% of the net profit of the continued activities, in other words, without taking into account those activities that were interrupted. And I would also like to remind you about another operation in the area of our shareholder composition, which was done about 1 month ago with the departure of Mahindra. Mahindra owned 4.16% of our shares. And the relevant thing in this case is that this figure, 4.16% has been acquired by the main company shareholders that is by the biggest shareholder we have as well as by the Chairman and the CEO by the company, therefore, increasing their possibilities. So I would like to thank you for your attention, and we can now move on to your questions. So you can either write them in or you can raise your hand on the screen -- zoom screen. Thank you very much for your attention. Unknown Executive: Okay. Well, let's start off with the questions then. [Operator Instructions] So let's start off with the Q&A session and give the floor to the people that have raised their hand. And please make sure that microphone is muted. Firstly, we have Carlos Javier Trevino from Group of Santander. Carlos Javier Treviño Peinador: I've got a couple of questions. Could you please give us an indication of the levels of growth that you expect for 2026? And could you perhaps give us some reference divided by businesses? That would be very grateful. And the second question is when do you think that growth in project can be reactivated because the 2 quarters have been pretty weak. And I would like to ask you specifically about the situation of the construction of the wind farms in Italy. When you signed an agreement in January last year, you spoke about 2 wind farms that would be built towards the middle of the year. And I want to ask you about that. And then could you please explain the reclassification that you've done with GDT services? And what kind of contracts have you got there? Could you please explain the nature of what's happened there? Unknown Executive: Yes, as regards to the growth guidance for 2026, we are continuing with the current strategic plan. And therefore, we have to be over and above that figure of 5%. And that's what we have in our forecast, too. So we have to grow above that figure of 5%. And then you were asking about the issue of wind farms in Italy. Well, the first 4 projects that we had, we had an agreement with the partner. Well, these are already underway. And we're now seeing what kind of new project we could do. We think that it could be another 4 or 5 projects that could be incorporated once again with this partner with IPT. We'd carry out another search. But in any case, so that we can build these projects based on the fact that we have already identified the majority buyer from 70% to 80% up to 100% even, and this is what we have in Italy. And then -- as regards to the reclassification issue, well, that's a very minor issue. Well, yes, it's -- let's say, that this has to do with the quarterly aspect because this is something that I think that you do perfectly well because we have an activity in which we provide logistics services and these logistics services have to be recognized as an income based on added value. And this doesn't have to do with the logistics business, but it has to do with the added value associated with our logistics services. And in this regard, we've had some accounting entries that came from previous quarters that we've had to reclassify and adjust. But in any case, this is an accounting system. Well, as you can see, the figure for the year is the same one, but it's basically a focus between the third and the fourth quarters. Carlos Javier Treviño Peinador: And when do you think that project growth can be reactivated? And when do you think you'll be going back to normal rates again, normal rates of growth? Unknown Executive: Well, Carlos, the truth is it's very difficult to forecast anything because they are currently involved in public tenders. And you know that these projects are binary. But this year, we have good expectations. And I think that we'll be carrying out a project in Chile. And I think that green after divesting in the Dominican Republic will produce the development of new projects in Latin America. Yes, I would say, in the Dominican Republic, where we've identified the partner, and it's basically the 2 main pension plans of the company -- of the country, and we have the right partner. We have the projects. So well, the -- there was -- 7 or 10 days ago, there was a PV tendering process with storage and we expected this for August or September last year, but this has been postponed 5 or 6 months. And the process -- well, towards the end of April, that's when we'll know what's going on. I think that the prospects are very good, and we will have a very significant reactivation as from the second or third quarter in relation to Dominican projects. We -- in Italy, as I say, business as usual. And in Spain, we have some differences that to the extent that they can become self-consumption things, we could have a minor pipeline too to construct and to execute. Unknown Executive: Let's give the floor to David Lopez from [ JB ] Capital. David Sanchez: I have a question on the growth CapEx because this year, you've invested EUR 37 million in expansion CapEx. But could you please give me some more details on what activities are involved? And especially the level of recurrence, what level of investment or expansion should we consider for 2026 because the levels for this year, the levels were very similar compared to what we saw in 2024. Unknown Executive: Well, yes, in that growth figure or CapEx figure, we have the CapEx that is related to the renting of mobile devices, and that would be well just over 1/3 of that total CapEx of EUR 37 million. And then we have the developments that are taking place in the area of renewables. We have developments in Italy, in the Dominican Republic and which, as you know, we've invested part in that development so that we can then allow our partners to join and then carry out the conversion of the EPC where you allocate much more capital. And we do this in the minority manner by -- well, by the arrival of the partner, we've recovered most of what we spent on developments. And then we have what we have invested in the greenfields in the GDE greenfield in the area of circular economy. And we'd be talking right now about something like, well, in Tarragona, where we've invested in the purchase of land in Fujairah, where we are also going to create a MARPOL plant. In other words, a circular economy facility, whatever is for MARPOL. It has to do with sea pollution. So this is going to focus on the circular economy applicable to polluted water, seawater. And these are the 3 chapters that is devices, renewables and GDE. David Sanchez: And what about 2026? What level of CapEx and expansion should we consider? Unknown Executive: Well, I think that lower as regards to the development of renewables because they are much more mature. And then what we are starting to see now are greenfields that have been better identified in the case of GDE. So I don't know. I think that perhaps and perhaps with a different kind of distribution, we'd be able to reach those levels, although it's very difficult to forecast anything like that straight of the cup. So yes, but as Robert said, it will be a different kind of distribution where GDE would be more present. Unknown Executive: Okay. We're now going to review the questions that have to be answered from the chat. And if you want to send in any more questions, it would be the time to do so before finishing. Let's start off with Luis Padron. He's already asked several things. But anyway, when do we expect to present the new strategic plan? That would be the first one. Why are we reducing the dividend when there's a significant improvement of our debt? And the final one is that would you be considering a buyback of shares. And that's why the dividend has been reduced. Unknown Executive: Well, as regards to the presentation of the strategic plan in the second half of the year, well, after the summer, we'll give you the specific date, we would like to present that on the Capital Markets Day, which is when we'll be able to analyze the different issues in greater depth. And then as regards to the dividend, as you point out quite rightly, I think that there's an issue here, like Patricia pointed out, that has to do with net profits without bearing in mind the interrupted operations, we've increased this up to 50%. And compared to previous year, previous years, cash generation has been significant and the levels of net debt have been reduced, and we're comfortable underneath 1x EBITDA. But I think that on our road map, we have attractive investment ideas. And as Patricia pointed out, we've tried to compensate things. And we've tried to be adequately reasonable in our remuneration to the shareholder, although we know that there are internal projects that will generate value -- more value for the shareholder. Yes. Well, this is linked to an aggressive investment plan. And then we have the issue of the buyback, the buyback of shares. Well, this is also something that is being dropped into. It's an issue that we would analyze under the new strategic plan as from this year. Unknown Executive: Let's move on to the questions from David [indiscernible] from Scotiabank. And both of them are asking us about GDE. So there are questions on Q4 in 2025 with a business figure of EUR 140 million and contribution margin of EUR 8.9 million, which represents 6.4%, which is much lower than previously reported figures. And why has there been this slump in the margin over sales? Unknown Executive: Well, this always happens to us in the most individualized part of GDE and Q2, Q3, well, these are much more powerful in the Central Europe or East Europe. But this is part of the company that we are individualizing and which -- what happens is that in December, when they achieve 100% of what they've committed to, we become a little bit more relaxed, but this doesn't really mean anything else. There's no really no significant element here to be considered. Unknown Executive: There are several questions here on Cerritos. So we're going to group them up. Okay. [ David ] from [ Destino Fortunato ] is asking if the situation in Mexico is affecting the negotiations for the sale of Cerritos. And then Diego Martinez and [ Ignacio Joaquin Andreu ] are asking us about our forecast for the net debt once Cerritos has been sold. Unknown Executive: Well, I'd say this is something that we mentioned with Cerritos. And Cerritos 2, 3 years ago became a problem because of the policies that were in place. It's no longer an issue. Now I don't know if this is going to be done on April 1 or May 1. But as you know, this is a project that is rated as an operation available for sale. So the value is about $100 million with a debt of about $85 million or $90 million because this is in euros. And we believe that the net asset value is properly reflected, and we're also actively working to round off the value of the project and defend its worth with an interesting PPA, something bankable, something that can be much more attractive for sale purposes and the sale for it to be operational. We -- well, we are going to -- we're now talking about 3 or 4 main leaders with whom we are negotiating things. and 3 or 4 bidders. And I think that this is a project that will become liquid. It's going to become liquidity, and we're now focusing a little bit on the details of if we can or cannot recover the accounting value or the book value, and that's what we're really focusing on. And I can't really say much more about Cerritos. Unknown Executive: Let's move on to the last questions from Ruben Alonso. But I would like to remind you if you have any further questions, this will be the time to send them in before we finish. Unknown Executive: Okay. Ruben, we've got 3 or 4 extensive questions. And the net asset value, well, we reaffirm what we have in our books because I think that there's an amount there for infrastructure that we will recover in the next 2 or 3 years. In other words, 20% of the Dominican Republic, we expect to recover this in 3 years. And we are also looking into if we have to perform any operations, as you point out, with the rest of renewable assets, because the idea is to focus completely on this rotation strategy that we initiated in the year '23. So this is what we can see. Although, obviously, together with the operating cash flow and according to the amount we would obtain in these recent divestments, I think that what we would really focus on is a company with 0 debt or 0 cash. And of course, it's very difficult because we're working on a new strategic plan, which I think is what Patricia mentioned and what the CEO said too. And we are focusing a lot on the greenfields and organic growth in the area of the environment where we have a number of interesting ideas that have to be carried out in the next few months, and it's very difficult right now to give you a debt and generation guidance. But we feel comfortable with 1x EBITDA. And I think we said that in the call of the third quarter, we said that we had an EBITDA of 1x. And I think what I'm missing is the debt that we had committed. But in any case, the important thing is that we have the basic elements to relaunch in this simplification strategy, the Dominion that we want to see in the future. Yes. And I think that I've answered practically everything with that comment. Unknown Executive: We have one final question from Luis Padron from GVC. What profitability do you expect from the aggressive investment plan of GDE? Is it possible to have a buyback of shares? Unknown Executive: Well, yes, of course, because we have an ambitious plan, and we have the right people, the right team for that. And we are now -- well, it's like when we were listed in 2017 and the segment -- the sector was highly segmented. And we wanted to achieve a lot of growth inorganic and organic growth. But as regards to this part of the plan, we are going to be aggressive. So in other words, the GDE figures of the last 3 years have multiplied EBITDA by 2, and the EBIT is 2.7x. We think that there are lots of very interesting opportunities on the table. And this is where we believe that it's worthwhile getting something done. So we will obviously remunerate the shareholder, but we think that here that there is -- I don't know, there is the possibility of generating a significant amount of value. Well, yes. And considering that we are in the year 10 since we were listed, we were first listed in 2016, and we reached the market -- we reached the market with a promise of EUR 43 million in EBITDA. It was EUR 150 million plus the green through. And all of that capital expansion via dividend and buyback has gone back to the shareholder. In others, we've given back to the shareholder much more than we initially predicted in 2016. But now we have another plan, which is a very aggressive plan, as Robert has just put it out in GDT, we will have lots of organic growth and very good performance. It's a very good business that we dominate and we are doing things even better, and it's very diversified, too. And the truth is that we're very happy with it. And GDE is a very ambitious project, and we expect to receive some very important news in the next few years. And that's what we're currently working on, and this is what our strategic plan is also focusing on, too. Unknown Executive: There are no more questions. So we will close the presentation here. Thank you all for listening. Thank you. Unknown Executive: Thank you very much. Goodbye. [Statements in English on this transcript were spoken by an interpreter present on the live call.]
Johan Svanstrom: All right. Now we officially start. So good morning, and welcome to the presentation of Rightmove's Results for 2025. I'm joined today by Rory Hook, our CFO, sitting here, who'll be here in a second. First, a couple of takeaways. Our 2025 performance showed strong continued delivery in a competitive market, and we will step up the pace further in '26. We continue to deliver compelling value from and across our platform to both core and other partners. We have a very strong position with consumers, partners and our data. And with our AI capability, we're enhancing all of that even further. We continue to deliver our proposition. We're executing our strategy. We're excited about all future opportunities to further digitize the U.K. property sector. Now we delivered some really strong KPIs for last year. Revenue growth of 9% was supported by ARPA and membership increases in the core business as well as contribution from growth in our strategic growth areas. Underlying operating profit growth of 9% reflects our revenue growth and ongoing investments in people, technology and product delivery. Underlying EPS grew by 11%, and we increased capital returned by 21%. And finally, time on site at 16.8 billion minutes was the second highest on record, only beaten by the COVID exceptional burst in '21. Said differently, the equivalent of 32,000 years of time was spent on Rightmove platform last year. We made some strong operational progress as well right across the platform last year. So from the left, over 85% of that large audience came through direct and organic traffic and we grew our app users by strong 11%. We continue to evolve to meet consumers wherever they are and we doubled their engagement numbers in social media channels. We saw a strong penetration of our top packages in Estate Agency and New Homes as well as a very fast start for our latest and market unique Estate Agency own product, Online Agent Valuation. Our Agency retention was the second highest in over 10 years, and third-party surveys showed record positive sentiment scores for Rightmove. We continued our strategic and operational progress and growth in the strategic growth areas. And all of this was delivered through Rightmove's platform and leading data. We did over 6,000 tech releases. And after a multiyear build, we now have 31 live strategic AI projects at year-end. It's an increase of 4 on our November update, and we tripled the number of data models used to process our proprietary data in the platform. This strong stance is down to purposeful work and investments over the most recent years and has a strong trajectory for future product delivery. And finally, on people, we have a world-class, engaged and energized team. 89% of our team described Rightmove as a great place to work. So my sincere thanks to all hard and smart working Rightmovers for delivering our results of last year. It is a competitive market out there, but our position is stable and it's strong. And that's because we keep delivering great value for both consumers and partners. We remain the leading place for consumers looking to make a move in U.K. property. And while facing various competitive dynamics, over time, we have, for years, averaged over 70% share of portal time on similar web and over 80% on Comscore. In December '25, we were at 75% and 89%, respectively. And that love and trust from consumers drives frequency, leads and, of course, a lot of data signals. And those enable us to drive strong outcomes and value for our over 19,000 U.K. estate agents and New Homes partners. Now I want to touch on that value point a bit. We operate in a competitive market, and we always gauge how we can do even better. So we commissioned third-party surveys quarterly with over 1,600 independent agents contributing responses. The top left chart here shows that the total positive sentiment scores from those surveys. These are -- there are 2 big takeaways. One, just in absolute terms, we've seen a positive trend and a new record high actually by the end of last year. Market conditions and general sentiment out there often impact survey responses. So in the context of the weaker Q4 in the property market through the U.K. budget hesitance, that's actually an excellent result. And two, in relative terms, you can see a 1.7x differential between Rightmove and the main portal competitors. Now we ask for feedback at branch frontline, branch management level and company management levels, and we also go deep on several subcategories. You can see that we lead across subcategories across business results, value and inclusive services at the bottom of this chart. So we rate really well in what's a competitive market, yet we, of course, always look for opportunities to improve and for all partners. Part of the value and those strong scores come from our Building Success Together program, which we launched in early 2024. We invest resource in supporting our partners' business objectives. We also help them to understand what happens in the market and where Rightmove can bring. And as noted top right, this comes in many forms and at true scale. Dedicated account management in the field, our Rightmove Plus and Rightmove Hub tools, which are both available to all partners regardless of package levels. We're sponsoring and collaborating with several leading industry organizations across the Estate Agency, New Homes and Rental operators. We continue to invest in and progress these 2. Rightmove Plus, as an example, is the business management tool for partners. Last year alone, had new features and enhancements introduced over 25x. And our partners' engagement value from Rightmove Plus is clear, 28 million sessions recorded in the year. So in summary, we deliver Rightmove outcomes and value from a broad range of solutions, packages, products, data, insight, training, dedicated servicing through our account management and support teams and we measure these results. Now let's move to the property end markets for a bit. Within sales, top left here, it was really a year or 2 halves. H1 was strong, building on 2024 and with successive Bank of England rate cuts. H2 was weaker year-on-year due to the fears around the late autumn budget. If you take them together, 2025 as a whole, so 10% more completions versus '24, and that was in line with long-term averages. Looking at the year ahead, top right, there's been a clear post-budget bounce back in available stock, which is now at a 10-year high. This has caused slower price growth, which is, of course, supportive for buyers in the market. Now these elevated levels of resale stock is less helpful for New Homes developers. So on the bottom right here shows New Homes as a proportion of total for sale stock on our site. And with approved planning applications at an all-time low, we don't expect a material recovery of the development numbers in the market in H1 this year. With the rentals, bottom left, increased supply and reduced demand continues to improve the more extreme imbalance seen in previous years and which we have talked about. So the 2025 average of 10 inquires per available property is still above the pre-COVID average of 6 to 7 though. And of course, all these segments, of course, mortgage rates is a key driver, and it continues on a steady downward trajectory. At the 31st of January, the average 5-year fixed rate was 4.35%, that's 55 bps lower than a year earlier, and that's per Rightmove's daily mortgage tracker. So with that, let me pass over to Rory for more detail on our financials. Ruaridh Hook: Thank you, Johan. Good morning, everyone. I'm delighted to present our financial results for 2025. Overall revenue grew 9% compared to 2024 with strong growth across the business. Starting with Agency, Row 1 in the table, revenues increased by 9% to GBP 305 million. If you look at the chart on the right, the light blue bars showed that this growth was driven primarily by ARPA-led games, which continue to be mainly discretionary. An additional contribution of GBP 6 million came from increased Agency membership numbers. And moving down the table to New Homes, revenues here also rose 9% to GBP 75 million. This was in spite of continued headwinds in the New Homes end market with new builds coming to the market remaining subdued. You can see the impact of this in the chart with the dark green showing revenue growth contribution of less than GBP 1 million from higher average membership increasing by 1%. The ARPA growth contribution remained strong, contributing GBP 5 million. At the bottom of the table, our strategic growth areas delivered another strong performance. Revenue increased by GBP 5.7 million, up 25% to GBP 29.1 million. Commercial revenues grew 13% to GBP 15.3 million as we continue to focus on customer acquisition with membership increasing 29% year-on-year. Mortgages revenue was up almost 50% to GBP 6.8 million. This was weighted towards the first half of the year, mainly reflecting the timing of interest rate changes and hesitancy in the property market around the budget, impacting activity in H2. Rental Services made up of our Lead to Keys product, referencing ancillary services, saw revenues up 35%, driven by strong growth across the Lead to Keys product. For completeness, the non-SG&A parts of other revenues being data services, overseas and third-party advertising grew 2% year-on-year. Revenues outside the core represented 11% of group revenue, up from 10% last year. Compared to December 2024 across Agency and New Homes, membership increased by 225, up 1% to 19,272. This increase was due to growth in Agency membership, which increased by 261, up 2% on December 2024. This was due to high Agency retention of 90%, continued growth in Agent formation as well as current partners opening new branches. Within New Homes, we saw a year-on-year decline of 36 developments, down 1% at year-end. You can see in the bottom right chart, a decrease of traditional developments in orange of 113, offset by an increase in housing associations in teal of 77. New developments coming on site remain low. We are not seeing a pickup in build rates and have seen traditional developments fall to their lowest level since January 2018. We do not see this changing in H1, but continue to be optimistic that developers will be encouraged to build more by H2 and in future years. Overall ARPA increased by GBP 97 to GBP 1,621. 60% of ARPA growth was product-led with similar percentage in both Agency and New Homes as our partners chose to upgrade or purchase incremental product. The remaining 40% of ARPA growth came from contract renewals, which all proceeded as expected. Given partner engagement with our strong suite of value-adding products, we expect a similar split this year. In terms of product ARPA growth, we saw upgrades in Agency come from multiple sources, ranging from upgrades through the package ladder from lower threshold packages to new joiners joining straight into the top package. You can see this in the pie chart for Optimiser Edge joiners in the middle of this slide. The migration of the old top package, Optimiser 2020, has gone well and will be fully retired by H1. Joiners in New Homes to the advanced package, shown top right, similarly came from upgrades and new joiners. We had a new top package, Ascend, launched in May with 818, 28% of developments live at the end of the year. We expect a similar split of upgrades going straight into this top package, but flagged that the advanced package remains highly attractive, especially for smaller developers. So expect to still see good inbound into advance next year. Taking these 2 pie charts together, you can see that key for both New Homes and Agency is that we do not rely on a single source of joiners to the top package and expect penetration to continue to increase in both. The other driver of ARPA growth comes from incremental product purchase. You can see from the charts at the bottom for both Estate Agency and New Homes. ARPA increases at the initial upgrade in month 1. This is the column marked upgrade. Then we see ARPA increase across the first year and the second year. In both Estate Agency and New Homes, you can see that ARPA keeps growing far past the initial upgrade. This happens as partners choose to purchase more of the same products or add additional products to their package mix. We have shown the previous top package in Agency Optimiser 2020 and in New Homes Advance to illustrate how we have seen this before. And that the initial months of the new top packages in both Agency and New Homes are performing as we expect and have seen previously. We know that continuing to provide great value and superior outcomes to our partners through continually evolving and new products sees them choose to engage further. Also, at the end of last year, we added online agent valuation exclusive to optimize our Edge partners and with an average price of GBP 170, providing both another reason to upgrade to the top package and also encouraging existing partners to increase their current product spend. Moving on to costs. Underlying operating costs increased by GBP 11 million year-on-year, resulting in a 70% underlying margin as we invested with discipline and within our cost framework. The main driver of costs remains our investment in people, up GBP 4.6 million or 7%. The other main cost component was our continued investment across technology with an increase of GBP 4 million. In the year, there was GBP 9 million of internal labor capitalization with total CapEx at GBP 10 million. As guided in November, we expect to see an increase in labor capitalization in 2026 with total CapEx to be around GBP 16 million, less than 4% of revenue. In 2026, we will see investment as outlined last November, which will mainly be in people. We anticipate over 100 joining before the end of the year in roles across data, product and engineering. A few of these roles will be through our new flexible resource provider, which will provide us with the flexibility of headcount over the investment phase. Other material increase in cost will be the AI-powered operations area with work on the back office initial phase already commencing. All in, post capitalization, this incremental investment is expected to total around GBP 12 million in 2026 as guided in November. We remain highly cash generative with a cash conversion ratio of 107% of operating profit. As we continue to grow the strong cash generation of our business, this leaves us well placed to return surplus cash to shareholders. This year, a total of GBP 220 million was returned to shareholders, GBP 141 million via share buybacks and GBP 79 million via dividends, an increase of 21% year-on-year. We reduced our share count by 2%, meaning over 40% of issued shares have now been repurchased and returned 6% of our year-end market capitalization in the year. This morning, we announced a final dividend of 6.59p, bringing the total dividend to 10.64p. There will also be a share buyback program of GBP 90 million until the 31st of July. This will be funded by the growth in earnings, but also reducing cash reserves from December's GBP 43 million to around GBP 20 million by half year, which we see as sufficient to manage the working capital of the business going forward. Our capital allocation policy remains prioritize investment in the business, evaluate value-accretive M&A and return all surplus cash to shareholders via a progressive dividend linked to earnings and buyback thereafter. Turning to financial guidance. This remains the same as set out in November. Looking at the right hand of this slide, revenue growth in 2026 will be between 8% and 10%. We expect H1 growth to be lower than the full year 2026 growth with a higher growth percentage in H2. This is due to the high comparator in H1 last year, particularly in Mortgages, which saw significant activity in H1 2025 due to the stamp duty changes and falling interest rates. And in New Homes due to the full year impact of 36 developments, fewer developments, contributing a negative revenue comparator of around GBP 1.5 million. For Core, we anticipate that membership will grow around 1% and we lifted ARPA growth to between GBP 110 to GBP 120. At an overall level, for the SGAs, we anticipate growth to be around 20% to 30% range. Underlying operating profit will grow by 3% to 5%, resulting in an underlying operating margin no lower than 67%. With no change to our longer-term target set out in November, we anticipate underlying operating profit growth in later years to be at similar levels to revenue growth as we still see no reason for a margin lower than 67%. That concludes the financials. I'll now hand you back to Johan. Johan Svanstrom: All right. Thank you, Rory. So our investment case outlined here will be familiar to most and this summarizes our approach to value creation at Rightmove. On the left, Rightmove has exceptionally strong foundations. We have established a differentiated leading platform at the heart of the U.K.'s large and structurally growing property market. The platform is digital, low-cost, capital-light, driving higher returns on capital. The subscription-based B2B model has a proven ability to deliver and generate value in all market conditions. Moving to the middle of the diagram. We're using powerful data and profound network effects to deliver that value to all stakeholders. And with it, we're executing an expanded growth strategy with targeted investment and delivering data and AI-backed product innovation and that is done through a high-caliber and very energized team. We're entering now our 27th year with confidence to deliver a larger, diversified, yet very connected Rightmove platform. All said, this will continue to deliver compelling financial outcomes. Now our strategy is to develop the leading digital ecosystem for the whole moving experience, powered by exceptional data and network effects. And our people, data and platform really are the foundations and strong differentiators for the 3 business pillars of Core Partner, Consumer and New Growth. The property market is a huge economic activity, and we think there's a long runway to deliver more digital value and grow our business. And that, of course, includes the use of AI. Now there's been a lot of debate who the winners and losers might be, both for classifieds and more recently across a range of industries, really. So I want to talk to property classified specifically. In my view, there are really 4 components you need to win to compete effectively also in an AI world, consumers, partners, data and AI capability. We're really well positioned across all of these. We were well positioned before gen AI, and we will be with the next generations of AI as well. And here's why. We're a technology company. We built up market leadership through deep knowledge, digital leadership and deep layers of servicing our industry in the first 3 of these 4 components and that's been done over 25 years and at an increasing pace. We keep doing that day in, day out, improving all the time. The numbers are leading and they're deep. Now the most recent components of these 4 is, of course, AI capability. AI models and tools, they're fast developing, it's dynamic and they're not fully defined yet. Here's the thing, though. Anybody can get a hold of AI capability. It's an enabling technology that you can buy, skills you can hire and that you can learn to operate. We've done exactly that and for several years already. So what Rightmove has? It's a very, very solid performance and performance platform and business model. It's creating the fundamental attributes that are mentioned here, important to any business success. And in turn, they all boil down to 2 things, which, again, deliver true business results and sustained leadership, trust and vertical innovation. Now we obviously thought a lot about this. In our view, in the case of property classifieds is that LLMs or start-ups running on LLMs are missing or are quite far away on 3 of these 4 components that matters so much in this particular vertical. ChatGPT has been around now for 3 years, yet referral traffic to us is still under 0.5%. And actually, their U.K. app downloads and traffic has leveled off in the last 5 or so months. But more so, I don't think they or other horizontal LLMs can or want to service our vertical as deeply and focused as we and others do, nor to innovate as relentlessly and deep in the specialty of it. Now I'll be very open-eyed and give the large LLMs the upper hand of AI capability and AI innovation overall. But remember, again, they actually enable and sell that capability to buyers like ourselves. So as we add this AI capability to Rightmove, we combine it with the first 3 components that we already have and that are so strong. We're in the best place of anybody to innovate and service this vertical in new and even better ways. I'm actually going to go and cover these 4 components in a bit more detail because it's so important and so topical. Let's start with consumer and partner. You're familiar with network effects and how they're part of a great business like Rightmove and how we invest in them. But I think it's very important to understand that in case of home exchanges, there are 3 special aspects of these network effects, which make them even stronger for property classifieds and certainly in the U.K. So first, in the middle, property transactions, they're high value, highly personal, take a particularly long time in this country and they're very often done in joint deliberation with another person. There's also an incredible amount of browsing done on properties because of 2 things: homes, they're fun to dream of or to be inspired by; and also becomes -- because finding the right one and really deciding when it's time to move is such a serious and important life decision that comes at a high price. So the habit loops are therefore massive. This is very different from a number of B2C categories like e-commerce or research of different kinds, where AI or agents can provide an alternative and shortcut path. And secondly, to the left here, the same consumer actually plays multiple roles, to consider the 4 key roles who use Rightmove and their multiple use. Very often, a buyer is also a seller, and the seller is also a buyer. In the same chain of events or at different points in life. There are 2.5 million private landlords in the U.K. renting to tenants. And those landlords, of course, themselves live and move. There are parents who help their kids with a rental or a first-time purchase, while they themselves might be downsizing or buying a second home. So here's the point. The individual gets value from the same property platform for many different needs. They've seen it in the past. They know what the quality is and they are being in different roles. So the platform is trusted. It's specialized. It has all these different audience roles. So in a way, this forms like a consumer side, individualized network effect in itself, not just across to the other side of the platform. And again, that's very different to, for example, e-commerce and other verticals where the consumer might only be a buyer. And thirdly, of course, in the U.K. property vertical, there's a diverse nature of our partner base, the Estate Agents, New Homes developments, developers, rental operators, commercial and smaller niches. And even in a single branch, an Estate Agency, you can have sales, lettings, commercial, potential financial services, a business owner and branch staff. The U.K. partner is very fragmented and with low barriers to entry. There are many, many different roles that benefit from being on the platform. Agents are local property experts and they can access a highly effective audience platform and with a lot of services included to power their business goals. So in our view, when you combine these 3 points, property complexity, consumer multiuse and agent diversity, you realize that the trusted and vertically specialized UX of the portal will not be replaced by generic or horizontal AI interfaces. Now let's talk about the fourth component, AI capability. We've been building a great tech and data AI capability for a few years now as we reported on several times since 2023. And the simplified, and I know it's simplified tech stack view on the left here, outlines how our Core platform is built on Google Cloud with logically connected enterprise tools like Big Query, Looker, Model Armor, Vertex AI and so forth and is running AI models from Google, like Gemini, Nano Banana and so forth. Now we have a close strategic and product team collaboration also with Google. And we are actually working together, and we have a good view on what's coming in the future. Now we have orchestrated the platform, the stack, the pipelines to nevertheless be flexible, performant and trustworthy. So we have relationships with and we also use Microsoft, OpenAI, Anthropic and a host of smaller solutions. Some of those smaller ones are pure-play AI, some of the more AI-enabled existing software. Our data science team, they can build and connect proprietary Rightmove data models or external models or a combination of them. In November, we showed you one example of the proprietary model and how it uplifts the results, something that is only possible for us because we're in the stack. At the end, the stack enables us to deliver more value and differentiated outcomes for partners and consumers and, of course, gain operational leverage and productivity for ourselves. The 31 strategic initiatives plus a whole host of many more AI tests across the business today will soon be less of a number counting exercise and rather it's going to be completely infused in an organic way of operating. We're perfectly set up to leverage AI capabilities. Now I'll come back to very crucial component, data. We estimate that over 90% of our data is proprietary. It's also interconnected and we leverage it with human expertise and usage in mind. This data is not available anywhere else and it keeps compounding inside our ecosystem. We've shown you many examples of large data sets in the past. Here, just outlining a few examples, but to illustrate how unique and valuable this data is. For property, as an example, we have over 28 million unique properties on our Rightmove optimized UPRN address framework. And someone might say, "Well, that's all scrabble, isn't it?" Fact is that over 50% of the metadata underpinning a Rightmove listing is not scrapable from the face of our site. And for partners, we have, for example, built 57,000 defined geographic agent patches. We dynamically optimize them with our data and also with input and tailoring from our partner agents. That drive unique insights, products and great outcomes. For consumers, for example, again, the 69 billion first-party signals, they don't only provide that strong habit loop that I mentioned before, but they, of course, convert to outcomes through moving auction strength of buyers and sellers. Again, they also drive unique products, insights and recommendations and provide fodder for what we develop next. And the real magic and protection is how those and many more data points are interconnected in the platform. There are a few more examples in the middle, the data compounds and the fortifies. And finally, in the third column, but not to be forgotten, we overlay our human expertise to enrich this data being completely vertically focused. We also make sure it delivers real outcomes and value for humans that is using the data. All said, we hold the living map of U.K. property moving. The value is not in AI itself. It's what AI can deliver when it sits on the best property data in the U.K. So to sum it all up, we combine these 4 components. What we have is one connected ecosystem already powered by data and it's enhanced by AI. All right. So over to some of the concrete product delivery that drove the 2025 results and a bit of a glimpse towards '26 and onwards as well. We increased the pace of delivery in '25 with only a few of the features illustrated here. And I'm going to talk to the renters checklist on the left. It's an important example because it's part of our rental market solutions to digitally enable more of the moving journey. We've seen some strong growth metrics in 2025. A few of them are noted here. And with this renters checklist for consumers, we put all the tenancy admin in one place on My Rightmove, seamlessly integrating it with things like open banking and verifications and what to do next. The average user revisited their checklist 8 times. The information is stored in their Rightmove account, so it can be reused. That, of course, builds a lifetime value opportunity for us. And like many other products, this product also helps the other side of the platform, in this case, lettings agencies. They benefit from operational efficiency through the enhanced leads and seamlessly have those in their CRM. Now they can also operate the entire flow digitally in the Rightmove Plus environment from referencing deposits and many more things, all the way to contracts. A quick step back to the outline from November of how we're accelerating the consumer demand going forward. Number one is that we are adding and enhancing ways of searching. Number two is that we're accelerating our services in a consumer home-moving journey, what we call Beyond Find (sic) [ Go beyond Find ]. And here, I've got 2 examples of what we're working on. The Move Journey Assistant set up for sales and the expansion of My Rightmove into My Home, a full-service hub for homeowners. Now across the consumer domain, we have around 25 key releases or so planned for 2026. And for context, that's more than the entire platform consumer and partner sites together delivered in 2023. Now I want to expand a bit on conversational search, no surprise, which we launched only a few weeks ago to a limited amount of traffic. So here's just a demo of what it looks like. I'm going to talk over while you follow this. So this experience and features built through our partnership with Google Cloud it's using Gemini models. It's trained on and interrogates our listings, text and images and we use over 1 billion proprietary image database and many attributes that goes into the listings. As of today, it links straight into listings on the main site. And we'll evolve this tool led by the data that we see and our design expertise and we're going to make sure that we deliver a high-quality experience. Data so far from thousands of conversations tells us that users seem to have a pretty good idea of what they're looking for. They continue to explore and engage with tools in the main flow of listings and on the site. And so far, those who engage with conversational search are almost 3x more likely to send a lead versus the control group. Overall, feedback has been very positive. Now I want to consider a little bit the conversational assistance in searching a bit more strategically. Now first, on the left here, this is really, in many ways, it's just a continuum of changes. However, you discover, we have you covered, right? So we're entering another search modality or paradigm for consumers, and our position is the same as it has been with previous changes. Discovery is key, right? The classic behavior of visual scrolling and comparing properties, I believe, will always be there. But longer term, I also think this holds a real amplification opportunity for Rightmove. Conversational search will enable hyper-personalization and new utility for consumers on our platform that I couldn't get before. So AI assistance will be useful up and down the funnel and seamlessly provide complementary information along a complex moving journey on the platform. This will drive 2 things: higher platform engagement; and substantially more intent and behavioral data signals. And we can convert that data signal to increased value and targeting for Core partners and for diversified revenue opportunities, just like we have done in the past. Now we have already started a few years back to build many more of these consumer features with exactly that in mind. And you can see some of this in the graph and in the table metrics here. Impressive growth, and a lot of that comes from well-defined features and, of course, the scale of the audience and traffic that we can apply them to. Every feature we built is research and data-backed. It brings utility, frequency and data to us on an ongoing basis. And with it, as noted right here, we create enhanced partner value and, of course, revenue opportunity for Rightmove. Some of these improve or enable new products for Core partners. For example, the enhanced lease to lettings agents with the appointment bookings with the New Homes Ascend package. Others are monetized separate through commercial relationships that we have, like, for example, mortgages or ancillary lettings products. And here's the thing, as we scale and compound this data, we just increased the revenue and profit opportunities. Now over to the partner side. We released significantly more product and optimization source of partners in '25. A few key ones are set out in this slide. And I want to highlight online agent valuation on the left, as Rory mentioned before. It's soft launched in the fall and it's off to a great start. This tool works on both sides of the platform. It enables consumers to receive a digital valuation estimate from an Estate Agency with a quick turnaround and it's an opportunity for agents to start a new online relationship with a potential vendor through our platform. It leverages and reinforces our existing valuation domain on various tools, slotting in very logically with instant valuation, local valuation alerts, best price and premium price guides and so forth. And agents, in this case, can also choose to use an AI tool to support the responses in OAV. And for those that do, we have seen so far in the data that the response times are 16% faster on average, and the cohort actually books 20% more visits. So OAV, I think, is a good example of where AI is an enhancer of an already great digital product with real value. But AI is not the entire product itself. Finally, with OAV, Rightmove's platform also gets more data signals through up-to-date photos and property attributes supplied by the consumer. And this is before the property becomes a listing gets put on the market. That, of course, can feed into our AVM, which is a business line on its own and also powers many other things internally that we can build on for the future. Both '25 and '26 show how we are developing across several product lines and segments much more in parallel than in the past. And with AI bringing more efficiency and marketing opportunity to partners. Moving on from Core to the strategic growth areas. These grew, as you heard from Rory, by 25% as a group and that's close to 3x the Core growth rate. Operationally, we've taken some great strides forward in the year. For commercial, we added 275 new members to the platform. This year, we will launch our new search pages. And at that point, every aspect of the user web journey will have been completely overhauled to commercial-first experience. We'll also be launching our first chargeable product in the segment during the year. In Rental Services, revenues grew by 35%. And as we set out in November, we started to roll out the upfront modules of inquiry manager and enhanced leads to dual agents within their Core subscription. It's a process that is ongoing over '26. This is an exciting market penetration step-up. It brings efficiency to agents, to landlords and to tenant applicants and it's a true market scale. And in Mortgages, we saw strong growth overall. You will have seen that we announced a new exciting partnership with NatWest, the U.K.'s leading digital mortgage lender, which will be introduced in April across both sites and our apps, and we'll also continue to build out the broker opportunities over the course of this year. And finally, again, and importantly, a reminder, the SGAs all strategically reinforced the Core platform, drives user utility and frequency, and again, thus the great data sets that we have. Now this slide is a reminder of the 3 focus areas that we described in November. We are positively stepping up the pace with an eye to the medium-term opportunity of a more diversified and technically advanced platform. We're driving towards that larger digital opportunity in the U.K. property ecosystem. Now also as a reminder, we set some really ambitious midterm target KPIs for these initiatives. And I'm glad to report that all of this is mobilized in one way or another and the capabilities will be built and realized throughout 2026. We're going to see results along the way. One example, of course, being the successful launch of conversational search already in the very beginning of the year. So we'll come back to these areas and the KPIs over time. And I hope you can see that we drive this business with discipline, high quality and our goal is to deliver strong value and returns. So in conclusion, here are the key takeaways I showed you at the start of the presentation, and I want to repeat them. We're happy with the strong results in '25. It was a record year for innovation for Rightmove. We look forward to an exciting 2026. And as you can see in the graph, we're stepping up our innovation and delivery considerably yet again. We will grow revenue and profit in line with guidance, adding to strong financial returns in both the short and medium term. And with that, we're going to go to Q&A. Johan Svanstrom: So Rory is going to join me up here. Please raise your hands. Yes, some already did. Say your name when you're passed a microphone and let's aim for 2 questions in the first instance. We can double back if it's fine. Jessica Pok: Jessica Pok from Peel Hunt. I've 2 questions, please. The first one, just on the ARPA guide, Rory, GBP 110 to GBP 120. Can you give us an idea of how we should think about that Agent versus New Homes given the trends that we've seen last year? And then the second one, maybe on Mortgages. The new relationship with NatWest, any color on what triggered the change and what we can expect from that relationship in the near term? Ruaridh Hook: So on ARPA guidance, GBP 110 to GBP 120 is the blended ARPA guidance. Expect Estate Agency to be towards the bottom end of that and New Homes well above the blended rate. I would flag that in both EA and New Homes, we expect their ARPA growth to be higher than they saw in 2025. Johan Svanstrom: All right. And on NatWest, yes, we're very excited about entering a new partnership here. We've had a great partnership with our other partner for the last couple of years. NatWest is really the #1 mortgage lender in digital channels. So that tells you, I think, something about the vision alignment that we have. We continue to work deeply with one partner because we're quite keen to both build the business, of course, give more -- consumers more utility on the platform, but really also try to innovate along the way in this industry, which is still very fragmented and analogous and off-line and so forth. So those are really the few simple reasons behind it. William Packer: It's Will Packer from BNP Paribas. A couple of questions. Firstly, could we talk a little bit about agent relations? So from today's update, the survey data looks very encouraging, although I know we didn't see the absolute numbers, but that would be interesting. Retention is at record levels. You've got new agent additions. But then in contrast, if you read the trade press, it all sounds a bit grim. You've got the court case coming. And I think there's a perception that your relations with your customers are more adversarial versus some of your peers globally. How do we square that circle? Is it -- there's a few loud adversarial agents, but the median agent is getting happier. Can you just give us a bit of color there? And then secondly, your framing around the labor intensity of Rightmove is a little bit different to some of your peers within classifieds and other platform businesses. You're growing headcount aggressively. It sounds like that's going to continue for a little while. Could you frame that for us? Is that catch-up investment because the previous management team didn't hire enough people? When can we see the labor force to stabilize? Any color there would be useful. Ruaridh Hook: I'll take. You can jump in. Look, the first one, you mentioned some of those KPIs, which I think stand out, right? High -- second highest retention in a decade, highest take-up of our new product, OAV. We had record uptake of Optimiser Edge. That shows customers are engaging with our products and really happy with the outcomes. That, for us, is a real sign of strength in terms of relationship we have with customers, of which over 80% are now with us for 5 years. They know us well. They know our products well and we work with them to grow their businesses. You're always going to have a small minority, might be louder than the majority, but I would say that those KPIs, what we look at to show the strength of our products and the value that we provide our customers. We also, as we showed today, do monitor sentiment and we're delighted to see that sentiment not only much higher than competitors, but growing. So we don't rest on our laurels. We take it very seriously, and we keep our finger to the pulse in terms of how agents are feeling. And we support them as the property market ebbs and flows. And ultimately, for us, key coming back to providing those great products, and I think that take-up really shows it. In terms of the labor intensity, yes, we're adding over 100 and those 100 people are going to be building some fantastic products and fantastic assets. They're going to make Rightmove stronger and on our path to higher growth. That, for us, is a short-term investment. It's going to allow us to build many of the things that will enable us across the domains that Johan talked about. And we've provided a flexible resourcing partner as well to help us accelerate or pull back in that recruitment as we see fit. For us, this is about driving higher profit growth. And this is about us building things that we're really excited about that we see great ROIs from and that requires some head count in the short term. But what you will see and what we look forward to bringing to you on a regular cadence is some of the really exciting products that they're going to build. William Larwood: Will Larwood from Berenberg. Firstly, just obviously integrating a lot more AI functionality going forward, consumer with like conversational search, et cetera. How can we expect sort of the cost profile of the business to shift particularly thinking about sort of using more compute going forward? And then secondly, you mentioned it very briefly in terms of the mortgage broker side of things, but if you could provide an update on that, that would be great. Johan Svanstrom: Yes. Yes, I'll start with AI. So look, we obviously anticipate and budget for compute cost that didn't exist in the past because of this. But I think there are a couple of important things to remember, a, again, back to that slide of how we set things up. We set it up in a very organized, very orchestrated away, and we have fantastic control over this just like we have on other costs. Here's the thing. It's a cost to deliver opportunity, right? And if you look at token cost overall, I mean, they keep coming down by 80%, 90% on an annual basis across the world, right, both because models become more efficient themselves and because there's a lot of competition out there. So it's an item to keep track of, but it's not something that concerns us particularly, right? Yes. So Mortgages, I'll go to that one as well. So we are -- I think we talked a little bit about this before. So we have brokers on the platform, but it's a small part of what we do today. A lot of attention has been on the MIP product, building awareness with consumers seeing what that does and obviously deliver great results. What we did last year was prepared a little bit more to be able to scale the broker side of the business as opposed to one-to-one relationships with brokers because there's literally 5,000 of them in the U.K. And it's also really about looking at this as -- I think of this as an inevitable trajectory kind of thing. Because of who we are, the interest in properties, the fact that 2/3 of properties needs to be financed, us having some kind of service in this space makes sense and that's evidenced already. But it's a long-term thing to build. There's still awareness. They're still optimizing it. There's still -- we're still, but what we're trying to do again is build a better experience and an experience that doesn't exist anywhere else. That takes some optimization. It's 2% of our revenue today. We're happy with the growth, but there's going to be a test and learning as we go along with it and we're executing on it really well. So over time, there will be broker options as well. And it's about understanding the consumer. And again, because of all the consumers that we have, what's their mindset, right? Are they close to transaction or they're really out shopping and still want to get an affordability check. So segmenting that and dissecting and making very logical for them and, therefore, funnel them to different opportunities for financing is important. And that doesn't come just from saying we do one thing on the website, right? But again, fantastic opportunity going forward and lots of money in this space, and I think we have a real right to play. Andrew Ross: Andrew Ross from Barclays. I've got 2 on AI. First one is about the conversational search you've rolled out on platform. What are you observing in terms of the conversion rate from search into leads or any kind of outcome-based metric that you track from and kind of what impact is it having on clicks on to featured and promoted listings as part of it? That's the first question. And then the second one is you guys have obviously applied to put an app into ChatGPT. Can you just give us some context as to what the thought process was as to why do that? On the one hand, you're kind of feeding the beast. On the other hand, first-mover advantage is where the users are. What were the kind of puts and takes? How are you thinking about it? Johan Svanstrom: Yes. And so when it comes to conversational, again, I outlined a few stats, right? We -- because of our traffic and in spite of having it on a minority of that traffic already, we've seen thousands of conversations, lots of messages, very good flow-through in terms of people getting the results that they wanted and also, as expected, coming back over to the main site and digging around and using different tools and so forth. We have seen that uptick of about 3x the sort of lead sending propensity. But to be honest, is that cause a correlation? It could be the most qualified users that have been on Rightmove before and so forth. Or is it a novel way and, therefore, they become interested? I think it's too early to say. And anyone who talks about these data points, I think it's important to give that kind of context. Now again, I point back to this as an opportunity, right? The fact that how consumers experience the site and the listings and what they do with it? First of all, this is a first version of integration. And how partners show up in that? That will, of course, evolve over time, right? It depends on how much of a traction this will see from consumers, small minority or complement to -- for a lot of people to what they do, it's just simply too early to tell. But again, the opportunity, if you think about it, it's a much more personalized and engaged consumer in different ways doing this. And that further qualification of someone's behavior has value. So the fact that there's potentially new or, for sure, different commercial opportunity around this is also there and that goes through our heads, right? But it's early days. And the second one on ChatGPT, yes, I think you maybe outlined it well, puts and takes, consideration. Look, today, they're just -- they're meaningless in terms of a feed or a platform for people actually looking for and going after homes. So as we said, with those stats, right? And I think most of the peers report the same numbers, very, very small. But look, it is a tool that lots of people use for different things. So for us, this is a test-and-learn, right? We want to be where some consumers are and see what we can learn from that. And very importantly, of course, it's an app that we created. It basically displays listings and consumers then go back and do much more of the experience where they have all that experience and again, all the data and tools in their own history and so forth on Rightmove and that's what we expect going forward as well. Andrew Ross: And you keep all the data, right? Johan Svanstrom: Yes. Joseph Barnet-Lamb: Joe Barnet-Lamb from UBS. Two for me. First one, a technical modeling one, but I think it's important for the interpretation of ARPA guidance. So historically, forecasting agency was simple as ARPA times by the average membership. But we now have a growing proportion of non-ARPA revenue within Agency. So can you just clarify which revenue streams within Agency are non-ARPA? How big they were in '25 and how you expect that to change into '26? Then the second question is just on buybacks. We see you're effectively restarting and spending excess capital generation beyond dividends and spending half of the GBP 40 million that you've accrued, whilst you weren't buying back. Can you just give a bit of color on why you aren't spending all of the excess cash to get you back down to 0? And a sort of general commentary on sort of the merits of running a net cash balance sheet given where your share price is? Ruaridh Hook: Sure. Two for me. Yes, you're right. ARPA used to be much easier. You took kind of customer numbers, multiplied by ARPA and you got roughly our revenue number. There is a non-ARPA element, which is because we don't count agent accelerator in our ARPA calculation because it's a program rather than a package and also insurance revenue in the rental services part of the business because that's insurance to consumers and landlords. So therefore, it's not counted under the average ARPA. Those 2 together, used to be almost 0 a few years ago. Great to see them grow, and they're around about GBP 3 million. So that's what you should add on once you take your average ARPA times by your customer numbers. In terms of the share buybacks, great, we -- first thing to flag, we return all of our surplus cash to shareholders, and we don't see that changing. We've reduced our cash reserves from GBP 40 million to GBP 20 million, which we think is sufficient to run the business from a working capital perspective going forward. For those that have been with Rightmove for a long time, GBP 20 million was always the number that we used to have and feel very comfortable that, that's a manageable cash reserves for our working cap. So flag that. In terms of looking at debt for share buybacks, I think is what you're asking, we're not philosophical about no debt on the balance sheet. At the same time, we see there's many pros and cons of having no debt on the balance sheet. It's something that we continually evaluate and discuss with our advisers and with the Board. At the moment, we don't have plans to leverage up. But I would say, as always, nothing is off the table, and we'll continue to evaluate all of our options. Joseph Barnet-Lamb: Just one follow-up maybe on Agent Accelerator -- on Agent Accelerator, obviously, with what we're seeing with new agent formation, is it fair to assume that the Agent Accelerator will grow faster in '26 than the average of Agency? Ruaridh Hook: It's Agent Accelerator, low ARPA. So don't get too carried away. Great to see the agent formation come back. I wouldn't expect to see that continually rising given its record levels. So I'd just be cautious about that, but great to see that market open up. Marcus Diebel: Marcus Diebel with JPMorgan. Johan, just one question again on investments. And clearly, we've seen '26 is going to be a peak year. Again, we're going to guide for like 3% to 5% operating profit growth. Given where the shares are and you're prioritizing, obviously, buybacks and those things, I mean, how critical is it really for you that '26 is really sort of a one-off in terms of operating profit growth and things bounce back relatively quickly, i.e., do you feel that some investments that you clearly had in mind are now a bit more put on hold longer term? Is that the case? Just a question for what is the mood? How critical is to see a meaningful margin bounce already in '27? And then the second question, just in general, because you touched on this value-accretive M&A. Are we then talking about sort of like investments in tech? Do you feel there are some tech assets out there that you should get to? Any comments would be interesting because it feels there won't be much. I just want to be really clear on this. Johan Svanstrom: Yes, I'll have a go. Maybe, Rory, you can fill in. But look, we -- when it comes to the investments, right, as we outlined, and I say it again, we have a great foundation, a great tech platform. We're doing this because we think there's more opportunity in this market. We look at the U.K. property market, our position and what we can do together with others over the medium term. we want to step up that pace. That's what we're doing. And in terms of how that's shaped, we've guided to '26 and what that means on both revenue growth and operating profit growth. And we're not going down, as we said before, to be specific year-by-year. But of course, you can assume that the profit growth will start aligning more to the revenue top line in the years following, right? So that's kind of all we can say. And as usual, you look at the business and you look at the opportunities or sometimes challenges ahead and you adjust after that. But we're very happy with what we're doing right now and off to a great start with it. Secondly, on M&A and maybe value -- well, value creation and what kind of companies. Yes, I mean, look, there's always been a plethora of proptechs in the start-up space. And now many of them come with AI after them. So I can tell you in some conversations we've had with agents directly, some of them, of course, use AI already. It's like, "Hey, here's a quicker way to do admin or whatever it is." They're start seeing some of the AI-enabled products that we actually equipped them with, and they're also inundated, right? They get so many pitches from that dot AI and the other dot AI on an ongoing basis. So it's a little bit confusing. And as usual, there's a lot of promise. Again, as I said before, I mean, AI is one thing, right? You got to -- you actually got to build it on something. And it's a filter and automation tool, right? But it certainly doesn't provide the whole experience. So that doesn't mean that there aren't interesting companies, and we keep a good eye on them. We have conversations with several of them. But for now, our organic growth path and with the capability we have is clearly how we operate mainly. Marcus Diebel: Maybe in this context, it's actually quite interesting. I mean, yes, we see a lot of start-ups approaching agents, very early, very small niche. But do you feel that the large players, the open AIs of the world also go directly to agents and asking them to upload and work closer together. Is there anything that you see you or hear? Ruaridh Hook: Nothing, I would say, particularly on, let's say, the big LLMs from an enterprise perspective. And first of all, because our 16,000 memberships typically consist of very small, medium-sized businesses. But the fact, again, that many of them are interested in using tools, right, whether that's a free user or paying GBP 20 a month. And some of them are, of course, more advanced in trying to figure out what's happening either on their own or again, sold by someone else. But I don't think that's a particular thing that we see, no. Annick Maas: Annick Mass from Bernstein. The first one is on ChatGPT, again. So can you tell us a bit more about how the user data is shared in between ChatGPT and youself? At what point do you get access to the user and actually can follow them around and actually can collect the data exclusively? And the second one is on Opti Edge. When agencies don't decide to upgrade, generally, why is that? Do they keep the money and they don't invest? Do they go for something else? Can you just tell us a bit through the challenges that you hear when you're meeting with agencies? Johan Svanstrom: I'll take one. You can take two. Yes, so on ChatGPT, again, what we built is an app and it has an end point and it sits within -- or will sit within the ChatGPT environment, right? And what the consumer will experience is to be able to do conversations that -- and answers will come partly from ChatGPT. And in the case of serving up property listings that are relevant, that will come from us. And what I think others have reported and what you can expect, it's a fairly simple outline, right? Yes, it's possible to find our brand there. You can find it today, but now we can find it in a slightly more organized fashion. And consumers will be very encouraged and already know where to go and find the full experience. So that's kind of the outline right now. And that means that the really valuable aspects of data on how people navigate and what they've done before and what they want to do in the future will remain in the Rightmove platform. And of course, remember, again, we're building a conversational interface on Rightmove, right? People already have that habit loop. It's like, "Hey, I can do all of this conversation, including complementary information on Rightmove." So yet another reason, I think, to not worry too much about some other alternative universe being built out. But again, interesting enough to test it. That's the way we view it. Ruaridh Hook: On Optimiser Edge, we actually don't want all customers on Optimiser Edge. We cater packages for all different types of customers and different types of businesses. And we want them to have choice and Optimiser Edge doesn't see all customers. low stock, low value, depending on where you are in the country, depending on competitiveness, funding, lots of different reasons. The strength of our account management team is knowing what products work for which customers. And the way that they start the conversation isn't about which package to be on, but which packages or which products are going to help you grow the business. And depending on that product mix is what then will generate a recommendation of which package to be on. And so for some, Essential is absolutely the right package to be on, and we don't expect them to move. Others, we'll see them move from Essential to Enhance to Opti and others will come straight in. And that was a little bit of what I wanted to show earlier was the variance of how we see the inbound into the Optimiser Edge package. The other stat I would flag is that over 50% of our customers are choosing to purchase products above their committed levels. So again, they can engage and see value in our product without having to move up the package ladder. So for us, it's about coming back to offering a plethora of different products that suit whatever needs a business has, but also fit whatever the property market is doing because the property market, as we all know, in the U.K. can change a lot. So we want products that suit them whatever is happening in the property market. Sean Kealy: First question, Johan, I was really pleased to hear you describe ChatGPT is meaningless at the moment, given they're 0.5% of your referral traffic. First question from me, from both a technical and sort of market power point of view, if it came to it, would you have confidence in blocking LLMs, not just from scraping data for training, but also for the grounding process in search? And sort of what would be the puts and takes? And how would you look at that decision? And then secondly, where you've rolled out market capabilities, for example, in conversational search? Are you finding that the major LLMs are good enough off the shelf? Or are they requiring quite a bit of fine-tuning customization to work with the data that you've got and Rightmove effectively, only Rightmove has? Johan Svanstrom: Got it. Yes. So look, on the first one, technically, you can choose to be in an environment and you can choose not to be in an environment. And so I think that option is already there. Again, it's an interesting environment to test and learning, probably very small meaning at the moment. It might grow, and then it will be relevant to be there. So we'll see how that goes over time, simply. But the optionality is absolutely there. I think on the conversational side that we've done ourselves. So again, we operated the current version with Gemini models from Google. And again, it has the benefit of -- it's all very tied up through our stack. But we have also built that capability to switch that out for literally any other large LLM. We have those relationships and conversations as well. So it's off the shelf in the sense that the general LLM is there. Now as you know, every week or 2 or whatever, there's another dot-something version coming out. And the 3 things that we optimize for is it's not just cost, right? Again, that's kind of a tailwind over time because it's going to continue to come down. But it's cost, it's quality and it's performance, right? Quality is very important. And performance as in speed and response rates. And already today and even as a consumer, at least if you pay, right, you can see for yourself how the models act a little bit differently. And of course, we have a fantastic platform and capability in the teams to judge these older things, right? So we built this stack where we can plug and play on the side and then we decide what we take live. And we run concurrent what's called evaluation models. So models that evaluate the models on an ongoing basis. So it will continue to go along that way simply. Then maybe the last point. Yes, of course, the generic LLM capability is one thing. The really interesting thing to create a fantastic experience and relevant experience for the consumers to combine it with the data that we have. And again, the more people actually use this and/or any other personalization features on our sites, the more tailor that experience can be. And a lot of that comes -- or the vast majority of that really comes from our own platform. Giles Thorne: Giles Thorne from Jefferies. Back on Mortgages, please. The attributes, Johan, you used earlier to describe what pulled you towards NatWest, I'm pretty sure the things that were used to describe nationwide when the MIP product was first developed. So I'm still a little bit none-wiser as to what went wrong with the nationwide partnership and what NatWest now solves. So I wanted to push you on that a bit harder. And then the second thing still on Mortgages is just to hear your latest thinking on how you solve for the problem of the broker product only appearing after a failed MIP, if that's even still the case? So an update there. Johan Svanstrom: Okay. Thank you. So I'll leave you to judge your own wiseness, Giles. But we've -- as I said before, we've had a great relationship with Nationwide and what we are looking at now, where are we now, what are our own plans, what have we learned from all the data. And we have selected NatWest as our partner going forward for what we think are really good reasons. And on the second question, yes, the broker path to a large extent has been -- because we have been focused so much on understanding the MIP path has been focused on, okay, who doesn't get a MIP for what reasons? And over time, of course, as I said before, we want to expand those choices for consumers through our segmentation, seeing what they do on the site and potentially what they are outright requesting. Some of that experimentation has been going on already, and that's going to continue in the future. Giles Thorne: And just a follow-up. Where is the remortgaging product? I think that was due to be second half of '25 -- I forget the exact date, but I'm pretty sure we passed the original signal around when you're going to launch that. Johan Svanstrom: No, it's launched. It's on the site. Again, it's not the main focus. Remember that we had a lot of first-time buyers, of course, on the site. And for lender partners, often, they want to try to get a hold of new customers. Now the remortgage product is absolutely there, has been there for a while. But it's sitting as we have said before, logically connected, so closer to the home valuation tools, for example, where people might be in that mode of, "Hey, I'm tracking the value of my property. That might be because I'm thinking about selling or I'm thinking about refinancing because I'm staying." So that's where that is. And again, over time, that's an opportunity to obviously build that out further, but it's going to come with -- in the right placements and as we see fit. Ruaridh Hook: Great. Well, I think that's -- well, I'll squeeze you in, Andrew, last one. Andrew Ross: So another on one AI and about kind of Agentic. And I appreciate there's a whole separate conversation about whether you'd actually want your personal agent to be searching for a house. But in a future world where that could be possible from a technology perspective, what's your view about whether you'd let agents be searching on your site, how you kind of set up the technology to do it? Do you let them call and do whatever they want on any sites? Do you make sure you have a commercial relationship where it has to be free your flow? Like how are you thinking about the Agentic journey? Johan Svanstrom: Yes, a little bit, let's say, early, but clearly, the Agentic opportunity keeps growing. But again, I just -- what you said yourself, remember property, particularly. AI is a filter, an advanced form of a filter, humans make decisions, right? It goes for a lot of processes. So the level of filtering assistant, obviously taking out admin tasks and so forth, big opportunity in AI, but humans need to be in the loop still for a lot of things and even more so for other things, including this one. So we'll see how that evolves over time. I really can't talk to the technology of it or who we might have a relationship with. There are interesting precedents on Amazon shutting down. I think it was Perplexity's Agentic rolling around. I don't know where that sits, right? But it's something that we'll deal with over time, just like we deal with other opportunities. Ruaridh Hook: I would say thank you all for your good questions today, and I wish you the best of the day. Johan Svanstrom: Thanks, everyone.
Operator: Good afternoon. Thank you for joining Romgaz Group Conference Call on the preliminary results for 2025. Following a brief introduction of our speakers, Mr. Razvan Popescu, Chief Executive Officer, will provide an overview of the preliminary results recorded by Romgaz Group in 2025, after which, we will proceed to the Q&A session. Please be advised that this conference is being recorded for internal purposes. On behalf of the company, the following speakers attend this conference. Mr. Razvan Popescu, Chief Executive Officer; Ms. Gabriela Tranbitas, Chief Financial Officer; Mr. Radu Moldovan, Energy Trade Director; and Mr. Ion Foidas, Production Department Director. With that, I will now invite Mr. Razvan Popescu for the opening presentation. Razvan Popescu: Good afternoon, everyone, and thank you for joining our conference call to discuss the preliminary results for 2025, which we published today, and it comprises the key economic and unaudited financial results for the group in the selected period. Also, an overall presentation will be available on our website in the Investors section. I would like take this opportunity to address certain aspects regarding the market context last year with impact on our group's performance. Natural gas consumption in Romania rose by 1.1% last year according to our estimates, with gas imports recording a significant advance to a 30% weight in the national gas consumption. The Romanian Commodities Exchange posted again weak trading liquidity as a result of the current regulation in force, and we estimate that the average wholesale price increased by almost 30% year-on-year. On the Central European Gas Hub, the average monthly reference price also rose around [17%] in 2025 according to the data provided by the NAMR. With respect to the fiscal environment in the gas and energy sector, Romgaz activity were mainly impacted by GEO no. 27, which was effective from April 1, 2022, and subject to subsequent amendments in GEO no. 6 that started in April 2025. We would like to remind the main provision that applied to gas producers last year, regulated gas selling price of RON 120 per megawatt hour for the gas sold to households and supplier of households, heat producers and their suppliers for the production of thermal energy for households and to the transmission operator and gas distributions to a maximum of 75% of the technological consumption. This price level is applied starting from April 2024 and up to the end of March 2026. For the gas sold under regulated prices, payment of the windfall profit taxes is exempt and gas royalties are computing based on these regulated prices. Regarding the operational and financial performance recorded by Romgaz in 2025, we can highlight the following main activities. Natural gas consumption amounted to 4.95 bcm, marginally adjusted by 0.2% year-on-year, favorably within the strategic objective of the natural decline threshold of 2.5%. We achieved this important performance through continuous efforts aiming to consolidate the potential of our onshore production, which included completion of investment work to extend production infrastructure, allowing us to stream into production 6 new wells, specific investment works in active or low flow wells resulting in reactivation of 175 wells that generated a total flow of over 300 million cubic meters continuous rehabilitation project of our main and mature gas reservoirs in order to maximize production and increase the recovery factor. Also, we completed drilling of one new production well, finalized 7 surface facilities while other 23 are in different proprietary stages. We can also highlight that all these measures led to a significant 47% increase of our condensate production to over 54,000 tonnes in 2025 due mostly to higher production in the Caragele field. Regarding the Caragele Deep, works are progressing with the 76 Rosetti well in production test, 54 Damianca well that is being prepared for production test, and 78 Rosetti well in prod -- that is already in production, while other 7 wells are in different stages of drilling preparation. For the last quarter alone, we can mention that gas production amounted to 1.28 bcm, adjusted only by 0.9% from the 1.29 bcm record output that was recorded in Q4 2024 and significantly up by 7.4% compared to the 1.19 bcm that was produced in Q3 2025. We reported total revenues from gas sold of over RON 6.9 billion, marginally adjusted by 0.3%. This was the combined result of a lower average selling price while gas volumes sold increased by 5.5% to 4.82 bcm in 2025 compared to 4.57 bcm in '24. This is based on net volume extracted and sold from our underground storages and lower deliveries to the Iernut power plant. Thus, we hold a substantial position on the Romanian gas market. According to our assessment, Romgaz continued to rank as the leading gas supplier in Romania in the last year, with a significant contribution of 50% in total gas delivery. Also, we are strongly positioned in gas consumption covered from domestically produced gas, holding a substantial share of 71% last year according to our internal estimates. Revenues from storage services also advanced by 10% year-on-year to RON 562 million with injection-related revenues higher by 56% and capacity reservation activities having the largest weight, 55%. We succeeded to increase our revenues from electricity by almost 2% to RON 382 million, while production of our old power plant has expectedly decreased to 750 gigawatt hour in the last year. The Iernut power plant is still contributing to the security of supply in the energy market in Romania. Overall, the group recorded total revenues amounting over RON 8 billion, higher by 1.2% compared to 2024, based mainly on the strong contribution of our upstream segment. Regarding the expenses, the windfall tax recorded a 36% increase year-on-year to RON 767 million, mostly due to higher gas volumes sold at the regulated prices. Gas and UGS royalties adjusted by 6% to RON 559 million. Altogether, the 3 main taxes, windfall tax, royalties and the duty to the energy transition fund decreased by 26% year-on-year, but still represented a significant expense of RON 1.34 billion in 2025, having thus a positive effect on our profitability. Bottom line, we reported a historical annual net profit of RON 3.35 billion, higher by more than 4% compared to the RON 3.21 billion recorded in 2024 and representing the highest annual value ever recorded by the group. All profitability rates were substantial last year, with net profit margin rose to the highest historical annual value of 41.7%. And both EBITDA and EBIT margin continue to be significant at 54.9% and 46.2%, respectively. For the last quarter alone, we can underline a net profit of RON 912 million, 70% higher compared to the quarterly average of the past 3 years and a net profit margin of 46%. Regarding our CapEx, the Romgaz Group invested a consolidated amount of RON 3.86 billion in 2025. Investment in Romgaz Black Sea Limited, which basically is the Neptun Deep, representing RON 2.74 billion from Romgaz alone. And with respect to our flagship offshore project, we can mention that it is currently in the execution phase, in line with our programs and budget and the execution calendar. During 2025, significant milestones of the projects included not only start of the construction works at the microtunnel in Tuzla, but also the achievement of all 4 reservoir targets in the Pelican South field by drilling all the 4 wells that were in the drilling program. Also, it is important to mention that in December 2025, the Romanian government approved Addendum no. 7 to the Concession Agreement for the Neptun Block, extending the exploration phase in Neptun Deep. Anaconda-1 exploration well will be drilled in the deepwater area with the aim to identify, evaluate and exploit further the energy potential of the Black Sea. Another important objective is the combined cycle gas turbine power plant in Iernut, for which the completion rate is around 98% for the overall Turkey project and 90% that was remaining from the last EPC contract. Following the termination of works contract with Duro Felguera as executive of this project on October 13, Romgaz became the general contractor and we are in process to assign the contracts for the essential subcontractors and directly purchase the services and products necessary for the testing and commissioning of the plant. The commissioning of this investment may not exceed December 31, 2026, according to the government decision that was taken at the end of 2025. Another important event was the approval of the company's decarbonization strategy for the 2050 target on October 22 by the Romgaz Board. This strategy was developed in the context of European and national policies aiming to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions. Our net zero trajectory shall be periodically reassessed based on technological progress, availability of funding and the clarity of regulations. I would also like to mention that the second issue of the bonds under the EMTN program, which were oversubscribed 8x on October 28, our new EUR 500 million issue of bonds has a maturity of 6 years and an annual coupon of 4.625%. The success of the second issuance of bonds confirms the confidence of the institutional investors in the company's development strategy. At the end of the presentation, I would like to emphasize the significant performance recorded by the Romgaz stock on the Bucharest Stock Exchange. SNG share price doubled over the last 12 months period, leading to a current market cap of around EUR 9 billion, Romgaz representing the third largest domestic stock and blue chip on the Bucharest Stock Exchange. With this, I would like to close our presentation, and thank you all for your attention. Thank you. Operator: [Operator Instructions] So we have a question from Ms. Daniela Mandru. Unknown Analyst: What I see -- just compared to my estimates, I've seen some large deviation in the income tax expense. I don't know, you recorded some deferred income tax or something in the last quarter? Unknown Executive: For 2025, it's still in -- still valid, an ordinance issued a few years ago, which provides for certain discounts, let's call them, on taxation if equity increases. Considering the increase in equity from 2024 to 2025, the income tax benefited from a 14% decrease. Unknown Analyst: Sorry, can you detail what equity increase? Unknown Executive: So equity in the balance sheet. Unknown Analyst: Equity in the balance sheet. Yes, please. Unknown Executive: Increased from RON 14 million in December 2024 to RON 17 billion in December 2025. Unknown Analyst: And sorry, I don't know what is this regulation -- not regulation, but this exemption referring to. So if this equity increase, you can -- so can you please detail this tax exemption, or what it is? Unknown Executive: Yes. It's based on an emergency ordinance, 153 issued a few years ago, I don't recall the exact year. Just a second. So it was issued in 2020. And it has several discounts. One of them is if equity increases compared to 2020, it benefits from discount of 3%. Then another discount is if equity has an annual increase between 20% and 25%, it benefits from a decrease of 9%. And there's another 2% decrease if... Unknown Analyst: Okay, I understood. I understood the logic behind. But this discount of 3%, 9% is applied to what, to the full year? Unknown Executive: Yes, for the full year. Unknown Analyst: Yes, to the full year, but applied to what? To the normal income tax? Applied to what? Unknown Executive: Yes, the current income tax. Yes. Unknown Analyst: To the current income tax. Okay. And I was not from the very beginning, but can you disclose the quantities sold at kept prices in Q4, please? And what do you expect for 2026 if it's possible? Razvan Popescu: '26, unfortunately, we can't -- we don't have the final ordinance. So the ordinance has not been published. The ordinance not having been published, we do not have the current quantities right now. For the entire year of 2025, around 80% of our entire production was sold at regulated prices -- over 80% was sold at regulated prices. Unknown Analyst: Okay. And now regarding the -- I didn't see the note, but I believe you don't publish them. Regarding the financial cost, and regarding the capitalized interest costs, can you disclose the total interest cost capitalized in the full year or... Unknown Executive: Yes. Just a second. So of the total income -- finance cost of RON 183 million, we capitalized RON 69 million for the full year. Unknown Analyst: RON 69 million? Unknown Executive: Yes. Unknown Analyst: Okay. So please help me a little bit here. I'm not quite familiar with these capitalizations and so on. So when the investment will be fully functional, these costs will be -- all these interest costs will be reflected in the financial results? Unknown Executive: No. It will be included in the value of the investment, and it will be depreciated based on the useful life of the investment. So it will... Unknown Analyst: Yes, it will be as depreciation, yes. Because I see that [ DG, ] they did the same, but all the capitalized interest, they put in the financial results. So I'm just wondering if you will do the same. I don't know the reason why. Okay. But for the first quarter of the year -- of this year, do you know the volumes at the regulated prices, yes? Razvan Popescu: For the first quarter of '26? Unknown Analyst: Yes. Razvan Popescu: Yes, they are the same. So it's around 80%, 81% for the first quarter of 2026. So they are basically the same. Unknown Analyst: It's basically the same compared with the last quarter, with Q1 2025? Razvan Popescu: A bit over 10 tera for the first quarter of '26, it was a little over 10 tera as well for the last quarter of '25. Unknown Analyst: Okay. And regarding the execution of the guarantee, I don't know because I didn't have time to go through all the notes, the report you published. Have you registered them in -- yes? Razvan Popescu: Yes. We registered them. Unknown Executive: Yes, we recorded the amount that was executed around RON 60 million. We still have to recover around RON 20 million. The provider of the guarantee would not say the amount that he owes us. So that amount was not recorded yet. But we are taking action -- legal action against them. Unknown Analyst: So probably, this amount will be recorded. So there are -- you can record the remaining of RON 21 million in the first quarter of this year or later? What is your estimate? Razvan Popescu: It depends what they are going to pay. We cannot estimate right now. Operator: Ms. Irina Railean, we are ready for your questions. Irina Railean: I hope you hear me well. My first question is regarding these changes on the regulated gas market. I mean, the expected change from regulated gas prices to some kind of administrated gas prices. How does this impact Romgaz? I understand you don't have the volumes for this year. But in general, what is the difference for a producer, let's say? And also here related to your supply segment strategy, I mean I see you plan to expand to the supply business? Will you enter also this administrative price scheme? If you could give us more details here? Razvan Popescu: Yes. Thank you for the questions. From our analysis, the impact for the producer is, of course, going to be the [indiscernible] difference, that is going to be assigned to the regulated price. So this is going to be the impact. But of course, it depends right now on the quantities that are going to be allocated because in the past years, we had a fluctuation from 55% up to 100% of our quantities on this ordinance. We expect for it to be published if it's going to be published probably next month, and we'll have the allocation of quantities in order to have a correct calculation and impact on the profitability. Regarding our supply. For us, we've started works on integrated and creating this line of business last year. The team from a commercial, economic, IT has been working around the clock. From a technical perspective, we will be ready to be able to cover the supply for the small household consumer and nonhousehold probably starting from 1st of April. But of course, this is relative compared to the quantities that are going to be allocated because right now, Romgaz is not a supplier to this household. So we do not have a portfolio in order for quantities to be allocated to ourselves. So probably, the bulk of our quantities will be again allocated to the thermal energy producers and to the suppliers of the house. Also, there is another ordinance, again the [indiscernible] ordinance that was published in November that kept our current workforce number and also the spending that we can make and the hiring that we can have to the levels of the end of November. We have a memorandum that is -- currently, we have pushed it to be approved by the government, but this has not happened as such. So at this point in time, we have a couple of unknowns to the supply business. Irina Railean: So basically, you don't know exactly the quantities, but does this prevent you from further trying to develop the supply business? I mean, even though if you have to deliver some of your -- part of your production, so this heating producers and suppliers of households, does this prevent you from like developing further your own portfolio? Razvan Popescu: No, we will develop our portfolio. It depends on how this ordinance will be published for our strategy for the supply business, we'll see how we'll approach, probably the commercial, the small non-household commercial that will be on the free market. We will not stop developing this supply business, but we need to see exactly how we'll draw our strategy, given the quantities that are going to be allocated because, of course, this will impact our pricing power because we are basing the synergies that we have from the production to the supply business and the fact that we are the producer. So basically, the entire supply, our supply business was drawn up from our own internal production. Irina Railean: Okay. So a lower share in this case will be more favorable for Romgaz because -- okay, because you'll have a remaining larger part to support your supply business? Razvan Popescu: Correct. Irina Railean: Okay, okay. And you said you don't have contracts for households, but what was the situation on the smaller commercial or industrial clients? Do you have any discussions there or potential clients for this supply business? Razvan Popescu: We do have even without having this typical supply and integrated supply business, we actually did offer gas to small non-household suppliers that ask for it. So Romgaz somewhat is already in the non-household let's say, business even now. We have the [ fleet, ] and we also have a couple of thousand people in the [ fleet ] that are registered to Romgaz already. So basically, we have a small foothold in the supply business. But in order to make it commercial on a larger scale, we do need available quantities in order to be able to be, let's say, favorable and get the market share in this respect. Irina Railean: Okay. And regarding Azomures, if you can provide us some update if you have in a favorable, let's say, situation, any estimated CapEx besides the acquisition that you will need to allocate if the transaction concludes? And what are generally the scenarios that can materialize this year regarding this acquisition? Razvan Popescu: We are currently in negotiation. We are negotiating the asset purchase agreement with Azomures. And we have made a nonbinding offer on interval price to them and we are expecting for them to come back. We'll see if it will conclude or not. Until then, I cannot give any details regarding CapEx or other investments. Irina Railean: Okay. And regarding Azomures, there were some discussions in the press and I'm not sure if you could provide more transparency here that you provided or the price was mainly the issue here. And as you view the acquisition price lower than the partner. So that's why I'm asking about the scenarios. What if you don't agree on the price, what if you -- or what are the possible solutions or situations or outcomes here? Razvan Popescu: So the possibilities are 2. We either do the acquisition or not. Of course, it is a matter of price. As I stated on Monday, we view Azomures as a distressed asset. We view the issues that the entire petrochemical industry is having in Europe because of the high gas, prices because of the [indiscernible] regulation, because of the CO2 pricing. So our offer was in accordance with this scenario, with the maturity of the asset and of course, with the modeling that we've done on the asset. Romgaz has to view this acquisition also as commitment to an investment for the foreseeable future. So for us, we took everything into account when we made this offer. Operator: We have a question from Laura Simion. What is your production estimate and what volumes will be sold in 2026 at regulated price? Razvan Popescu: Our production estimate for 2026 is keeping our 2.5% decline in production in check. As you've seen for the last 2 years, we've been doing this actively, and we've not lowered our production. So we are hoping to keep it around to 4.9. bcm for 2026, again with the wells that we need to put into production with workovers that we're going to have on our mature fields. At regulated prices, we really don't know what the allocation is going to be. We have the entire quantity sold for Q1, and around 47% of our production is sold to the end of 2026. So it has to be somewhere in the vicinity of around half of our production probably at a regulated price. Operator: Another question from Ms. Laura Simion. What is your estimate for 2026 power production? Razvan Popescu: This is a bit complicated because for our energy business, we are looking to start the -- restart the works in the Iernut power plant. Right now, our old power plant is shut down. We've been having some technical issues with it. So this is going to be very, very volatile to say so. The moment that we'll start testing in the new Iernut power plant, then the old Iernut power plant is not going to be put into production. We had up until 2 weeks ago, the plant was working at full capacity. We'll probably be trying to have it work again for a couple of months. But after that, given the progress in the Iernut side, it's going to be probably stopped. Operator: The next question from Laura Simion. When will you start retail business for gas? Razvan Popescu: As I said, it depends a lot on the quantities that are going to be allocated on the ordinance in 2026. Technically, we want to be ready starting for the 1st of October. So in terms of processes and in terms of technical capability. Operator: Ms. Simion wants to know what will happen with Trident Block after Lukoil retired? Razvan Popescu: So officially, Lukoil has not retired yet. This is mostly a question for the Naryan-Mar. The concession agreement and the exploration phase for Lukoil and for -- at the end of this year. But it is interesting to see if Lukoil will divest and who will be the new investor in Lukoil. Of course, Romgaz will work closely with any company that is trying to develop that block. We have a 12.2% stake there. So right now, what we can do is only wait to see how these things will work out. Operator: Another question from Ms. Simion. Do you estimate that quantities sold at regulated prices in 2026 will be more or less than 2025? Razvan Popescu: For us, it's probably going to be less because we already have quantities sold in 2025. But if you take into account the Q1 quantities, which is basically at over 80%, they could be in the same vicinity of 2025. Operator: And finally, the last question from Ms. Simion for store quantities, will it remain the obligation to be registered at regulated prices after the 1st of April 2026? Unknown Executive: So far, we have -- we do not have gas at regulated prices in our storage facilities. And we do not know what happens with the remainder. Operator: We have a hand raised from user ending in 85, Mr. Tamas Pletser? Tamas Pletser: Yes. Can you hear me? Operator: Yes. Tamas Pletser: Yes. I got two questions. First of all, you mentioned the Lukoil stake in Trident Block. Would Romgaz be interested to acquire Lukoil stake? I think you suggested on your answer that you may be not interested, but I'm just curious what is the reason that you are not interested, if you are not interested? And if you are interested, please explain us why would it be interesting for you? That would be my first question. And my second question would be regarding the Iernut power plant. Last time you said that you would finish the project by yourself. Is this the case right now? Will you make the last part of this investment by yourself? Razvan Popescu: Yes. Thank you for the question. So regarding the Trident block, from the information that we have right now, Lukoil is also selling this asset in a complete deal with its other assets. So it's not for sale separately and it has not been offered for sale for Romgaz, first of all. So they are looking to have a complete sale of their entire asset. This included, but I cannot talk on behalf of them. The Iernut power plant, indeed, Romgaz will act as an EPC. Yesterday, we went into auction for the site management, which is one of the most important contracts. We have companies that have extensive expertise in offering site management in such recovery projects. And for us, this is one of the most important things that a site manager needs to know is to know how to recover such project that they cut some corners in order to put it into production from the companies that have made the bid for the site management. Some of them have seen the site, and they are confident that the plant can be put into production by the end of 2026. Operator: We will proceed now with Mr. Oleg Galbur. Oleg Galbur: Yes. I hope you can hear me well. I have several follow-ups. First of all, can you please disclose the exact volume of gas sold at regulated prices in Q4 '25? And what level of realized gas price has Romgaz recorded in the last quarter of last year? And also since we don't have yet a full report with a full disclosure, it would be very helpful if you could disclose the profit before tax by segment. I mean by upstream, storage and power for the full year or last quarter of '25. And then I have two more general questions. The first one refers to the production outlook. So it is my understanding that for this year, you would rather expect a flat level of gas production. Please correct me if I'm wrong. But otherwise, it would be also interesting to know what is your expectations longer term, let's say, for the next 3 years, according to your strategy. Do you see the possibility to keep the production stable? Would you rather see small production declines? So putting in the longer-term perspective would be very helpful for us to understand which way you see developing? And lastly, on the upstream production costs and here, I refer to all costs excluding taxes, windfall taxes and royalty expenses. So if I look correctly at those expenses -- production costs, sorry, then I calculate a level of RON 320 per 1,000 cubic meters for the full year of '25 and that would imply a 22% increase year-over-year, which would be in line with the cost inflation seen by other oil and gas producers in the region. So first of all, if you could confirm whether I'm not wrong with my calculation. And second of all, it would be helpful to hear your comments about the cost development, whether you see some high cost inflations coming from labor, from services, coming from other angles and whether you have a strategy in mind or already an action plan how to contain this growth or even maybe improve your cost base? So that would be my -- those would be my questions. Razvan Popescu: So regarding the sales in the fourth quarter of 2025, we sold 10.23 tera at regulated prices, ut on an average selling price of RON 134 per megawatt. In the first quarter of 2026, we expect around 10.38 tera to be sold at regulated prices at a bit higher price, around RON 137 from our estimates. Regarding the cost inflation, we do not publish necessarily our production cost. Yes, it can be computed. You are not far from the truth. We have been seeing inflationary pressures on -- especially on the services side. Given the fact that Romgaz's mature fields need heavy investment, heavy investment in compressors, heavy investment in the well workovers, it's quite hard to keep production at this level without sizable investments. That's why we are investing in the Caragele field as well. That's why we are drilling in the Caragele field as well. We've seen inflation also stepping to the -- to our contracts for drilling the rigs. So yes, we have been seeing pressures. And one way that we are trying to mitigate this is through our SIRCOSS branch. Given the fact that we do most of our well workovers with internal sources, it helps us keep the costs in check. So this is why I think we've not seen such a big inflationary pressures on our production cost. Also, we are working in digitalizing these fields. This is one of the main pillars of strategy that we are trying to implement, and we are implementing right now. We are implementing the well production, well production type of analysis, and this will help us with the well workovers and also to be able to have a more clear picture on the production and what we can do to keep it at this level. Looking forward, onshore production in Romania, except for the Caragele field and the Boteni project, there aren't that much prospects that we can work on. This is why we invested in the Neptun Deep. This is why we have gone offshore in order to be able to have this production capacity and in order to keep gas as a transition fuel up to 2050. But our onshore is getting difficult year after year because of our mature fields and the fact that without having these investments, so we are talking around EUR 200 million each year only in keeping production at this level, we will have a much higher decline somewhere in the 8% region in our mature fields under operation. Oleg Galbur: That's extremely helpful. So in other words, just to check if I understood correctly, the strategy is to continue investing into -- if not maintaining, at least lowering the production decline in the next years and I'm talking about the current portfolio, onshore portfolio, not including the new developments. Razvan Popescu: Correct. Correct. This has been kept in check through well workovers around, let's say, 6% of the, let's say, counter decline of production and from new wells around 3%. So this is how we manage to keep the production, the production in check. We are, of course, investing in new drying station. We are investing in new compressor station and also the deep wells that we have been drilling at Caragele in 2025. We had the deepest well ever to be drilled in Romgaz history, 5,056 meters. We are trying to open the Caragele field deep gas reservoirs in order to counter this decline in production that we have from our mature field in the Northwestern Romania. Operator: Ms. Ioana Andrei has sent us some questions. First, a follow-up question on supply business. Do you have a target beyond the next year? Razvan Popescu: Beyond next year, of course, we're putting into production the Neptun Deep and starting the complete liberalization of the price in 2027. We will keep our strategic approach in order to be the supplier, the main supplier in the years to come for the Romanian household and non-household consumer. Operator: The second question from Ms. Andrei, Ioana. Regarding Neptun Deep, since drilling has begun on the second perimeter, can you confirm whether the drilling results from the first perimeter validate the anticipated volumes? Razvan Popescu: Yes. Operator: Please also share whether there is any deviation from initially estimated volumes? Razvan Popescu: I cannot share that as of yet. Operator: Is there a regional trading strategy? Could you please share? Razvan Popescu: Right now, the trading strategy for the Neptun will be devised after we know what we're going to do with the Azomures and how it will and approach our estimates for the supply business and Moldova. But right now, we are more focused on delivering the Neptun Deep with OMV Petrom, the operator. We are supporting the operator in finalizing the drilling and continuing the drilling on the Domino field. It's going to be, let's say, a year, not necessarily, but very intensive year in terms of investment, technical exploration there, and we are trying to be more concentrating on that. Operator: And the third question from Ms. Ioana Andrei regarding power prices. What is the estimate impact of vertical corridor on gas transit, especially considering the influence of LNG? Razvan Popescu: We see the vertical corridor as a complementary source of gas, but as a possibility of diversification in Europe. And if the -- and when the vertical corridor will be operationalized, it will give, let's say, a connection with the TTF with the Henry Hub prices. So for us in this region, it will have a beneficial impact from the perspective of possibility of gas supply and diversification. Operator: Regarding Caragele, what is the current status of the project? Please share something on the volumes? Razvan Popescu: The current status of the project is evolving. As I said, we have drilled 3 deep wells in Caragele. One is already in production, 2 of them are waiting to be finalized in order to be put into production. So basically, the drilling was finalized in Caragele. Around 8% of our entire production stems from this field and 97% of the gas condensate production comes from this field. So yes, we can expect a continued increase in the Caragele fuel production. Operator: The next question, we will take from Ms. Daniela Mandru. Unknown Analyst: Yes. So regarding CapEx, how much did you invest up to now in Neptun Deep? Yes, this is the question, first. And the other one is regarding an update on Iernut. I'm not sure if I know anymore when this new power plant will be commissioned. So I want some clarification, please, on the issue. Razvan Popescu: So for the Neptun, this year, we've invested around RON 2.74 billion. We've invested around a bit less than RON 4 billion last year. And for this year, we anticipate around RON 3.5 billion, around 70% of our entire investment in Neptun is going to be the highest CapEx here in Romgaz's history. For the Iernut power plant, as I said, we went into auction and procurement for the site management. There, after the site management, we are working on 58 different contracts in order to negotiate with subcontractors that have already worked in the site. And we are confident that we're going to start works in the site starting from late March to early April. When these works will start, we'll update the market, and we will continue to update the investors regarding how works are going to go forward and be finalized. Romgaz is going to act as an EPC, and we are the ones that are going to do all the contracting for this power plant. But of course, with the support of well-renowned site manager and with the support of General Electric that is the producer of the equipment in the site. Unknown Analyst: Yes. Here some more clarification. I've read in the newspapers, I don't know if it's true or not. So regarding the grant for this Iernut plant, I read that if you don't commission the plant by June '26, you will be forced to reimburse the grant? This is true? Razvan Popescu: It's always been like that. So it has been prolonged, but it's 31st of December '26. Unknown Analyst: So now it's prolonged to the end of '26? Razvan Popescu: In December '25, it has been prolonged up to the 31st of December '26. So we have almost a full year in order to finalize and put it into production, but at the parameters, it should work. Unknown Analyst: So just to conclude for now, you don't know exactly when this plant will start producing power? Razvan Popescu: No. We need to have everyone back in the site. We need to have General Electric and the subcontractors in the site, and we need to have the site manager to see if we can put it into production as soon as possible. For us, it's very important to start the test as soon as possible and to be able to put it into commercial production by the end of this year. But of course, it has a number of factors that it depends. Operator: So finally, questions from the user with the number ending in 85. Could you please unmute your microphone? Tamas Pletser: I wanted to ask about dividends. I know what you've been communicating in the recent past that before the start of production at Neptun, you don't see dividend levels coming to the historical of about 50%. But still for last year, for 2025, a year with quite good results. How should we think about the dividend payout? Would you see it staying at the previous 2 years' levels? Or do you still see room for some increases? So any comments on this matter would be very helpful. Razvan Popescu: Thank you. Given the fact that we've prioritized the Neptun Deep project, and given the fact that 2026 is the highest CapEx intensive CapEx years from this company's history, we would like to have a balanced approach of the dividend payout. So in our opinion, the dividend payout has to take into consideration the fact that we still have some long way to go until the Neptun Deep will be put into production. We keep our estimates that just after when Neptun Deep will be put into production, the dividend payout will somewhat, again, be raised to, let's say, more historical standards. Operator: Are there any further questions? So if there are no further questions, we would like to conclude today's conference call. For any additional information, please contact our Investor Relations team. And on behalf of Romgaz, thank you for joining us today. Razvan Popescu: Thank you, everyone.
Operator: Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. Welcome to Fourth Quarter 2025 Earnings Call. This conference is being recorded, and the replay will be available at the company's website at auraminerals.com/investidores. The presentation will also be available for download. This call is also available in Portuguese. [Operator Instructions] [Foreign Language] [Operator Instructions] Before proceeding, we would like to clarify that any statements that may be made during this conference call regarding the company's business prospects, operational and financial projections and goals are the beliefs and assumptions of Aura Executive Board and the current information available to the company. These statements may involve risks and uncertainties as they relate to future events and therefore, depend on circumstances that may or may not occur. Investors should be aware of events related to the macroeconomic scenario, the industry and other factors that could cause results to differ materially from those expressed in the respective forward-looking statements. Present at this conference, we have Rodrigo Barbosa, President and CEO; and Kleber Cardoso, CFO. Now I will turn the conference over to Rodrigo Barbosa. You may begin the conference. Rodrigo Barbosa: Thank you, and good morning, all. I'm super proud to be here sharing a few information, not only the results, but all the strategic advancements that Aura is pursuing. If I remind all the investors here and analysts about our strategy, we are very much executing right on track on our strategy. The strategy is, number one, to increase production through development of greenfield projects. Number two, to increase resource and reserves as we see significant potential in our current deposits to increase the reserves. And number three, continue to grow through M&A and address our daily trading volume or multiple that is still discounted compared to our peers. And doing all these 3 while we continue to pay significant dividends to our shareholders. And I'm glad today that I will be able to walk you through that we've been executed in all of those 3 areas while we pay dividends. So number one, first, going to the results, and I ask to put on the first page. In terms of executing greenfield projects and also improving the results, we see, again, the company going on record high production on a quarterly basis and also on a yearly basis. On a quarterly basis, which we have already disclosed to the market, we produced 82,000 ounces gold equivalent ounces, 11% up compared to Q3 '25 and 23% compared to Q4 last year. On annual production, 280,000 ounces of production, 9% up at constant price. And at guidance prices, excluding MSG acquisition that was not on the budget and was not on the guidance, we were very much in line with the middle and actually slightly above the middle of the guidance with the market. The combination of higher production, cost under control and higher gold prices drove us to hit $208 million in the quarter with a gold price of $4,090, while MSG only 1 month and Borborema is still on the final phase, achieving nominal capacity. When we look to the year, we reached $548 million of EBITDA with the gold price $3,400. If I remind the investors, since '23, we've been doubling the EBITDA coming from $135 million, $270 million, now $540 million. And if you take into account the last EBITDA of $208 million with the gold and put the new gold price and then put a higher production, we'll see that we'll be able to, during this year, perhaps maintaining this gold price, double again our EBITDA if the current gold prices continue to be as strong as it is today. On the all-in sustaining cash cost, we are glad also to disclose to the market that we have not only reached the guidance, but we are slightly below the low end of the guidance, and we will talk more through this during the presentation. Higher gold price, cost under control, we have a very also strong recurring free cash flow of close to $100 million on last quarter, understanding that we are also investing in inventories, investing in developing the mines, which put some low grade into the inventory. So some working capital is allocated as an inventory as low grades -- we leave the low grades of the mines that are entering production to the further years while we now focus on higher grades. And I will talk more about this also during the presentation. Combination of strong cash flows. And although we acquired MSG, we continue to be in a very -- and paid dividends. We continue to be at the low leverage ratio. Kleber is going to walk you through that always being able to grow without even leveraging our cash flows that coming from the operations being more than enough to fund our acquisitions and our greenfield projects, while we also count with leverage to fund those projects, freeing more cash to be distributed to our shareholders. A good news, it's a net loss of $20 million. That means that gold price continues to appreciate. And if you take out the noncash nonrecurring losses, we'll see that during the year, the adjusted net income was $206 million, and Kleber is going to walk you through all the details how to achieve this $200 million. For the year 2026, we have a strong -- continue to have a strong production coming from our operations and some increase in all-in sustaining cash costs, some increase also in CapEx due to positive news. We are now expanding Almas. We are coming from Almas, we built a 1.3 million tons plant. Last year, we finished above 2 million tons. We are now upgrading to 3 million tons to the plant. That means that we have to develop the mine that needs to raise the tailings then. We are also advancing in Era Dorada. We just announced Era Dorada early works. We also acquired MSG for $76 million. MSG has structurally a higher sustaining CapEx and a higher CapEx during the year of the turnaround and structurally will be higher than our average. However, the price that we paid for MSG more than justified this higher CapEx, sustaining CapEx and also higher sustaining cash cost, which we will walk you through also during the presentation. Very important additional events. Again, we closed MSG. We got the license for early works in Era Dorada, which we already started the early works. We are now finishing all the analysis, all the studies to be able to go and approve in the Board the full construction. Yesterday, we also announced a major milestone for Borborema, which we obtained the license to move the road, reaching now 1.5 million ounces just with the reallocation of the road freeing additional 670,000 ounces of reserves into the project, while we continue to analyze during the next few weeks for the AIF or 20-F to be released by the end of March, we are updating our resource and reserves based on higher gold price, which means lower cutoff that will free more reserves into all across our operations. Major milestones that we conquered also is after listing in NASDAQ and after the new issuance in $200 million all came from in 1 year, $1 or $2 million being traded per day, now reaching $100 million per day, addressing the low trading volume that we had now being attractive for major investors to invest in the company. And finally, not least, announcing again a very strong dividend of $0.66 per share on a quarterly basis, which gives us a yield on the last 12 months of 6.2% to our shareholders while we made acquisition, while we ramp up Borborema and while we're doing all these growth projects. So in summary, we can see that we are very much delivering on the long-term strategy. Number one, we are increasing production and developing the greenfield projects. Borborema last year, again, on time, on budget, commercial production in September. Then we also acquired MSG. This is the third avenue is continue to grow through M&A. Add daily trading volume. So on the third avenue, we acquired MSG, and we significantly increased daily trading volume, which is helping us to attract more bigger investors, although yet we are still discounted compared to our peers. And the second avenue to increase resource and reserves, again, with the Borborema, we increased Borborema reserves by 82% of reserves, significantly increasing cash flows of this project. And I can also walk you through a little bit the importance of this additional 670,000 ounces, which I will do during the presentation. So very much increasing production, increasing resource and reserves and address the multiple through daily trading volume and also new acquisitions. In terms of safety, super proud. And again, now -- all those numbers are putting Aura as a benchmark in the world in the sector. Not only we had the full year without any single lost time incidents, but now we're achieving over 18 months with no lost time incidents, which put our in a benchmark in the world in terms of safety. Any well-managed company will give you strong levels of safety and also strong results. In terms of stability of the structures, again, we make reviews every quarter, every month through external consultants and all our geotechnical structures are in satisfactory levels. Next slide. So when we look on the quarterly basis on the production that we have already disclosed, now we see since Q1 2025, a constant growth on production through a combination of the ramp-up of Borborema and lastly, still not only December, the acquisition of MSG. For the further quarters, we should see now continue to grow in terms of production on a quarterly basis as MSG now comes a full quarter and then gradually, we should also improve our production from our other operations. When we look on the guidance, we see that Aranzazu, the production, when you consider the same metal prices of the budget, we see that we were very much in line with the guidance in terms of production. I will get attention for those that are not used to looking carefully our numbers, Aranzazu, we have -- we sell copper and gold concentrate. And then we convert all the copper into gold equivalent ounces. When you do that, you get just the revenues, the revenues from copper and you divide by the gold price. The higher the gold price, the lower the conversion into the gold equivalent ounces. So when you look at the number of Aranzazu and you see the gold equivalent ounces decreasing along the last year, it's not because we are decreasing production, but it is mostly because our gold price is appreciated, which is positive for our whole company and that conversion goes to a lower gold equivalent ounces, which also translates to higher all-in sustaining cash cost because you divide by the total cost by the gold equivalent ounces gives -- and the gold equivalent ounces is lower. So that gives us a higher all-in sustaining cash cost. But that is because of a good news of gold appreciating. Apoena, we've been able to develop faster than where we were projecting during the year, so we could also produce above the guidance. Minosa very much in line with the guidance. Almas also very much in line with the guidance. And Borborema is where we were a little bit below the guidance. That's because we had the project, we had some minor issues with the agitators of the CIL tax that did not jeopardize the ramp-up. But as this drove to a lower -- was driving to a lower recoveries, we decided just to put for a couple of months very low grades instead of high grades, not to lose the long term, not to lose recoveries on that project that droves the production down while we preserved those -- that high-grade gold when we could finish the fix on the CIL tanks, which took us just a couple of months, not jeopardizing the ramp-up again, not jeopardizing reaching our capacity and not jeopardizing the recoveries that we reached after we changed those parts on the CIL tanks. Next. So in terms of all-in sustaining cash cost, excluding MSG, I'm proud also to show the market that we also could not only be within the guidance, which is the next slide, but also slightly below the low end of the guidance, fulfilling what we promised to the market in terms of production and also in terms of cost. If we take out the MSG, our all-in sustaining cash cost for Q4 would have been $1,363. And as we know, as we acquired MSG, we know MSG had over $3,000 of all-in sustaining cash cost, which doesn't scare us. I think that was the positive point on acquiring MSG was to see those high all-in sustaining cash costs and project and believe that during the turnaround of this year, we'll be able to drive that all-in sustaining cash cost to below $2,000 for the years ahead, not this year, but for the years ahead. Next, so just quickly going to the guidance. I just -- I mentioned to you, in terms of production, very much in the middle, slightly above the middle of the guidance. On the cash cost per gold equivalent ounces also, we reached the finish the year at $1,070. The low end of the guidance was at $1,078. All-in sustaining that translates also to a lower all-in sustaining cash cost finishing $1,368 and the low end of the guidance at $1,374 and also very much in line with the guidance in terms of CapEx, understanding that there was a year that we also built Borborema and decided to move forward with the expansion of Almas, the first phase, and now we are going to the second phase of the expansion of Almas. Next. So for the 2026, an overview here of the guidance and then Kleber can go in a little bit more detail in the next slide. But in terms of production, now we project full year of Borborema, full year of MSG, although MSG still during this year on 2026 in MSG, we are not focusing to produce the most at the lowest cost. We are focused on preparing that mine to be able to produce over 80,000 ounces per year and below 2,000 for the next years. So this year is a turnaround, although during this year, imagine that we should we projected a producing 50,000 to 60,000 ounces of production. Even if the cost is above $3,000 per year all-in, we have -- the price -- gold price today is $5,200. So it's $2,200 of free cash flow margin in a turnaround year for MSG. That price converted to 50,000 or 60,000 ounces means that the free cash flow and the EBITDA will be way above this is $120 million, $130 million in this project that we acquired for $76 million in the year that yet we are not focused on production. We are not focused on cost. We are focused on preparing that mine to higher production along the next years. In terms of -- and that higher all-in sustaining cash cost, which Kleber is going to explain, is translated to -- from MSG is translated to higher cash cost in our consolidated levels, higher all-in sustaining cash costs also in our consolidated levels and Kleber is going to explain that 65% to 80% of this increase is explained by MSG. And then we have other factors that we will disclose in more details during the presentation. In terms of CapEx, it's the same situation. It's a year that we are investing in MSG. We are expanding Almas, Almas we're doing the pushback of the pit to fast access also the underground development. We are expanding the capacity of the plant. We are already doing in this expansion project is not the full investment in Era Dorada, but yet already the first groundwork and the first early works. So there's a lot of capital that's been committed for good news, which we are expanding production, expanding to go at 600 or even above 600, preparing the company goes above 600,000 ounces of gold equivalent on the upcoming years. In terms of production, again, Aranzazu, that decrease comes from mostly metal prices, although Aranzazu is where we are more stable and getting more lower grades during the next years, while we continue to explore opportunities to decrease the cost of mine and the cost of plan to offset this slightly lower grades in Aranzazu. Borborema, the range of 65,000 to 77,000 ounces. This is also accounts that we are working, and we should publish our new resources and reserves, the old AIF, now the 20-F by the end of March. That means that we are updating our resources and reserves and all the mine plan of the company based on the new cutoff with a higher gold price. That means with the higher gold price, we reduce the cutoff, we can free and release and convert more resources into the reserves. On the other hand, the grades -- average grade goes down. But all in all, it builds value. It's a positive news because we are now assessing grades that was not economically viable in the past with this higher gold price. We've been able to access more ounces on total, although it's lower than former grades that we were projected in the past. So that is a positive news that has -- on the long term, that has minor impact on the short term. So next slide. Kleber? João Cardoso: Yes. Sure, Rodrigo. So good morning, everyone. So let's start with understanding the main drivers behind the impact of the increase in first in the all-in sustaining cash costs. We expect all-in sustaining cash cost in 2026 is expected to increase between $262 and $407 compared to 2025. And as we can see here on the right side on the top, the main driver for the increase by far is MSG that's bringing up our weighted average cash cost explains 70% to 80% of this increase. Metal price effect that Rodrigo was explaining, the gold equivalent conversion because gold prices on average in '26, if you take market projections are above the average of '25, so accelerated more than copper price, so explains another 5% increase. And the second impact that we have is in Almas. Almas due to mining sequencing this year, we're doing a pushback in the mine and having higher strip ratio. So the costs and lower grades also due to mining sequencing. So the cost is the increase this year. This is not expected to be repeated, for example, in 2027. And we also have tailings dam expansion this year in Almas. So in Almas mostly nonrecurring this effect. And then other impacts are marginal. We have slightly minor worse cash costs in Minosa, for example, but better cash costs in Apoena, so they compensate each other. So then on the bottom, understanding the main increases behind the sustaining CapEx is a similar story. So 75% to 70% of the increase. We're expecting to see an increase in '26 compared to '25 between $15 million and $17 million, of which about 2/3 are MSG. First, because it's an underground mine, so it has a higher sustaining cash cost. So we should not expect going forward to see sustaining CapEx for MSG comparable to the other open pit Brazilian mines. So it's going to be higher. But also it's a turnaround year as we have been communicating, we're going to be allocating some additional capital, especially in maintenance in MSG. And Almas is the same reason Almas explains another 15% to 20% of the increase in the sustaining CapEx for the same reason. The pushback a portion of the waste is capitalized the sustaining CapEx and explain also a portion of this increase. And finally, of course, Borborema is going to be operating for a full year. In '25, we had just 3 years of commercial production for Borborema -- 3 months, sorry. And then in '26, we have 12 months. Of course, that brings a higher sustaining CapEx. And finally, when we look at the expansion CapEx, what is in our guidance for '26 mainly is Almas underground development and the plant expansion that we are investing to increase the plant capacity to 3 million tonnes until the end of the year. Apoena, we have the second year of the North pushback that we are planning in '25, '26 to invest in the North Phase 3 pit to have higher grades from '27. So this is the second year. In Borborema, we have a filter press expansion. So the filter press now is the current bottleneck that we have at the plant. So by expanding the filter press, we can go beyond the nominal installed capacity that we have today at the plant. And also is going to help us prepare for potential expansion of the plant in the future. And also, we're going to be investing in engineering studies for potential expansion now that we were able to get the permits to move the roads. Era Dorada as well, we're investing in the early works, and we have then some other impacts such as Matupa and some investment in the projects. Rodrigo Barbosa: Thank you. So I think one major milestone that we also achieved, again, go to the next slide, is the license that we've been discussing with the national authorities that we finally signed an agreement of partnerships to move the road. That is releasing 670,000 ounces of gold on the mine sequencing. Just hypothetically, if you get the gold price as of today, $5,200 and then you imagine our all-in sustaining cash cost of $1,500, which according to our mine sequencing is below this. We see -- and then you multiply by the 670,000 ounces, you'll see that the company with this is we'll be able to generate along the years more than $2 billion, $2.5 billion pretax in this project. That's the size of the magnitude that these additional ounces can generate. And of course, we don't want to go from -- we already have 15, 16 years old, 16 years of life of mine, that will expand to above 20, 25. We don't want to do this. That's why we made the plant flexible. And now we are advancing our engineering studies and water access in order to expand the capacity of the plant perhaps up to 4 million tons that will drive us to a significantly higher production after we finish and conclude the expansion. We are now working on engineering. We are now working on water access. And we believe during the second semester, more towards the fourth quarter, we'll be able to present a detailed and a new feasibility study for this project using now a higher capacity. While we also were doing and we should expect for the 20-F by March. This project is very sensible to cutoff grades. So as gold price is going up, we are changing the price for cutoff, which means that we can now access, as I was mentioning, lower grades that was not economically viable in this project now becomes viable. So we should expect further increase in reserves by the end of March when we publish the new resource and reserves for the entire company, particularly here in Borborema. Again, I mentioned that we are delivering on the greenfield projects on time, on budget. Remind Borborema, the first Almas now Borborema. We are delivering on new acquisitions. We closed MSG in December. And we also told the market -- we've been telling the market for the last many years that we had to address the daily trading volume. And here, it is the very successful results of our listing in NASDAQ moving from TSX and listing in NASDAQ that coming from $1.52 million per day, now reaching on average in February, $100 million per day with a combination of NASDAQ plus B3. So that will also help us address the multiple. According to the analysts, we are still traded with a discount compared to our peers, and we will not only change the peers coming from the production of 300,000 ounces on average last year or this year to above 600,000 ounces. And then also with the higher daily volume and higher reputation as we are delivering on our projects, we should address this discount compared to our peers and maybe even be with a premium compared to our peers as we continue to grow. So with that, I conclude here the more high-level analysis. Kleber is going to drive and walk you through the details of the results, and then I come back for questions. João Cardoso: Okay. Thank you. So we start with a summary of the main financial KPIs that we are reporting for the quarter, for the year and also comparing with the previous quarters. As we -- Rodrigo mentioned and we see the results here, a combination of higher gold prices in the fourth quarter and increasing production in the fourth quarter as well. There was a substantial increase in our net revenues, closing the quarter with $322 million and bringing our annual revenues beyond $920 million in 2025. The adjusted EBITDA, it's the sixth quarter in a row that we delivered record high adjusted EBITDA at $208 million, considering Q4 average gold prices close to $4,000 per ounce. And bringing our annual EBITDA to $547 million as well and also the last 12 months, also the 6 in a row that we see increasing. When we move to net income, we're reporting a net loss of $20 million basically for the same reason that we reported losses in some of the previous quarters due to the sharp increase in gold prices during the quarter, which is good news, but it brings noncash losses related to our outstanding gold derivatives. Excluding those noncash losses, which amounted about $82 million in the quarter and certain other noncash items, we see that we had also an improvement in the adjusted net income, reaching $73 million in the quarter. And then in terms of cash and net debt, we see we continue in a very comfortable position in terms of balance sheet. There was some increase in our net debt in the quarter, but that's basically because in Q4, we paid for the acquisition of MSG. And unlike many other cases, many other companies when we make acquisitions, there are maybe some reduction in dividends. We didn't reduce the dividends. In Q4, we kept paying dividends above our minimum dividend policy because our balance sheet allows for it. So -- and then we can see, as a result, we closed the year also with a low -- very low net debt over EBITDA in the last 12 months, below 0.3x. Now moving to understanding the main items between the adjusted EBITDA and net income for the quarter. If we see a breakdown of the adjusted EBITDA of $208 million, Almas and Borborema were the top performers, about $50 million in the quarter each. We highlight, of course, Borborema considering it was only the first quarter of commercial production and is almost our highest EBITDA. So it shows all the potential that we have in this mine. Minosa and Aranzazu also coming very strong at $48 million and $41 million, respectively, Apoena delivering EBITDA of $22 million and MSG, $10 million. MSG also, I'd like to highlight for a couple of reasons. First is was just one-off, and one that we didn't see yet any impact of any turnaround in terms of production and in terms of cost. And we already -- with gold prices at much lower levels that we have today, and we already generated $10 million in a month for an investment for an acquisition that we paid $73 million. So it shows the type of returns that we should expect for this acquisition. When moving to financial expenses, I mentioned already, we had $82 million noncash losses related to the outstanding gold hedges. And we also had $22 million realized losses related to derivatives that expired during the quarter. Income tax expenses increased compared to the previous quarters, basically because our results from the operations also increased. So it's in the same proportion. On this quarter, we had nonrecurring other expenses that's mostly related to provisions that we did on year-end related to potential partial nonrecoverability of certain VAT credits that we have mostly in Honduras and also in Brazil. Then with that, we see our net income of minus $20 million, but then bringing back the noncash items, mostly the unrealized losses with derivatives, we come to adjusted net income of $73 million. Now moving to understand in detail the change in the cash position during the last quarter. We see on the left side of the page, we started the quarter with about $350 million in cash. Here on this more left side page, we can see what's the cash flow -- recurring free cash flow, which is the cash flow generated by now the 6 mines in production not including any investment to expand our business. We see we generated $94 million already deducting the realized losses with the gold derivatives. That cash was almost enough to pay for all the capital allocated to growth, the business in the last quarter. We invested $103 million, mainly the MSG acquisition and also expansion CapEx, the first steps in Almas mainly here for the underground mine development and plant expansion. And to the right side, more the financial items, highlighting, as I indicated before as well, $40 million dividend payments. Next page. And then when we move to the year, the cash flow by the mine in production generated over $250 million in cash, which was more than enough to pay for all the investment in growth and 2025 was 1 year that we invested significantly in growth. So we invested to Borborema construction, the second year of Borborema construction, the acquisition of MSG, acquisition of Era Dorada, acquisition of Altamira shares. Investment in exploration to increase our mineral reserves and resources that was funded -- entirely funded by the cash flow -- recurring free cash flow from the operations. And to the right side, the more financial items, we highlight the cash we returned to our shareholders, mainly through dividends, $116 million and the net proceeds we received from the NASDAQ IPO to $100 million, and that brings our cash position close to $290 million at the end of the year. This is the last slide, and then we open to questions. Thank you. Operator: [Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from Henrique Marques with Goldman Sachs. Henrique Tavian Marques: So quickly on guidance. I mean, there's still a lot to be made during 2026. So I just wanted to make sure here, what is already implied in this guidance because there are technical report updates coming up, which should impact reserves and eventually grades, which might weigh on production. But at the same time, you have some processing capacity expansion expected for this year. So I just wanted to confirm exactly try to better understand what is already implied in this 2026 guidance that you guys just released? And also on a second topic, a lot of things going on. I think that's great, but it would be also great if you guys can just help us map everything that is going on. So just any update on timing for Era Dorada or Matupa to be taken to the Board to eventually increase the processing capacity for Almas. What is the timing for that? And just to confirm, is Almas expansion already Board approved, the processing capacity? And lastly, just any timing for Aura to join the GDX index. Is there any prerequisite missing for that? That's it. Rodrigo Barbosa: Thank you for the question, Henrique. And yes, as you mentioned, a lot of going on in Aura. And again, another year that we continue to prepare the company to reach over 600,000 ounces of production. So going step by step, what you should expect. And then first question is for the budget of this year, we are not considering old gold price. We're already using new gold price based in new cutoffs that we will update the market. So there's this lag a little bit on what we forecast on the budget and what we will publish now by March. So we are already reducing the average grade of some of the mines based on lower cutoff and higher gold price, which is a good news because we're going to free ounces in terms of reserves for the long term and for overall, it generates NPV for the company, although in some cases, might slightly be -- drive to a lower production. So that's part of the question that you made that I could answer. Then there are a few things that's going on in. So you also asked about Almas. It's already included on the budget. It's already included on the CapEx for us to expand the capacity and also to raise the tailings dam to prepare the tailings dam for this new capacity up to 3 million tons of the plant already preparing this to receive higher grade material as an underground while underground is not totally developed, we'll put average and medium grade that's already on the stockpile because the mine is working faster than the plant, and we have some important stockpile that to use on the higher capacity of the plant. While we don't want to finish that. We go -- we should finish the year or early next year at 3 million tons per year at the plant. But we have projects to go up to 4 million tonnes, but that will depend on some more positive geological information that we are investing in the project. So we should expect this 3 million tons already hired, approved and should be implemented by early -- should be already in full production by early next year or by the end of this year, while we have projects and we have ideas and have discussions to go up to 4 million tons, but that will depend on more exploration results that we are conducting as we speak right now. On this -- also on this -- for this year, Borborema, we are -- as Kleber mentioned, we are increasing capacity of the filters that will give us a possibility to go beyond the nominal capacity that we should reach along the second semester, while, again, we are also preparing this doing engineering that's already approved in the Board and doing now studies for water assessments to double the capacity, and we would like to be able to approve this in the Board by the end of this year for the new capacity for Borborema. On MSG, it's a year of turnaround. We are -- although we are generating positive cash flows, we are not focusing on production and not focusing on short-term gains. We are focused on building the right plan and the right structure so that we can finish the year with a very good view that for the next years, we'll be able to produce above 80,000 ounces with below $2,000 of all-in sustaining cash cost. So that means that we are preparing the mine, we are doing underground development and advancing. Again, if I remind the investors, one of the reasons that MSG lost productivity and lost production and the plant become idle is that they are doing -- the mine 6 is they lost productivity to doing underground development and they start doing top bottom that increased dilution that reduce the speed. So that creates a lot of complexity. So now we need to do all the proper underground development in order to do from bottom to up. That means 1 year of a lot of underground development and preparing this so that we can do the right methodology underground. And then fulfill the capacity of the plant that will drive us to produce extra ounces and significantly reduce dilution, significantly reduce also the all-in sustaining cash cost. So -- and the final question you made was... Henrique Tavian Marques: It was regarding the index, the GDX -- yes, just if there's a prerequisite missing. Rodrigo Barbosa: No, I think we are reaching, but we need to reach for 2 consecutive quarters. And each quarter, you need to prove that your daily trading volume was higher on the last 2. So we believe we'll be eligible for GDX, although there are some -- it's not 100% sure because there is some analysis that the team do, but we believe that we'll be eligible to GDX by the second semester between third to fourth quarter of this year. Operator: Our next question comes from Edgard de Souza with Itaú BBA. Edgard de Souza: So my first question regarding the -- still on the guidance, production expectations came in slightly softer than what we were expecting, in particular at Borborema. I wanted to understand, I don't know if Glauber is connected here, but maybe if not, for sure, you can help me, Rodrigo. How much of this lower production profile in Borborema is a direct consequence of incorporating material that was previously above the cutoff? And at a broader portfolio level, how are you approaching cutoff optimization in the current gold price environment? To what extent are you trading near-term grade and free cash flow for longer life of mine and higher total value extraction, let's put this way. Then my second question, moving to the main positive news from the release is regarding the expansion at Borborema and the road relocation. So I wanted to understand the next steps from here. What is the expected time line for the physical relocation of the road? You mentioned that the capacity could reach around 4 million tons. How much of this incremental processing capacity could be gradually added in a brownfield scenario similar to what you did in Almas? How much of the expansion would require a more significant CapEx, maybe a new ball mill? And how should we think about water availability as a constraint until which levels can you produce with the current water availability that you have? And for which levels this would require a more significant investment for water availability there? Those are my main questions. Rodrigo Barbosa: Okay. I will start, and then I think Glauber is here with us, he can finish. But on the production for Borborema, mostly of the reduction in production comes from a lower grade that comes from a lower cutoff, right? And then we always -- we don't -- and that's one thing that we do in our and that actually, it's this mine that drove us to be here today with a successful story. We don't take decisions to favor only short term. We think the company as a whole, what builds the best value, although sometimes hurts the short term. And this example of Borborema is a very good example because we know that we have a lower production. But overall, as we should see during the publications of the 20-F, we'll see an increase in resource reserves. So that means we are significantly increased NAV of the company, although that on the yearly -- on this yearly basis means slightly lower grades, which is translated to a lower production. On the CapEx, I'll let Glauber explain, but I'll give an overview of the plant. It takes probably 2 years in terms of construction to relocate the road, which is the same time that we will do a next plant expansion. And the plant expansion will require a CapEx. The plant is not at 4 million tons. The plant was built for 2 million tons, flexible and prepared to receive new investments and then go to 4 million tons. But I'll let Glauber walk you through more and what we are thinking about on this expansion. Is Glauber here otherwise or the mic is off. Glauber Rosa-Luvizotto: Okay. Sorry. Good morning, everyone. So yes, as Rodrigo comment, so we -- this drop on grade is a positive thing. In fact, it's much more ore becoming economical right now with this new price. And what we are doing right now can bring some impact in the short term, but it is a big benefit in the long term. So in fact, we are preparing the mine for higher capacity or higher production that we are doing the engineering in the plant. In the CapEx, to answer your question. So it's basically built a new parallel plant. So now what we are doing is the bottleneck the filter area is the constraint that we have right now to increase capacity, but we already approved. We already hired all the service and construction, and we will build -- we will implement the new filters in this year. We expect to be done in the beginning of the next semester of this year. In parallel, all the engineer to expand the plant. We don't have the total CapEx right now, but we need to expand the CIL circuit, the mill circuit and the crusher circuit it means that everything. It's prepared to expand because we just need to connect without impact the actual production. but it's something that require CapEx to be done. Rodrigo Barbosa: And in the meanwhile, we are doing all the water assessment. That's ideas, there's projects also to do to increase the capacity to treat gray water from the city or receive gray water from other cities. So there are a few discussions going on right now, and it takes time, but we don't believe it's going to be the issue. Operator: Our next question comes from Guilherme Nippes with XP. Guilherme Nippes: Can you hear me? Rodrigo Barbosa: Yes. Guilherme Nippes: Okay. So I have Two questions here on our side as well. My first one is on the reserves report. So could you guys share any key shifts, any takeaways from the reserve report? And also if you have any shifts on geological interpretation and also on long-term assumption for gold prices as well? And if you could guys share also news on the underground mining for Almas, Borborema plant expansion and the increased reserves at Matupa. So any news on the updated reserves report? And my second question is on capital allocation. Of course, you guys have a lot of projects going on, but we still see balance sheet room for -- as gold prices are holding higher as well, we still see room for further acquisitions. So I would like to understand what are the priorities now? And if you guys are also looking for acquiring other assets here in Brazil as well and in Latin America as well. Rodrigo Barbosa: Okay. Thank you for the question. Unfortunately, we cannot disclose what will be on the AIF yet. That will be published on the -- by the end of March. But as you mentioned, we are working on the new cutoff for the current mines that we have that can affect some of the mines and not affecting other mines depending on the distribution of the grades in that mine. Borborema, as I mentioned, has some sensitivity to this. So it can be affected by a lower cutoff than increase, which is already translated on the budget. So we will see already the grades going down. As you mentioned, we are working on Matupa. We're doing analysis on [ Saguis ], doing analysis also in those Pezão Pé Quente that we acquired and perhaps some of those already be able to incorporate into the X1. So we should expect also the new report, including part of the resource and reserves of the X1 and also Pé Quente. Then underground, we continue to do underground development and also reaching the right level, then we continue to do intensify exploration. That -- although we've been having a very important and interesting interception that confirms the underground mine, that takes more time. So we should expect more towards the end of the year that we can consolidate all the information. But we don't want to waste time. That's why we're already doing all the underground development because we believe that this will become a mine, and we don't want to waste time doing all the studies while we develop the underground. So in terms of M&A, as you mentioned, the company, it's significantly increasing EBITDA and cash flows. Again, if you take it back in the last 2 years, we doubled -- every year, we doubled the EBITDA, '23, $136 million, then '24, $270 million, '25 now $540 million with the last quarter of $210 million with the gold price $4,000 and MSG only 1 month, you can already imply that we are significantly already on the running rate above the last year. And that, of course, although we can -- although we've been able to -- if you look what has happened to our in the last 4 years, we have the highest dividend yield in the world, of our gold price. We acquired Borborema, we built Almas, we built Borborema, we acquired MSG and yet we have a low leverage. And that was with a gold price of [ 32,500 ]. Now we are with the gold price at [ 550,200 ] with higher production. So we should expect for the upcoming years more than we've done in the last years in terms of we'll be able to generate higher cash, pay more dividends. Now we have more cash also to do more acquisition. We want to continue to do acquisitions. We know very much how to get to beyond 600,000 ounces that we published last year, but that by itself is going to generate a lot of value to us, but we know that the right multiple starts when you get closer to 1 million ounces. So we want to continue to pursue growth through M&As. We are America players. We don't feel -- we have the knowledge and expertise for the other continents. But in the Americas, we like gold, and we also like copper. So we should expect from our acquisitions, either in gold and also in copper, most in countries that we feel that has democracies, some institutional -- strong institutional entities. So that give us the minimum security to invest. We also like a project that has -- it's well developed in terms of geology, maybe needs further exploration, but just to convert resources into reserves and then implement our projects that are already, as we saw brownfield that we believe that's not perhaps the core of other companies that they might sell. So if you see an angle to buy them and reduce and generate [indiscernible], that's what we see. Basically, what you should see for Aura for the upcoming years is what we've done in the last years with now higher production and higher gold price, higher cash flow, so more intensified. Operator: Our next question comes from Marcelo Arazi BTG. Marcelo Arazi: A few questions on my side as well. We can see that we are seeing a slightly wide range of production guidance than what we were used to. Can we say that is this related to a more conservative approach and a large number of assets or it can be read as a sign of a more challenging or more hard to predict conditions? And a second one on CapEx. Is this level of sustaining CapEx, the new reality for the company or the full year 2026 print is inflated by the turnaround project in MSG? Can this eventually impact the dividend distribution given your policy of 20% of the EBITDA minus the sustaining CapEx? And just a final one, if I can. On the Guatemala CapEx, the guidance is already accounting for the early-stage investments. But with the eventual project approval, can we expect some CapEx revision for this year? Rodrigo Barbosa: Marcelo, for the questions. And I think for this higher all-in sustaining cash cost and higher CapEx, this is neither more challenging, neither more conservative. Actually, it's a good news. It's a good news that the company is being able to buy MSG for $76 million in only 1 month without -- as Kleber mentioned, we have $10 million of EBITDA. MSG structurally has a lower all-in sustaining cash cost. MSG structurally has higher all-in sustaining cash cost and higher also sustaining CapEx. But that's how we generate returns. We put this asset into our consolidated basis, affect negatively, but doesn't mean that it's a challenge. Actually, we see this more as an opportunity because during this year, we'll be able to do the proper work, and we are very confident that for the upcoming years, we will see that we'll be able to reach above 80,000 ounces and below $2,000 of all-in sustaining cash costs. Nevertheless, in a single [indiscernible], we generate $10 million without any new -- any turnaround. So -- and the other increase that we have comes from positive news also again, Almas, we've seen a very strong opportunity to increase capacity. So that increased also our CapEx. Another factor that increased the CapEx is Era Dorada because we felt that we got the license that the former company could not get for several years. So we already started early works. And then going to the final questions that you made, we are -- it is not on the CapEx, the full construction of Era Dorada. So as we go to the Board and as we approve the full construction of Era Dorada, this is when we then we will add a new CapEx for the project as we published already last year, the updated feasibility study, the CapEx of this project is close to $380 million. Of course, it doesn't happen in the full year. Actually, most of the CapEx goes towards the end of the investments. So -- but if we approve the Board, then we will incorporate on our guidance this year. So again, the higher CapEx that you see in this year is way more as an opportunity rather than a challenge. Marcelo Arazi: And just a quick follow-up. Could this impact the dividend distribution given your policy? Rodrigo Barbosa: No, we've been able to do everything. So our policy is 20% of the EBITDA minus recurring CapEx. Actually, we've been able to pay 50%, 60% above the policy. And we see no reason that we affect this for the upcoming years, except that there's some major acquisition that we believe that is super high return and super high value added, then perhaps we go to the policy, but we should expect the policy are above the policy for the upcoming quarters. Operator: Our next question comes from Lawson Winder with Bank of America. Lawson Winder: Could I actually start by asking maybe a bit of an expanded question on the index inclusion. So there are U.S. indices for which Aura would technically qualify like some of the Russells and are even much more widely followed than the gold indices. I mean, is there any discussion of potential inclusion or potential inclusion in the Russells on the horizon? Rodrigo Barbosa: We are monitoring, and we have a plan this year to be included in all the indices that we can fulfill. So we already were included in about 30 different indexes. But as you mentioned, I think we have way more opportunity to reach those major indexes that can not only help with the pricing on the multiple, but we also increased significantly our daily trading volume. So definitely is in our agenda. Lawson Winder: Okay. Fantastic. On Borborema, could you just confirm that the recoveries in Q1 '26 to date are now hitting design capacities? And if not, what's left? And sort of in what quarter should we think about that hitting the design recovery rates? Rodrigo Barbosa: Glauber, do you want to answer this, but we are at the design end... Glauber Rosa-Luvizotto: Yes, we are at the design. So it's not an issue. In fact, to run the plant in the capacity that was designed, it hasn't been an issue for us. So the difference in production is mainly related to the grades that we are feeding into this strategy to expand the pit with these new reserves and new cutoffs. Rodrigo Barbosa: So just continue the answer Lawson, that was a good question. The mill is running super well. Actually, we see room in the mill to run even above capacity. CIL tanks is the same. That's why Glauber mentioned that where we have now, although we are already at a nominal capacity, the filters are the bottleneck. Once we do the investment, the filters, then we can go beyond nominal capacity because everything else is running super well. Lawson Winder: Okay. If I could ask about Matupa from both the point of view of CapEx and annual production. So one, you guys have been investing a fair bit in exploration into Matupa. Does that have any implications for what your anticipated annual production rates will be? Like, I mean, at least, for example, at the Investor Day, you highlighted 55,000 ounces a year from that asset. And then conversely, I mean, if that's the case, what are we looking at in terms of a magnitude of potential increase in upfront CapEx for Matupa? Rodrigo Barbosa: Matupa, I think we continue to have this view of 55,000 ounces. We are not changing the nominal capacity of the plant. What we are doing now is invest in exploration to expand the resource and reserves. This project has a resource of 400,000 ounces, slight below in terms of reserves. But with [indiscernible] and with also, we see a significant room to expand the resource and reserves, which then we feel that's the right time to start the construction. And as we did with Almas, we prefer to build this project, prepare the plant to be flexible and expand because we know that we will even continue to expand resource and reserves beyond what we have today, beyond what we will publish in the AIF so that we can then increase the plant. And understanding that if you change too much the design of the plant as of today, even though we might see an opportunity, it's a whole different new environmental license process. So we prefer to respect what is in the license of environmental. And then during the years, talk to the agency and see opportunities to do amendments and then increase gradually the plant. Lawson Winder: Okay. Fantastic. And if I could ask one more question just on Apoena. I mean, that mine continues to impress. You guys are planning to mine much higher grades than we had modeled at that asset in 2026. Are these higher grades now sustainable into 2027? Rodrigo Barbosa: I think, yes, we should reach higher grades by the second semester, and then we'll last towards a couple of years. So it will be maintained. I think we believe that we can put this mine into 50,000, 60,000 ounces of production on the running rate after the second semester of this year, if not go beyond depending on some of other exploration that we are doing at the mine. It's a difficult mine, but full of potential. Operator: Our next question comes from Matheus Moreira with Bradesco. Matheus Moreira: My first question is on Almas. I would like to better understand the rationale behind the production guidance for the mine. I mean, considering the ongoing plant expansion and the fact that the mine is already operating at an annualized run rate above the published guidance, the numbers appear somewhat conservative to us. Are there maybe any operational bottlenecks or specific factors that you have already identified that could justify this more cautious approach? So that's my first question. And my second question on M&As. I would like to hear to explore a little bit more on this topic. Within Aura's capital allocation framework and considering that the company is now operating at a different level of cash generation than in the past, what type of assets in terms of size makes sense for the company today? And if possible, could you comment on geographic preferences? You've already touched on this a little bit earlier. But in the past, you mentioned the potential expansion into North America. Does that still make sense strategically? Rodrigo Barbosa: Thank you. So in Almas, we are operating at 2 million tons, but we will go through expansion and reach 3 million tons by the end of the year. So this is a process that is going to happen during the year. So today, we are still yet below what we expect to be until the end of the year. So that is also reflected on the production. Almas also first year started with a higher grade. So there is lower grades coming in now during this year. We will add higher grades again when we have the underground coming in. So we should expect Almas for the next year after the underground then continue to increase production together with the higher capacity. And if we have positive results on exploration, then we can even expand further to 4 million tonnes, and then we'll see another step up. So Almas, I think you should see that some conservative scenario during this year, but gradually continue to grow while we continue to expand capacity and then access higher grades when the underground mine come online. In terms of projects, I think we won the way to reach to 1 million ounces. I think that's where companies start to become relevant and then also start to get a fair multiple. We know very much how to get to 600,000 ounces. So to go beyond this, we will need a few acquisitions. Of course, as you mentioned, that we are growing and we have a larger balance sheet, and we have a larger also higher production, so that a meaningful -- more meaningful acquisitions should be coming online. But again, the higher the production, the higher the acquisition is the higher also the CapEx. So we will balance the internal rate of returns where is the right size, 80,000, 100,000, 150,000. We saw sometimes even above 150,000, but that will really depend on the return we see and with the angle for Aura to generate value, right? It's Americas, as I mentioned, and you asked about North America. I think it's intuitive to think that down the road, Aura will expand into North America. But yet, we feel that our multiple is too discounted. We believe that in North America, there's always -- probably always be a higher multiple compared to the players in Latin America in general. However, it cannot be that high gap. So we need to narrow this gap. We have a homework to do first to narrow this gap first to then be able to do accretive acquisition and not a dilutive acquisition to our shareholders. But if something shows up that we believe that it is accretive to our shareholders, we will do. We look and we are ready, and that's part of our strategy. Operator: Our next question comes from Tathiane Candini with JPMorgan. Tathiane Candini: I think most of them were already replied. I would just like to explore maybe a little bit two more. The first one, and again, you already explored a little bit of this, but this is regarding the cost of MSG. So I know that like more long term for 2027 is to reach lower cost. I would just like to understand a little bit of the pipeline for this? Like what are the plans for reach those guidance? And if there is like any type of hurdle that you imagine that you can reach? And the second one is regarding the CapEx of Era Dorada, which again, you already explored a little bit, but I'd just like to understand how is the pipeline for getting this approved for what I understood this year. But this is like a 22-month plan. Do you have like deadlines if it's not approved by any type of months, this could like have a little bit of an impact on 2028 production? Just trying to have a little bit more clarity on the months going forward. Rodrigo Barbosa: Okay. So for Era Dorada, we are now analyzing our internal analysis. We did -- we conducted during the last year, over 1,000 hours of dialogue with community leaders and community representatives. We brought some of the leaders also to visit our operations. So there was a very intense work on socializing this project. We moved back to underground, which drove attention from also national authorities that they understood that was a positive move. That's why that the result of this was the license to initiate the groundwork. I think we feel now even more and more confident to go to full production. It's our full construction. And we should expect this decision between first and second quarter this year. That's how we are thinking. And then it's a moving part, right? Tathiane, as you mentioned, 22 months of construction. And depending on the date that we started, it will affect the final production for sure. And the first question you mentioned was -- I forgot. Tathiane Candini: Regarding the MSG cost, just to try to understand like what is the plan to reach the guidance for lower cost by 2027? Rodrigo Barbosa: The plan is already under execution. We know very much how to improve efficiency. We know very much how to decrease the cost. We are now detailing in executing this plan as we speak. As I mentioned, we need to do a significant underground development because the mine today is connected to the plant. So any problem at the mine means that the plant is going to receive the ore. That's why we've been seeing in the last few years, a decrease on the plant production. So it's becoming idle. It has 20%, 30%, 35%, even 40% of idle capacity at the plant because the mine cannot fulfill. So in order to accelerate the production of the mine, we need 1 year of underground development to proper prepare the stopes, proper dual bottom-up approach. We have prepared the mine also to receive the veins are 1, 1.2 meters .They'll be mining at 1.80 at 2 meters. Now we want to mine at an narrow at 1.5, prepare the mine for 1.5, which means lower dilution, higher average grade. So all of those -- all of those strategies already being implemented, but we need time. We need up towards the end of the year to really see that the mine will be prepared to produce at its full capacity. On the hurdle rate, as we mentioned, we believe that we can prepare this for the medium to long term to be able to produce above 80,000 ounces per year at all-in sustaining cash cost of $2,000 or below. Operator: The Q&A section is over. We would like to hand the floor back to Rodrigo Barbosa for the company's final remarks. Rodrigo Barbosa: So again, thank you for the opportunity. I'm super proud, again, to be diligently executing on our strategy, diligently executing on implementing greenfield projects with the Almas on time, on budget, Borborema on time, on budget and a few others now and Era Dorada now prepared to go and hopefully, during the first quarter, second quarter, approved to implement. Also diligent execution on increasing resource and reserves. We just added 670,000 ounces of reserves, one project that's already derisked, already invested the CapEx, already generated cash flows that will give not only an opportunity to increase the NAV, but we'll also be able to increase production, while we continue to invest in exploration, as we mentioned, on Matupa, underground Almas and also Borborema has also potential to significantly increase. So diligently executing also increasing resource and reserves of the company. And third, also diligently executing on acquisitions. We just acquired MSG now closed in December, then -- we also addressed the daily trading volume now trading $100 million per day, while we've been able to pay dividends. And the higher CapEx and the sustaining CapEx we see today, as I mentioned, is not a challenge, it's an opportunity. We increased this because the company is growing. We increased this because we see opportunity to further expand the plant. We increased this because we see an opportunity to buy one asset that has a significant potential to expand capacity in terms of MSG in terms of production and then reduce the cost. Overall, in terms of results, again, super proud. If you take the EBITDA from '23, you doubled to '24, then we doubled again to $25. And if you take the EBITDA of last quarter with the gold price at $4,000, now you use $5,200 plus higher production Borborema plus higher production in MSG on the full quarter, you'll see that we are already on the running rate also lining going towards maybe perhaps even to double or even more during this year. So very much on track and what we promised to the market, delivering results, delivering on resource reserves, delivering on strategic agenda and also strong dividend. So thank you all. And hopefully, down the road, we have a new calls with the new quarter. And then again, between first or second quarter this year, take a look on Era Dorada and see if we feel ready to go to the Board and approve. Operator: Thank you. Our conference is now closed. We thank you for your participation and wish you a nice day.
Operator: Good morning, and welcome to Innovex's Fourth Quarter 2025 Earnings Call. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this call is being recorded. I will now turn the call over to Eric Wells, Chief of Staff. Please go ahead. Eric Wells: Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining us. An updated investor presentation has been posted under the Investors tab on the company's website, along with the earnings press release. This call is being recorded, and a replay will be made available on the company's website following the call. Before we begin, I would like to remind you that Innovex's comments may include forward-looking statements and discuss non-GAAP financial measures. It should be noted that a variety of factors could cause Innovex's actual results to differ materially from the anticipated results or expectations expressed in these forward-looking statements. Please refer to the fourth quarter and full year 2025 financial and operational results announcement that we released yesterday for a discussion of forward-looking statements and reconciliations of non-GAAP measures. Speaking on the call today from Innovex, we have Adam Anderson, Chief Executive Officer; and Kendal Reed, Chief Financial Officer. I will now turn the call over to Adam Anderson. Adam Anderson: Good morning, and thanks for joining us today. First off, I want to recognize our team, which has worked tirelessly to deliver margin improvement, organic share growth, improved on-time performance and strong free cash flow since the merger with Dril-Quip in September of 2024. We've asked a lot of the organization, and I'm proud of what we've accomplished. In 2025, we made tangible progress against the goals we articulated at the time of the merger and the results we are discussing today are a direct reflection of the commitment and collaboration of our global teams. A defining characteristic of Innovex is our no Barriers Culture, the belief that to drive the best outcomes for our customers and shareholders, we must tear down barriers between ourselves, our customers and internally across the entire company. This mindset of working effortlessly across product lines, geographies and functions has enabled us to build a leading global oilfield service company from a standing start less than a decade ago. Our fourth quarter and full year results demonstrate the power of our no barriers approach. On today's call, I will discuss our fourth quarter and full year results and highlight the key developments shaping our performance, starting with continued market share gains, synergy capture from recent acquisitions, customer-led product innovation and progress against our key operational initiatives. After these operational and commercial updates, I will turn the call over to Kendal, who will discuss our financial results and provide more detail on our balance sheet, capital allocation priorities and our outlook for Q1. Turning to performance. We delivered a strong finish to 2025, exceeding the high end of our fourth quarter revenue guidance while generating substantial free cash flow and further strengthening our balance sheet. Fourth quarter revenue totaled $274 million, up 14% sequentially. That performance was driven by higher-than-expected subsea deliveries, continued momentum in our drilling enhancement and well construction portfolios and revenue synergies from recent acquisitions. Strong Q4 revenues reflected some pull forward of subsea deliveries that were previously expected for Q1 2026, which will impact sequential comparisons. As a reminder, we recognize revenues from those large subsea projects upon customer delivery, which can drive quarter-to-quarter volatility. Despite a softer macro environment, we grew market share across U.S. land, offshore and international markets. We continuously invest in innovation across our portfolio of big impact small ticket products. While our products represent just a small portion of the wells cost, they are critical to a wells function. And therefore, our customers' purchase decision is driven more by product performance than achieving the lowest possible price. We've curated a portfolio of primarily single-use technologies, which allows us to operate in a capital-light manner. We leverage a diverse and nimble supply chain, which combined with our product portfolio keeps CapEx low, historically less than 3% of revenue, which allows us to convert a significant proportion of our adjusted EBITDA to free cash flow. We generated strong free cash flow, which we plan to redeploy into disciplined M&A, customer-led innovation and shareholder returns. Operational execution was strong across the platform. In U.S. land, we outperformed underlying activity levels by realizing revenue synergies and introducing new technologies. The integration of Citadel and DWS provides a clear example of this execution in action. We acquired Citadel for its strong cultural alignment with our no barriers philosophy and its portfolio of highly engineered single-use technologies designed to reduce our customer cycle times and improve operational efficiency. At the time of the acquisition, we noted limited customer overlap between our legacy Innovex business and Citadels, creating a clear opportunity for revenue synergies, which we are now beginning to realize. Our drilling enhancement product line, which largely came to us through the acquisition of DWS has also driven cross-selling opportunities across the customer base. Together, these integrations demonstrate exactly how our M&A playbook is designed to work, disciplined acquisitions translating into execution, revenue synergies and market share gains. In offshore and international markets, execution remains solid. During the quarter, we delivered our first products under our global alliance with OneSubsea, validating the strategic importance of our partnership. The alliance enables us to supply OneSubsea with industry-leading wellheads for EPCI or bundled contracts, increasing our addressable market for subsea wellheads and improving OneSubsea's competitive offering. During the quarter, we also completed our 10 successful XPak expandable liner installation in Brazil's pre-salt fields. XPak is a differentiated technology that we acquired from Dril-Quip, which we believe has broader applicability across offshore basins. We also leveraged this technology onshore, an example of how we create value through innovation, customer relationships and distribution. In the quarter, we successfully delivered our first onshore XPak Express installation for a major independent in U.S. land, adapting this offshore expandable liner technology to support some of the most technically complex wells in the Permian. In Mexico, we substantially completed deliveries of subsea wellheads and large-diameter tubulars for a major offshore development, reflecting strong project execution and coordination across our global supply chain. In Saudi Arabia, we increased revenue sequentially and strengthened our local content position with the inauguration of our manufacturing facility in the Dammam industrial area. Overall, we exited 2025 with strong momentum, a differentiated and expanding technology portfolio and a clear runway for continued execution. I'm excited about the trajectory of our Subsea business with new orders in Q4 and at the start of Q1. We have been awarded significant projects for subsea wellheads and associated specialty items in Asia Pacific and the Mediterranean. In Brazil, we signed a landmark subsea contract with an IOC we have not worked for in over a decade. We have additional significant opportunities in the subsea pipeline we expect to win this year, setting up a strong outlook for our Subsea business. We plan to build on our commercial momentum this year while remaining focused on improving margins, enhancing the customer experience and unlocking long-term value for our shareholders. Our execution in 2025 gives me confidence that we're building a platform capable of delivering value for our employees, our customers and our shareholders. I will now turn the call over to Kendal, who will walk through our financial results and outlook in more detail. Kendal Reed: Thanks, Adam, and good morning, everyone. I'd now like to review our fourth quarter and full year 2025 financial results. For the fourth quarter of 2025, revenue was $274 million, which is a 14% sequential increase from the third quarter and a 9% increase compared to Q4 2024. Adjusted EBITDA for the quarter totaled $52 million, resulting in an adjusted EBITDA margin of 19% and free cash flow for the quarter was $43 million. Our strong Q4 performance was driven primarily by our Subsea business, which over the past several years has seen a seasonally strong Q4 followed by a weaker Q1, an effect further amplified this year by some deliveries occurring prior to year-end, which we previously expected to fall in Q1, a credit to our team's ongoing efforts to improve manufacturing on-time delivery. From a geographic perspective, NAM land revenue increased sequentially by 5% to a record level of $139 million. Our NAM land business continues to outperform underlying activity levels, driven by market share gains, strong execution and increased cross-selling across the Innovex platform. Customers increasingly deployed multiple Innovex solutions together in the same wellbores, reflecting the value of our integrated sales approach and supporting strong margins and cash generation. We do expect slightly lower NAM land revenues in Q1 due to the impact of weather on U.S. land activity, but we continue to improve our market position and feel very positive about our organic and M&A growth opportunities. International and Offshore revenues increased sequentially by 25%, benefiting from significantly higher subsea deliveries during the quarter, including approximately $15 million of deliveries we previously expected to fall in Q1 2026. We want to thank our team for the incredible effort to meet our customers' needs in Q4, and we remain pleased with the long-term outlook of our International and Offshore business with significant orders building for late 2026 and 2027. As expected, Q4 margins were impacted by the completion of several lower-margin legacy subsea projects as well as costs associated with the ongoing exit of the Eldridge facility. These factors will continue to weigh on margins during the first half of 2026. Importantly, the planned exit of the Eldridge facility, which we expect to complete by the end of the second quarter, is a foundational element of our margin improvement plan. Our reduced manufacturing footprint, improved on-time delivery and more disciplined bidding practices are expected to drive meaningful margin expansion as we progress through 2026. Selling, general and administrative expenses for the full year 2025 were $129 million, representing 13% of revenue. This is a significant decrease from our 2024 level of 18% of revenue. This improved efficiency comes as a result of our focus throughout the year on fully realizing synergies from all recent acquisitions and improving our cost structure wherever possible. As a result of these cost savings, despite a challenging product mix in Q4 and ongoing Eldridge exit costs, adjusted EBITDA for full year 2025 was $188 million, resulting in margins of 19%. Capital expenditures in the fourth quarter of 2025 totaled $9 million, representing approximately 3.3% of revenue. Full year 2025 capital expenditures were $35 million, representing 3.6% of revenue. 2025 CapEx was slightly elevated relative to Innovex's historical range of 2% to 3% of revenue related primarily to facility integration efforts, and we expect this slightly elevated spending to continue through Q2 2026 as we complete the exit of Eldridge. However, we believe significant efficiency gains and long-term margin improvement will be unlocked by these onetime investments. Free cash flow was $43 million for the quarter and $156 million for full year 2025. We converted approximately 83% of our adjusted EBITDA into free cash flow in both the quarter and full year 2025, a phenomenal result, well above our normalized conversion target of 50% to 60%. This performance reflects our countercyclical cash conversion profile, which we have previously discussed. During periods of slower activity growth, we typically convert a higher percentage of our adjusted EBITDA into free cash flow as working capital unwinds. Conversely, during periods of accelerating activity, we see the opposite effect as we build inventory to meet growing customer demand. In addition to this dynamic, 2025 benefited from harvesting cash from the legacy Dril-Quip balance sheet, driving further outperformance. As a reminder, we do typically see our lowest seasonal free cash flow in the first quarter of each year due to timing of certain annualized cash payments. I'm thrilled with our cash flow performance in 2025 as our high free cash flow conversion reflects the through-cycle strength of our capital-light business model and our disciplined working capital management. We ended the year with approximately $203 million of cash and cash equivalents and no bank debt, providing significant financial flexibility. Our balance sheet strength supports continued execution of our disciplined capital allocation framework, including selective high-return M&A opportunities and opportunistic share repurchases. We continue to see numerous opportunities to enhance our portfolio and drive market share growth through accretive acquisitions of businesses that fit our big impact, small ticket engineered product thesis, and this remains our top capital allocation priority for 2026. Return on capital employed for the full year 2025 was 10%. While this remains below our long-term target, we expect ROCE to improve as margins expand, lower-margin legacy projects roll off, integration benefits are fully realized and we utilize cash for high-return M&A or return it to shareholders. Looking ahead to the first quarter of 2026, we expect revenue in the range of $225 million to $235 million and adjusted EBITDA of $38 million to $42 million, with the sequential decline in revenue driven by seasonality and delivery timing in our Subsea business and some weather-related impacts on U.S. land activity. Our ongoing share gains on U.S. land, further recovery in Saudi Arabia and Mexico as well as the subsea wins Adam mentioned should drive further growth in 2026. While subsea mix and remaining transition costs will continue to impact margins early in the year, we remain confident in our margin improvement trajectory as 2026 progresses. Our M&A pipeline also remains active with several high-quality capital-efficient businesses that align with our strategy under review. I'll now turn the call back to Adam. Adam Anderson: Thanks, Kendal. To close, I want to again recognize the Innovex team for their execution and commitment throughout 2025. We strengthened our foundation, delivered strong financial results and positioned the company for the next phase of growth. We're building a business that can perform across cycles, leveraging our strong balance sheet, disciplined capital allocation and a differentiated portfolio of technology-driven, high-return products. As we move into 2026, we remain focused on continuing to enhance customer experience, capturing additional market share and driving sustained margin expansion towards our long-term target of 25%. Thank you once again to our employees, customers and investors for your trust and partnership. Operator, we can now open the line for questions. Operator: [Operator Instructions] We'll take our first question from Derek Podhaizer at Piper Sandler. Derek Podhaizer: Maybe just to start, hoping to unpack the first quarter margin guide a little bit further. You've talked about the Subsea margins weighing on company margins, these low-margin projects continue to weigh first half of the year. I know you have the exit costs associated with Eldridge. You talked about optimizing your bidding process. I'm just trying to get an understanding of what happened, what's causing these margins to be weighed upon? And how should we think about the improvement over time and just thinking about any structural headwinds to that long-term 25% target that you've laid out? Adam Anderson: Derek, thanks for the question. So first, I would say, hey, point you to Q4, and we had a really strong result in the quarter. Some of that was a result of pulling forward. Some of the subsea deliveries that we were expecting in Q1 got pulled into Q4, which I think on balance is good for us, but makes Q1 a little bit lighter. We'll still have a couple of low-margin subsea deliveries Q1, Q2 that will weigh margins down a little bit. And then as you know, we're working on a lot of things around improving margins. The single biggest of that is the Eldridge exit, which has pushed back a little bit like we were originally forecasting that probably early-ish in Q1. That's probably going to slide into Q2 as we finish out some customer orders here for the Western Hemisphere. So I think all in all, like a very good Q4. Yes, Q1 is a little bit -- we're seeing a little bit of seasonal decline there and a little bit of that pull-through effect we mentioned earlier. But I don't think any of this impacts how we're thinking about the long-term margin progression, both seeing a little bit of improvement as you particularly as you get in the back half of this year as well as in '27 and beyond. Derek Podhaizer: Got it. Okay. That's encouraging. I appreciate that. And then I guess on the integrated cross-selling opportunities, I mean, this is pretty exciting, just given this shows the unique platform that you guys have as far as bringing on these acquisitions and putting them on the larger Innovex platform. Maybe could you help us provide some maybe real tangible examples of how you've been able to expand the drilling enhancement well construction with DWS and Citadel because it feel like this sets the playbook for your future M&A opportunities that I know you guys are focused on as we move through the year. Adam Anderson: Yes, I agree. I think we're really excited about that, both what we've accomplished in the couple of those really great acquisitions we've done over the last 1.5 years or so as well as our pipeline of M&A opportunities. So if you look at the drilling enhancement product line that came to us through the DWS acquisition, that business is performing great. And then we're seeing both benefits in U.S. land, where that team has some really strong relationships with a couple of larger independents Innovex historically hadn't worked for that we're seeing some product pull-through already. So that's exciting. And then conversely, we're seeing really good adoption of those products into the Middle East, which is going to be very difficult for that business to go attack on a stand-alone basis, like we're seeing really good uptake in Oman, UAE. We're doing some good work there with some of those independents coming in to do unconventional work there in the Middle East. And then a similar story, albeit a little bit earlier with respect to the Citadel deal, another business that's performing -- was performing great in the acquisition has continued to do well. And then we've seen some cross-selling opportunity in North America. And then we're really excited with what those -- that product set can do internationally and the likes of Argentina. We're in the middle of a trial test right now in Saudi with the trench foot wet shoe product that came to us through the Citadel acquisition. So yes, we're seeing a lot of good early tangible benefits from those deals, which gives us more confidence not only in where those deals are headed, but also executing on the string of other -- of really other attractive businesses that we see in front of us. And to be clear, we normally don't bake any of these revenue synergies into underwriting new deals. We look at them on a stand-alone basis and any kind of revenue synergies, we usually keep as upside. Operator: Next, we'll move to Don Crist at Johnson Rice. Donald Crist: It's been about 15 months or so since you closed Dril-Quip. And I know a lot of investors probably don't realize the kind of length of order schedule on the offshore side. So just kind of curious as to -- are you fully finalized all of the kind of Dril-Quip initiated orders on the Subsea side now and maybe that's the reason why your margins are coming in a little bit? And kind of when did your sales team really take over after the Dril-Quip merger to where you're actually driving the pencil versus inheriting some of those orders? Can you tell us where you are in that kind of structure? Adam Anderson: Yes. Don, thanks for the question. Yes. So to be clear, like I wouldn't -- some of the contracts, these are long-term 4-, 5-year contracts, some of which are very attractive. Other -- some stuff comes in a little bit less margin. We're going to see margin improvement going forward, both through cost structure reduction, for example, not having as many really large under manufacturing plants and really consolidating a lot of that or all of that subsea demand into a singular manufacturing plant is going to be a really big benefit. We do have a couple of specific one in particular subsea project flowing through the books right now that's at lower margin than we expected. And to be perfectly frank, that was bid under our tenure. That was bid post the deal closing. We just made some assumptions we were too optimistic in some of our assumptions there. So we'll see that order still weigh a little bit in Q1, start to bleed off in Q2, and then we're rebidding that as we speak. And would expect both a little bit of incremental price improvement as well as a little bit of cost reduction on that specific one, but that's kind of the broader theme. Donald Crist: Okay. And then can you give us an update kind of on the Far East manufacturing expansion, Vietnam and China and that kind of where you are in that process of kind of moving everything over? I mean, are we pretty much done with the CapEx on that and ready to kind of go full force there? Adam Anderson: Yes. No, I would -- I think we're kind of mid-innings. I think we've got two big projects going on there. We're moving a lot of the subsea manufacturing to our existing footprint in Singapore. As Kendal said on the call, we saw some CapEx impact in Q4 of that. We'll probably see a little bit more in the first half of this year. Then to be clear, that's both for some manufacturing footprint in Singapore as well as repositioning our Gulf U.S. offshore operations here, we need some CapEx to probably sustain that as we move out of Eldridge. And then on the downhole world, we acquired a business, a manufacturing facility in Vietnam last year. That's still -- we're ramping slowly into that. I think that's one over the next year or 2, we'll see continued growth there. There will be a little bit of incremental CapEx there, but that's kind of baked -- again, kind of baked into our earlier comments. I think both of those, we really haven't started to see any of the impact of the efficiencies that will come with having lower overall footprint and then a really high-quality but low-cost, high-volume facilities there in the Far East that we can lean on. We'll maintain a pretty robust supply chain in many of the markets we operate like the U.S. We'll always have a pretty good-sized manufacturing capability to respond to our market needs here in the U.S. But as we channel some of the higher volume and some of the Eastern Hemisphere demand into these plants, we'll see some nice benefit over the next year or 2. Donald Crist: Okay. That's very, very helpful as you expand around the world. And just one final one for me. We're -- as analysts, we're talking a lot about the broader Middle East and Northern Africa region. And can you just tell us just broadly speaking, kind of when you get brought into conversations if somebody is bidding on one of those big tenders? Is it 6 months before the project starts? Or is it kind of when the project starts? Because I know a lot of the guys from the U.S. are over there consulting and presumably, they like your equipment here in the U.S., they would bring it over there. Adam Anderson: Yes. So it depends a lot based on the project and the operator. For example, if you look -- some of the quickest hit stuff, if you look at some of the IOCs that are putting rigs to work and like a Bahrain or the UAE, we're seeing some benefit from that right now and some guys that we work with in the U.S. have showed up over there, and we're seeing some of that. That's on the smaller side just because that's -- those are smaller dollars. When you look at some of these big, big contracts that are let across the Saudi or Kuwait, some of those, we don't -- the benefit of being these kind of big impact small ticket products is that we're not always included in those big, big tenders that can be pretty aggressively priced. And we have these niche products that are sold a little bit later than those big projects. So it can kind of run the gambit from we get them brought in right away to, hey, we're a little bit more just in time as the rigs are getting stood up and start to go to work. Donald Crist: Okay. But you are seeing demand from friends over there that have moved from the U.S. that like your product? Adam Anderson: Yes. Yes. We have definitely seen some of that. I mean to be -- it's not nearly as big. And these IOCs, you're not running nearly the same rig count as some of the big NOCs in the region. But yes, we're seeing a little bit of benefit from that. And then in general, we're seeing some of that reactivation of rigs in Saudi, continued growth in other countries in the Middle East. So we'll start to see the benefit of that as we progress throughout this year and go into '27. Operator: We'll move next to Keith Beckmann at Pickering. Keith Beckmann: I just kind of wanted to hit around the M&A side of things again. I wanted to know if you could give us a little bit of a better sense on maybe the current M&A landscape you see, whether it's private equity companies in the U.S. or are there even any opportunities internationally? And maybe what areas of the business do you think could be improved? You guys have a lot of products, but maybe is there any areas from an M&A perspective that you think you're missing that could help you improve? Kendal Reed: Yes. Thanks, Keith. So as you know, M&A is definitely a core part of our strategy. So we're constantly looking for opportunities to grow and improve the business through acquisitions. And I would say right now, we're very excited about the opportunity set. Our M&A pipeline is probably as active right now as it's ever been. We mentioned on the call, we have multiple opportunities under review. Some of those are progressing nicely. And I think to your question on what are the most kind of actionable opportunities there. We have a handful of things, but I would say the most near-term impactful ones for us are probably going to be add-on style acquisitions where we can add kind of a specific differentiated product or a small portfolio of products to our overall portfolio and then look to grow those through the global distribution network. That could be private equity-backed, could be founder-backed, but generally speaking, more U.S.-based, a little bit smaller companies that have a lot of the abilities to both help us and we can help them kind of allow the DWS and Citadel playbook. I think that continues to be a really interesting space for us to play. We are looking at a few bigger, more transformative, more international style deals as well. But as you know, those tend to be take much longer or harder to handicap what's going to come to fruition there. But overall, I think based on what we're seeing, we really think M&A remains a great way for us to deploy capital in the near term. But as we've always said, we screen these deals against our buyback program and look to allocate capital in a way that drives the best long-term shareholder returns. Keith Beckmann: Awesome. That's very helpful. And then my second question was just going to be kind of around free cash flow conversion. And I know you guys hit on this a little bit, but the free cash flow improvement, I mean, I think you guys had 83% free cash flow conversion for the year, which is just a substantial structural improvement, along with some help from working capital, I know. But I think you've described 50% to 60% is kind of the normal business run rate conditions. I just wanted to get an idea on throughout 2026, if we should expect some further structural improvement maybe with some self-help still or 50% to 60% is maybe a good way to think about a good chunk of this year? Kendal Reed: Yes, it's a good question. I mean we're thrilled with the free cash flow conversion in 2025, and you kind of see it showing up on the balance sheet gives us a lot of capital to go look at some of these great accretive M&A opportunities as well as do some different things. So very pleased with how that's played out. I do think the 83% is probably on the high end, benefited from harvesting some cash off the Dril-Quip balance sheet, like we said. But that 50% to 60%, that's kind of our normalized through cycle number that we target. So in a year like 2026, I mean, we're not giving out full year guidance, but I think it probably in the market feels generally flattish, maybe some areas of growth, some areas of some slow decline. But if you're not expecting a huge ramp-up, we don't need to build the inventory to support the customer needs in that scenario. And I think we'd look to still continue to have a healthy free cash flow conversion. So yes, probably something more akin to that range, but maybe on the higher end of that 50% to 60% target. Operator: We'll move next to Eddie Kim at Barclays. Edward Kim: We don't get too much detail on the magnitude of your Subsea product bookings. But just curious if you could share even just directionally how 2025 Subsea product bookings trended versus '24 levels? And looking ahead to this year, do you expect Subsea orders will be up versus last year's levels? Or do you expect that to be more of a 2027 event? Adam Anderson: Yes. Eddie, yes, fair question. We probably in '25 in aggregate subsea orders would have been down a little bit versus '24, but it's pretty lumpy. So the first half was down a little bit. What I would say, though, is in Q4 through the beginning part of this year, there's been a lot of projects that have kind of been a little bit slow to come that we've seen show up in Q4, Q1. So we have a number of big projects in the Far East that we've gotten contract awards on. We got a nice project in the Mediterranean awarded, and then we have a bunch of things we're waiting to see what happens in Asia. So I would think that our order volume for '26 is probably going to be up pretty nicely versus '25. And we're going to start to see a little bit of the fruit of that into this year and as we move into '27. So we're really happy with the trajectory of that, but there was a little bit of a lull there back half of '24, start of '25 on those orders, I would say. Edward Kim: Got it. Got it. That's very helpful. And then just with the exit of the Eldridge facility at the end of 2Q, and the slide in your earnings deck is a good one and an 80% reduction in that footprint. I'm sure that facility was set up for an activity environment far beyond current levels. But to the extent we do get an offshore activity recovery here really in 2027 and for the next several years, how confident are you that your reduced footprint is going to be able to support an increase in subsea product demand? Adam Anderson: Yes. We're very confident that we can serve that market even with the reduced footprint that we're seeing here that as you said, that Eldridge a wonderful facility just built for a different time in that market. I think from here forward, we can still sustain a very nice increase in activity levels across the Subsea business globally. Operator: And we'll move next to Josh Jayne at Daniel Energy Partners. Joshua Jayne: Adam, I feel like you've been one of the more balanced with respect to offshore outlooks as we work through this white space period over the last 12 to 18 months from a rig activity standpoint. But I'm curious if you've seen enough things announced recently with respect to term on some contracts and maybe the subsea tree awards that we've seen where you could provide more of an outlook outside of Q1 on the Subsea side and how you see the business going, maybe an international offshore walk-through sort of through the end of this year and into 2027 would be helpful. Adam Anderson: Yes. Josh, Well, yes, fair question. We can be probably qualitative in how we respond to that. We're not putting out quantitative guidance beyond Q1. What I would say is I would -- I think we're seeing some nice project opportunities pop up for us, as I just referenced to Eddie's question that we -- things we've been waiting for a little while that came in, a couple of things that have been a little bit of a nice positive surprise in the offshore award world over the last few months for us that I do think, again, getting back half of this year into '27, we should see some nice growth there in the offshore -- our offshore business, our Subsea business. When you look at the other international markets, I would think the other really important places for us like Saudi and Mexico, which were down in '25, they have started to come back a little bit. They're still probably closer to a trough than a peak, but I think both of those markets will see some nice growth this year. And then we're seeing pockets of other countries in the Middle East that are admittedly smaller for us, but we're seeing some nice green shoots of growth there. So I think in general, yes, probably it will take a little bit of time. But I think, again, back half this year into '27, we'll see some nice overall international offshore growth. Joshua Jayne: And then if you've referenced this before, I apologize what the cycle times you highlighted. But when you think about shortening your cycle times from order to delivery on the subsea side of the business, could you remind me what your initial targets were? So for example, from the time in which an order was placed right after the acquisition of Dril-Quip closed to ultimate delivery, what that time frame was like? And then how you see that playing out sort of for something ordered middle of this year or end of this year and how your targets on ultimately how much cycle times will compress and since you started this journey, if there was upside to your initial target would be helpful. Kendal Reed: Yes. So I think with respect to specifically from the time line from order to delivery, that has not changed too much. I mean it varies to some extent, but rule of thumb, I would say, for a subsea order, we're generally getting that a year or so before delivery, plus or minus. I think the big thing we've really been focused on is improving that on-time delivery in that Subsea business, which we've continued to see really nice progress with that. I think it was very low when the deal started has kind of consistently ticked up and we're around 80% on-time delivery in that subsea product line in Q4 with the target, obviously, of getting that to 95-plus percent. So I think that's the big area we've been focused of really pulling that in, making that run efficiently and consistently hitting that delivery date that we schedule. Adam Anderson: The other thing I would point out, and I don't know that we've talked about this a lot publicly, but it's definitely -- when you look internationally, it's definitely you get an order, you build it over x period of time and then deliver it and that model will probably persist. In the Gulf, the U.S. offshore, we're seeing some transition to more of a consignment model where, hey, we have a contract. We are built -- for example, we're building stuff right now against a contract that will really only recognize the revenue once we install it for the customer, whereas in prior subsea cycles, that would have been -- we've been recognizing revenue as we speak right now for that stuff. So that also is going to contribute to a little bit of this lag in revenue versus what you would historically have seen as the Gulf makes this transition, which ultimately will be good for us and good for our customers as we're able to standardize products, build more things in volume across a wider customer base versus just do one-off project stuff, but there's a little bit of an air pocket there on revenue as you make that transition, if that makes sense. Joshua Jayne: It does. Operator: And that concludes our question-and-answer session and today's conference call. We thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect.
Operator: Good morning, ladies and gentlemen, and thank you for standing by. Welcome to the Sunstone Hotel Investors Fourth Quarter Earnings Call. [Operator Instructions] I would like to remind everyone that this conference is being recorded today, February 27, 2026, at 12:00 p.m. Eastern Time. I will now turn the call over to Mr. Aaron Reyes, Chief Financial Officer. Please go ahead, sir. Aaron Reyes: Thank you, operator. Before we begin, I would like to remind everyone that this call contains forward-looking statements that are subject to risks and uncertainties, including those described in our filings with the SEC, which could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected. We caution you to consider these factors in evaluating our forward-looking statements. We also note that the commentary on this call will contain non-GAAP financial information, including adjusted EBITDAre, adjusted FFO and hotel adjusted EBITDAre. We are providing this information as a supplement to information prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Additional details on our quarterly results have been provided in our earnings release and supplemental, which are available in the Investor Relations section of our website. With us on the call today are Bryan Giglia, Chief Executive Officer; and Robert Springer, President and Chief Investment Officer. After our remarks, the team will be available to answer your questions. With that, I would like to turn the call over to Bryan. Please go ahead. Bryan Giglia: Thank you, Aaron, and good morning, everyone. Despite the various headwinds that impacted our industry in 2025, our portfolio finished the year on a high note with fourth quarter operating results that exceeded our expectations, driven by broad-based strength across the portfolio. The fourth quarter capped off a productive year at Sunstone, where we made further progress on our 3 strategic objectives, which include recycling capital, investing in our portfolio and returning capital to our shareholders. Earlier in the year, we completed the sale of the Hilton New Orleans at a mid-6% cap rate inclusive of required near-term capital and fully recycled the proceeds into the repurchase of our stock at a compelling discount and a higher implied yield. In addition, we completed several capital projects, including the debut of the Andaz Miami Beach, which despite its later opening, had a solid festive period and good momentum heading into this year. Lastly, we returned more than $170 million of capital to our shareholders through a well-covered dividend and accretive share repurchases. These strategic accomplishments will drive growth in per share earnings and NAV in the years to come. We will share additional details on our outlook and our expectations for 2026 shortly, but I'll start with a quick recap on the fourth quarter results. As I noted at the top of the call, our results came in better than expected with total RevPAR growth of 7.4% in the quarter or 12.5%, including the contribution from Andaz. Our resorts led the portfolio driven by solid performance at the Wailea Beach Resort. As we shared with you on our recent calls, our results in Maui were hampered through much of last year as market demand normalized. We were pleased to see the green shoots we witnessed at the resort in the fall continue into year-end, leading to 19% RevPAR growth in the quarter. On the opposite side of the country, Andaz Miami Beach delivered year-end results that were ahead of expectations, and the outperformance has carried into the early parts of this year, positioning the resort well to deliver on our expectations for 2026. We are pleased with the demand our renovated resort is attracting, including high-profile business around some key events in the market that should help the resort further build awareness. Performance at our Wine Country resorts was also stronger than expected with Montage Healdsburg capping off a better year with 15% total RevPAR growth in the quarter and just over 9% for the year. Overall, our resorts were our strongest performing segment in Q4, and we expect that to continue into 2026, but now with the added benefit of a full year contribution from Andaz Miami Beach. At our urban hotels, we were pleased with our quarterly performance at Marriott Long Beach Downtown, which continued to benefit from its brand conversion in 2024 and generated total RevPAR growth of 12%. Similarly, the Portland market continues to recover with the Bidwell Marriott turning in nearly 13% growth. This strength was partially offset by a softer market and tougher comps in Boston and New Orleans. While top line growth was less robust at our urban hotels, we continue to work with our operators to control costs and managed to grow margins during the quarter. Our convention hotels turned in better-than-expected performance with RevPAR growth of 2.8%, even with some headwinds from the meeting space renovations that we had underway in San Antonio and San Diego. Excluding these 2 hotels, our convention hotel RevPAR growth was 5.3% during the quarter. San Francisco was once again a standout performer, which added to solid top line results in the first 3 quarters of the year to generate more than 12% total RevPAR growth for the year. We continue to be encouraged by how the market and our hotel are setting up for additional growth this year with group pace up in the low double-digit range and a strong start with good group activity in January and the Super Bowl in February. The Renaissance Orlando at SeaWorld also had a solid quarter with total RevPAR growth of more than 10% on a better mix of business. Group revenue production for the current and future periods in Orlando increased over 10% last year, and the hotel is pacing for better performance in 2026. Operating results in San Antonio were softer in 2025 on a lighter group event calendar and some displacement from our completed meeting space renovation, but 2026 should benefit from increased production and the renovation. As we shared with you on prior calls, performance last year in Washington, D.C. was less robust than initially anticipated and was impacted by government spending cuts, changes in policies and the government shutdown. Similarly, our results in San Diego were hampered by softer transient demand and a less constructive backdrop for international travel. On the expense side, we were pleased with our operators' ability to drive efficiencies in response to continued cost pressures. We knew coming into the year that 2025 would be particularly tough on margins as contractual cost escalations at certain of our larger hotels were adding to general inflationary pressures across the portfolio. I am pleased to report that we made significant progress in managing costs and delivered comparable portfolio margin growth of 40 basis points during the year on total RevPAR growth of 3.5%. This was a much better cost management outcome than we expected at the start of the year. While some of the efficiency measures that were additive in 2025 will be harder to sustain as we move into this year, we will continue to work with our hotel teams to manage costs, increase productivity and defend margins. As we look into 2026, we see some reasons to be optimistic about the year ahead. Andaz Miami Beach is starting off well with impressive year-to-date occupancy above 80% at a mid-$500 rate. In addition, the resort has nearly 8,000 group room nights already on the books, representing more than half of our budgeted room nights for the year, which is very strong for a market with a shorter-term booking window. The property is building momentum, which will continue this year with the opening of Bazaar Meat and our membership Beach Club. We are seeing additional positive signs as market recovery continues in Northern California, fundamentals in Biolea are more constructive, and there is the potential for industry-wide lift from special events such as F1 in Miami, which we missed last year, America 250 celebrations and the World Cup. At the same time, our focused portfolio will experience headwinds from softer transient demand in San Diego and continued uncertainty in D.C., 2 of our larger markets, which will offset some growth. That said, both hotels had better-than-anticipated transient demand in January and February, which, if current trends continue, could result in a better-than-anticipated year. While there are many encouraging signs, the industry and Sunstone have been disappointed by various headwinds over the past 2 years, making us more cautious. That said, we are excited about our prospects this year. And if costs remain controlled and some of these events produce more than our modest expectations, we could be positioned to see performance accelerate as the year progresses. The guidance that Aaron will share with you later attempts to balance these factors and reflect an outlook that we believe is reasonable and achievable based on how we see things today. As we move through 2026, we will continue to execute on the 3 components of our strategy: recycling capital, investing in our portfolio and returning capital to shareholders. While the transaction market has been quiet the last couple of years, we are clearly seeing some incremental activity, and we are looking for ways to thoughtfully demonstrate the value of our portfolio. In the meantime, we are focused on delivering profitability growth from operations and realizing the benefits of our investment projects. We expect these actions will support our capital return objectives in the coming year. And with that, I'll turn the call over to Robert to give some additional details on recent capital investment activity and our plans for 2026. Robert Springer: Thanks, Bryan. 2025 was a busy year for us on the operations and investment front. We debuted Andaz Miami Beach in the second quarter and the fully renovated resort looks great and is gaining traction. We have been pleased with recent transient booking velocity and the progress we have made attracting high-quality group business. We will round out the resort this year with the addition of the Beach Club and the introduction of Bazaar Meat, the resort's signature dining destination. Performance in the initial weeks of 2026 has been encouraging with year-to-date RevPAR of nearly $475 and the resort is well positioned to deliver earnings growth this year and into 2027. Earlier in 2025, we completed a rooms renovation at Wailea Beach Resort and are happy to see the demand backdrop turning a corner on the island. We have the opportunity for meaningful growth at the property as occupancy rebounds and we benefit from our recent investment. We are seeing good progress with RevPAR index increasing 17 points sequentially into the fourth quarter as the market normalizes and the resort reestablishes its competitive positioning. In the fourth quarter, we completed a renovation of the meeting space in San Antonio, which complements the room renovation done just prior to our acquisition, and the hotel now looks great from top to bottom. In San Diego, we are putting the finishing touches on a renovation of the meeting space there as well, which should allow the hotel to maintain its leading position in this premier group event destination. We are completing this work in phases to minimize disruption, but will have a modest amount of earnings headwinds in the first quarter. The project remains on schedule and on budget. This year, we will also be performing some maintenance projects at our Renaissance Orlando, facade work and a rooms refresh at Oceans Edge, Resort and Marina as well as some smaller routine projects across the rest of the portfolio. As Bryan alluded to earlier, we are seeing some incremental signs of life in the transaction market. While we are hopeful this will provide a more constructive backdrop to execute on our capital recycling strategy, we expect to remain disciplined in our approach and mindful of other capital allocation opportunities available to us. With that, I'll turn it over to Aaron. Please go ahead. Aaron Reyes: Thanks, Robert. As we noted at the top of the call, our earnings results for the fourth quarter came in ahead of expectations as stronger leisure performance at our resorts added to modestly better performance across most other hotels in the portfolio. Rooms RevPAR grew an impressive 9.6% in the quarter, including a 540 basis point benefit from Andaz Miami Beach. In a continuation of the trends we saw earlier this year, growth in ancillary spend outpaced rooms and contributed to total RevPAR growth of 12.5%, including a 510 basis point benefit from Andaz. This stronger top line performance and ongoing cost controls contributed to full year earnings that were ahead of the midpoint of our guidance range, including adjusted EBITDAre in the fourth quarter of $57 million and adjusted FFO of $0.20 per diluted share. We continue to benefit from a strong balance sheet with net leverage of only 3.5x trailing earnings or 4.7x, including our preferred equity. In early January, we drew the remaining $90 million balance from a previously arranged term loan and used the majority of the proceeds to repay our Series A notes at their scheduled maturity. Following this repayment, we have addressed all debt maturities through 2028. As of the end of the quarter and pro forma for the January payoff, we had over $200 million of total cash and cash equivalents, including our restricted cash. Together with full capacity available on our credit facility, this equates to over $700 million of total liquidity. Included in our press release this morning are the details of our outlook for 2026. As Bryan noted earlier, while we see reasons to be optimistic about the year ahead, we remain cautious, while still in these initial months. Based on what we see today, we expect that rooms RevPAR for all hotels in the portfolio will increase between 4% and 7% to a range of $234 to $241. This reflects the full year benefit of Andaz Miami Beach, which is expected to contribute approximately 400 basis points of growth at the midpoint. For 2026, we are also introducing guidance for total RevPAR, which is expected to increase between 3.5% to 6.5% and which would imply a range of $385 to $396 with a similar 400 basis point benefit from Andaz. We anticipate that our first quarter will be our strongest growth quarter of the year as the contribution from Onda and better performance in Maui will more than offset the challenging comp in D.C. from the inauguration and in New Orleans from the Super Bowl last year. This should result in first quarter RevPAR and total RevPAR growth being above the high end of the full year ranges just discussed and then the subsequent quarters being between the lower end and the midpoint. This revenue growth is expected to translate into adjusted EBITDAre in the range of $225 million to $250 million. Excluding onetime items and an asset sale, which together contributed approximately $10 million to our 2025 results, the midpoint of our 2026 EBITDA range reflects 5% growth in earnings over last year. Based on where we sit today, we expect our FFO per diluted share to range from $0.81 to $0.94. Adjusting for the same onetime items in the prior year, the midpoint of our FFO range reflects growth of 8% relative to 2025 as the benefit of our share repurchase activity adds to the growth in hotel earnings. In terms of the distribution of our earnings by quarter, we anticipate that the first quarter will represent approximately 25% of our full year projections at the midpoint. This is a bit higher than our historical run rate, but reflects the added contribution from Andaz Miami Beach. As is typical for our portfolio, the second quarter is expected to be our largest contributor at approximately 30%, with the balance split more or less evenly across the third and fourth quarters. Moving to our return of capital. Since the start of 2025 up to the middle of this week, we have repurchased approximately $108 million of common stock at a blended price of $8.83 per share. In addition, we have also purchased $3.1 million of our preferred stock at a blended price of $20.46 per share or an 18% discount to its liquidation value. This common and preferred stock repurchase activity has been accretive to both NAV and earnings per share. As we noted in our press release this morning, our Board of Directors has reauthorized our repurchase program back up to $500 million. And while we retain capacity and appetite for additional share repurchases, our 2026 outlook does not assume the benefit of additional common stock buyback activity. In addition to our share repurchases, our Board of Directors has also authorized a $0.09 per share common dividend for the first quarter and has also declared the routine distributions for our Series HNI preferred securities. Before we conclude our prepared remarks, I'll turn it back over to Bryan for some additional thoughts. Bryan Giglia: Before we open the call to questions, I want to highlight our 2026 objectives. The management team and Board are focused on realizing the value of our portfolio. Over the past few years, we have actively sold hotels at what have proven to be attractive valuations and redeployed proceeds into the most accretive option available at the time. While most of the proceeds went to repurchase common or preferred stock at a discount, we also acquired assets when our cost of capital became more competitive. We will continue this practice in 2026 while evaluating other potential transactions to realize and return the value of this portfolio to our shareholders. As I mentioned last quarter, the Board and management remain committed to maximizing value for shareholders and are open to any alternative that would reasonably be expected to result in value creation. With that, we can now open the call to questions. Operator, please go ahead. Operator: And your first question comes from the line of Cooper Clark with Wells Fargo. Cooper Clark: Curious if you could walk through some of the puts and takes as we think about the 1.5% midpoint of '26 RevPAR growth ex-Andaz within the context of 2.1% growth last year and what should be a continued recovery in markets like Hawaii? Bryan Giglia: Sure. Cooper, when you look at the remainder of the portfolio ex Andaz, you're absolutely right. Maui is a market where we are seeing growth. We talked about it last year where we mentioned that for the hotel to get back to where it needs to be, the Kaanapali market needed to stabilize, which is something that we saw happening in kind of the late third quarter, fourth quarter of last year. And that continues to happen going forward. We went from the high -- mid- to high 90s occupancy index to at the end of the year, over 100%. We should stabilize around 110%. So that is absolutely moving in the right direction. As I said earlier, we're seeing continued transient demand as we recapture that index. And so far, the first 2 months of the year have been a pleasant surprise to see that continue. The group business in Maui is -- the pace is down a little bit this year. We do have this one piece of business that is on for a couple of years and then off and it's off island this year. But we are seeing a transient pace is up about 53%, and that will help cover that shortfall. When we look at the rest of the portfolio, continued strength in San Francisco in wine country, other markets and one that we highlighted on the call, D.C. is a market that we faced a lot of headwinds last year, not only with government shutdown at the end of the year, but then also cutbacks and impacted a lot of the group business there. Our -- the amount, the percentage where groups would actually actualize as compared to their blocks was down to historic averages. And so while we anniversary that coming up shortly, and so the year-over-year comp will get easier, we do -- we are cautious. And then we are also seeing in D.C. a pickup in transient business that we were not seeing in the middle part of last year. And so some of the government transient, we're starting to see that come back. Again, with what the impacts and the headwinds that we saw last year, we're approaching the D.C. market with as cautious. And if we continue to see these trends, we would expect that we could be in a position where that midpoint would move up a little bit. But D.C. is one of the markets right now that we're keeping an eye on and is pulling that average back. Cooper Clark: Okay. Great. That's helpful. And then could you talk through the expense growth implied in guide, both including and excluding the Andaz and what are some of the key drivers there? Bryan Giglia: Sure. I mean I think roughly, we're on expenses, we're right around 3% total. Labor over the last couple of years has been sort of in that 4-ish range. It's coming down a little bit this year into the 3s. Energy prices are up a bit this year. And then there are a couple of the larger fixed expenses that will unfold as the year goes on. Our insurance renews in June, and that's something that we had good renewals with last year. There were not any major cat hits in our portfolio. So that should be helpful. But we go into the year, and we expect there to be some growth in those rates. And so if that -- if we get a year like last year, that could be a benefit. And then property taxes have been down over the last few years, we're kind of assuming that those are going to normalize. And then on the Andaz side, overall, I don't think it's going to make a material difference in that overall percentage. Aaron Reyes: Cooper, it's Aaron. And just maybe to add to what Bryan was saying. So as we move through last year, as we noted in the prepared remarks, we were much more successful in managing costs relative to where we thought that they would be at the beginning of the year. And so we ended up with margin expansion to the tune of about 40 basis points on RevPAR growth of about 3.5%. From a cost growth perspective for the comparable portfolio, so the 13 hotels ex Andaz, expense growth is in that kind of that 3-ish percent or so area. What we'll feel a bit differently this year is just that, as you noted, the blended RevPAR growth rate for that comp set is -- for that set of hotels is a bit lower. So we'll expect some margin headwind for the comp portfolio in '26. If we add in Andaz, things obviously do get a little bit noisier given that it was only open part of the year last year will be open all of the year this year. We'd look at probably a total overall expense growth rate of around 5% or so, which starts then align with where the midpoint of the RevPAR range is for the total portfolio. So a good chance of margin being able to defend margins as we move from '25 to '26 for the total portfolio, and then we'll be hopeful that we have an outcome like we had last year, whereas the year went on, we were a bit more successful on the cost side. Operator: Your next question comes from the line of Duane Pfennigwerth with Evercore ISI. Duane Pfennigwerth: A call earlier today talked about the expectation for being a net seller of assets. I wonder if that's your expectation as well. And if you have any update on the marketing process around the Wine Country assets. Bryan Giglia: Sure. In the fourth quarter, we started to see a pickup in transactions, either closed transactions or announced transactions. And I think as we have more clarity into this year and debt markets continue to be strong. I think that we'll continue to see an uptick in transactions. I think thematically, it will be similar. I think that there is a lot of demand for luxury assets. I think there's a lot of demand for cash flowing assets. And so those obviously can support the highest debt balance. And we're still seeing for midsized transactions, enough equity out there as you start to get to a larger assets, the bidder pool is still thinner. I do think we're seeing that improve. And so our view is really no different than what we were doing last year and when we sold New Orleans at a very attractive cap rate and then redeployed those proceeds into our common stock. We're going to look to realize private market values for where we can for those -- for hotels and resorts that we have, where we see the biggest gap between the public and private market values. And basically, we'll continue to try to unlock value where we can and then go and deploy that in the most accretive manner. We don't comment on transactions prior to announcement. But we have been clear and I think our actions have been very clear is that our major pillar of our strategy is recycling assets. So there's always going to be a point in time where we'll have one or more assets that in some form of marketing or discussion with potential buyers. And we don't think that this year will be any different. The question then comes is what is that most accretive allocation of that redeployment of that capital. And that depends on a lot of factors. It depends on where the stock is, where our cost of capital is, where our stock is trading, what -- and on a risk-adjusted basis, what is make more sense to repurchase stock or preferred? Does it make more sense to acquire an asset? And over the last few years, I think we've demonstrated that we've been able to pivot between those sometimes in shorter time periods, but we've been able to effectively deploy that capital, whether it be through the acquisitions of [indiscernible] or buying back stock. Operator: Your next question comes from the line of Smedes Rose with Citi. Bennett Rose: I just had another question about your guidance, just in terms of total RevPAR being a little bit lower than your RevPAR outlook. Usually, they're sort of at least in line or maybe total RevPAR would be a little bit higher. So I was just wondering if you could just speak to that for a moment. Bryan Giglia: Sure, Smedes. Having a focused portfolio with some larger assets, D.C. being one of them I spoke about and then San Diego also that had a -- we finished up a pretty substantial meeting space renovation or we finished a portion of it, and we'll finish the rest of it in the quarter that's impacted on those 2 big hotels. On the group side, that's going to impact some of our ancillary spend, getting some of that back in Andaz. And quite honestly, I would expect an increase in our total RevPAR, if we continue to see the transient trends in D.C. somewhat, but more importantly, the transient trends we're seeing in Wailea with the additional spend that comes from the transient rooms, that will help buoy our total RevPAR. But right now, it's more a function of some of the limited displacement in the first quarter in San Diego and then a slower group pace in D.C. it's more that. Bennett Rose: Okay. And then I was just wondering if you could talk a little bit more. You mentioned in your opening remarks some transient weakness in San Diego. Is that specifically to your hotel? Are you seeing that kind of market-wide? And maybe just if you could just speak to kind of just the broader market in San Diego, what you're seeing just maybe on the group side, what's happening with the convention calendar there, et cetera? Bryan Giglia: Yes. In San Diego, we saw some ups and downs last year. Some of it government related. There's a lot of defense contractors. So we saw it slow down last year. We've seen that pick up. Towards the end of the year, the leisure time period, whether it's some international travel not coming in, some Canadian markets come to that area. What we're seeing now, the first 2 months have been pretty promising in San Diego, DC2, we mentioned. And so I think we're starting to see government transient come back. And part of that might just be certain segments and what San Diego pulls from is the defense contractors. And so that can be a positive for the market. And so we'll see over the next few months, but we are seeing positive signs as the year goes on right now in San Diego on the transient side. Operator: Your next question comes from the line of Michael Bellisario with Baird. Michael Bellisario: First one for Aaron. Just on this Ohana preferred, can you just remind us like what are the mechanisms there for you to take that out? When and by how much is that coupon ratchet? And then just on capital allocation, is this a potential use of capital if you were successful with dispositions? Aaron Reyes: Yes, Mike, thanks for the question. So the Ohana is referring to is our Series G preferred, which is issued in connection with our acquisition of Montage. That one does have a mechanism where the yield there is tied to a greater of the hotel yields or a fixed rate, which is currently now 6.5%. So overall, it came in at $66 million in size, so it's a manageable amount of capital. We kind of view our preferred, I would say, as a total bucket. So all in the $280 million at a pretty attractive blended price of just around 5% or so. But as you saw in our results for our fourth quarter, we did take the opportunity to look at some buyback on the preferred side, and we'll continue to do that as a way to kind of just manage the overall preferred dividend exposure and ensure that we're mindful of that -- of the mechanism on the Series C, which does step up. So I think as we think about this year, I wouldn't expect that our preferred dividend would increase in '26 relative to where it was in '25, even with the escalation on the Series C, just given that we'll manage the overall outstanding balance. So we'll take another look at it as we move through the year. I mean, certainly, as we noted, we have $200 million of cash that we could readily put to use to address that Series G. And the function there is it's callable solely in our discretion. Bryan Giglia: And it doesn't have to be in the total amount either. So we can take out pieces of it at a time. Michael Bellisario: That's helpful. And then just 2 little modeling follow-ups, maybe I missed them. What's your EBITDA expectation for Miami this year? And then what are some of those onetime items that you mentioned that's impacting the year-over-year growth rate? I think it's like $7 million net of the New Orleans sale, if my math is right? Bryan Giglia: Okay. I'll start with -- so in Miami, our expectation is consistent with where we were before. We think it's low to mid-teens EBITDA this year. And our what we've seen starting in kind of really in December and December, we hit close to 70% occupancy. The comp set was right around 70%. Our rate granted was lower than the -- than our luxury set. We were in the 500s. They were in the 900 plus. So we have plenty of room to grow. We're building a very good base. Our group room nights have doubled quarter-over-quarter. We've got a lot of good momentum going into F1 and FIFA later in the summer, which is a great time for that piece of business to be there. So our expectations are consistent with where we were last quarter with Miami. And if we have a strong summer, my expectation is that we are at the upper end of that. Aaron Reyes: And then, Mike, just on the second part of your question as it relates to the onetime items that we called out for '25. It's a total of around $10 million or so, and the components would be about $3 million contribution from the Hilton New Orleans, which we sold last year, so won't repeat this year, a cost recovery that we had in connection with one of a settlement at one of our properties and then just some incremental interest income that we generated last year given where deposit rates were and where our cash balance was at the time that we wouldn't expect to repeat in '26. Operator: Your next question comes from the line of Chris Woronka with Deutsche Bank. Chris Woronka: So I understood everything you said, Bryan, about any potential transactions in Wine Country. My question on it is kind of do you think any sale process is having any kind of impact on operations right now? It looks like in '25, you had pretty good results at the Montage, both big Four Seasons, maybe a little bit less so. So is there anything to draw from that? And what's kind of embedded in your guidance as to how those perform this year? Bryan Giglia: Yes. I mean both resorts were on pace to have very good years. As you probably remember, there was a fire close to Four Seasons that impacted the third quarter last year and a little bit trickled into the fourth quarter. So adjusting for that, that was probably about $1 million of EBITDA. So adjusting for that, one, your question, not commenting on a sale process, but typically for a managed hotel. The management contracts are long term and stay in place, so that doesn't really impact the day-to-day operations of the hotel. Four Seasons has fantastic group pace for this year. I think group pace is up about 22%. And so we have really great expectations for that. Again, the San Francisco market has been doing better, which then leads to more weekend trips or extensions of convention trips out to Wine Country. The high-end luxury traveler continues to be very strong and spend quite a bit. And then on the other side of the valley, we -- we've had great success with group at Montage. Group is not as strong as Four Seasons this year, but they're moving from a much larger base. And our transient demand over at Montage has been phenomenal. So I think transient pace is up 25% year-over-year. So just like San Francisco, a lot to look forward to in the Bay Area and Wine Country. And so there, again, with the impact of the fire last year was sort of a unique impact to Four Seasons, both hotels should have very good years. Chris Woronka: Okay. Appreciate all that color, Bryan. Maybe to kind of keep it in the San Francisco area at the Hyatt. I know there was probably a Super Bowl benefit back in January. This hotel is running single-digit margin in '24 and '25. Is there any expectation this year that whether it's, again, outside of Super Bowl, but with AI and back to office and other group things that are happening in San Francisco, is there a hope or an expectation on your part that, that hotel starts meaningfully improving margins? Bryan Giglia: Yes. I mean our location in that market has become the primary location. And so our basic -- with the office that surrounds it, the inflows of new tenants, AI-based, but really, the center of San Francisco has moved into the Embarcadero financial area. And so we have -- we're benefiting from a recently renovated hotel that while it still has quite a ways to go to get back to where we were, we finished '25 at 78% occupancy, which is 10 points of occupancy down from where we were. We have a $300 rate. There's still quite a bit of room in the rate. And so we have great pace this year. Transient pace continues to grow. The market had a great Super Bowl. World Cup is -- we're just starting to see bookings for that, and that's something that will help compress the summer as we get into it. So look, I think that given the continuing increase in health of the San Francisco market, our location, our product, our meeting space, we still have a very good run ahead of us and are very -- are looking forward to the next several years in this market. Operator: Your next question comes from the line of Daniel Politzer with JPMorgan. Unknown Analyst: This is [ Michael Harris ] on for Dan today. Congrats on a nice quarter. For my question, you noted in the press release that the operating environment could be impacted both positively or negatively by events outside of your control. Could you speak to some of those events or macro environment that you contemplated for this year, when putting together your guidance? Bryan Giglia: Yes. Look, I mean, if you look over the last few years, starting each of the years, expectations were higher and then there were various headwinds that popped up and went away and came back throughout that time frame. I think D.C. is a good example of what is our -- what are our expectations in D.C. Like I said, they're cautious this year. There was -- we did not expect the impact to government business, government shutdown, those things for a large 800-room hotel in our portfolio. Those were things that were not fully -- we weren't expecting last year and impacted operations. Could elements of that happen again? Sure. If we look at '26 in D.C., it's just starting off. It's a tough comp. You had inauguration the year before. We had storms in January and you have midterms later in the year, which means Congress won't be in session a lot as much. So those are things that keep us cautious, especially from the framework of the prior year's experience. But then on the other side, you look at the positives there. You've got the America 250 celebrations. You have an Indie race that was just scheduled for August that's happening. Our transient pickup for January and February has been stronger than we thought. The negotiated transient demand for the next 6 months is up 11%. Part of that is still the benefit we're seeing from the conversion to Westin. Some of it is business that's coming back to the market. When you look at our transient demand for January and February and you put it against the backdrop of we had weather issues this January. We didn't have an inauguration this year, but yet our transient demand is greater than what we had last year. That points to strength. And so that makes us very optimistic. The question is we probably need to see a few more months of this before our -- before we can have our outlook reflect that for the rest of the year. Unknown Analyst: And then for my follow-up, more modeling related. On your CapEx guidance for $95 million to $115 million, could you speak to the timing and allocation of those dollars between the different projects? Bryan Giglia: Yes. Let me start with that, and then Aaron can go through some more specifics. We are working through and finishing the meeting space in San Diego. Keep in mind that it's a 1,200-room hotel. It's a lot of meeting space. So there's $25 million of that number right there. A portion of that does come from the FF&E reserve. And so that's a big piece of it. There's some additional bills that are being paid and finish up work from Andaz. And then throughout the portfolio, we have various other projects, some HVAC projects, some roofing projects, some elevator modernizations. Those are spread out more throughout the year. The biggest chunk -- single chunk will come from the San Diego piece, which will be in the first and second quarter as it gets paid out in. Aaron? Aaron Reyes: Yes. Bryan basically got the punchline there. The largest projects will be front-loaded. So I'd expect about 1/3 of it happens in Q1, but -- and then Q2 will be the second largest contributor and the rest will trickle into the back half. But work largely performed in Q1 and then the payments in Q1 and Q2. Operator: There are no further questions at this time. I will now turn the call over to Bryan Giglia for closing remarks. Bryan Giglia: Thank you, everyone, for your time and interest in the company. We look forward to seeing many of you in -- at upcoming conferences and property tours that we have in our portfolio. Thank you. Operator: Ladies and gentlemen, that concludes today's call. Thank you all for joining. You may now disconnect.
Operator: Hello, everyone, and thank you for joining the PharmaMar Full Year Results 2025. My name is Gabriel, and I will be coordinating your call today. [Operator Instructions] I will now hand over to your host, José Luis Moreno, Head of Capital Markets and Investor Relations. Please go ahead. José Martinez-Losa: Thank you, Gabriel, and good morning to everyone, and thank you for joining us for today's PharmaMar Earnings Conference Call to discuss our 2025 Financial Results. On the call with me today are María Luisa de Francia, Chief Financial Officer; Luis Mora, Managing Director of PharmaMar; and Pascal Besman, the Senior Vice President of Strategic Development. After our comments, we'll open the floor for your questions. And before we begin, please note that certain statements made during this call may constitute forward-looking statements, and these statements are based on current expectations, and actual results might differ materially from those projected. A full safe harbor statement is available in the corporate presentation on our website and together with the press release and the results report issued this morning. We undertake no obligation to update these statements, except as required by the applicable law. All right. Well, I'm pleased to say that 2025 was a very strong year for the company with clear progress, both strategically and financially. Strategically, a key milestone in 2025 was the U.S. approval of Zepzelca as first-line maintenance therapy in October. And this, of course, represents an important step for patients and a meaningful catalyst for the business. Financially, we delivered very strong -- very solid performance. Revenues grew 27% year-on-year, reflecting strong execution and the increased scale of our business. Our top line growth translated into a significant step in profitability with EBITDA up by roughly 5x versus '24 and net income up 187% year-on-year. Importantly, we achieved these results ahead of the expected European approval for Zepzelca, which is granted, it should provide an additional tailwind to revenues and further reinforce our growth trajectory. And with that, I will hand over to María Luisa to walk you through the financials in more detail. And then Luis Mora will update you on our development plans for the years ahead. María Luisa? María de Francia Caballero: Thank you, José Luis. Good morning, and thank you all for joining us in the 2025 results conference call. Regarding the financial statements for the year just ended, we would like to highlight the following points. First, a substantial increase in revenue from all of the company's sources of income, sales plus 20%, royalties plus 4% and licensing revenues 66%. We expect this trend to continue in 2026 with growth in sales due to the potential approval of Zepzelca for Europe and also growth in royalties due to the approval of Zepzelca as a first-line maintenance treatment last October, which will increase sales for our partners in the U.S. in 2026. Another point is the maintenance of R&D expenditure at the same level as last year and in line with our expectations for next year with the projects we are involved in, which Luis Mora will detail below. We had also a slight increase in operating expenses, for example, in commercial expenses, where activities have been carried out to prepare for the eventual launch of Zepzelca in Europe in 2026. This increase has been -- this increase in expenses -- in operating expenses has been partially netted out by the European grants obtained its first the Sylentis project. All the above has led to EBITDA of EUR 68 million, approximately 5x that of the previous year, as José said before, and to a net profit of EUR 75 million. Finally, and also noteworthy is the generation of operating cash flow amounting to EUR 53 million. This has enabled us to close the year with cash and financial investment of EUR 168 million, while debt remains at similar levels to 2024. This financial situation enabled us to continue with our ongoing projects without any pressure as Luis Mora is going to explain right now, and I pass the floor to Luis Mora. Luis Capitán: Okay. Thank you, María Luisa. 2025 has been a great year for PharmaMar with significant milestones achieved for both patients and the company. We obtained the approval in the United States and Switzerland for Zepzelca in first-line maintenance non-small cell lung cancer. The compound was licensed to Merck for Japan and both the pivotal trials, LAGOON and SaLuDo trials continued successful according to schedule. We also submitted the registration dossier for Zepzelca in Europe for first-line maintenance non-small cell lung cancer and the compounds P54 and PM534 are continuing day-to-day development. The total revenue as María Luisa described it has grown by 27%. I would like to highlight the growth of Zepzelca in Switzerland and especially in France under the early use model with a 31% increase. This clearly demonstrates that Zepzelca is changing the treatment paradigm for the patients. I also want to highlight to increase Yondelis raw material sales to our partners with a 20% growth compared with '24 as well as the growth in Yondelis royalties in the U.S.A., which have more than doubled compared with 2024. This means that Yondelis continues to grow, being considered a standard treatment for soft tissue sarcoma. In Europe, where there are already 6 approved generic version of Yondelis, the unit sales have grown by approximately 4% compared with '24. This help us to introduce in the future lurbinectedin in leiomyosarcoma in first-line treatment. Regarding Zepzelca in the United States, the royalties have decreased by 12% compared with '24 for 2 reasons. One is the exchange rate Euro-U.S. dollar, which has had a negative impact 7.5% and another to enter a new competitor into the market. However, in this last quarter, we have seen a significant change that we expect that will continue to grow in 2026 with the approval of [indiscernible] in first-line small cell lung cancer maintenance therapy. Finally, looking ahead to the next 12 months, important milestones are on the horizon that will be transformative for the company. The European registration dossier for Zepzelca for first-line maintenance non-small cell lung cancer is currently under evaluation by EMA, and we expect the opinion likely in the first quarter of this year. If this is the case and given the European Commission time lines, we could begin marketing the product in some European countries in the second half of this year. In fact, our entire marketing, sales, market access, medical affairs, logistics team is working intensively on this. We expect it to grow in commercial expenditure in 30% over the next [ 2 ] years. The LAGOON trial for second-line treatment non-small cell lung cancer is expected the top line results in the second half of this year. If the results are positive in either arm where Zepzelca is administrated either as a single agent or in combination with irinotecan. It will lead to another registration dossier likely in the second half of this year for the second line, and this is the objective of the company to any patient with small cell lung cancer will have the opportunity to take lurbinectedin in first on the second line. The SaLuDo trial, which compares Zepzelca plus high-dose doxorubicin, Zepzelca plus low-dose doxorubicin against doxorubicin alone is expected to complete enrollment in the first half of this year ahead of the schedule. We expect the results in the first half of '27, and if positive, they will lead another registration dossier in 2027 with potential approval in '28. The other 2 products we have in the clinical development pipeline, PM54 has already reached the recommended dose in both infusion regimens included in the separated Phase I trials, and we expect it to show the data in the next ESMO Congress in Madrid in October as we have observed very manageable safety and promising efficacy. This encourages us to begin a very ambitious plan in 2026 with expansion as a single agent for different tumor types as well as initiating combination trial with another chemotherapy agent and immunotherapy. In fact, the FDA already approved the new IND for this combination trial with immunotherapy at the end of 2025. Similarly, PM534 is in dose escalation in 2 different Phase I trials with 2 different institution regimens, and we expect to begin expanding 1 of 2 regimens in different tumor types in the second half of this year. In summary, '25, we executed as planned and '26 will be a transformative year for the company with significant milestones, both commercially and in the development for our compounds. Now I pass across to [indiscernible] Thank you. José Martinez-Losa: Thank you, Luis. And well, with this, we conclude our speech today, and we open the floor to questions. Gabriel? Operator: [Operator Instructions] Our first question is from Joseph Hedden from Rx Securities. Joseph Hedden: It's been the first quarter since Zepzelca's label was expanded for first-line use. So 90 million sales in the U.S. Can you just tell us how that compares to your internal expectations? And perhaps any feedback that you've received from U.S. docs or any kind of usage metrics other than the sales that you may have? Pascal Besman: All right Joe, Pascal here. We're not going to tell you what our projections are and Jazz doesn't give you what their projections are. So unfortunately, not much that I can help you with. And in terms of inventory levels that you're asking, that's not something that we make public other than if there was a situation where there was a problem with inventory, then we would feel that would be material. But obviously, we were expecting to see an uptake after the October FDA approval in the first-line maintenance setting. That happened with a 13% quarter-over-quarter bump, which we're pleased to see. And we expect, personally, we as PharmaMar expect that to continue, as Jazz indicated on their call earlier in the week. Joseph Hedden: Okay. Fair enough. And then perhaps if I could have one on Yondelis. It was interesting to see that U.S. sales climbing again there after the NCCN inclusion. Do you expect that trend to continue through this year of having a much better year with royalties coming from J&J sales there? Luis Capitán: Yes. We expect that continues to grow if you compare '26 with '25. In fact, from the inclusion in NCCN guidelines, the combination of Yondelis plus doxorubicin in first-line leiomyosarcoma, the use of Yondelis is increasing dramatically, and we expect that to continue to grow in 2026. Joseph Hedden: Okay. And then perhaps if you could just reconfirm your expectations for generic entry for Yondelis in the U.S.? Luis Capitán: I don't know. This is not -- remember, it's J&J territory, it's not PharmaMar territory, then we don't know where they will potentially enter the generics. So we don't know. I can advise you not -- in principle, not in 2026. Operator: Our next question is from [ Rowan Ropali ] from Santander. Unknown Analyst: Can you hear me? Luis Capitán: Yes. Unknown Analyst: Okay. Perfect. So I have a few questions. The first one is on the potential approval of Zepzelca in the first-line maintenance setting in Europe. Are there any updates on the pricing negotiation process that we should be aware of? And have you already initiated discussions with the relevant national authorities in key European markets? The second one was concerning the M&A and in-licensing. How is the process progressing at this stage? So should we expect any concrete developments or announcements this year? And that would be everything. Luis Capitán: Okay. Thank you very much. As I said in my speech minutes ago, we expected accordingly the calendar from the EMA opinion at the end of this quarter for first-line small cell lung cancer maintenance therapy. That is we expected. And then accordingly, the European Commission time lines, they have 2 months after the EMA opinion to send us the authorization for commercialization in this territory. This is the time line. Regarding the pricing, the procedure in all the European countries, you can start the submission dossier for pricing and not before the EMA opinion because at the end of the day, you negotiate the pricing and reimbursement from one particular label. And the label is included in the EMA opinion, then you can negotiate before you have this label, okay? But in fact, this is all the PharmaMar team regarding this matter as working more than 1 year ago. Then in order to be ready, the dossier for submission immediately after the EMA opinion. And regarding the licensing here, okay, we can't disclose the [indiscernible] and the process. We have some options in the table. And when we will arrive some type of agreement, we will disclose. Operator: We will now move on to text questions. So I will hand over to the management team. Please go ahead. José Martinez-Losa: Thank you. Now we have some written questions that we received. And we can start with these ones about Zepzelca. The first one says, now that the FDA has approved lurbinectedin as a first-line maintenance therapy for small cell lung cancer, could we expect significant increase in U.S. royalties by 2026? Luis Capitán: Yes, that is what we expected in the second line, you compare with the first-line maintenance therapy. First of all, the number of cycles in the IMforte trial, if we compare with the basket trial, is quite a double and it's about 30% of the patients potentially in this disease. Then we expect the royalties will be growing across 2026. José Martinez-Losa: We have another question about some regulatory issues also regarding with Zepzelca. Could you please confirm whether IMforte has been officially approved in Uruguay and Ecuador as mentioned by [ Adrian ]. Luis Capitán: Yes, Uruguay was approved in the last quarter 2025 and Ecuador in this year, January. José Martinez-Losa: We have another question also in regulatory issues. As the dossier for IMforte being submitted in the Japanese authorities for approval? Luis Capitán: Well, I want to remember it's not about territory. We license the drug to Merck, and this is the Merck task. And when Merck decide to disclosed or not, this process is a Merck decision. It's not PharmaMar decision. José Martinez-Losa: Okay. More about pricing. When do you anticipate receiving reimbursement for IMforte in Switzerland? Luis Capitán: Well, we are in the negotiation process actively. This is a normal process. We expected in the middle of the year, finalize this process in order to have the price and reimbursement for first-line maintenance therapy. But I want to remind you that from the commercial point of view, we are already selling in first line, but we're waiting for final pricing and reimbursement. José Martinez-Losa: So in that regard, there's another question of the same person that he asked about if you could say anything about the pricing that we have in Switzerland for [indiscernible]. Luis Capitán: No, it's in the negotiation process. You can't disclose that. José Martinez-Losa: Okay. All right. We have other questions about other molecules in the pipeline, PM54. So the FDA has approved IND for the new Phase I/II of PM54 with immunotherapy since the trial targets multiple tumor indications, could we expect to include several immunotherapies as well? Luis Capitán: Well, we are in the decision process when we will start the trial, we will announce. We have several options like in the synergistic effect is already demonstrated with this type of compounds. We have several options, and we will start the trial, we will disclose, okay? Could be atezolizumab, pembrolizumab, durvalumab, et cetera, et cetera. José Martinez-Losa: In this regard, there are also questions about what's the time frame when we could start. You've mentioned that we'll start this year. What can we expect about starting point and endpoint? Luis Capitán: Yes, we are already prepared every seeing the protocol. We already contacted with the centers to start the trial, and we expected to start the trial in the first half of this year. José Martinez-Losa: All right. We have a question about Sylentis. And if you could provide any update on SYL1801 and specifically, is the Phase Ib trial expected to start surely. Luis Capitán: Well, when the SYL1801 was disclosed the data, the team are still analyzing the data. They have worked so hard in the preclinical setting in order to be focused in the next trials in some subtype of DCC. And when we will start the trial, we will announce. We are working on that. José Martinez-Losa: Thank you. We're receiving more questions. Here's another one. R&D investment decreased from EUR 103 million to EUR 95 million this year. Does this reflect a natural tailing of late-stage trial costs? Or is a strategic decision to be more selective in early-stage compounds like PM534, PM54? Luis Capitán: No, this is a normal one. When you have several Phase III ongoing or you finalize the Phase III, the investment in R&D are down, in fact, given the Phase III ongoing. But according to María Luisa's speech, we expect the similar numbers in 2023 than 2025, but this is the major reason. José Martinez-Losa: Okay. We have another one about Zepzelca. With the FDA approval of Zepzelca in combination with atezolizumab, how does management expect this change in treatment paradigm to impact the long-term peak sales estimates compared to the previous second-line monotherapy use? Pascal Besman: Well, to echo what Luis said recently, maybe I'll add a little bit more. Out of 100 patients who are diagnosed with extensive stage small cell lung cancer, about 95% are treated in first-line induction. About 75% have been seen to be treated in first-line maintenance, about 50% to 60% in second line. So right away, you can see by having the first-line maintenance label, there are more patients in the pool. In addition, as Luis also mentioned, the number of cycles that are seen on a mean or median basis is about double from 4 to 8, moving from second line to first line. And a third key point is to consider market share between atezolizumab and durvalumab, which are both approved insofar that these 2 drugs are widely seen as Coke and Pepsi, especially in small cell interchangeable duopoly. And therefore, if atezo plus lurbinectedin is better than atezo, it's seen that atezo lurbinectedin is better than durva. In addition to that, in terms of market share potential, atezolizumab has a version that's been approved in the U.S., U.K. and Europe and Switzerland of a subcutaneous, whereas durvalumab does not and will not have one. So with all that said and with the caveat that we're not making predictions that Jazz hasn't themselves made, we expect sales to be improved starting this year as they were in the last quarter after the first -- the approval in October. José Martinez-Losa: Thank you, Pascal. We have received -- talking about Jazz, we have received some other questions about the patent situation in the U.S. and we cannot answer these questions. I guess these are more questions for our partner, Jazz, who's doing a great job in the U.S. The final question here says the company spent EUR 34 million on share buybacks in '25. Given the cash position, how is management balancing further buybacks against potential M&A or licensing opportunities to diversify the oncology portfolio? I'll take this one. We do not -- I mean, from the company, we do not see either doing one or another. I mean the fact that we're doing share buybacks program does not mean that we cannot consider, as Luis has mentioned now, in-license deals or any other deals. So we could do both, and we're happy to look at everything. Talking about share buybacks, if we're going to do further buybacks, as you know, we decide that on a yearly basis, same as the dividend policy. I mean, from our perspective, from the company perspective, our first priority is investment in R&D. And once we've covered all that and we have room for more stuff like dividend increase or the share buyback, then we decide on the year. But again, the fact that we do additional share buybacks, if we do it or whatever, does not mean that we're not going to consider in-license agreements or M&A or any other deal. And I think these are all questions that we received in written. So in summary, just to wrap up, our 2025 results demonstrate robust growth driven by rising Zepzelca revenues and a meaningful advance across our clinical development portfolio. And in addition, we expect a strong flow of important news in the near term. And with this, we conclude our call today, and we would like to thank you all for joining us and Gabriel. Operator: Thank you. This concludes today's PharmaMar Full Year Results 2025. Thank you for joining. You may now disconnect your lines.
Operator: Ladies and gentlemen, good afternoon. Welcome, everyone, to the BlackRock TCP Capital Corp. Fourth Quarter Earnings Call. Today's conference call is being recorded for replay purposes. [Operator Instructions] Now I would like to turn the call over to Alex Doll, a member of the BlackRock TCP Capital Corp. Investor Relations team. Alex, please go ahead. Alex Doll: Thank you, operator. Before we begin, I'll note that this conference call may contain forward-looking statements based on the estimates and assumptions of management at the time of such statements and are not guarantees of future performance. Forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, and actual results could differ materially from those projected. For more information, please refer to the risk factors discussed in our most recently filed report on Form 10-K and the Form 8-K filed with the SEC today, along with the associated press release. Any forward-looking statements made on this call are made as of today and are subject to change without notice. Additionally, certain information discussed and presented may have been derived from third-party sources and has not been independently verified. Accordingly, we make no representation or warranty with respect to such information. Earlier today, we issued our earnings release for the fourth quarter and full year ended December 31, 2025, and posted a supplemental earnings presentation on our website at www.tcpcapital.com. To view the slide presentation, which we will refer to on today's call, please click on the Investor Relations link and select Events and Presentations. These documents should be reviewed in conjunction with the company's Form 10-K, which was filed with the SEC earlier today. Now I will turn the call over to our Chairman, CEO and Co-CIO, Phil Tseng. Philip Tseng: Thank you, Alex, and thank you to our investors and analysts for joining us today. I'll begin with an overview of our fourth quarter and full year 2025 performance. Our President, Jason Mehring, will then provide details on our portfolio and investment activity, and Erik Cuellar, our CFO, will review our financial results. Then I'll provide closing comments before we open the call up for your questions. We are also joined today by Dan Worrell, our Co-CIO, who will be available to answer questions. Since we preannounced our preliminary fourth quarter results on January 23, I will focus my remarks on providing more detail on the results and the key factors behind our performance. I'll begin with an overview of our financial results. Full year 2025 adjusted NII was $1.22 per share compared to $1.52 in 2024. Annualized NII ROE for the year was 12.3% compared to 14.5% in 2024. Adjusted NII was $0.25 per share in the fourth quarter compared to $0.30 per share last quarter and $0.36 per share for the fourth quarter of 2024. The decline in NII primarily reflects the impact of portfolio markdowns and nonaccruals as well as lower base rates and tighter spreads year-over-year. Fourth quarter NII includes the benefit of a voluntary waiver by our adviser of 1/3 of the base management fee, which added approximately $0.02 per share. As of December 31, 2025, nonaccrual debt investments represented 4% of the portfolio at fair market value and 9.7% at cost compared to 5.6% at fair market value and 14.4% at cost for the fourth quarter of 2024. NAV declined 19% to $7.07 per share as of December 31, 2025, from $8.71 as of September 30, in line with the midpoint of the range we previously provided on January 23. The portfolio markdowns for the quarter largely reflect issuer-specific developments during the period. Six portfolio companies contributed approximately 67% or $1.11 per share of the NAV decline. Now I'll provide details on these 6 investments. Our investment in Edmentum, an educational technology business is comprised entirely of preferred and common equity, making it inherently sensitive to changes in enterprise value. Edmentum's valuation declined as a result of overall underperformance in the fourth quarter and lower anticipated future growth. This markdown accounted for 23% or $0.38 per share of the NAV decline for the quarter. Razor and SellerX are Amazon aggregators that have been restructured previously and continued to underperform during the quarter, resulting in further reduction to their outlooks. Razor contributed $0.24 per share or 15% of the NAV decline, and we have now fully written our position down to 0. SellerX contributed $0.22 per share or 13% of the NAV decline. On Renovo, as discussed on our last earnings call, we moved forward with writing down our investment in the fourth quarter. This negatively impacted NAV by $0.15 per share, in line with the expectations we communicated previously. Next is Hylan, a provider of telecom and wireless engineering and construction services, which was also previously restructured. Due to ongoing underperformance in this quarter as well as liquidity concerns, we marked down this position, which includes both debt and equity. This resulted in a $0.06 per share impact to NAV. And last, we marked down our position in InMobi, a digital advertising company. Our remaining exposure consisted solely of warrants for equity that we retained after the company fully repaid its term loan. Based on InMobi's underperformance in the fourth quarter and an associated impact on the company's outlook, we reduced the valuation of this position, resulting in a $0.06 per share impact to NAV. Looking at the reduction in NAV for the quarter more broadly, approximately 91% was from investments that we underwrote in 2021 or earlier. Certain of the companies, including Amazon aggregators and e-learning platforms benefited from high levels of pandemic era demand but have since seen results soften. All of these positions were underwritten in a significantly lower base rate environment and have faced challenges adjusting to sustained higher interest rates. Regarding our challenged investments, we continue to work diligently with our borrowers, their sponsors and creditors to optimize recovery values, including pursuing restructurings and other transaction-driven outcomes when appropriate. Now I'll share an update on capital allocation, starting with our dividend. Our Board declared a first quarter dividend of $0.17 per share payable on March 31, 2026, to shareholders of record on March 17, 2026. As we have said before, our goal is to maintain a dividend that is both sustainable and covered by NII. As part of our commitment to supporting our shareholders, we repurchased 515,869 shares of TCPC stock during the fourth quarter at a weighted average price of $5.84 per share. We also purchased an additional 233,541 shares after quarter end at a weighted average share price of $5.50 per share. Now I'll turn the call over to Jason to discuss our portfolio as well as our recent investment activity. Jason Mehring: Thanks, Phil, and welcome, everyone. I'll begin with an overview of our portfolio composition. At year-end, our portfolio had a fair market value of $1.5 billion invested across 141 companies in more than 20 industry sectors with an average position size of $10.9 million. 92.4% of our portfolio was invested in senior secured loans, all of which were floating rate and 7.5% was in equity investments. Our largest investment based on fair value represented 7.2% of our portfolio and our 5 largest investments accounted for 23.1%. Investment income was distributed broadly across our diverse portfolio with more than 75% of our portfolio companies each contributing less than 1%. During 2025, the average size of our investments in new portfolio companies was $5.8 million compared to an $11.7 million average position size at the end of last year, demonstrating our ongoing effort to reduce concentration risk. All new portfolio company investments during 2025 were in first lien loans, bringing total portfolio exposure to first lien loans to 87.4% on a fair value basis, up from 83.6% last year. At the end of the fourth quarter, the weighted average effective yield of our portfolio was 11.1% compared to 11.5% last quarter. Investments during the quarter had a weighted average yield of 9.7%, while those we exited had a weighted average yield of 11.1%. Current yields reflect lower base rates and spread compression during the period. In the fourth quarter, in line with our strategy, we deployed $35 million into senior secured loans across 5 new and 3 existing portfolio companies. Our largest new investment was a $4.5 million first lien term loan to a highly scaled wealth management platform with a focus on high net worth individuals. This financing was made in connection with the recapitalization where BlackRock Private Financing Solutions, or PFS, was the second largest lender in a $2 billion credit facility. The PFS platform has been a lender to this business since early 2024, and the opportunity was a natural fit for TCPC given our past success investing in the wealth management sector. In addition to attractive industry fundamentals, we were drawn to the company's high client retention rate, strong management team and brand recognition. Our second largest investment was a $4 million first lien loan to Coalfire, a leading cybersecurity services and solutions provider. This investment was part of a $375 million first lien financing in which BlackRock PFS provided approximately 30% of the facility. We believe Coalfire is well positioned to benefit from increasing cybersecurity regulation and complexity. Given our focus on direct origination and borrower relationships, incumbency continues to be an important competitive edge for TCPC. And during 2025, 65.4% of our deployments came from existing portfolio companies. We continue to find opportunities within our portfolio where our deep relationships and industry expertise help as we evaluate risk. Paydowns this quarter were $80.7 million compared to $140 million in the prior quarter. Before I turn the call over to Erik, I want to briefly comment on the software sector, which has been the subject of considerable interest among investors in the press. While public equities in this sector are experiencing a valuation reset following a long upward run, we haven't seen that widely translate into lower operating results in our portfolio companies, although we will continue to monitor developments going forward. In addition, we believe software is not monolithic as some segments are fundamentally more resilient than others. For some time, we have considered the potential for AI disruption in our underwriting of potential software investments, and we have sought to continue to actively pursue businesses where we believe AI is more likely to positively augment the company's offering rather than displace it. Now I'll turn the call over to Erik, who will discuss our financial results, capital and liquidity positioning. Erik Cuellar: Thank you, Jason. I will begin with a review of our financial results for the fourth quarter and year ended December 31, 2025. As detailed in our earnings press release, adjusted net investment income excludes the amortization of the purchase accounting discount resulting from our merger with BCIC and is calculated in accordance with GAAP. A full reconciliation of adjusted net investment income to GAAP net investment income as well as other non-GAAP financial metrics is included in our earnings press release and 10-K. Gross investment income for the fourth quarter was $0.52 per share. This included recurring cash interest of $0.41, nonrecurring income of $0.01, recurring discount and fee amortization of $0.02, PIK income of $0.06 and dividend income of $0.02 per share. PIK interest income for the quarter was 10.9% of total investment income, up from 9.5% last quarter and included no new names. Operating expenses for the fourth quarter were $0.25 per share, including $0.18 per share of interest and other debt expenses. As of December 31, 2025, our cumulative total return did not exceed the total return hurdle, and therefore, no incentive compensation was accrued for the fourth quarter. Additionally, as Phil mentioned, we waived a portion of our base management fee again this quarter. Net realized losses for the quarter were $73.9 million or $0.87 per share, with Anacomp and Astra being the most significant portfolio company contributors. Net unrealized losses were $66.5 million or $0.78 per share, primarily due to the unrealized markdowns on the 6 investments Phil discussed earlier. The net decrease in net assets for the quarter was $118.3 million or $1.39 per share. Now I'll discuss our balance sheet and liquidity positioning, which remains solid. Total liquidity at year-end was $570.2 million, including $482.8 million in available borrowings and $61.1 million of cash. The weighted average interest rate on debt outstanding at year-end was 4.9%, down from 5.0% at the end of the third quarter. Unfunded loan commitments represented 8.4% of our $1.5 billion investment portfolio or $129.2 million, including $53.7 million in revolver commitments. Net regulatory leverage was 1.41x at year-end compared to 1.2x at the end of the third quarter, resulting in a total debt-to-equity leverage ratio of 1.74x. Subsequent to year-end, our net regulatory leverage ratio has improved to 1.34x as a result of paydowns. We expect to reduce leverage further over time as we exit additional investments. On February 9, 2026, we paid down the entire $325 million principal amount of our 2026 unsecured notes, resulting in current liquidity of approximately $290.8 million. Our diverse leverage program now includes 3 low-cost credit facilities, an unsecured note issuance and an SBA program. Now I will turn the call back to Phil for his closing remarks. Philip Tseng: Thanks, Erik. While the write-downs in the fourth quarter were disappointing, we continue to actively manage our investment portfolio with the goal of seeking to maximize recoveries and reposition our portfolio to deliver attractive returns to our shareholders over time. Our highest near-term priority is to improve the credit quality of our investment portfolio by working diligently to resolve challenged credits. At the same time, we continue to implement the refined investment strategy we set forth last year. This includes seeking to, one, deploy capital selectively into senior secured first lien loans where we are a lender of influence; two, build a well-diversified portfolio in terms of industry sectors and investment size to reduce concentration risk; and three, fully leverage the unparalleled resources of BlackRock's platform. There is work to be done, but we're confident in our strategy. As Jason mentioned, in 2025, we increased first lien investments to 87.4% of the portfolio on a fair value basis, up from 83.6% last year. In addition, we improved our portfolio diversification by reducing the average size of new investments made in 2025 to $5.8 million each or 38 basis points compared to the $11.7 million average position size at the end of 2024. We are proud to be part of BlackRock and believe the substantial resources of this industry-leading platform will support our efforts to reposition our portfolio and enhance our capabilities. We are already seeing the benefits of an expanded pipeline of investment opportunities that supports our objective of deploying capital very selectively into what we believe are high-quality investments that align with our investment strategy. I want to thank our investors for your continued support as we reposition our portfolio. And now I'll turn the call back to the operator for questions. Operator: [Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from Robert Dodd from Raymond James. Robert Dodd: I appreciate all the color you gave about the individual businesses. And obviously, you've discussed kind of the new allocation efforts going forward. At what point -- and this is really a question for the Board rather than you, to be fair. But at what point does it make sense to take maybe more aggressive overall strategic adjustments to the BDC rather than continue in the current efforts. I mean it shrunk -- leverage is up. If you buy back stock, leverage will go up even more unless you shrink the portfolio. There's a lot of issues that are going to take a -- with your best efforts, and I applaud them, and I think you put it in those best efforts, it's going to take a long time to turn this business around. At what point does it make sense to do something more aggressive on the strategic front? Philip Tseng: Yes. Thanks, Robert. I appreciate the question. We continually evaluate ways to optimize returns for the shareholders. And at this time, we believe the best path forward is to continue to focus on improving the credit quality of the portfolio and executing on the investment strategy that we've been discussing. This includes an ongoing rotation of the portfolio into first lien loans, which we've made progress on. It's up to 87.4% now versus 83.6% a year ago and also increasing portfolio diversification, which, as you know, has been an area that's been suboptimal and causing some of the credit losses so far. And we've made progress on that front as well, where the average size of new investments have decreased to about $5.8 million per position or about 38 basis points. And of course, we're working on continuing to leverage the broader resources that BlackRock's platform has to offer, which has been yielding some benefits, as you heard from the prepared remarks on a couple of the new investments that we put into the portfolio this past quarter. Robert Dodd: I appreciate that. Now going on to the portfolio assets. I mean, several of them, as you mentioned, have been previously restructured. This is not a theme just in your portfolio. We've seen several other assets and other BDCs this quarter and in more recent quarters that have been previously restructured and are back on nonaccrual or back getting marked down. What -- how should we take that or how should investors take that in terms of when -- over the last few years, it looks like restructurings seem to stick less often than maybe was the case if we go back further, that's just a sense, right? So I mean what's your view on that -- on when you do the initial restructuring of an asset, do you need to be more aggressive on that, maybe equitize more of the debt or take -- if you can take the keys quicker? Or what is it? I mean, again, this is not just in your book, it's elsewhere, but obviously, you've had a fair number of them. So what's your thought on how restructurings need to be done going forward? Philip Tseng: Yes. Restructurings, they can play out in several different ways. The road to recovery, as we've discussed on past calls, are not always linear. In fact, they're rarely linear. So it's hard to predict when they may recover. And these businesses oftentimes recover into -- from a capital structure standpoint with a loan and equity component. And equity investments, as you know, are more sensitive to enterprise value changes just given that they're at the bottom of the capital stack, whereas the debt is obviously more insulated from enterprise value changes. We think, Robert, we have a robust process in place, certainly bringing to bear the resources of the broader BlackRock platform to actively manage these challenged investments. But I appreciate your concern around when we can call bottoms on some of these restructurings, but it's challenging. Operator: Our next question comes from Finian O'Shea from Wells Fargo. Finian O'Shea: Just to piggyback on the first topic with Robert. So listening to the issuer-specific developments, and I appreciate those, but they just don't sound like that big of changes in the context of their outstanding underperformance. And in the history of BDCs, these NAV drawdowns do happen from time to time, but I can't remember another Friday night 8-K. So the question is, is there sort of more to the story, perhaps a change in personnel, a change in procedure on the valuation team that was brought to the Board and led them to rethink and push this out there? Jason Mehring: Fin, it's Jason. Thanks for the question. There hasn't been any sort of change to our valuation policy. As I think we've talked about before, our end-of-quarter process includes a pretty granular review of each portfolio company, and that methodology does include, obviously, third-party valuation services and resources from within the BlackRock PFS platform. So I think that's all remained consistent. I do think that when you look at the overall write-downs in the quarter, they were concentrated fairly heavily among those 6 names that we've outlined, which were about 2/3 of the drop in NAV. And I think that those names, generally speaking, had an equity orientation, which obviously, as everybody knows, is more volatile and is fundamentally more sensitive to changes in underlying performance. So we obviously didn't delineate specific performance level detail when we were outlining the businesses that we talked about. But it's safe to say that the inputs and just sort of the factors related to the business performance, industry outlook, et cetera, moved in a way that had on a cumulative basis, a more material impact on NAV for the quarter. Finian O'Shea: So I guess not a change in -- okay. So it sounds like go forward, we're not going to 8-K all the time when the equity market moves. It sounds like maybe less valuation, but more, yes, these 6 names had just straw that broke the camel's back kind of thing, idiosyncratic event that forced your hand to reassess the valuation and that's very one-off. This is like the one 8-K that will ever happen under those circumstances. Jason Mehring: Yes. Listen, it's obviously difficult to predict the future, but I think there were a unique collection of factors that led to a more material markdown in the aggregate for the quarter, which is why we saw fit to release the 8-K when we did in January to make sure that the market was aware. To your point, it's not something that we've seen on a regular basis. There were, again, idiosyncratic factors that happened to occur in unison, which drove a lot of that swing. Again, we've referenced those 6 names. But again, we're -- the process is the same, and we'll continue to consider the need to disclose things on an 8-K basis if and when they arise. Operator: [Operator Instructions] We currently have no further questions, and I would like to hand back to Phil Tseng for any closing remarks. Philip Tseng: Thanks, operator. In closing, I want to thank you all for joining our call today. I'd also like to thank our team for their continued hard work and dedication for TCPC. As always, please reach out with any questions. Thank you. Operator: Thank you. This now concludes today's call. Thank you all for joining. You may now disconnect your lines.
Operator: Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by. I'd like to welcome you to Fibra UNO's Fourth Quarter 2025 Results Conference Call on the 27th of February 2026. [Operator Instructions]. So without further ado, I'd like to pass the line to the CEO, Fibra Mr. Andre El-Mann. Please go ahead, sir. André Arazi: Thank you, Luis. Thank you, everybody, for your interest in our call regarding the fourth quarter of 2025. I would like to begin that we are very excited again to release these numbers for you of the fourth quarter of 2025, which has been a very busy year for us at FUNO. This is the first report after the drop-down of our industrial portfolio. I would like you to bear in mind that we need to consider -- we are considering only a few days of the complete revenues in this new structure, in this particular quarter. Nevertheless, we make sure that everything goes as planned, as we will be able to report a complete quarter this very first quarter of 2026 in the next few weeks. That would allow us to reveal that all the efforts made last year will pay back, and our shareholders will be able to see the positive impact that the carve-out of our industrial portfolio will have on the future of the company. I would like to express our excitement on the numbers released yesterday that show a consolidated company with assets close to $25 billion. These are the big numbers, but we are also taking care of the little numbers. 95.5%, our historic high of occupancy level across the board. NOI margin growing by more or less 300 bps and looking good for this year. A healthy growth above inflation on all the significant lines of the balance. I would like to remember you about last year's achievements. We made the liability management of the company, having renewed close to $800 million at the beginning of the year of the U.S. bonds -- U.S. dollar bonds. We renewed also MXN 12 billion of the Mexican peso bonds. We made the repayment of close to MXN 10 billion of short-term bilateral revolving lines of credit, with the issuance of an unsecured line long term. We made the exchange of our bonds across the curve to complete the transfers of debt to Fibra Next. We finalized the internalization process and we expect savings in the order of $400 million to $500 million this year. We did the carve-out of our industrial portfolio. First, with the IPO of Fibra Next in which we raised close to $430 million. Then we made a follow-on equity offering of Fibra Next close to $400 million. We did the exchange of the bonds. And then finally, at the very end of last year, we finally made the drop-down of the industrial portfolio of UNO into Next. All of this done last year, during which we managed to maintain and excel in our metrics, mainly total income, total NOI, total FFO, total dividend yield, all of them improving in a healthy way. And also, we improved at the end of the year in an overall NOI margin. I would like to thank all the team here at Fibra UNO because none of this would have been possible. We made last year very difficult choices and very strong efforts in order to get where we are today. I was sure -- I will make sure to be reporting the first quarter this year, which will be much clearer of all the efforts that we did last year and will reflect on the balance and the performance of the company and of course, of our subsidiary company, Fibra Next. Thank you for your attention. I would like to pass the mic to Jorge to go in depth with the numbers. Jorge, please. Jorge Pigeon Solórzano: Thank you very much, Andrea, and thanks, everybody, for joining our call. As usual, I'll start with the MD&A for the quarter. Fibra UNO's total revenue increased by MXN 348 million or 4.6% compared to the previous quarter, primarily driven by a 50 basis point increase in the total portfolio occupancy, inflation-driven increases on active contracts, rent increases and on lease renewals and this was offset by the peso-dollar exchange rate appreciation and the effect that this has on our U.S. dollar-denominated rents. In terms of occupancy, our operating portfolio stood, as Andre mentioned, 95.5%, which is a 50 basis points increase compared to the previous quarter. If we look at the retail portfolio, we recorded an occupancy of 93.7%, 10 basis points above the previous quarter. The office portfolio recorded 82.9% occupancy, 10 basis points below the previous quarter. The other portfolio recorded 99.3% occupancy remaining stable versus the previous quarter. The industrial portfolio, 97.7%, which is 30 basis points above the previous quarter. And the in-service portfolio recorded 87.7%, which is 330 basis points above the previous quarter. In terms of operating expenses, property taxes and insurance, total operating expenses increased by MXN 97.1 million or 9.8% versus the third quarter of 2025. This is mainly due to increases in the cost of some of our supplies and services that are above inflation. As you know, we've mentioned this before, a lot of our expenses are linked to service providers that have high degree of correlation with the minimum wage. And this has kept some of those expenses higher. In terms of property taxes, fees increased by 6.1% or 3% above the previous quarter, mainly due to consolidation of Fibra Next. Insurance expenses increased by MXN 10 million or 7.6% versus the previous quarter, again, due to the consolidation of Fibra Next. In terms of net operating income, our NOI increased by MXN 498.3 million or 8.9% versus the third quarter of '25 to reach the amount of MXN 6.079 billion. NOI margin calculated over rental revenue was 85.1% and 77.2% compared to total revenues. In terms of interest expense and interest income, the net interest expense line increased by $51.9 million or 1.8% compared to the third quarter of 2025. This was mainly due to Fibra Next debt consolidation and the interest related to this consolidation. And as Andre mentioned, this was not a complete quarter. So we'll see the complete effect on our financials in the first quarter of 2026. This increase was offset by interest rate reduction in pesos and the effect that this had on our variable rate debt. The appreciation of the exchange rate, which went from MXN 18.38 to MXN 17.97 quarter-over-quarter and obviously, the effect that this has on our interest expense line during the quarter, a decrease in the interest capitalization and the impact of the pricing of our derivative financial instruments. The bottom line on our funds from operation as a result of the above, FFO controlled by FUNO increased by MXN 157.4 million or 6.6% compared to the third quarter of '25, reaching MXN 2.55 billion. Adjusted FFO recorded an increase of MXN 121.1 million or 5% compared to the third quarter of 2025, reaching MXN 2.55 billion. A slight difference against FFO is due to the update in the cost of a property that was sold in the third quarter of 2025. FFO and AFFO per CBFI calculation during the fourth quarter of '25, we put circulation, 5.3 million CBFIs corresponding to the ECP (sic) [ EPC]. And with that, we closed the quarter with MXN 3.810 billion CBFIs outstanding. The FFO and AFFO per average CBFI were MXN 0.6690 and MXN 0.6712, respectively, variations of 6.5% and 4.9% compared to the third quarter of 2025. In terms of the quarterly distribution, we reached MXN 2.55 billion or MXN 0.67 per CBFI with a quarterly AFFO payout of 99.8% and a payout of 94% compared to the annual AFFO. Moving on to the balance sheet. In terms of accounts receivable, we totaled MXN 2.131 billion, a decrease of MXN 260 million or 10.9% from the previous quarter. Reflecting the organic growth related to the consolidation of Fibra Next as well as an improvement in collections that we had in the quarter. Investment properties, the value of our investment properties, including financial assets and investments in associates increased by MXN 32 billion or 9.3% compared to the third quarter of '25. This obviously, as you can see, reflects the consolidation of Fibra Next on the balance sheet as of December 31, 2025, CapEx invested in our portfolio and fair value adjustment of our investment properties. In terms of total debt, we finished the fourth quarter of '25 with MXN 152 billion compared to the MXN 147 billion we had the previous quarter. The variation is primarily due to the consolidation of Fibra Next, which included additional debt, the valuation of the maturity effect of financial instruments and the exchange rate effect appreciation that I mentioned before. In terms of total equity, equity increased by MXN 55 billion, almost MXN 56 billion or almost 30%, 29%, including controlling and noncontrolling interest. As you know, this is obviously the effect of the consolidation of Fibra Next, which is one of the things that we wanted to achieve, and we finally have completed that in the previous quarter. This capital includes the consolidation of the Jupiter portfolio, the second part of Jupiter portfolio. Net income generated from quarterly results, the derivatives valuation, shareholders' distribution related to the third quarter results and the employee compensation plan. Moving to the operating results in terms of leasing spreads. Leasing spreads, we had increases of 16.4% or 1,240 basis points in the industrial segment, 8.2% or 820 basis points in the retail segment and 500 basis points in the office segment. If we look at dollar-denominated leasing spreads, we saw 13.9% or 1,390 basis points for the industrial segment, 460 basis points or 4.6% in the retail segment, and we saw negative 320 basis points in the office segment. As you know, this is something that we are very pleased with and something that we have come to expect in terms of what's happened in the office portfolio. In terms of constant property performance, the rental price per square meter for constant properties increased by 5.3% compared to the weighted annual inflation of 3.6%. So we had 170 basis points growth despite a depreciation of the peso about 13%. If we had not seen that this appreciation, we probably would have been closer to about 8.4% constant property performance. So again, very pleased with the performance that we saw in this area. In terms of the NOI at the property level, we saw for the fourth quarter, an increase of 2.9%. It can be divided in Fashion Mall segment NOI decreased by 2.5% Regional segment decreased by 3.5%, stand-alone segment decreased by 3.6%. The decrease is mainly due to extraordinary income recorded in the third quarter of '25, which is obviously a one-off in [ comparison ] to the fourth quarter of '25. The office segment NOI increased 5.2%. And the others segment decreased by 1.2%. The industrial segment NOI increased by 11.2%. And with this, we finalize the MD&A. Now Luis, if we can open the floor for Q&A. Operator: [Operator Instructions]. Our first question is from Igor Machado from Goldman Sachs. Igor Machado: My question here is on leverage as we have seen a relevant leverage process for FUNO in the last quarters. So I just want to better understand here how does management view the leverage target for the end of 2026? And what is the long-term strategy for maintaining this improved ratios? That's it. Jorge Pigeon Solórzano: Well, as you know, part of the -- there were many drivers for the carve-out of the industrial portfolio and the capitalization and the consolidation, let's say, of that industrial portfolio Fibra UNO. One of them is the deleveraging effect that we have by adding roughly $2.3 billion of new equity, which is a combination of the value of the Jupiter portfolios as well as the equity we raised from the market. Ideally, we feel comfortable, obviously, below 40%, and we feel comfortable having an investment-grade credit rating, which is where we are today, both stable outlooks from Moody's and Fitch. And the trajectory that we have for the company will delever it even further based on a couple of events. One is, as you know, this business is inflation indexed. So that will have a deleveraging effect over time. And then the other one is that Next will continue to grow, and we expect that to come with additional equity issuances further down the road, and that equity is going to be consolidated into Fibra UNO. So that's going to delever the company even further. So at this point, we don't have additional deleveraging strategy, so to speak. And we would like to maintain our investment-grade credit rating going forward. So the metrics that we need to be in that world is what we're going to aim to maintain. So let's say, LTV below 40% is where we feel comfortable around 35% to 40%, say, the sweet spot. Operator: Our next question is from Mario Simplicio from Morgan Stanley. Mario Sergio Simplicio: I have my question is, well, in 2025, you achieved a lot of milestones of your long-term strategy and you have the internalization, we have Fibra Next. And I wonder what are the next targets that you're aiming for, let's say now '26 and for the future years? Like how is the long-term strategy for Fibra UNO now that it has already achieved so many milestones? André Arazi: Thank you for the question. We have many, many plans for the future. And I hope that we, first of all, will reduce the gap between the NAV and the price of the share. Once we do that, all of our opportunities will open wise, and we will act on it. Operator: Our next question is from Diego from Citi. Unknown Analyst: I have one on my side regarding CapEx. In the fourth quarter, the CapEx reached MXN 2 billion. And how this level of investment support FUNO's growth pipeline, including expansions and asset stabilization? And additionally, what you guys expect for CapEx in 2026? Jorge Pigeon Solórzano: I think that the MXN 2 billion is a good number for CapEx for the company, let's say, on a normal operating year on the normal status of what we have been doing, which is keeping up or trying to keep up with the demand for new space that we have from our tenants is a reasonable number to expect again for 2026. And obviously, as you know, this does not include any new developments or anything of that nature. Some minor expansions at some of our properties, but not large scale development. For that, I think that's what we need to open the doors for additional capital for the company. Operator: Our next question is from Pablo Mulas from GBM. Pablo Mulas: You already answered my question. Operator: Our next question is from Gordon Lee from BTG. Gordon Lee: Just a quick question. I was wondering whether you have an estimate or even just a ballpark figure of what the total operating expenses that we saw this quarter that were associated with either the next transactions or the internalization transactions that should be nonrecurring on an ongoing basis, just to get a sense of a more sort of stabilized EBITDA margin for, let's say, the new FUNO. Jorge Pigeon Solórzano: Not yet. I don't think we we run that number. I'll get back to you on that we'll work on it and get back to you. Gordon Lee: Okay. Perfect. Just a ballpark is fine. Operator: Our next question is from Anton from GBM. Unknown Analyst: Just a quick one. I mean, as everyone mentioned, you reached a lot of milestones for FUNO, mostly focused on the industrial side. So I was wondering what are your plans for the retail and office and the other segments? Do you expect to do any acquisitions there? Or what's the overall strategy? Jorge Pigeon Solórzano: Well, more than the strategy, let me tell you what we think about what's going on in the retail sector. If you see our logistics portfolio, it's at 98% occupancy and the rents in the Mexico City market have continued to grow. There is very strong demand for logistics assets. Why? Because the companies that demand that logistics, which is basically consumer-driven in Mexico, are -- have been doing well and expect to continue to do well, and there's growth -- a lot of growth coming in that sector. So that means that there's going to be demand for new shopping malls, new stores, new Walmart and so on and so forth down the road. And obviously, we want to be able to capture those opportunities. Opportunities we have been seeing them the last years, and we've had to let those opportunities pass at Fibra UNO because with the deep gap that we have to our NAV, it's -- this is a capital-intensive business. We want to close that gap in order to be able to issue equity. And then as Andre mentioned earlier, that will open up a lot of opportunities for us for acquisitions and for developments, et cetera. So we see a very strong and attractive retail market in Mexico. Operator: [Operator Instructions]. Okay. We have a question from Felipe Barragan from JPMorgan. Felipe Barragan Sanchez: I have a question on an update on the office segment. Just want to hear your thoughts on the trends and what's going on in that segment. Unknown Executive: Actually, as you have seen on the -- our report, we have been increasing the occupancy that we have there. And I think that it's not just us, it's just a tendency already on the market. Obviously, we are above the average of the market in terms of occupancy. But I think the trend is that the offices are getting occupied. And probably we are at 83% occupancy. Once we hit the 85%, we will be seeing increasing the rent levels that we have as of today that has been almost flat in the last 2 or 3 years. Operator: Our next question is from David Soto from Scotiabank. David Soto Soto: Just a quick one and a follow-up on the retail side. Should we expect variable rents to start contributing to your portfolio anytime soon? André Arazi: They are already contributing. We have a very interesting mass of contracts that we changed. If you remember, I've been saying that in the past that we changed our contracts, some of the contracts for a dual rent, one fixed rent, which was lower than the previous rent that the tenant was paying and/or our percentage of their sales, which has been paying off in the last couple of years. But right now, given that we finished the -- for example, the luxury Avenue in La Isla Cancun, we have been receiving the fruits of that, and we have been receiving already percentage of rent. If you add to that, that we exchange many of the regular contracts of regular shopping malls from fixed rent -- pure fixed rent to fixed rent plus a percentage of the sales, whichever becomes higher. So we have been already receiving that in our portfolio. And given that we exchange many of the contracts, we think that we will continue to be receiving those percentages in the near future. Operator: We'll give it a few more moments for any further questions. Okay. It looks like we have no further questions. I will now hand it to the Fibra UNO team for the concluding remarks. André Arazi: Thank you very much. Thank you, everybody, for your interest in our call, and I hope to hear from you in the next call about the first quarter of 2026 in the future. Thank you very much. Operator: That concludes the call for today. We'll now be closing all the lines. Thank you, and have a nice day.
Operator: Good morning, and welcome to the disclosures. Before starting, I would like to remind you that once the presentation is over, and as usual, we will move on to the Q&A session. [Operator Instructions] So we're going to start with the presentation. We have Mikel Barandiaran, the CEO of Dominion; and Roberto Tobillas, the Director General; and Patricia Berjon, who's the Director for Corporate Development. Unknown Executive: Well, good morning, everybody, and many thanks for attending this call for 2025, and many thanks for being so patient, too, because we are starting somewhat later because of a technical issue. So many, many thanks, many thanks for waiting. But before talking about the figures of the year and to understand how this evolution has been in the different business areas, I think that what we should do is mention how the year 2025 has evolved and also refer to the many events that have happened at the global level that have had a direct impact on the company's evolution. And I think that compared to previous years, geopolitics has now become an ingredient that we have to take into account because we are facing a context where what is improbable has become something possible. And this global paradigmatic shift also includes other things like elections in those countries in which we have a significant presence like in Chile and the paradox that still exists in France where it's difficult to carry out structural reforms. But as regards to macroeconomic events, the most relevant ones have focused on the tariff war that was kicked off in April by the North American government and the effect that this has had for global trade. But although this has not affected the company directly, it has done so indirectly because it has affected the decision-making of some of our customers or different economic agents. And another consequence, another relevant consequence is the strong depreciation of the North American dollar, which has produced significant exchange rate differences and conversion differences in the figures of this year. And what this proves what we already observed since we presented our current strategic plan or our most recent plan, and it shows that there's more uncertainty, which is not disappearing. It's only increasing. But as regards to the strategic plan, this fiscal year of 2025 has been a year in which we have consolidated the transformation that we initiated in the previous fiscal years, and we materialized many of the objectives that we had set ourselves within the pillars of recurrence, simplification and sustainability, which are the 3 fundamental pillars of the plan. So in the year 2025, we initiated the new reporting where the businesses and environmental activities for the industry have their own strategic area structure on the Global Dominion environment. And the creation of these 2 major areas, Global Dominion Environment and the rest of the businesses under Global Dominion Tech Energy want to simplify and regroup the activities in such a way that it's easier to understand the company and also be able to value its elements. And this also means that we can work on different options to develop the strategic area of GDE, where the company has put its focus on organic and inorganic growth, which is the end result of the potential that we can see nowadays where the buildup opportunities are numerous and where the optimization of markets by geographies and activities is a fact. This process has already been addressed in the second part of 2025 with several acquisitions of companies and infrastructures, and we hope that we will add more in the short and medium term. And at the same time that we are developing greenfields in different strategic locations like the case of Tarragona and the United Arab Emirates. And finally, and as regards to the simplification process, we already made the most relevant divestitures of activities in previous fiscal years. And in the month of July, we carried out the divestment of the PV facilities we had in the Dominican Republic that has improved the balance sheet. And we also divested our activities in France where the possibilities of growth were below our objectives. And this divestment doesn't have any impact on the year's figures because this was as of December 31, but in any case, it's going to change things in 2026. But apart from the qualitative improvements, if we were to have to underscore the figures of the year, well, we are growing organically by 4% and we are doing so because both GDE as well as GDP services, in other words, the recurrent areas of the company are growing above the guidance. They're growing at levels of 6%. And this means that this year, the projects have not contributed as much as in other previous years. And we also have to underscore that the simplification of nonstrategic activities is improving our profitability. It's growing and our EBITDA over sales margin is 13.7%, which is a maximum figure for the company, a historic maximum figure. Thirdly, the depreciation of the dollar affects the balance sheet as well as our net profits and this has a one-off effect because of the correction of the divested assets in the Dominican Republic. And this one-off is EUR 18.5 million. And without that correction, our net profits would have been 10% higher compared to the figure reported in 2024. But an important thing is a strong reduction in the net financial debt, which at the end of the fiscal year is EUR 137 million, and this is 25% lower than the figure reported in '24 and 35% -- sorry, and 34% lower than the figure we saw in the first half of the year. So that means that the leverage ratio is 0.9x EBITDA. But before talking about the figures in detail, I would like to remind you that the figures for 2024 have been pro forma to be able to compare identical parameters because the divestitures are significant. And we have applied a pro forma formula. So in other words, these divestments, it's EUR 134 million and EUR 7.5 million in and EUR 5.2 million in net profits. So we are going to compare this with this figure with this pro forma figure that gives us a real snapshot of what this looks like. We've closed the year with a business figure of EUR 1,045 million, which means that an organic growth of sales of 4% with lots of inorganic growth and also growth of ForEx because ForEx has taken off 2% and inorganic growth, 11%. And although there's been a slowdown of projects whose causes that I will be describing later on in the information divided by segments. And as I said, we are growing at a very good speed over in -- especially in activities, the recurrence of GDE and GDT services and the margins are growing and EBITDA has reached a maximum figure of 13.7% of the sales, which shows that this simplification has been very handy with the divestitures of those activities that had lower margins, and we focused much more on activities and businesses that have much more profitability than are related to the environmental world. And the results of 2025, some of them stand below EBITDA, and it's important to detail this and the most important things would be a progressive reduction of financial expenses that finishes with a reduction of 8%, another EUR 2.5 million less in absolute terms. And this reduction came from the reduction of interest rates, which we expect will continue in the next quarters, motivated by 2 factors because there's been a reduction of the financial debt in our balance sheet and the normalization of the interest rates, especially in the United States, where the company also has debt denominated in dollars, interrupted operations. And well, we have the relative figures for the Cerritos wind farm and losses have been reduced by EUR 3 million compared to 2024. And this reduction is mainly due to a reduction of financial expenses associated with the funding of the wind farm and with the commissioning of it, which would generate income. And this commissioning of the wind farm was one of the necessary conditions to carry out the divestment in the infrastructure, which started in the second half of 2025. And right now, we are working on the negotiation of a PPA with different companies so that we can maximize the value of this infrastructure. And finally, this correction that has been brought about by the depreciation of the North American dollar in the assets of the Dominican Republic represent an extraordinary effect of EUR 18.5 million. So the attributable net profit is EUR 10.2 million without taking into account that one-off of EUR 18.5 million. So the figure would be EUR 28.7 million, which compared to 2024, it's a recurrent profit that is 10% higher. But let's now review -- let's review each one of the segments, each one of the business segments, starting off with Global Dominion Environment. And this segment has a turnover of EUR 472 million in the fiscal year, which is equivalent to an organic growth of 5.9%, which is nearly 6% that we mentioned before, a percentage that stands above the guidance of the strategic plan. And so this, we have to add positive in organic growth totaling 1.1% as a consequence of these acquisitions that we announced in Q3. In other words, we're talking about Ecogestion de Residuos and UREC, which is a recovery unit for water in Cartagena, which is in the area of circular economy and the German company, ZCR that operates in the area of decarbonization. But sales have had a negative impact on ForEx of about minus 3% and this area has reached a contribution margin of 10.3% of sales, which is somewhat higher compared to the figure reported in the previous fiscal year. And as mentioned on other occasions, within this area, there are different activities with very different margins. And we have those margins of circular economy that are higher than the rest. And right now, the circular economy represents 25% in the area of GDE. So as the weight of circular economy grows, the objective would be that this should reach something like 50-50, and then the margins will carry on growing. Regarding the total figures of the company, this segment, GDE accounts for 45% of our turnover and 28% of the total margin of the company. So -- and in relation to what we've already said about the strategy of the company in this area, we are working on a relevant pipeline with lots of acquisition possibilities, and we're looking for new capacities, new capabilities and a new position so that GDE can become a European reference in terms of environmental services and infrastructures. And not only that, we also have the organic development of this area, which is very significant. And I have to underscore that as regards to the circular economy, we're signing new contracts for the recovery of hydrocarbons and both in Spain and Latin America, but especially in Chile and Peru, where this activity -- where this automatic cleaning activity is a new development, and it's something that only we do and where we are consolidating our presence, and this is becoming a recurrent activity. As regards to decarbonization, we're still signing new contracts with existing and new customers. And we've signed the first thermal optimization contract in the United States. So we're opening up this market to this activity, and this has an enormous potential. Let's move on now to Global Dominion Tech Energy. And here, we explain the 2 segments, GDT Services and GDT projects. On the one hand, GDT Services closes the fiscal year with a business figure of EUR 460 million, which is organic growth of 5.8%. And this segment is what actually has the divestitures -- the divestments are focused on this segment, and they subtract 23% of the turnover, and we have to add that ForEx is subtracting 2%. So this year, anything that is related to this area is affecting us in other areas, too. And the GDT Services segment accounts for 44% of the total sales. But if we were to add this segment to GDE, we'd be talking about 90% of the company's turnover. And these segments are recurrent, as I said before. So therefore, we have achieved this objective, this recurrency objective in the plan that is exceeding 60% of our total and also 60% of the contribution margin related to recurrent activities. And these recurrent activities are the ones that have grown organically above the guidance. So this gives us lots of visibility in terms of turnover and in terms of future cash flow generation. So we have the margin -- the contribution margin in the segment that reached 19.7% over sales. And as regards to the total figure of the company, GDT Services accounts for 53% of the company's contribution margin. Finally, GDT Projects closes the fiscal year with a figure of EUR 113 million, which is 14% lower than what we reported a year ago. And as mentioned, not only in this period of time, but this behavior has to do with the temporary slowdown in the execution of projects. And this is a consequence of the situation of geopolitical uncertainty that we're facing and also because there's been a change. There's been a change of strategies in renewable projects where we do not execute anything until we incorporate a financial partner. So we want to have a greater financial discipline. So this slower rhythm of execution does not represent the loss of any projects or the collapse of any projects. So our pipeline is still strong and will eventually become income for us. And on the closing date of the fiscal year, the pipeline is EUR 413 million, which I think is well more than 2 years of project execution. The contribution margin now reaches 28.5% of sales in the year. And in Q4, the percentage has been higher, much higher than the average, and this can be explained by the reversal of some provisions because of costs that we have not incurred in a project that has already finished. So we made an adjustment and the adjustment was positive, and it's the transmission line or transport lines in Angola. As regards to the total figures of the company, GDT projects accounts for 11% over sales and 30% of the contribution margin. So once -- now that we've taken a look at the P&L, both globally and by segments, let's move on now to the main movements of the balance sheet. With regard to fixed assets, we have -- they have remained in line because this has coincided with the amortization of the CapEx of the year and also with the changes of perimeter. And there have been changes in the infrastructural assets where this reduction of nearly EUR 62 million comes from divesting in the photovoltaic assets in the Dominican Republic. The variation of the operational net circulating capital -- working capital is -- represents a net investment of EUR 250 million and there's also variation in the rate of exchange and elimination of the debt positions associated to renewable assets in the Dominican Republic. With regards to financial debt, well, it now stands at EUR 136.6 million, which means that it's a reduction of 25% compared to December of 2024 and 34% compared to the last debt figure reported in June 2025. And this reduction has been brought about by the generation of operating cash flow in the year and also because we've collected EUR 70.3 million because this operation was signed in dollars and in euros, it means that we'll be collecting EUR 70.3 million for the divestment of the wind farms in the Dominican Republic. So that means that the leverage of the company is equivalent to 0.9x EBITDA. So in other words, it's 0.9x for this fiscal year. So this generation of operating cash flow was EUR 71.7 million. So that means 5.4% higher compared to the operating cash flow that we generated in 2024. And of course, in 2024, we generated EUR 76 million in cash flow, but we have to discount a number of activities. So the figure for comparative purposes is EUR 78 million. Cash generation has been used to pay an earn-out totaling EUR 1.2 million that corresponds to the acquisition of the Gesthidro company in 2023 and also for the payment of dividends to the shareholders were EUR 50 million in July as well as the minority shareholders, EUR 1.9 million and the investment of C&O related to the divestment in the Dominican Republic and EUR 6.3 million that correspond to interrupted operations. In terms of CapEx, it has to be underscored that in addition to the EUR 20.1 million of maintenance CapEx, which is a figure that remains stable year-on-year, and we've even managed to optimize our levels, we have destined EUR 37 million to the expansion of different activities, among which we have the renting business for mobile devices, the development of renewable infrastructures and greenfields in the area of circular economy in Fujairah and in Tarragona. So as a conclusion of these results in this year, we have achieved the targets established for the fiscal year. So this is thanks to the transformation we've carried out with a very positive evolution, and we have materialized many actions that were geared towards the simplification exercise established in the plan. And we've done so within the context that is pretty turbulent too, with lots of complications. So therefore, we have reached this final year of the strategic plan with most of the changes made and decisions taken in order to carry on progressing in our focus on the environmental world through Global Dominion environment. And we also confirm that in 2026, we will be presenting a new strategic plan where we will lay down the foundations of Dominion of the future and where each strategic area will play a very important role. And before finishing, I would like to remind you that the dividend policy establishes a payment of 1/3 of the attributable net profit. But even so, the Board is going to suggest or propose to the AGM that we pay a much higher figure, much more than the EUR 3 million that would result from applying that policy. And this is so that we can preserve the remuneration to the shareholders. So we will suggest a dividend of EUR 8 million in 2026, which is equivalent to about 50% of the net profit of the continued activities, in other words, without taking into account those activities that were interrupted. And I would also like to remind you about another operation in the area of our shareholder composition, which was done about 1 month ago with the departure of Mahindra. Mahindra owned 4.16% of our shares. And the relevant thing in this case is that this figure, 4.16% has been acquired by the main company shareholders that is by the biggest shareholder we have as well as by the Chairman and the CEO by the company, therefore, increasing their possibilities. So I would like to thank you for your attention, and we can now move on to your questions. So you can either write them in or you can raise your hand on the screen -- zoom screen. Thank you very much for your attention. Unknown Executive: Okay. Well, let's start off with the questions then. [Operator Instructions] So let's start off with the Q&A session and give the floor to the people that have raised their hand. And please make sure that microphone is muted. Firstly, we have Carlos Javier Trevino from Group of Santander. Carlos Javier Treviño Peinador: I've got a couple of questions. Could you please give us an indication of the levels of growth that you expect for 2026? And could you perhaps give us some reference divided by businesses? That would be very grateful. And the second question is when do you think that growth in project can be reactivated because the 2 quarters have been pretty weak. And I would like to ask you specifically about the situation of the construction of the wind farms in Italy. When you signed an agreement in January last year, you spoke about 2 wind farms that would be built towards the middle of the year. And I want to ask you about that. And then could you please explain the reclassification that you've done with GDT services? And what kind of contracts have you got there? Could you please explain the nature of what's happened there? Unknown Executive: Yes, as regards to the growth guidance for 2026, we are continuing with the current strategic plan. And therefore, we have to be over and above that figure of 5%. And that's what we have in our forecast, too. So we have to grow above that figure of 5%. And then you were asking about the issue of wind farms in Italy. Well, the first 4 projects that we had, we had an agreement with the partner. Well, these are already underway. And we're now seeing what kind of new project we could do. We think that it could be another 4 or 5 projects that could be incorporated once again with this partner with IPT. We'd carry out another search. But in any case, so that we can build these projects based on the fact that we have already identified the majority buyer from 70% to 80% up to 100% even, and this is what we have in Italy. And then -- as regards to the reclassification issue, well, that's a very minor issue. Well, yes, it's -- let's say, that this has to do with the quarterly aspect because this is something that I think that you do perfectly well because we have an activity in which we provide logistics services and these logistics services have to be recognized as an income based on added value. And this doesn't have to do with the logistics business, but it has to do with the added value associated with our logistics services. And in this regard, we've had some accounting entries that came from previous quarters that we've had to reclassify and adjust. But in any case, this is an accounting system. Well, as you can see, the figure for the year is the same one, but it's basically a focus between the third and the fourth quarters. Carlos Javier Treviño Peinador: And when do you think that project growth can be reactivated? And when do you think you'll be going back to normal rates again, normal rates of growth? Unknown Executive: Well, Carlos, the truth is it's very difficult to forecast anything because they are currently involved in public tenders. And you know that these projects are binary. But this year, we have good expectations. And I think that we'll be carrying out a project in Chile. And I think that green after divesting in the Dominican Republic will produce the development of new projects in Latin America. Yes, I would say, in the Dominican Republic, where we've identified the partner, and it's basically the 2 main pension plans of the company -- of the country, and we have the right partner. We have the projects. So well, the -- there was -- 7 or 10 days ago, there was a PV tendering process with storage and we expected this for August or September last year, but this has been postponed 5 or 6 months. And the process -- well, towards the end of April, that's when we'll know what's going on. I think that the prospects are very good, and we will have a very significant reactivation as from the second or third quarter in relation to Dominican projects. We -- in Italy, as I say, business as usual. And in Spain, we have some differences that to the extent that they can become self-consumption things, we could have a minor pipeline too to construct and to execute. Unknown Executive: Let's give the floor to David Lopez from [ JB ] Capital. David Sanchez: I have a question on the growth CapEx because this year, you've invested EUR 37 million in expansion CapEx. But could you please give me some more details on what activities are involved? And especially the level of recurrence, what level of investment or expansion should we consider for 2026 because the levels for this year, the levels were very similar compared to what we saw in 2024. Unknown Executive: Well, yes, in that growth figure or CapEx figure, we have the CapEx that is related to the renting of mobile devices, and that would be well just over 1/3 of that total CapEx of EUR 37 million. And then we have the developments that are taking place in the area of renewables. We have developments in Italy, in the Dominican Republic and which, as you know, we've invested part in that development so that we can then allow our partners to join and then carry out the conversion of the EPC where you allocate much more capital. And we do this in the minority manner by -- well, by the arrival of the partner, we've recovered most of what we spent on developments. And then we have what we have invested in the greenfields in the GDE greenfield in the area of circular economy. And we'd be talking right now about something like, well, in Tarragona, where we've invested in the purchase of land in Fujairah, where we are also going to create a MARPOL plant. In other words, a circular economy facility, whatever is for MARPOL. It has to do with sea pollution. So this is going to focus on the circular economy applicable to polluted water, seawater. And these are the 3 chapters that is devices, renewables and GDE. David Sanchez: And what about 2026? What level of CapEx and expansion should we consider? Unknown Executive: Well, I think that lower as regards to the development of renewables because they are much more mature. And then what we are starting to see now are greenfields that have been better identified in the case of GDE. So I don't know. I think that perhaps and perhaps with a different kind of distribution, we'd be able to reach those levels, although it's very difficult to forecast anything like that straight of the cup. So yes, but as Robert said, it will be a different kind of distribution where GDE would be more present. Unknown Executive: Okay. We're now going to review the questions that have to be answered from the chat. And if you want to send in any more questions, it would be the time to do so before finishing. Let's start off with Luis Padron. He's already asked several things. But anyway, when do we expect to present the new strategic plan? That would be the first one. Why are we reducing the dividend when there's a significant improvement of our debt? And the final one is that would you be considering a buyback of shares. And that's why the dividend has been reduced. Unknown Executive: Well, as regards to the presentation of the strategic plan in the second half of the year, well, after the summer, we'll give you the specific date, we would like to present that on the Capital Markets Day, which is when we'll be able to analyze the different issues in greater depth. And then as regards to the dividend, as you point out quite rightly, I think that there's an issue here, like Patricia pointed out, that has to do with net profits without bearing in mind the interrupted operations, we've increased this up to 50%. And compared to previous year, previous years, cash generation has been significant and the levels of net debt have been reduced, and we're comfortable underneath 1x EBITDA. But I think that on our road map, we have attractive investment ideas. And as Patricia pointed out, we've tried to compensate things. And we've tried to be adequately reasonable in our remuneration to the shareholder, although we know that there are internal projects that will generate value -- more value for the shareholder. Yes. Well, this is linked to an aggressive investment plan. And then we have the issue of the buyback, the buyback of shares. Well, this is also something that is being dropped into. It's an issue that we would analyze under the new strategic plan as from this year. Unknown Executive: Let's move on to the questions from David [indiscernible] from Scotiabank. And both of them are asking us about GDE. So there are questions on Q4 in 2025 with a business figure of EUR 140 million and contribution margin of EUR 8.9 million, which represents 6.4%, which is much lower than previously reported figures. And why has there been this slump in the margin over sales? Unknown Executive: Well, this always happens to us in the most individualized part of GDE and Q2, Q3, well, these are much more powerful in the Central Europe or East Europe. But this is part of the company that we are individualizing and which -- what happens is that in December, when they achieve 100% of what they've committed to, we become a little bit more relaxed, but this doesn't really mean anything else. There's no really no significant element here to be considered. Unknown Executive: There are several questions here on Cerritos. So we're going to group them up. Okay. [ David ] from [ Destino Fortunato ] is asking if the situation in Mexico is affecting the negotiations for the sale of Cerritos. And then Diego Martinez and [ Ignacio Joaquin Andreu ] are asking us about our forecast for the net debt once Cerritos has been sold. Unknown Executive: Well, I'd say this is something that we mentioned with Cerritos. And Cerritos 2, 3 years ago became a problem because of the policies that were in place. It's no longer an issue. Now I don't know if this is going to be done on April 1 or May 1. But as you know, this is a project that is rated as an operation available for sale. So the value is about $100 million with a debt of about $85 million or $90 million because this is in euros. And we believe that the net asset value is properly reflected, and we're also actively working to round off the value of the project and defend its worth with an interesting PPA, something bankable, something that can be much more attractive for sale purposes and the sale for it to be operational. We -- well, we are going to -- we're now talking about 3 or 4 main leaders with whom we are negotiating things. and 3 or 4 bidders. And I think that this is a project that will become liquid. It's going to become liquidity, and we're now focusing a little bit on the details of if we can or cannot recover the accounting value or the book value, and that's what we're really focusing on. And I can't really say much more about Cerritos. Unknown Executive: Let's move on to the last questions from Ruben Alonso. But I would like to remind you if you have any further questions, this will be the time to send them in before we finish. Unknown Executive: Okay. Ruben, we've got 3 or 4 extensive questions. And the net asset value, well, we reaffirm what we have in our books because I think that there's an amount there for infrastructure that we will recover in the next 2 or 3 years. In other words, 20% of the Dominican Republic, we expect to recover this in 3 years. And we are also looking into if we have to perform any operations, as you point out, with the rest of renewable assets, because the idea is to focus completely on this rotation strategy that we initiated in the year '23. So this is what we can see. Although, obviously, together with the operating cash flow and according to the amount we would obtain in these recent divestments, I think that what we would really focus on is a company with 0 debt or 0 cash. And of course, it's very difficult because we're working on a new strategic plan, which I think is what Patricia mentioned and what the CEO said too. And we are focusing a lot on the greenfields and organic growth in the area of the environment where we have a number of interesting ideas that have to be carried out in the next few months, and it's very difficult right now to give you a debt and generation guidance. But we feel comfortable with 1x EBITDA. And I think we said that in the call of the third quarter, we said that we had an EBITDA of 1x. And I think what I'm missing is the debt that we had committed. But in any case, the important thing is that we have the basic elements to relaunch in this simplification strategy, the Dominion that we want to see in the future. Yes. And I think that I've answered practically everything with that comment. Unknown Executive: We have one final question from Luis Padron from GVC. What profitability do you expect from the aggressive investment plan of GDE? Is it possible to have a buyback of shares? Unknown Executive: Well, yes, of course, because we have an ambitious plan, and we have the right people, the right team for that. And we are now -- well, it's like when we were listed in 2017 and the segment -- the sector was highly segmented. And we wanted to achieve a lot of growth inorganic and organic growth. But as regards to this part of the plan, we are going to be aggressive. So in other words, the GDE figures of the last 3 years have multiplied EBITDA by 2, and the EBIT is 2.7x. We think that there are lots of very interesting opportunities on the table. And this is where we believe that it's worthwhile getting something done. So we will obviously remunerate the shareholder, but we think that here that there is -- I don't know, there is the possibility of generating a significant amount of value. Well, yes. And considering that we are in the year 10 since we were listed, we were first listed in 2016, and we reached the market -- we reached the market with a promise of EUR 43 million in EBITDA. It was EUR 150 million plus the green through. And all of that capital expansion via dividend and buyback has gone back to the shareholder. In others, we've given back to the shareholder much more than we initially predicted in 2016. But now we have another plan, which is a very aggressive plan, as Robert has just put it out in GDT, we will have lots of organic growth and very good performance. It's a very good business that we dominate and we are doing things even better, and it's very diversified, too. And the truth is that we're very happy with it. And GDE is a very ambitious project, and we expect to receive some very important news in the next few years. And that's what we're currently working on, and this is what our strategic plan is also focusing on, too. Unknown Executive: There are no more questions. So we will close the presentation here. Thank you all for listening. Thank you. Unknown Executive: Thank you very much. Goodbye. [Statements in English on this transcript were spoken by an interpreter present on the live call.]
Operator: Good morning. My name is Gabriel, and I will be your conference operator. [Operator Instructions] This is FHipo's Fourth Quarter 2025 Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] FHipo released its earnings report on Thursday, February 26, after market closed. If you did not receive the report, please contact FHipo's IR department directly, and they will e-mail to you. Please note that this call is for investors and analysts only. Questions from the media will not be taken nor should the call be reported on. Any forward-looking statements made during this conference call are based on information that is currently available. Please refer to the disclaimer in the earnings release for guidance on this matter. We are joined by Daniel Braatz, Chief Executive Officer; Ignacio Gutierrez, Chief Financial Officer; and Jesus Gomez, Chief Operating Officer. I would now like to hand the call over to Daniel Braatz. Daniel, please go ahead. Daniel Michael Zamudio: Thank you, and good morning. Thank you for joining us today. Let me walk you through our fourth quarter and full year of 2025. Throughout the year, we maintained a disciplined management of the company, focused on strengthening our balance sheet and optimizing our capital structure, aiming at generating long-term sustainable value for our investors. In the 4Q, we maintained our commitment to delivering profitability. Throughout its history, FHipo has shown solid financial performance, consistently delivering distributions. As of the fourth quarter of 2025, we have distributed more than MXN 7,300 million to our investors on a cumulative basis since 2014, reflecting our long-standing focus on value creation and capital discipline. FHipo maintained a strong capitalization profile. As of the 4Q of 2025, FHipo reported a capitalization ratio of 60% and a debt-to-equity ratio of 0.7x on our balance sheet. In recent years, we have successfully executed a disciplined deleveraging strategy, focused on strengthening our balance sheet and better position the company to pursue attractive market opportunities when conditions get favorable. Our financial margin stood at 54% in the quarter. And on a cumulative basis for 2025, FHipo obtained a financial margin of 54.5%, highlighting the company's operating efficiency. On January 20, 2026, we completed the full early amortization of the RMBS CDVITOT 14U collateralized by INFONAVIT denominated in VSM or Veces Salario Minimo. The execution of the cleanup call was based on portfolio balances as of December 2025. And finally, as of the date of this report, the CDVITOT 13U, 14U and 15U issuances that have been fully amortized throughout the execution of the cleanup calls, significantly reducing the balance of the INFONAVIT mortgages denominated in VSM in our total portfolio. Moving on to Slide 5. We highlight FHipo's consistent track record of generating value to our investors through stable distributions. As I mentioned before, up to the 4Q of 2025, our annualized yield per CBFI stands at 10.9% based on an estimated quarterly distribution of MXN 0.35 per share or per CBFI, subject to the current distribution policy. We have also distributed over MXN 7,300 million to our investors since FHipo was created back in 2014. That is equivalent to MXN 19.68 per CBFI, demonstrating our investor-focused approach and our ability to translate disciplined financial performance into consistent returns for our shareholders. As we move into Slide 6, we take a closer look at FHipo's solid capitalization profile, supported by a disciplined financial strategy management. As of the fourth Q of last year, our debt-to-equity ratio considering both on and off-balance financings was 0.3x and considering on balance financing stood at 0.7x. This result was supported by a balance sheet optimization strategy, which reduced our leverage significantly since 2019 and enhanced our ability to capitalize on market opportunities under favorable conditions. On Slide 7, we continue focusing our strategy on assets with an attractive risk-adjusted profile. Our portfolio collateralization profile remains very strong with an average loan-to-value of 77% at origination and today, an estimated loan-to-value of 28.6% based on current market value. Moving on to Slide 8. As of the 4Q, our nonperforming loan ratio based on the accumulated balances of the total portfolio at origination stood at only 3%, reflecting the historical credit performance of the company. Finally, on Slide 9, FHipo affirms its commitment to sustainability and ESG best practices. Our objective is to generate long-term positive impact beyond financial returns. We have provided more than 100,000 loans, of which women borrowers account for 31% of our overall portfolio, while 46% of our workforce are women, underscoring our commitment to inclusion and gender equality. On governance, our Nomination, Audit and Practices committees are fully independent, and more than half of our technical committee members are independent as well, reinforcing strong oversight and transparency. On the environmental front, approximately 70% of INFONAVIT borrowers have utilized the green mortgage program benefit, supporting energy efficiency home improvements. And internally, we have introduced initiatives to reduce paper, plastic and water consumption. Together, these actions demonstrate FHipo's commitment to responsible and sustainable value creation. Now I will turn the call over to our CFO, Ignacio Gutierrez, who will walk you through our leverage strategy. Ignacio Gutiérrez Sainz: Thank you, Daniel, and good morning, everyone. I will walk you through our funding structure and leverage strategy. FHipo has further reinforced its balance sheet by executing a disciplined deleverage strategy over the past years. As of the fourth quarter of 2025, our total debt-to-equity ratio, including both on and off-balance financing stood at 1.3x. And on a stand-alone basis, our on-balance leverage ratio was 0.7x. This financial discipline strengthens our position and provides us with greater resilience in evolving market conditions. Our diversified funding structure allows us to maintain solid liquidity levels while preserving the flexibility to allocate capital efficiently and focus on long-term value creation. On Slide 12, we will go through the detailed breakdown of our consolidated funding structure as of the fourth quarter of 2025. Our funding sources are well diversified across securitizations, bank facilities and capital market instruments with competitive rates and spreads. As shown on the breakdown, over 90% of our outstanding financings have a legal maturity exceeding 20 years, providing long-term funding stability and mitigating refinancing risks. Given our current capital structure, FHipo maintains additional leverage capacity of approximately MXN 16.8 billion or 1.8x debt to equity in comparison with the target leverage limit of 2.5x. This position gives us flexibility to act prudently and selectively as opportunities arise. Now with this, I'll turn the call over to our COO, Jesus Gomez, who will walk you through the portfolio breakdown before we discuss the financials. José de Jesús Gómez Dorantes: Thank you, Ignacio. Good morning, everyone. Thank you for joining us today. Let's move on to Slide 14 to take a closer look at the breakdown of our mortgage portfolio as of the end of fourth quarter 2025. FHipo's consolidated portfolio comprised 43,849 loans as of December 31, 2025, with an outstanding balance of MXN 16.8 billion, an average loan-to-value at origination of 77% and an average payment-to-income ratio of 24.4%. At the end of the quarter, 92% of the portfolio is performing. Our portfolio remains diversified across several origination programs, including INFONAVIT Total, INFONAVIT Mas Credito, Fovissste and the digital mortgage platforms portfolio, which as of the end of the fourth quarter 2025 represents 20% of the total consolidated portfolio. In over 10 years, we have continuously adjusted our origination and asset acquisition strategy to improve the credit quality of the assets we acquire. Moving on to Slide 15. FHipo's portfolio remains geographically diversified across all 32 Mexican states. Nuevo Leon, Estado de Mexico and Jalisco continue to represent the largest concentrations together accounting for approximately 28.8% of the total portfolio balance. In terms of our partnerships and origination programs, here is the breakdown of our portfolio. INFONAVIT Mas Credito program accounts for 51.7% of the total portfolio equivalent to MXN 8.7 billion. The digital mortgage platforms portfolio accounts for 19.2%, equivalent to MXN 3.2 billion. The INFONAVIT Total pesos program represents 14.3% of the total portfolio, equivalent to MXN 2.4 billion. Fovissste's portfolio accounted for 12.1% of the portfolio equivalent to MXN 2.0 billion. And finally, the INFONAVIT Total VSM denominated loans reached only 2.7% of the portfolio for MXN 0.4 billion, significantly it reduces the balances of INFONAVIT mortgage denominators in VSMs after the cleanup call of the CDVITOT transactions that Daniel mentioned before. This distribution reflects our strategy to prioritize origination programs that offer strong risk-adjusted returns while maintaining a diversified portfolio aligned with market demand. FHipo is well positioned to participate in future growth opportunities while maintaining a strong focus on profitability. I will now return the call back to Ignacio Gutierrez, our CFO, to discuss FHipo's financial results for the fourth quarter of 2025. Ignacio Gutiérrez Sainz: Thank you, Jesus. On Slide 17, our consolidated nonperforming loan ratio stood at 8% at the end of the quarter. As of the end of the fourth quarter of 2025, we continue to maintain a solid reserve and allowance for loan losses with an expected loss coverage of 1.3x and an NPL coverage of 0.53x. If we move to Slide 19 for our financials for the quarter. The total net interest income for the fourth quarter of 2025 was MXN 321.6 million, reflecting an increase compared to the fourth quarter of 2024. The interest expense totaled MXN 148 million, representing a slight decrease compared to the MXN 153.9 million reported in the fourth quarter of 2024, primarily as a result of the decline in interest rates over the past 12 months. Our financial margin stood at MXN 173.5 million, representing 54% of the total interest income, an increase of 3 percentage points compared to the 50.9% in the fourth quarter of 2024. The allowance for loan losses recorded in the fourth quarter of 2025 was MXN 44.9 million, reflecting the underlying credit performance of the portfolio during the quarter and its expected loss. The valuation of receivable benefits from securitization transactions showed a net loss of MXN 8.2 million in fair value during this quarter. This result is mainly explained by the performance of the portfolio and collateral of such trust certificates during the quarter and a net effect derived from the total early amortization of the CDVITOT 14U trust certificates. The total expenses incurred during the fourth quarter of 2025, which include the portfolio servicing and operational services as well as other expenses amounted to MXN 108 million. As a result, the net profit for the quarter amounted to MXN 19.5 million. With this, the estimated distribution for the fourth quarter of 2025, subject to the current distribution policy, as Daniel mentioned, is of MXN 0.356 per CBFI, which considering the average price for CBFI as of the fourth quarter of 2025 and the days of lapse in the fourth quarter results in an annualized yield of 10.9%. With this, I'll now hand the call back to our CEO, Daniel Braatz, for some closing remarks before we move to the Q&A session. Daniel Michael Zamudio: Thank you, Ignacio. As we close 2025, FHipo's business model continues to demonstrate resilience and adaptability. During the year, we sustained a strong financial position and maintain a healthy capitalization profile. Our focus remains on driving profitability and strengthening our capital structure and managing risk responsibly. Through 2026, we will continue evaluating new opportunities aligned with our strategic objectives while enhancing the overall quality of our portfolio. We believe the initiatives undertaken so far have strengthened our position for the future, enabling us to capitalize on future market conditions. Our objective remains clear to deliver stable and sustainable returns to our holders while maintaining the disciplined approach that has defined FHipo since inception. At the same time, we will continue advancing our ESG initiatives and creating long-term value for all stakeholders, including the communities we serve. Thank you for your continued trust. I'll now hand the call back to the operator to open the Q&A. Operator: [Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from the line of Martin Lara. [Operator Instructions]. Martín Lara: This is Martin Lara from Miranda Global Research. I have 2 questions. Could you please share your expectations for this year in terms of loan portfolio, including potential acquisitions of other portfolios or other financial companies? That's the first one. And the second one is that your capitalization ratio is very high at 60%. How do you see this indicator going forward? Daniel Michael Zamudio: Thank you for your questions. In regards of the capitalization, as you know, we've been trying to stronghold our balance sheet in order to take advantage of future leverage opportunities that obviously will reduce the cap ratio that we are holding at the moment. We're working in a couple of financing facilities that will help us lever a little bit more our equity. And the use of proceeds for those financings goes towards your first question, which is we're going to be using part of those proceeds and liquidity that we are holding at the moment to tackle some opportunities in terms of acquisition of new originators and also portfolio on mortgages and real estate-backed loans. Martín Lara: Okay. And your -- I have a follow-up. Your financial margin was very strong. It expanded nearly 4 percentage points year-on-year. What can we expect in the future? Daniel Michael Zamudio: I would say that we need to expect the financial margin to keep at that level. It will depend a lot, as you know, on the interest rate curve that Mexico will be running. As of today, we have a small portion exposed to floating rates. But as we keep performing throughout the year and depending on what Banxico does, I think that could increase a little bit more. But to be in the safe side, I would say that you should target that between the 50% and 54% of financial margin is a target for the company in 2026. Martín Lara: Okay. But more towards 54% instead of 50%? Daniel Michael Zamudio: I would say that, yes, more towards the 53.3%. Operator: We would like to take this moment to thank you for joining FHipo's Fourth Quarter 2025 Results Conference Call. We have not received any further questions at this point. So that concludes our question-and-answer session. Thank you. I would now like to hand the call back over to Daniel Braatz for some closing remarks. Daniel Michael Zamudio: Thank you all for joining us today. Please don't hesitate to reach out to us if you have any more questions or concerns. We appreciate your interest in FHipo and look forward to speaking with you soon. Operator: That concludes today's call. You may now disconnect.
Operator: Good afternoon, and welcome to Alignment Healthcare's Fourth Quarter 2025 Earnings Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] And please note that this event is being recorded. Leading today's call is John Kao, Founder and CEO; and Jim Head, Chief Financial Officer. Before we begin, we would like to remind you that certain statements made during this call will be forward-looking statements as defined by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act. These forward-looking statements are subject to various risks and uncertainties and reflect our current expectations based on our beliefs, assumptions and information currently available to us. Descriptions of some of the factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from these forward-looking statements are discussed in more detail in our filings with the SEC, including the Risk Factors sections of our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025. Although we believe our expectations are reasonable, we undertake no obligation to revise any statements to reflect changes that occur after this call. In addition, please note that the company will be discussing certain non-GAAP financial measures that we believe are important in evaluating performance. Details on the relationship between these non-GAAP measures to the most comparable GAAP measures and reconciliations of historical non-GAAP financial measures can be found in the press release that is posted on our company's website and in our Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025. I would now like to hand the conference over to John Kao, Founder and CEO. You may begin. John Kao: Hello, and thank you for joining us on our fourth quarter earnings conference call. For the fourth quarter 2025, health plan membership of 236,300 represented year-over-year membership growth of approximately 25% -- this supported total revenue of $1 billion, which grew 44% year-over-year. During the fourth quarter, we also exceeded the high end of guidance across each of our profitability metrics. Adjusted gross profit of $125 million represented an adjusted MBR of 87.7%. Meanwhile, adjusted EBITDA of $11 million solidly surpassed our guidance range of negative $9 million to negative $1 million. For the full year, total revenue of $3.9 billion grew 46% year-over-year. Adjusted gross profit of $495 million resulted in an MBR of 87.5%, representing an improvement of 130 basis points year-over-year. Taken together, this year marks a tremendous milestone in the maturation of our company's profitability. We transformed from roughly breakeven just $1 million in adjusted EBITDA in 2024 to delivering adjusted EBITDA of $110 million in 2025. This reflects an adjusted EBITDA margin of 2.8% and represents 270 basis points of margin expansion year-over-year. Throughout the course of 2025, we have demonstrated both the strategic and operational advantages of our clinically centric model, which is purpose-built to deliver the highest quality care at the lowest cost. The data insights provided by our AIVA technology platform, combined with our Care Anywhere clinical model provided us with the visibility and control necessary to navigate a year of significant disruption, where we overcame the second phase of the V28 risk model, a redesign of the Part D program and broad utilization pressures across the Medicare Advantage industry. And importantly, this allowed us to pursue growth while expanding margins even as competitors took a step back in 2025. I'd like to congratulate our team for their success and recognition by Fortune Magazine for their unwavering commitment to seniors, which named us to its World's -- most Admired Companies list for the first time. We believe our model of lowering costs by delivering more care to seniors, not less, is the MA model of the future, and we are eager to serve more seniors as we continue along our path towards 1 million members. 2025 also marked an important step in demonstrating the replicability of our model beyond California. We more than doubled our ex-California membership, while consistently exceeding our financial expectations throughout the course of the year. As of December 2025, we had approximately 38,000 members across our markets outside of California, representing approximately 16% of our total membership. We have grown confidently outside of California by first leading with quality, which starts with success in star ratings. We now have a 5-star plan in North Carolina for the third consecutive year, 2 5-star plans in Nevada, a 4.5-star plan in Texas and a 4-star plan in Arizona. These achievements are further supported by the portability of our Care Anywhere clinical model, which focuses on delivering care to our high-risk polychronic members. By leveraging the strength of our care model, quality of clinical outcomes and scalability of our health plan operations, we are unlocking the growth potential within these markets. We are now focused on sustaining the momentum of our ex-California markets. In 2026, we plan to invest in our sales and distribution engine, build deeper relationships with our broker partners and continue growing with aligned provider partners where we have durable relationships. With less than 4% market share across our 23 counties outside of California, we see significant opportunity to take share over the coming years. Turning to our 2026 AEP results. We grew to 275,300 health plan members in January of 2026, representing 31% growth year-over-year. We saw broad growth across each of our markets with 23% growth in California and more than 80% growth in our ex-California counties. Importantly, we focused on growing responsibly through our bid design and sales strategy. We drove nearly 20% improvement to our AEP voluntary disenrollment metric and sourced approximately 80% of our gross sales from plan switchers. By taking a balanced approach to growth and profitability this year, we remain mindful of the impact of the final phase-in of V28, while still capitalizing on the growth opportunity in a year of significant disruption. Taken together, we are pleased with the solid growth in California, while continuing our rapid expansion outside of California. Our growth this year is adding to our future embedded earnings potential, while supporting our near-term operating leverage objectives. Meanwhile, improved operating efficiency across the enterprise is creating additional capacity to reinvest in long-term projects and scalability initiatives. Each of these factors is giving us confidence in our initial full year adjusted EBITDA guidance range of $133 million to $163 million. This is consistent with our previous expectations for consensus adjusted EBITDA of approximately $145 million to be in the range of our initial 2026 outlook. Jim will expand further on our financial outlook in his remarks. Looking beyond 2026, I'd like to spend a few minutes on the 2027 advanced rate notice. On a net basis, the announcement appeared to indicate a relatively flat rate environment for the industry. This reflected a combination of underlying cost trends and policy changes. While we have heard disappointment across the industry, we believe the update is largely consistent with the CMS focus on program integrity and aligning payments with underlying costs. Specifically, we are encouraged that benchmark trends reflect continuing growth in costs within the fee-for-service population. This was partially offset by certain policy adjustments, including those related to skin substitutes. As it relates to unlinked chart reviews, we have long supported excluding these records from risk score calculations as part of improving program integrity. Of note, our exposure is limited. Approximately 1% of our total HCC value is derived from chart reviews of any kind. Within that category, an even smaller subset is related to unlinked chart reviews. For those, we believe we have a clear path to ensuring the diagnoses are supported by a linked claim or encounter over time. Most importantly, the current environment reinforces the importance of our strong clinically led model and core medical cost management competency. We believe this enables us to win in any rate environment, just as we have demonstrated in 2024 and 2025, where the industry experienced tighter reimbursement. And furthermore, we will continue to have STARS payment advantages in 2027 with 100% of our members and plans rated 4 stars or above. In closing, we believe we are entering a reimbursement environment that creates a more level playing field with our competitors, which allows our distinct care management model to shine. We are proving the effectiveness of our distinct medical cost advantages with the results we have shared with you over the past 2 years. While we're pleased with our performance, we are not done yet. 2026 will be a year of continuous improvement where we plan to make targeted investments across our clinical model, new market playbook and scalability initiatives, including investment in AI workflows to improve administrative efficiency. In doing so, we are balancing our near-term financial objectives with unlocking the embedded potential of our model. With that, I'll turn the call over to Jim to further discuss our financial results and outlook. Jim? James Head: Thanks, John. I will jump right in with our 2025 results. For the year ending December 2025, health plan membership of 236,300 increased 25% year-over-year. Growth in membership drove total revenue to $3.9 billion for full year 2025, representing 46% growth year-over-year. Full year adjusted gross profit of $495 million represented an MBR of 87.5%, an improvement of 130 basis points year-over-year. We ended the year with strong outcomes across all major cost categories. Of note, Part D profitability and supplemental expenses trended in line with our guidance expectations. Meanwhile, our proactive care approach again delivered strong outcomes, leading to inpatient admissions per 1,000 in the low 140s during the fourth quarter. Taken together, the strength of our performance across each of these medical cost categories and the durability of our clinical model are giving us confidence in our underlying bid assumptions as we step into 2026. Moving to operating expenses. Our operating cost ratios continue to demonstrate significant year-over-year improvement as our operational infrastructure scaled to support our new members. Full year 2025 GAAP SG&A was $443 million. Our adjusted SG&A was $385 million, an increase of 28% year-over-year. Adjusted SG&A as a percentage of revenue declined from 11.1% in 2024 to 9.7% in 2025, representing an improvement of approximately 140 basis points. Taken together, we delivered full year adjusted EBITDA of $110 million and an adjusted EBITDA margin of 2.8%. This represents 270 basis points of margin expansion year-over-year. Turning to cash flow and our balance sheet. We generated positive free cash flow in 2025 and ended the year with $604 million in cash and investments. Subsequent to the quarter, today, we announced the close of a $200 million revolving credit facility. This facility is simply good housekeeping and further evidence of the maturation of our capital structure. We do not expect to draw on the credit facility in the near term, and our increasing positive free cash flow position allows us to support our organic growth objectives. Moving to our guidance. For the full year 2026, we expect health plan membership to be between 292,000 and 298,000 members, revenue to be in the range of $5.14 billion to $5.19 billion, adjusted gross profit to be between $615 million and $650 million; and adjusted EBITDA to be in the range of $133 million to $163 million. For the first quarter, we expect health plan membership to be between 281,000 and 285,000 members, revenue to be in the range of $1.21 billion to $1.23 billion, adjusted gross profit to be between $138 million and $148 million and adjusted EBITDA to be between $26 million and $36 million. As it pertains to our full year expectations, given the strength of our OEP results and continued stability with our retention, we are raising our year-end membership guidance by 2,000 members at the midpoint relative to the commentary we provided in our January 8-K. Moving to revenue. The midpoint of our initial revenue guidance range of $5.16 billion represents 31% growth year-over-year. The expected year-over-year increase to our revenue is primarily driven by our membership outlook. Meanwhile, our underlying revenue PMPM assumptions are balanced by increases to benchmark rates and the Part D direct subsidy. This is partially offset by the impact of the final phase-in of B-28 risk model changes and mix of growth outside of California, which carries modestly lower per member revenue. Turning to adjusted gross profit. Our $633 million guidance midpoint implies an MBR of 87.7%. The outlook contemplates improvement from the retention of existing members and modifications to our product designs within markets to reflect the current reimbursement environment. These tailwinds are balanced by the third phase in of V28 and our new member mix, which is disproportionately represented by LIS, dual eligible and C-SNP eligible members. Caring for these complex members is core to our clinical model, but they typically join with higher MBRs in year 1 as we transition them from an unmanaged setting to our care model. Additionally, as a reminder, we do not incorporate any assumption for sweep pickup from new members in our initial 2026 guidance. In 2025, this pickup was a benefit of approximately $14 million to our full year adjusted gross profit and EBITDA or roughly 30 basis points to our consolidated MBR. Moving to SG&A. We forecast further improvement in our SG&A expense ratio. We expect to achieve operating expense scale economies resulting from both membership growth and enhancements to administrative workflows. As John mentioned earlier, we also plan to reinvest a portion of the savings derived from improved operating efficiency towards further advancements in our clinical model, new market activities and technology infrastructure to prepare for scaling our business and the deployment of AI workflows in the future. Taken together, we expect to deliver adjusted EBITDA of $133 million to $163 million, consistent with our preliminary profitability comments provided earlier this year. Turning to our seasonality expectations. We expect a modestly lower MBR in the first half of the year compared to the full year average. Conversely, we expect the second half of the year to be slightly higher versus the full year average. Our initial view generally reflects the regular seasonality of our Part C MBR experience, combined with a flatter slope to our Part D MBR in 2026. In conclusion, the 2025 execution of our clinical model, the replicability of our results across markets and the consistency of our operating performance all give us tremendous confidence as we enter 2026. We are excited for the significant growth opportunity in the years ahead and are determined to make the right investments in people, processes and technology to ensure that we are scaling responsibly. With that, let's open the call to questions. Operator? Operator: [Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from the line of Michael Ha with Baird. Hua Ha: So I want to frame this question by calling out a few numbers first. So over the past 2 years, Alignment has seen nearly 50% revenue growth CAGR, I think almost 500 basis points of margin improvement, right, sub-10% G&A, all while improving to 100% of members in 4-plus star rated plans, and all this happened in a flat rate environment, while trends nationally rose to high single digits. So on the heels of all of this and with the potential again for another flat rate year in '27, my question is, I guess, simply put, what would prevent Alignment in '27 from having a rerun of what you just accomplished in '24 or '25 because it looks very similar to setup into '27. John Kao: Well, Michael, this is John. You should probably expect my response to be, we feel very comfortable with the 20% growth rate. No, we feel good. I mean the model is working, and it will work irrespective of what happens in the rate universe. And I think that if rates do go back up a little bit in terms of the events switching to the final notice, I think it will be fine. I think what I'm hearing in terms of the amount of potential increase is still going to be pretty short of what we think trend is, at least what the sector thinks trend is. So I think that will be something favorable to us. And if rates don't go up, I think it could be more favorable to us. And I think we're going to do exactly what we've done year after year, which is be very, very disciplined and find the right balance between growth and margin expansion. I would say that we don't want to get ahead of our skis on terms of growth. We don't want to talk about bids. I do expect -- I said this to people beforehand, I think it's still going to be 1 or 2 years of kind of people finding the right model to dig out of this kind of post V-28 world. And I think that there are some folks that grew a lot this past year for AEP. And we chose not to grow at the level some of these other folks grew. We didn't just grow to get growth. We wanted durable provider relationships. We wanted to make sure our infrastructure would be able to sustain the level of stars that we've been able to produce. And the other thing that we're doing is we know how good we're doing in '25, and I feel very strongly about '26 as well. We're taking the opportunity and we're not complacent. We're getting even tougher on ourselves internally from an operational perspective, from a clinical perspective, from an AI deployment perspective. We're just getting stronger to really get to the level of growth we think we can get to over the next 3 or 4 years, getting into a number of growth that will be really meaningful for everybody. That's kind of how we're thinking about it. So Michael, I mean, you called it 2 years ago. I'm not going to give you the benefit of calling it again quite yet. Hua Ha: Got it. Helpful. Okay. My next question, the implied MLR for '26, Jim, I think you mentioned midpoint 87.7%. If I were to strip out that sweep payment from '25, I'm seeing maybe 10 bps of MLR improvement year-to-year. So at first glance, it feels a bit conservative since clearly, prior years have grown a lot more and done a lot more MLR improvement. So I'm just trying to understand the assumptions embedded in MLR a little bit better. I know you mentioned LIS,-SNP,-SNP member mix. How much does that year 1 member mix impact your year-to-year MLR? What are you assuming on trend in '26 versus '25? Just a general sense on the various components. James Head: Yes. And thanks, Michael. I guess a couple of things. Just in terms of the inputs to the 2026 guide, I mean, we're -- it's kind of 3 core inputs that we feel pretty good about. So I want to start with that. And our 2025 experience, how we manage costs and delivered throughout the year, new members delivering, et cetera, that gives us a lot of confidence as we go into the year. We also bid in mid-'25 -- 2026. And you say, okay, how do we feel about that now that we're in January, February and building our model for the year. And it played out very, very nicely in terms of how we thought what was going to happen and happen. And then finally, John's point, this is very disciplined growth, and we chose to play in spots, where we could win with the products we like, with the cohort of members that we like and the geographies and the networks that we like. So that's the setup. Now as it pertains to the MBR, you're right, it's about a 10% kind of apples-to-apples improvement because -- or 10 basis points, I should say, apples-to-apples improvement because we're stripping out the impact of the suites last year. I would say 3 drivers, Michael, that kind of are inputs to why it wouldn't be better. #1, we're still going through the third phase in the B-28, okay? And so we've navigated that very, very nicely, as you mentioned. But that does -- it's not a tailwind. It's a headwind. The new member mix was disproportionately represented by Dual-Eligible, C-SNP eligible and LIS members, which is our sweet spot, but they come with a little higher MBR in the beginning. So it is -- that is a little bit of a headwind. But the trade-off is we know how to manage these members really well, and there's a lot of long-term opportunity there. So we consciously made that choice, and it was a big portion of our AEP -- and then as I mentioned before, we didn't have a suite. So I think the B-28 and the new members coming in at that, I'll call it, heavier mix in terms of special needs, et cetera, is driving that. But we feel very good about where we're at with respect to the visibility we have. And I'll also throw in Part D. A second year, we did a great job delivering on Part D in 2025 and on our promises, and we have a fair degree of visibility as we go into 2026. So I'd say that was another input that was part of the overall mix. Operator: Our next question comes from the line of John Stansel with JPMorgan. John Stansel: I know you called out potentially changing some approaches around your distribution network and broker community. Can you just talk about how you're thinking about that change? And then maybe looking at the '27 commentary a little bit, I think there's been an expectation about potentially expanding into new states in '27. Is that index at all to needing a better rate in '27? Or is that something that you think you can do in an all-weather environment? John Kao: John, it's John. Yes, with respect to distribution, we're going to -- and I think that comment was specifically related to some of the ex-California markets, including some of the potential new market entry strategies that we're going to be taking into the existing states, new markets in existing states and what we're doing with potentially getting into another state. And so we're at a size now in pretty much each of our markets that we're really kind of a player and relevant. And so I think we've got deeper relationships with brokers and providers. And a lot of the success that we've been able to achieve in California is starting to take root in these new markets. And that really does start with the providers. And what we've learned also is really is the brokers are really pretty important in that discussion. And you put that against the backdrop where the receptivity of the brokers is just much greater given the fact that a lot of the incumbents are taking a step back for the last year or 2 and maybe for the next year or 2. I think that creates an opportunity for us. And so we're just very intentional about that. With respect to new markets, we are seriously thinking about that. We're not quite where I want to be quite yet with some of the provider engagement conversations, but I'm pretty comfortable we're going to be able to get into a new state. And the rates, I just don't think that matters to us. I think it's going to be whatever it is, it is, and I think we're going to do well in any environment. I really mean that. And again, a lot of this is choosing the right provider partners, which I think we have in these 2 distinct new markets. John Stansel: Great. And then on the RFI from CMS that is still out and about but has received comments at this point, a couple of different topics embedded in there. As you've had further discussions with the administration and with your counterparties, how are you thinking about potential incremental changes that could potentially come out of that RFI? John Kao: TBD. I mean we submitted our comments like everybody else yesterday. I think from a policy point of view, I think we'll see what they have to say around the reward factors and the HEI. Again, we'll see what happens. I think we're going to be okay either way. And I think from a kind of just more information gathering purposes, we feel pretty strongly about kind of the C-SNPs remaining as C-SNPs and not really getting linked to any kind of aligned network. And the logic there really is we want there to be choice for the beneficiaries. We don't think that's right that the beneficiaries should be forced into a suboptimal star rating plan is more of a key plan. I think they should really be -- have choice, get the right benefits, get the right network and just to get the right quality they deserve. But other than that, there's other moving parts. I've been asked what we think about risk adjustment going forward. We do support documentation of the HRAs. We've always supported that. So I think that's a good thing. I think the administration focusing on program integrity and minimizing gaming, all that is kind of the right direction. But as I mentioned earlier, I do think there's going to be some exposure on rates. And as the previous Mike said before, I mean, I think we stand to be a beneficiary of that. But I think they're going to do the right thing on rates. That's what I actually think when the final comes out. Operator: Our next question comes from the line of Matthew Gillmor with KeyBanc. Matthew Gillmor: I wanted to start off with the 80k metric in your outlook. Can you provide some more details and unpack what drove the favorability in the fourth quarter? And then also, as we're looking ahead, I would think the 80k metric will probably tick up given the duals mix, but just wanted to get a sense for what's the right kind of apples-to-apples comp for 80k that's embedded within the guide? James Head: Well, I'll start with how we finished the year, we had an expectation, if you remember in the third quarter, Matt, that 80k might tick up. We weren't ready to bet on flu season being favorable, and it did come in pretty well. So we ended the year, as we said, in the low 140s. As we go into the new year, the answer is yes. Because of mix, our 80k could tick up a little bit, and that is not because the trend is wrong on an apples-for-apples basis, it's because of that. And so I view that as another component of the, I'll call it, the cost trend that we're pretty maniacally focused on and managing actively. But it might tick up a little bit in the -- over the course of the year. As you're aware, first quarter is usually a little bit higher. So that's just a seasonal issue. Matthew Gillmor: Great. Very helpful. And then maybe asking about AI investments. You mentioned some investments in the prepared remarks. I think last call, you also talked about AI within Care Anywhere and AVA. Just wanted to get a flavor for where some of the technology enhancements you have in flight, where they maybe be directed and how that may benefit the business over time? John Kao: Yes. Matt, it's John. Yes, it's a great question. We've got 30-some-odd different potential use cases where we could deploy Agentic AI. Having the use cases is not our issue. What we're actually doing is to require 2 foundational actions be at a level where we're satisfied. And the first one is really as part of this kind of revalidation of everything. It starts with a unified data architecture. It starts with AVA. And we're just looking at everything. We're making sure all the data ingestion is as tight as we think it is. We're validating everything. We're not assuming anything, all of which is designed to ensure that we can scale and replicate without any abrasion. We're going to be just that much more efficient scaling. And what that really translates into is we're going to get to cash flow breakeven faster than we would have thought before. We're going to grow and be more aggressive on Stars and benefits even more so than we did before. The second issue is what we're talking about internally, is just making sure the end-to-end workflows within each functional area is well documented and frankly, well understood. And what I mean by that is when you basically double in size every 2 years, you bring in a lot of people, a lot of new people that have to get trained. And so the training opportunity is to make sure that all of these different workflows are understood by everybody. And then within the end-to-end workflows, you've got micro workflows. You really know what's happening. And then ultimately is the cross-functional workflow processes. And when you -- again, those are very sophisticated workflows that factor in our clinical work processes, our provider contracting work processes, which one of these providers are we delegating, -- are we not delegating? We have our directly contracted networks. All of that is being evaluated right now. And once I get those done, which we expect to have done midyear this year, you're going to see us start deploying these use cases for Agentic AI. The other thing we're doing is we're kind of revisiting the initial stratification model within AVA. And I think there's going to be tools that we have -- sorry about that. I went on mute for a second. I was going to say, we talk about AVA and we're looking at using the new tools to make the stratification model even better for our Care Anywhere members of the 10% of the population we think that account for 78% of the spend. You're also going to see us have use cases around administrative improvements. I think member services is going to be one of the first ones, and I think there's going to be immediate savings there. I think in our financial reporting, I think you're going to -- we're going to be able to use AI and look at the raw data and be able to come up with actionable conclusions market by market. I think those are things you're going to see. What we're probably not going to do is kind of lead the market in deploying Agentic AI in care delivery. We're going to still rely on our doctors and nurses to do that. I hope that helps. Operator: Our next question comes from the line of Scott Fidel with Goldman Sachs. Unknown Analyst: This is Sam on for Scott Fidel. I was just wondering if you could talk about just are you concerned about the DMA industry that has -- may have lost too much bipartisan support in Washington? And what can the industry do to improve its standing and position itself better to alleviate the ongoing regulatory pressures on the sector? John Kao: I think it's to get back to what CMS originally intended MA to be. And I think it's -- all the actions that I see going on are exactly consistent with that, meaning -- and I've spoken about this. They want a program that creates value to the end beneficiary. And to define that, you got to have higher quality, better experience. And I think to do that in a way that is the most affordable. And so this is what I always say, you got to have high quality and low cost. And in that environment, the folks that can create the highest degree of value ought to be positioned to win. I think there's been some financial engineering away from that over the past several years. There's an emphasis on coding, global capitation, prior auth, all of which I don't think are going to be sustainable going forward. So I think if people just do what CMS intended them to do, they're going to be in a good place. And I think the benefit differential in MA relative to traditional Medicare, I think, is going to cause MA to continue to grow, not go down. That's what I think. And I think for the last 40 years, we go through these different phases of whether it's the BBA in the '90s and the ACA in the early 2000s. I mean, you go through those peaks and valleys, MA has always thrived. It has always come through. And I just think it's -- I would be very surprised if that trend changed put that way. Operator: Our next question comes from the line of Craig Jones with Bank of America. Craig Jones: So I want to follow-up on what you said on the final rate notice for '27. You said you think CMS will do the right thing on rates in the final notice. We saw United in its letter to CMS around the advanced rate notice thinks that growth rate for '27 should be closer to 9% to 10% versus the 5% in the advanced notice. So where do you think that growth rate should be? And then what do you think CMS will actually end up doing when you say do the right thing? John Kao: I think the thing that I've been reading about really is related to the impact of these skin substitutes and how that's been an effective offset to the utilization trends for traditional Medicare. And I think it remains to be seen how they actually manage that specific issue. I'm not sure it will get up to the 9%, 10% rate net. But I think it's possible you get to the 5%. And I'm not sure that's still enough, frankly, to kind of fully meet the trend. But I got to tell you, I was surprised by the rate notice in the advanced notice. And very practically, it was related to the midterms. That's really how I was thinking about it. And I think there's an opportunity with additional data that's going to be coming in to capture the second half trends. I think they're going to come up with something hopefully to do with skin substitutes that was a material takeaway. And I think it will be something that will be reasonable. And maybe I should say I'm hoping it will be something reasonable because if it's not, I think you're going to get a lot of people that are going to degrade benefits even more. And it is a real issue. And we saw this during BBA 30 years ago. Operator: Our next question comes from the line of Ryan Langston with TD Cowen. Ryan Langston: John, I want to make sure I caught what you said on the chart reviews. Did you say the exposure to total chart reviews is 1% and then even smaller from the unlinked piece? John Kao: Yes. For us, we don't rely on that much at all is really the message. And we don't feel exposed by that change at all. Ryan Langston: Okay. And then, I mean, is it fair to maybe assume the split is more just 50-50 within that sort of 1%? John Kao: I'm not sure I understood that. James Head: Yes. Ryan, I just don't think we're going to get precise about that because it's so immaterial. It's a small number. It's a small number. Ryan Langston: Okay. And then I guess just building maybe on John's question and John, your remarks about sort of deepening broker relationships. A direct noncompetitor you guys in your markets announced some plan to use MA brokers more like health navigators and get them involved in patient experience. I guess is this -- is that sort of a strategy you think could work for the industry? And maybe just more broadly, how do you believe the payer broker relationship will or could evolve sort of over time? John Kao: Yes. We -- I mean, we have been consistent about this. We value our broker partners. We think they do a good job. We think they're generally looking out after the best interest of the beneficiary and are fair. What I do think is going to be interesting is how CMS tries to position itself as a bit of a, call it -- if not the actual agent, a little bit more of the FMO. I think that will be interesting. And we're kind of looking at some of that -- some of the developments, some of the -- just it's very nuanced, but I think that's going to be interesting, one to watch. Not sure it's going to be implemented anytime soon, but I think that's on their radar. With respect to your kind of commentary on some of our competitors, I don't know. I think they were, I think, very specifically saying that whatever it is, 4% to 6% of premiums going to distribution is a big line item, I think, is what was quoted. Yes, I'm not sure. I mean there are certain parts that they can maybe be additive to a little bit, but I'm just -- I'm not sure about that one. Operator: Our next question comes from the line of Whit Mayo with Leerink Partners. Benjamin Mayo: John, can we go back and talk about the D-SNP growth in some of the non-California markets? Are there any numbers that you can put behind that? And then also maybe just elaborate on the potential opportunity in the coordination-only duals contract in Nevada. James Head: And I'll take the growth issue. We -- about 50% of our AEP growth was in the LIS duals and C-SNP. And that was both in California, but also outside of California. As you know, we have strong outside California growth. So that's a real healthy portfolio for us. And we think we can manage that pretty well over time and with a lot of embedded value. But John, I think there's a second half of the question, maybe I'll give it over to you. John Kao: Yes. I actually would need to follow up with you on that one. I don't have a good answer for you. Benjamin Mayo: Okay. And my follow-up would just be with some of the Stars changes that if CMS deletes the 12 measures in Stars, is this a good or bad thing for you? I know you had some 2s and 3s in some of those measures. John Kao: Yes, we've looked at it. I think it's net neutral is kind of the bottom line. I think it does get implemented, it's probably not going to actually take root until '27 anyways, which means it will impact '29, maybe 2029, 2030. But net, I think as of now, we think it's effectively a net neutral. I do think CMS is going to try to simplify that whole Stars program. And so we actually think that's actually a pretty good thing. Operator: Our next question comes from the line of Jessica Tassan with Piper Sandler. Jessica Tassan: Can you maybe give us a little more detail on the slope of MBR over the year? I think you mentioned typical Part C seasonality and then flat MBR flattish slope in Part D. So just trying to understand, excluding the sweep in '25, will calendar '26 follow kind of a similar seasonal cadence? James Head: Yes, ex the sweep. And as you're aware, history has shown itself pretty consistently that Q1 and Q4 are kind of the higher MBRs. And then not even with the sweep, but just in Q2 is usually our seasonal low and then it picks up in Q3. So I think it's going to follow a similar pattern, Jess. And I think you're kind of seeing that in our first quarter guidance. Jessica Tassan: Okay. Great. And then just my next one is, can you all discuss retention during AEP? And then on the lower projected intra-year growth in '26 from 1Q to 4Q, is that a matter of lower gross adds or increased intra-year churn or switching? Just trying to get a sense of basically year 1 versus tenured membership and the mix of year 1 versus tenured in 2026. James Head: Yes. Why don't I try the first -- the second question first, which is the intra-year and then we can talk about retention. But as we come into this year, there was just a lot more movement. Disruption is probably too strong a word because we weren't picking up that stuff, but there was just a lot of movement. And so we are trying to assess whether we picked up most of that movement in AEP or whether it will sustain itself throughout the year. So it's a little bit like we're not ready to bank on a greater AEP opportunity turning into sustained growth throughout the year. OEP is feeling fine, but the -- we just aren't ready to kind of bank it all the way through December. And then as it pertains to retention, I think we talked about it in January at the conference. We felt very good about the retention this year. That was one of the reasons why we had kind of very nice -- we had both sales growth, but we also had retention, and that's wonderful for us, because of our ability to mature our cohorts and get better MDRs. So we're not churning them, we're holding on to the loyal numbers. So that was -- that's turned out to be a nice little boost for us. Operator: Our next question comes from the line of Andrew Mok with Barclays. Unknown Analyst: This is [ Tiffany Yan ] on for Andrew. I just wanted to follow-up on the advanced notice. You mentioned your exposure to the unlinked chart review is fairly limited. Can you share what you think your exposure is to the risk model rebasing component relative to the industry? John Kao: That's actually an interesting question. I actually don't think we are as exposed as others for the simple reason that our kind of blended RAF scores are -- what are we, Jim, 1.08 or something like that. I mean it's just 1.1, yes. James Head: Below 1.1, yes. John Kao: Yes, it's below 1.1. And even with the final phase of V28, you still got people coming down from 1.5, 1.6, 2.0 in certain markets, down kind of 20-some-odd percent. And so I just -- I think we're -- we've never relied on it other than to make sure that we're just very accurate and compliant on the coding part and have focused on the cost management side and the Star side. And I think we're going to be advantaged actually, if there's any more tweaks to that. Unknown Analyst: Okay. Got it. And then I just wanted to follow-up on the MLR seasonality. I appreciate the comments around sort of the blended seasonality. But could you remind us how your Part D MLR specifically progressed through the quarters in '25? And is your expected '26 slope consistent with that '25 experience? James Head: Yes. It's the -- it will be slightly different in '26 than '25, but -- which is to say that the profitability of Part D is going to be a little bit more weighted to the first half. But this is all in the margins. So I would kind of say at a high level, consistent but slightly more weighted to the first half. And that's just really kind of the construct of risk quarters and how we accrue for contra revenue when we're outside the risk quarter, et cetera. So I would say pretty similar to 2025, a little bit flatter. Operator: Our next question comes from the line of Jonathan Yong with UBS. Jonathan Yong: John, I think you mentioned that you're still in some provider engagement or negotiations in the new state. I guess what in your mind is currently the hang up there? And typically, where are you in terms of when you're thinking about entering new states? Would you normally be completed at this time? Or would it be a little bit further down the road you have that completed? John Kao: It depends. It's a good question, John. It depends. Really, we're looking for full provider durability, full provider engagement. And I think we're going to get there. It's just -- again, our lessons learned over the past several years in terms of entering new markets is just causing us to be extra vigilant and to make sure people understand our model, why we're different than everybody else. And it really -- even if you work with different health systems and integrated delivery networks and whatnot, a lot of it really relates to the physicians and to create economic, clinical and operational alignment with that doctor and/or their MSO. And that's really what I was focusing on. I think we've got great hospital partners, and we've got a lot of good doctors that understand and like what we're saying in terms of the clinical model. We just need -- we just -- I would like to have a few more. That's all. Jonathan Yong: Got you. Okay. And then just going back to the rate update for '27. It wasn't clear to me because I think at the beginning in your prepared remarks, you said that the industry is complaining about what the effective growth rate is. But then it sounded like it was fine for you, but then I believe later on, you said that it is running below trend in terms of what it is I just want clarity on that. John Kao: Yes. The 0.9% net kind of advanced rate notice, I think, is clearly disappointing to the industry. I think there's a little bit of debate over what's causing that low trend. And I think that CMS has certainly shared with us that it was really just an actuarial reality when they use different data for more recent dates relative to what was used in the past. So their intention was not kind of programmatic policy issue, but it's just like the data was different. And that's what led to a little bit lower-than-expected raw traditional fee-for-service trend. Then in addition, you deducted these skin substitutes as an offset to that and ergo, you kind of get this 0.9%, which is a big problem. If that maintains for the rest of the industry, people are going to be rationalizing benefits again. And so my point was I heard somebody say 9% to 10% from one of our competitors. I'm just not sure I've seen that number -- and so if you then -- if you think about the fee-for-service trend data and let's say you get a portion of the skin substitutes, if not all, but let's say a portion is actually used as an offset and then it's phased in over time. I think you could see kind of closer to what the other analysts was talking about 5%. I have heard a lot of people talk about 200 to 300 basis points increase, kind of getting 0.9 to increase to 200, 300 basis points, which gets you to whatever, 3% to 4%, 5% increase potentially. But my point was I think that's still lower than the kind of the utilization trends that would cause people to be aggressive on benefit designs. That's what I really meant. My point as it relates to alignment is I really think we can win either way because we're the high-quality, low-cost producer. We're not dependent on kind of an external entity to do our medical management. That's something that we're actually very good at. And what we've also said is the margin that would otherwise go to a third-party value-based provider, we actually reinvest to the individual practitioner and/or to richer benefits. So I just think either way, we're going to be in a really good place. From an industry perspective, I hope they're right, actually, that you're going to get a rate increase of 9% to 10%. Not sure that's going to happen. Operator: Our next question comes from the line of John Ransom with Raymond James. John Ransom: Just thinking about bending the trend with AVA, 1.0 was, I think, pop health 1.0 was CHF, COPD, type 2 diabetes. What's the -- if it's going to become more about bending the trend, what's kind of 2.0 in terms of deploying your assets to do that? John Kao: Really good question. John Ransom: I thought it really was, John, so I appreciate that. John Kao: No, it's -- your questions are always still like advanced. No, they really. No, no. So I think I think 2 things. It's actually a serious, serious answer. I think that as good as we are, we can do a lot better operationally. And so what I mean by that is I think our stratification models can be more precise. I think our workforce management of our clinicians can be more efficient. I think we're focusing on clinical outcome measures as what you talked about, which is kind of traditional chronic disease management. I think the outcomes measures are going to be more and more important where we demonstrate not only the efficacy of better utilization, but better clinical outcomes. I think that's going to be something we focus on. But in terms of programs, I think transitions of care programs we can do better on, case management [indiscernible] we can do better on, tighter integration with our provider partners from a medical management perspective and potentially on palliative programs, I think we can do better on. And like when you kind of combine all these together, I think they all represent small opportunities for we to continue bending the cost curve. The other thing I would say is, and I've alluded to this in the past, is and this is less of a clinical MLR piece, but an overall MLR piece, the supplemental benefits right now that we have, whether it be kind of dental coverage or vision coverage or transportation or Flex card, I mean those kinds of benefits represent about 5% of overall premium, right? And I think that we're getting big enough now that we are going to be investing in starting, buying kind of some of these captives, these specialty company captives. And I think from that, we ought to be able to save on margin because we would be paying ourselves basically. And if we did -- I'm just picking on whatever, whatever specialty we do, we'll be able to seed it with 300,000-ish seniors, if you know what I mean. And so I think that's going to be a way where we bend the cost curve. The other thing that we've also talked about is one of the benefits of our performance in '25 was we really working closer with these IPAs that we have and taking the technology tools and really helping them do the utilization management for the acute authorizations. And I think we've done a very good job. And we're operationally good with them. We have some work to do, I still think in terms of some data. But I think by delegating that has been something that's going to help us and help the member and help the IPA. And I think that -- before this past year, we hadn't done that. And so the full benefits of AVA and Care Anywhere weren't fully realized yet. So I'm very optimistic about that part. John Ransom: That was quite the answer. My second question is a very simple one. There are studies as long as your arm about is MA a good deal for the taxpayers. If you do apples-to-apples, risk adjust apples-to-apples, where do you -- I mean you've got MedPAC on one hand saying it's terrible. There's the Evolent study on the other hand saying it's a great deal. And there's all over the -- when you talk to people in D.C., what study do you point to? And do you think it's apples-to-apples a good deal yet for the taxpayers? John Kao: I think it's a very good deal for the seniors. I think from a tax point of view, the last study I saw is post B-28. It's pretty much apples-to-apples is what I saw. And to the extent that plans that are able to remain competitive and still have a reasonable rebate back to that beneficiary are going to be the winners. And I think that CMS has been consistent with they want to grow MA. They just want to grow it the right way. They want to minimize the gaming, their words not mine, and ensure program integrity. On the other hand, they want to have an alternative with what they're referring to as traditional fee-for-service Medicare. Now I just -- I think just looking at the value proposition to the beneficiaries, I personally think you're going to get continued growth and market share growth in MA. -- because the rebate dollars, even though they go down, they're still material enough in terms of being better than fee-for-service that people are going to still choose it. Operator: Our next question comes from the line of Raj Kumar with Stephens. Raj Kumar: Maybe just one quick one around kind of AEP and just thinking about new member engagement kind of pertaining to the Care Anywhere platform. Any kind of insight on that and how that's trending relative to kind of this time last year? John Kao: Raj, it's John. Can you just repeat that again? I kind of faded out or you faded out. I didn't quite... Raj Kumar: Yes. Sorry about that. Yes. Just maybe kind of any details around kind of new member engagement and kind of pertaining to the Care Anywhere platform and how that's trending relative to kind of this time last year with the new membership. John Kao: Yes. I got it. Yes, I would say it's about the same. I think there's opportunity for us to get better. We're spending a lot of time, again, taking advantage of, again, the -- I think the strategic decisions and operational decisions we made 2 years ago that are really paying off in '24 and '25, and I think will also pay off in '26. That same kind of operational focus of continuous improvement Again, just not being satisfied with any of it is going to cause us to get better and better and better. And one of those areas is Care Anywhere engagement. I think we were still at about 65%, which really isn't bad. But I think we've set a target internally. We're trying to get to 75%. And I think some of the new people that we brought in on the member service and member experience side, shout out to that team is really going to be good for the company and for our beneficiaries. So I'm optimistic about that. But year-to-year, to answer your question, it's about the same. Raj Kumar: Got it. And then just maybe as a follow-up, just kind of thinking about your ex-California markets and kind of been in them for a while now and as they've matured, have you kind of seen any divergence in just overall trend or even consumer behavior and how maybe that has kind of led to operational kind of nuances in those distinct markets and maybe even kind of any catering or tweaking around AVA to kind of service those operations in the kind of most optimal manner. John Kao: That's a very good question. I think the work that we're doing now in terms of, call it, I call it, operational scaling is really designed to make sure that the providers and the members outside of California get the same level of service they get inside of California. And that's part of our maturation. It's part of our scalability -- and we're working really hard on that right now. Again, having very clear member satisfaction, but we're really starting provider satisfaction metrics. And I think the bigger we get, the more critical this area is, particularly outside California. I think we've done a very good job on Stars. I think we've done a very good job on clinical replicability in terms of the ADK metrics outside of California. I think our provider engagement is something we got to just get better at. And I say that to all the providers out there. We're working on it. We're going to get really, really good. And we want 5 Stars from all of you, just like we got 5 Stars from the members. Operator: Ladies and gentlemen, that's all the time we have for questions. This concludes today's conference call. Thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect.
Operator: Good morning. My name is Gabriel, and I will be your conference operator. [Operator Instructions] This is FHipo's Fourth Quarter 2025 Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] FHipo released its earnings report on Thursday, February 26, after market closed. If you did not receive the report, please contact FHipo's IR department directly, and they will e-mail to you. Please note that this call is for investors and analysts only. Questions from the media will not be taken nor should the call be reported on. Any forward-looking statements made during this conference call are based on information that is currently available. Please refer to the disclaimer in the earnings release for guidance on this matter. We are joined by Daniel Braatz, Chief Executive Officer; Ignacio Gutierrez, Chief Financial Officer; and Jesus Gomez, Chief Operating Officer. I would now like to hand the call over to Daniel Braatz. Daniel, please go ahead. Daniel Michael Zamudio: Thank you, and good morning. Thank you for joining us today. Let me walk you through our fourth quarter and full year of 2025. Throughout the year, we maintained a disciplined management of the company, focused on strengthening our balance sheet and optimizing our capital structure, aiming at generating long-term sustainable value for our investors. In the 4Q, we maintained our commitment to delivering profitability. Throughout its history, FHipo has shown solid financial performance, consistently delivering distributions. As of the fourth quarter of 2025, we have distributed more than MXN 7,300 million to our investors on a cumulative basis since 2014, reflecting our long-standing focus on value creation and capital discipline. FHipo maintained a strong capitalization profile. As of the 4Q of 2025, FHipo reported a capitalization ratio of 60% and a debt-to-equity ratio of 0.7x on our balance sheet. In recent years, we have successfully executed a disciplined deleveraging strategy, focused on strengthening our balance sheet and better position the company to pursue attractive market opportunities when conditions get favorable. Our financial margin stood at 54% in the quarter. And on a cumulative basis for 2025, FHipo obtained a financial margin of 54.5%, highlighting the company's operating efficiency. On January 20, 2026, we completed the full early amortization of the RMBS CDVITOT 14U collateralized by INFONAVIT denominated in VSM or Veces Salario Minimo. The execution of the cleanup call was based on portfolio balances as of December 2025. And finally, as of the date of this report, the CDVITOT 13U, 14U and 15U issuances that have been fully amortized throughout the execution of the cleanup calls, significantly reducing the balance of the INFONAVIT mortgages denominated in VSM in our total portfolio. Moving on to Slide 5. We highlight FHipo's consistent track record of generating value to our investors through stable distributions. As I mentioned before, up to the 4Q of 2025, our annualized yield per CBFI stands at 10.9% based on an estimated quarterly distribution of MXN 0.35 per share or per CBFI, subject to the current distribution policy. We have also distributed over MXN 7,300 million to our investors since FHipo was created back in 2014. That is equivalent to MXN 19.68 per CBFI, demonstrating our investor-focused approach and our ability to translate disciplined financial performance into consistent returns for our shareholders. As we move into Slide 6, we take a closer look at FHipo's solid capitalization profile, supported by a disciplined financial strategy management. As of the fourth Q of last year, our debt-to-equity ratio considering both on and off-balance financings was 0.3x and considering on balance financing stood at 0.7x. This result was supported by a balance sheet optimization strategy, which reduced our leverage significantly since 2019 and enhanced our ability to capitalize on market opportunities under favorable conditions. On Slide 7, we continue focusing our strategy on assets with an attractive risk-adjusted profile. Our portfolio collateralization profile remains very strong with an average loan-to-value of 77% at origination and today, an estimated loan-to-value of 28.6% based on current market value. Moving on to Slide 8. As of the 4Q, our nonperforming loan ratio based on the accumulated balances of the total portfolio at origination stood at only 3%, reflecting the historical credit performance of the company. Finally, on Slide 9, FHipo affirms its commitment to sustainability and ESG best practices. Our objective is to generate long-term positive impact beyond financial returns. We have provided more than 100,000 loans, of which women borrowers account for 31% of our overall portfolio, while 46% of our workforce are women, underscoring our commitment to inclusion and gender equality. On governance, our Nomination, Audit and Practices committees are fully independent, and more than half of our technical committee members are independent as well, reinforcing strong oversight and transparency. On the environmental front, approximately 70% of INFONAVIT borrowers have utilized the green mortgage program benefit, supporting energy efficiency home improvements. And internally, we have introduced initiatives to reduce paper, plastic and water consumption. Together, these actions demonstrate FHipo's commitment to responsible and sustainable value creation. Now I will turn the call over to our CFO, Ignacio Gutierrez, who will walk you through our leverage strategy. Ignacio Gutiérrez Sainz: Thank you, Daniel, and good morning, everyone. I will walk you through our funding structure and leverage strategy. FHipo has further reinforced its balance sheet by executing a disciplined deleverage strategy over the past years. As of the fourth quarter of 2025, our total debt-to-equity ratio, including both on and off-balance financing stood at 1.3x. And on a stand-alone basis, our on-balance leverage ratio was 0.7x. This financial discipline strengthens our position and provides us with greater resilience in evolving market conditions. Our diversified funding structure allows us to maintain solid liquidity levels while preserving the flexibility to allocate capital efficiently and focus on long-term value creation. On Slide 12, we will go through the detailed breakdown of our consolidated funding structure as of the fourth quarter of 2025. Our funding sources are well diversified across securitizations, bank facilities and capital market instruments with competitive rates and spreads. As shown on the breakdown, over 90% of our outstanding financings have a legal maturity exceeding 20 years, providing long-term funding stability and mitigating refinancing risks. Given our current capital structure, FHipo maintains additional leverage capacity of approximately MXN 16.8 billion or 1.8x debt to equity in comparison with the target leverage limit of 2.5x. This position gives us flexibility to act prudently and selectively as opportunities arise. Now with this, I'll turn the call over to our COO, Jesus Gomez, who will walk you through the portfolio breakdown before we discuss the financials. José de Jesús Gómez Dorantes: Thank you, Ignacio. Good morning, everyone. Thank you for joining us today. Let's move on to Slide 14 to take a closer look at the breakdown of our mortgage portfolio as of the end of fourth quarter 2025. FHipo's consolidated portfolio comprised 43,849 loans as of December 31, 2025, with an outstanding balance of MXN 16.8 billion, an average loan-to-value at origination of 77% and an average payment-to-income ratio of 24.4%. At the end of the quarter, 92% of the portfolio is performing. Our portfolio remains diversified across several origination programs, including INFONAVIT Total, INFONAVIT Mas Credito, Fovissste and the digital mortgage platforms portfolio, which as of the end of the fourth quarter 2025 represents 20% of the total consolidated portfolio. In over 10 years, we have continuously adjusted our origination and asset acquisition strategy to improve the credit quality of the assets we acquire. Moving on to Slide 15. FHipo's portfolio remains geographically diversified across all 32 Mexican states. Nuevo Leon, Estado de Mexico and Jalisco continue to represent the largest concentrations together accounting for approximately 28.8% of the total portfolio balance. In terms of our partnerships and origination programs, here is the breakdown of our portfolio. INFONAVIT Mas Credito program accounts for 51.7% of the total portfolio equivalent to MXN 8.7 billion. The digital mortgage platforms portfolio accounts for 19.2%, equivalent to MXN 3.2 billion. The INFONAVIT Total pesos program represents 14.3% of the total portfolio, equivalent to MXN 2.4 billion. Fovissste's portfolio accounted for 12.1% of the portfolio equivalent to MXN 2.0 billion. And finally, the INFONAVIT Total VSM denominated loans reached only 2.7% of the portfolio for MXN 0.4 billion, significantly it reduces the balances of INFONAVIT mortgage denominators in VSMs after the cleanup call of the CDVITOT transactions that Daniel mentioned before. This distribution reflects our strategy to prioritize origination programs that offer strong risk-adjusted returns while maintaining a diversified portfolio aligned with market demand. FHipo is well positioned to participate in future growth opportunities while maintaining a strong focus on profitability. I will now return the call back to Ignacio Gutierrez, our CFO, to discuss FHipo's financial results for the fourth quarter of 2025. Ignacio Gutiérrez Sainz: Thank you, Jesus. On Slide 17, our consolidated nonperforming loan ratio stood at 8% at the end of the quarter. As of the end of the fourth quarter of 2025, we continue to maintain a solid reserve and allowance for loan losses with an expected loss coverage of 1.3x and an NPL coverage of 0.53x. If we move to Slide 19 for our financials for the quarter. The total net interest income for the fourth quarter of 2025 was MXN 321.6 million, reflecting an increase compared to the fourth quarter of 2024. The interest expense totaled MXN 148 million, representing a slight decrease compared to the MXN 153.9 million reported in the fourth quarter of 2024, primarily as a result of the decline in interest rates over the past 12 months. Our financial margin stood at MXN 173.5 million, representing 54% of the total interest income, an increase of 3 percentage points compared to the 50.9% in the fourth quarter of 2024. The allowance for loan losses recorded in the fourth quarter of 2025 was MXN 44.9 million, reflecting the underlying credit performance of the portfolio during the quarter and its expected loss. The valuation of receivable benefits from securitization transactions showed a net loss of MXN 8.2 million in fair value during this quarter. This result is mainly explained by the performance of the portfolio and collateral of such trust certificates during the quarter and a net effect derived from the total early amortization of the CDVITOT 14U trust certificates. The total expenses incurred during the fourth quarter of 2025, which include the portfolio servicing and operational services as well as other expenses amounted to MXN 108 million. As a result, the net profit for the quarter amounted to MXN 19.5 million. With this, the estimated distribution for the fourth quarter of 2025, subject to the current distribution policy, as Daniel mentioned, is of MXN 0.356 per CBFI, which considering the average price for CBFI as of the fourth quarter of 2025 and the days of lapse in the fourth quarter results in an annualized yield of 10.9%. With this, I'll now hand the call back to our CEO, Daniel Braatz, for some closing remarks before we move to the Q&A session. Daniel Michael Zamudio: Thank you, Ignacio. As we close 2025, FHipo's business model continues to demonstrate resilience and adaptability. During the year, we sustained a strong financial position and maintain a healthy capitalization profile. Our focus remains on driving profitability and strengthening our capital structure and managing risk responsibly. Through 2026, we will continue evaluating new opportunities aligned with our strategic objectives while enhancing the overall quality of our portfolio. We believe the initiatives undertaken so far have strengthened our position for the future, enabling us to capitalize on future market conditions. Our objective remains clear to deliver stable and sustainable returns to our holders while maintaining the disciplined approach that has defined FHipo since inception. At the same time, we will continue advancing our ESG initiatives and creating long-term value for all stakeholders, including the communities we serve. Thank you for your continued trust. I'll now hand the call back to the operator to open the Q&A. Operator: [Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from the line of Martin Lara. [Operator Instructions]. Martín Lara: This is Martin Lara from Miranda Global Research. I have 2 questions. Could you please share your expectations for this year in terms of loan portfolio, including potential acquisitions of other portfolios or other financial companies? That's the first one. And the second one is that your capitalization ratio is very high at 60%. How do you see this indicator going forward? Daniel Michael Zamudio: Thank you for your questions. In regards of the capitalization, as you know, we've been trying to stronghold our balance sheet in order to take advantage of future leverage opportunities that obviously will reduce the cap ratio that we are holding at the moment. We're working in a couple of financing facilities that will help us lever a little bit more our equity. And the use of proceeds for those financings goes towards your first question, which is we're going to be using part of those proceeds and liquidity that we are holding at the moment to tackle some opportunities in terms of acquisition of new originators and also portfolio on mortgages and real estate-backed loans. Martín Lara: Okay. And your -- I have a follow-up. Your financial margin was very strong. It expanded nearly 4 percentage points year-on-year. What can we expect in the future? Daniel Michael Zamudio: I would say that we need to expect the financial margin to keep at that level. It will depend a lot, as you know, on the interest rate curve that Mexico will be running. As of today, we have a small portion exposed to floating rates. But as we keep performing throughout the year and depending on what Banxico does, I think that could increase a little bit more. But to be in the safe side, I would say that you should target that between the 50% and 54% of financial margin is a target for the company in 2026. Martín Lara: Okay. But more towards 54% instead of 50%? Daniel Michael Zamudio: I would say that, yes, more towards the 53.3%. Operator: We would like to take this moment to thank you for joining FHipo's Fourth Quarter 2025 Results Conference Call. We have not received any further questions at this point. So that concludes our question-and-answer session. Thank you. I would now like to hand the call back over to Daniel Braatz for some closing remarks. Daniel Michael Zamudio: Thank you all for joining us today. Please don't hesitate to reach out to us if you have any more questions or concerns. We appreciate your interest in FHipo and look forward to speaking with you soon. Operator: That concludes today's call. You may now disconnect.